World Wildlife Fund

TIK – TOK: China’s – Toy To Own The Youth Market

Posted on by Helena

Tik Tok, Tik Tok, The mouse ran up the clock, the clock struck one, the mouse ran down and the cat ate him for dinner….

Tik Tok is a Chinese owned, operated, and manipulated propaganda tool to infiltrate and radicalize the youth of the US and beyond in a pledge of Marxist Communism.   Initially constructed by the founder of ByteDance, Zhang Yiming, Tik Tok utilizes far left Hollywood hypes to funnel their agenda for domination and control of America.   And unless the death spiral of Communism is taught to these 16-24 year olds, they are quite easily duped!

ByteDance partners include: World Wildlife Fund, Red Cross, Conservation International and the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals.   If you didn’t think China was wholly entrenched in the US – based on the above partners – you should be scared shitless. Because these fake human rights and environmental nonprofits are funded by US Taxpayer Dollars and registered in the Cayman Islands.

Outside of the founder, the Board of Directors is an interesting magglevich of people from the makeover law firm McKinsey and Co, Rockefeller University, Blackrock, Council on Foreign Relations, and Action For Diversity and Inclusion.

Action for Diversity and Inclusion has been instrumental in inciting the BLM anarchy.

The LIST of Action CEO’s supporting this Action for Diversity Movement is 18 pages long and includes US pharmaceuticals, Bain Capital (Romney), Insurance Companies, Kroger, KPMG, DOW, Denny’s, Dupont, IBM, WalMart, Eli Lilly, etc… etc… etc…   The list is vast, the sellout to China is vast, and many of the names would be depressing – at best. Deutsche Bank, PGA, NFL, PayPal, Macy’s, L’Oreal, Harvard, USAA, NYT, Papa John’s, Ford Motor CO., Tiffany, Dell, T Rowe Price, Hilton – the list is enlightening and saddening – for it reveals the sellout of American Business to China.

Why?

Money.

Ethics and Values have been eclipsed by graft and Mafia tactics.

And too many of our stalwart Corporations have sold us out to Communist China without a lick of thought or compassion.   A quick look into the CEO compensation might benefit the understanding of the sellout. For example: Ford CEO, James Hacket annual compensation = nearly $18 million. John Hayes at Ball Corporation = $11million.   Reed Hasting of Netflix – $38.6 million annual compensation.   These are the people who advocate for diversity and inclusion … because it looks good on the ledger.

These are the company’s funding the Liberal Agenda, the Propaganda, the chaos and anarchy that has created rage amongst a group of people who are relatively uneducated and historically bereft of ANY knowledge.

Why?

Because it lines their pockets.   And they look good on paper.

The recent Trump Rally is a scurulous example of China manipulation to upend our President.   AOC and other Liberals think it is ‘funny’ that TikTok is wholly responsible for creating a ‘fake agenda’ of Trump attendees, only to be – well – FAKE!   And somehow, these bizarre people find their tactics within Chinese Communism stupendous in the results???? And in so doing align themselves and all associated companies including the once revered McKinsey and CO as being frauds.

Tik Tok is not the only co-company within the umbrella of ByteDance. There are a total of eight manipulative propaganda tools they host.   ALL Nonprofits – ALL organized under the Cayman umbrella, NONE paying a cent of Tax, ALL housed under the makeup of McKinsey and Company – and JP Morgan.

McKinsey and Company is well known for their ‘makeover’ manipulations of people so as to create a persona that has nothing to do with the – person – and everything to do with propaganda manipulation and political sales.

Pete Buttegieg was a former client of McKinsey and described them as “amoral as the American business community in general, or at least the corporate community,…” In other words – they have no party affiliation per se other than the almighty dollar. Previous scandals have included the pre-MLB of Saudi Arabia scandal, Enron, China, Purdue Pharma, Rikers Island, etc… with high level influence within Google, Facebook, IBM, Boeing, etc… This is NOT an unaffiliated unbiased, nonpartisan, bunch of lawyers.   They are huge and well connected in the Swamp of Parlor Politics…  And they know how to ‘create’ a politician.

In the end, most of these bandwagon corporate entities that claim they are onboard with “Diversity and Inclusion” do so in order to mitigate any business fallout.   They may or may not have any actual opinion.   Instead, they sell their souls for a dime and hope they don’t have to pay a quarter.   And yet, they will literally do most anything, to appease being set on fire and murdered.

This is the threat they live under.  Should they sellout their family or sellout their country and countrymen?  Romney is one of the more sad examples of a human being.Tik 

Environmental Charities – Another Ponzi Scheme

Posted on by Helena

Once upon a time, environmental organizations were at the top of their game!   They made the news nearly daily with their accomplishments, advocacy, and rallied millions to their causes. What happened?

The Nature Conservancy is by far one of the wealthiest with over $7.4 billion in assets and $2 billion per year in gross revenues.   But where does the money go?   In 2017, $400 million went to salaries and benefits, while $64 million went to program grants around the world. That would equate to just 3.2% of gross revenue – and 7% of total expenditures.   Unfortunately, a detailed list of every NGO receiving grants is not available – apparently, their donor recipients want to remain anonymous. In a world of NGO’s it bears accountability. The balance of expenses was equally disconcerting:   “Other” ranked highest at $138 million, $87 million for office related expenses, $15 million for interest, $5 million for equipment, etc…

They have previously come under fire for making unsecured loans and buying and selling assets to employees, trustees, and related third parties.   But even that doesn’t tell the story.

