narcissism

Hollywood’s Pathological Ego

Posted on by Helena

John Cleese, an actor, has just unleashed a spew of vitriol in which he describes President Trump as an a**hole, unscrupulous, a pathological liar, and upholding a power seeking obsession while all of the peons that follow him are simple idiots.

Cleese, who has been married 4 times, has made his millions pawning his comedic temperament, is a long standing Liberal who supported Obama.

And somehow the irony of his shrewish tongue is lost on him…

In essence he stated that in order to be in politics one must be a narcissistic power grabbing money obsessed a** – but that definition only applies to Conservatives, Liberals would seem to be – immune.   In addition, he would seem oblivious to the obvious irony that this same oblique definition is rather common among actors.

According to Psychology Today, actors are driven by the outcomes of fame, money and adulation.   They are narcissistic, self obsessed and driven by ‘idiocy’.   They are ego driven to extreme and thrive on attention.

But what is most compelling is why they feel the need to become activists, whether politically, socially or environmentally.   Guilt.   Because of their undeserved accolade they feel a sense of guilt that they have accomplished nothing of value.   Subconsciously, they realize that they have spent their lives pretending to be someone else and that as a person they have no character.   So they do what they do best, they create one. They create a personality.

Recently, John Cleese stated that “critics ‘who can’t themselves direct, write, act, sing or dance’ should be replaced.” Perhaps that same denunciation should be imposed on actors/comedians who can’t themselves provide anything worthwhile outside of acting , ie they shouldn’t pretend to be politicians, businessmen, or scientists.

Of course, he is entitled to his opinion, but the glamour fame that surrounds Hollywood should come with greater wisdom in how it is parlayed. Perhaps these Pretenders should undergo classes teaching them not to utilize their fame in a way that deludes people into thinking they are anything else…

Another actor that has attempted to become an activist is Alyssa Milano.   Unlike Cleese, her formal education is rather alarming – less than 8th grade it would seem.   Her most recent rant was an angry tirade over the fact that Joe Rogan’s Podcasts garnered more hits than her own.   Her feelings were hurt because someone else was earning greater fame – and therefore this other person must be denigrated, vilified, and put in their place.

Like Cleese, Milano is oblivious to the hypocrisy.

This isn’t a new phenomena, Celluloid Heroes have been around for decades with Hollywood gaining status as a ‘culture’ of glamour, notoriety, and stardom.   And thus the ego was fed.

Today, many actors having little to no formal education feel compelled yo create in themselves an erudite attitude in which they portray themselves as ‘experts’ in science, art, math, business and – politics.   Having played the screen role, they envision themselves as having the knowledge and wisdom of PhD’s.   And the general public greedily eats up this fakery, this illusion fulfilling the fantasy.

Why?   Because glamour has been redefined as intellect.

While none of this redacts any talent these actors may possess in their chosen employment, it does provide a clearer picture of why they feel compelled to assert themselves as more, and why that power drives them.

World Wildlife Fund: Conservation Ponzi?

Posted on by Helena

Brazil’s president, Bolsonaro, has accused Leonarda Di Caprio of funding an NGO that is complicit in the Amazon fires as arson triggers the cycle need of financial aid.   While the media have widely tabled the allegation as unfounded, the root would seem to revert to the World Wildlife Fund. Mired in extensive allegations of corruption and fraud for over a decade at least, it bears further investigation.

While the World Wildlife Fund may have originally been created for idealistic purposes, it’s role in the environment has slowly evolved into a ‘finance mechanism of swaps and pillages as they sold out to such environmentally unfriendly organizations like – Monsanto.

A cursory list of donors includes; the MacArthur Foundation, Packard foundation, USAID, and Wildlife Conservation Society.   While their names may seem innocuous, their agenda is not. And Bolsonaro’s concerns may be quite valid.

The Packard Foundation is run by his granddaughter and her husband, Franklin Orr, who was Under Secretary For Science and Energy – under Obama.   Their organizations are clearly focused on – over-population, and how to reverse this evolution. Of course, select names on “The List” who are designated to survive would be a who’s who of the wealthy.

After all, there has to be a carrot.   What could make, lure, these people without ethic or morality toward a failed earth?

The notion that they will survive as some super human class.

So what happened to the largest environmental group in the world that caused it to be so mired in controversy?   The Panda.   It hardly represents any action within the organization, it’s focus having shifted from the actual hands-on to the financial reward, or gain that can be levied so easily under the guise of beneficial ownership. Corrupted.   It is like a virus that takes over the host soul and creates new gene cells.   It is nothing compared to what it once was.

I remember well when I was in my post Hippy coming of age era and I was introduced to Greenpeace.   I invited the gentleman into my house and he talked for hours.   And I was hooked.   I had no idea what he was revealing and having a heart I wear on my sleeve, I was completely drawn.