The most recent award granted the Nature Conservancy was for it’s restructuring of Sychelles’ ‘sovereign debt’ in 2016. Debt, micro-finance?   What happened to the ‘environment’?

Some of their largest corporate benefactors include: Monsanto, BP, Cargill, Shell, Chevron, Conoco, Altria and Nestle.   Not exactly companies with environmental friendly business models…   But then, they have learned from the giants.   Another supporter is Jack Ma of Alibaba who stated that he would fund his foundation with .3% of the Alibaba net revenue for such causes as education, environment, and philanthropy. In the five years since he established the foundation, he has ‘pledged’ or distributed $300 million.   He is worth $48billion. That would reflect a contribution based on his net worth of .125% per year. To put that in perspective, for a person with a net worth of $500,000, that would represent a contribution of $625.

The Sierra Club is another former actionable environmental group that has succumbed to political agendas.   For them, it is support for the Socialists who vie for the Green New Deal.  

Greenpeace past president, Patrick Moore, has vocally outed Greenpeace for abandoning their true environmentalist actions while bowing to political agendas, fear mongering and propaganda.

World Wildlife Fund  is now mostly a micro-finance organization that does little to protect the environment.   Micro-lending in countries that have no usury, the interest rates are as high as 32%.   Hardly a charitable cause.

Most of WWF income comes from government grants.  Total revenue per their 2017 990 form tax return was roughly $300 million.   Despite being a non-profit, net profit for 2017 was over $37 million, salary costs were $92 million, office related expenses were roughly $46 million, and grants amounted to about $75 million of which $70 million funded grants outside the US to unnamed NGO’s. One of their primary partnerships is with Coca-Cola.

All these environmental organizations claim to be working toward one desirable goal; sustainable water.

All of the partners of these environmental organizations have one shared need for their business future – water.   All of these partners are guilty of depleting water reserves across the globe:

“Coca-Cola has been accused of dehydrating communities in its pursuit of water resources to feed its own plants, drying up farmers’ wells and destroying local agriculture. The company has also violated workers’ rights in countries such as Colombia, Turkey, Guatemala and Russia. Only through its multi-million dollar marketing campaigns can Coca-Cola sustain the clean image it craves.

The company admits that without water it would have no business at all. Coca-Cola’s operations rely on access to vast supplies of water, as it takes almost three litres of water to make one litre of Coca-Cola. In order to satisfy this need, Coca-Cola is increasingly taking over control of aquifers in communities around the world. These vast subterranean chambers hold water resources collected over many hundreds of years. As such they the represent the heritage of entire communities.

Coca-Cola’s operations have particularly been blamed for exacerbating water shortages in regions that suffer from a lack of water resources and rainfall. Nowhere has this been better documented than in India.”

The environmental organizations of lore have been hijacked and bear no resemblance to what their mission statement details or their ideology dictates. Instead they have become the progenitors of waste, subsidizing the depletion of valuable water resources across the globe, while pocketing huge sums of money that are labeled – nontaxable. As of 2015, there were 1.5 million nonprofits registered in the US, employing roughly 10% of US workers. There are roughly 160 Environmental nonprofits in the US.

We are supposed to be stewards of this planet.   Each individual is tasked with protection and balance.   But these organizations, many of which began with a grand ideology, have succumbed to the greed of businesses that are some of our greatest polluting threats.   Instead of helping, they are decimating.   Their integrity is non-existent.   And they fly under the flag of ‘nontaxable status’, paying exorbitant executive wages, while gifting often less than 3%.

It is a travesty.

World Wildlife Fund: Conservation Ponzi?

Posted on by Helena

Brazil’s president, Bolsonaro, has accused Leonarda Di Caprio of funding an NGO that is complicit in the Amazon fires as arson triggers the cycle need of financial aid.   While the media have widely tabled the allegation as unfounded, the root would seem to revert to the World Wildlife Fund. Mired in extensive allegations of corruption and fraud for over a decade at least, it bears further investigation.

While the World Wildlife Fund may have originally been created for idealistic purposes, it’s role in the environment has slowly evolved into a ‘finance mechanism of swaps and pillages as they sold out to such environmentally unfriendly organizations like – Monsanto.

A cursory list of donors includes; the MacArthur Foundation, Packard foundation, USAID, and Wildlife Conservation Society.   While their names may seem innocuous, their agenda is not. And Bolsonaro’s concerns may be quite valid.

The Packard Foundation is run by his granddaughter and her husband, Franklin Orr, who was Under Secretary For Science and Energy – under Obama.   Their organizations are clearly focused on – over-population, and how to reverse this evolution. Of course, select names on “The List” who are designated to survive would be a who’s who of the wealthy.

After all, there has to be a carrot.   What could make, lure, these people without ethic or morality toward a failed earth?

The notion that they will survive as some super human class.

So what happened to the largest environmental group in the world that caused it to be so mired in controversy?   The Panda.   It hardly represents any action within the organization, it’s focus having shifted from the actual hands-on to the financial reward, or gain that can be levied so easily under the guise of beneficial ownership. Corrupted.   It is like a virus that takes over the host soul and creates new gene cells.   It is nothing compared to what it once was.

I remember well when I was in my post Hippy coming of age era and I was introduced to Greenpeace.   I invited the gentleman into my house and he talked for hours.   And I was hooked.   I had no idea what he was revealing and having a heart I wear on my sleeve, I was completely drawn.

Decades later, WWF has accumulated a veritable laundry list of controversial infractions – all of which lead to one over-riding justification – money.   As such, this once ideological organization has evolved into a Lehman Brother’s subsidiary.   It is nothing more than a clearing house for – money.

And Bolsonaro’s claim begins to gain traction.

Because, you can’t finance a crisis if a crisis doesn’t exist.   So create the crisis so as to perpetuate the finances.   And this would seem to be the crux of Bolsonaro’s claim and the Ponzi scheme manifested by World Wildlife Fund.

Leonardo Di Caprio has no more interest in anything than his own gain however that might be attained.   Too often we forget. Hollywood is composed of actors, playing make believe, faking who they are, and convincing an audience they are real.   Most have little more than an 8th grade education. And yet, they are experts at everything because they played this part once – upon a time. And therefore, presume they are this person, this created persona, with full knowledge of what would be – their education.

It is fantasy.

I think we may soon discover that World Wild Life Fund and its players have indeed manipulated in the witch’s brew of population control, destructive micro-financing, sterilization, and deadly vaccines.

WWF website lists exactly four initiatives

All of which are based on a financial schematic, and have nothing to do with the initial focus of wildlife or even environment, instead it is a for profit, money making scheme that indebts whose who had nothing, with less than nothing, and bulges the pockets of ‘conservation’ organizations.

In Brazil, there are two companies that Bolsonaro mentioned when calling out Di Caprio;   Alter Do Chao and Forest Trends both of which are connected to WWF.

In Bolsonaro’s esteemed belief, these NGO’s are actually conspirators of Amazon arson for the purpose of creating a market for the financial initiatives offered by these WWF adjuncts, which include;   MacArthur Foundation, Packard Foundation, and USAID.

It is really no different than the belief that wars are literally created, and propagandized, by the media so as to line the pockets of a few. WWF is labeled the worlds largest conservation organization with consolidated assets over $500million and annual revenue for 2018 shy of $340million.   The executives are paid handsomely with the CEO, Carter Roberts, of the US entity reporting over $1.45 million in compensation. While they are incorporated in Delaware, the vast majority of their grant making is to foreign countries – all donation names have been ‘redacted’.

Like the racket that NGO’s and Foundations have become – their funding is a mass circle of Ponzi schematics whereby each Foundation donates to another so as to support excessive salaries and little actual philanthropy.

Like The Nature Conservancy where Carter Roberts previously was employed, the WWF Board is composed of a number of elite corporations that are quite removed from conservation and more inclined to making money, including the Leonardo Di Caprio Fouundation, Google, Goldman Sachs, Coca Cola, and individuals connected to petrochemical companies, mining companies, natural gas companies, and individuals currently or formally connected to the UN!

While there are likely a few people who actually are dedicated to climate change ideologies, the phrase has recently been hijacked – again.   It is now “Climate Justice” and includes reparations, and LGBT rights, and ‘legal rights’ for eco-systems.

One such organization has gained traction in the last year, Extinction Rebellion.   Their motto is ‘nonviolent civil rebellion’, which is rather an oxymoronic statement given that rebellion means ‘destruction’ and the creation of chaos.   While its members and advocates routinely cite the need for government intervention in our climate, they don’t actually exert any personal change in their own gad about town delusional activities.   Including the Hollywood elite who defend their excessive flying as necessary for their career – and their excessive use of electricity and other carbon footprint mechanisms.

While they may not effect any positive change, they do manage to make quite a bit of money – to support their own higher education in degrees like ‘effective radical campaigning’.

In alignment with Ocasio Cortez, unions, green anything, except vegetables, and socialist communism for all, these millennial’s have found a niche wherein they can radically up their monetary inflow all while spouting billionaires should be eliminated.

Of course, naked protests are always inserted in their agenda revealing narcissism at it highest altitude!

FYI:   At present;   “World Wildlife Fund is the subject of an investigation by The House Natural Resources Committee according to an article titled, “House Panel Investigates Whether U.S. Funds Anti-Poaching Efforts Linked To Rights Abuses.” 

Nature conservancy:   There have been allegations of The Nature Conservancy obtaining land and reselling it at a profit, sometimes to supporters,[47] who have then made use of it in ways which many perceived as being insufficiently environmentally friendly. The Nature Conservancy argues that the profit from such sales allows The Nature Conservancy to increase its preservation of what the Nature Conservancy claims are more important locations

IN addition there have been numerous sexual harassment charges brought against the Nature Conservancy.