Decades later, WWF has accumulated a veritable laundry list of controversial infractions – all of which lead to one over-riding justification – money.   As such, this once ideological organization has evolved into a Lehman Brother’s subsidiary.   It is nothing more than a clearing house for – money.

And Bolsonaro’s claim begins to gain traction.

Because, you can’t finance a crisis if a crisis doesn’t exist.   So create the crisis so as to perpetuate the finances.   And this would seem to be the crux of Bolsonaro’s claim and the Ponzi scheme manifested by World Wildlife Fund.

Leonardo Di Caprio has no more interest in anything than his own gain however that might be attained.   Too often we forget. Hollywood is composed of actors, playing make believe, faking who they are, and convincing an audience they are real.   Most have little more than an 8th grade education. And yet, they are experts at everything because they played this part once – upon a time. And therefore, presume they are this person, this created persona, with full knowledge of what would be – their education.

It is fantasy.

I think we may soon discover that World Wild Life Fund and its players have indeed manipulated in the witch’s brew of population control, destructive micro-financing, sterilization, and deadly vaccines.

WWF website lists exactly four initiatives

All of which are based on a financial schematic, and have nothing to do with the initial focus of wildlife or even environment, instead it is a for profit, money making scheme that indebts whose who had nothing, with less than nothing, and bulges the pockets of ‘conservation’ organizations.

In Brazil, there are two companies that Bolsonaro mentioned when calling out Di Caprio;   Alter Do Chao and Forest Trends both of which are connected to WWF.

In Bolsonaro’s esteemed belief, these NGO’s are actually conspirators of Amazon arson for the purpose of creating a market for the financial initiatives offered by these WWF adjuncts, which include;   MacArthur Foundation, Packard Foundation, and USAID.

It is really no different than the belief that wars are literally created, and propagandized, by the media so as to line the pockets of a few. WWF is labeled the worlds largest conservation organization with consolidated assets over $500million and annual revenue for 2018 shy of $340million.   The executives are paid handsomely with the CEO, Carter Roberts, of the US entity reporting over $1.45 million in compensation. While they are incorporated in Delaware, the vast majority of their grant making is to foreign countries – all donation names have been ‘redacted’.

Like the racket that NGO’s and Foundations have become – their funding is a mass circle of Ponzi schematics whereby each Foundation donates to another so as to support excessive salaries and little actual philanthropy.

Like The Nature Conservancy where Carter Roberts previously was employed, the WWF Board is composed of a number of elite corporations that are quite removed from conservation and more inclined to making money, including the Leonardo Di Caprio Fouundation, Google, Goldman Sachs, Coca Cola, and individuals connected to petrochemical companies, mining companies, natural gas companies, and individuals currently or formally connected to the UN!

While there are likely a few people who actually are dedicated to climate change ideologies, the phrase has recently been hijacked – again.   It is now “Climate Justice” and includes reparations, and LGBT rights, and ‘legal rights’ for eco-systems.

One such organization has gained traction in the last year, Extinction Rebellion.   Their motto is ‘nonviolent civil rebellion’, which is rather an oxymoronic statement given that rebellion means ‘destruction’ and the creation of chaos.   While its members and advocates routinely cite the need for government intervention in our climate, they don’t actually exert any personal change in their own gad about town delusional activities.   Including the Hollywood elite who defend their excessive flying as necessary for their career – and their excessive use of electricity and other carbon footprint mechanisms.

While they may not effect any positive change, they do manage to make quite a bit of money – to support their own higher education in degrees like ‘effective radical campaigning’.

In alignment with Ocasio Cortez, unions, green anything, except vegetables, and socialist communism for all, these millennial’s have found a niche wherein they can radically up their monetary inflow all while spouting billionaires should be eliminated.

Of course, naked protests are always inserted in their agenda revealing narcissism at it highest altitude!

FYI:   At present;   “World Wildlife Fund is the subject of an investigation by The House Natural Resources Committee according to an article titled, “House Panel Investigates Whether U.S. Funds Anti-Poaching Efforts Linked To Rights Abuses.” 

Nature conservancy:   There have been allegations of The Nature Conservancy obtaining land and reselling it at a profit, sometimes to supporters,[47] who have then made use of it in ways which many perceived as being insufficiently environmentally friendly. The Nature Conservancy argues that the profit from such sales allows The Nature Conservancy to increase its preservation of what the Nature Conservancy claims are more important locations

IN addition there have been numerous sexual harassment charges brought against the Nature Conservancy.

Pipe Bomb Scare or Scandal?

Posted on by Helena

George Soros was the first recipient of the pipe bomb.  It was ‘hand delivered’ to his mailbox at his suburban home in Katonah New York.   The normal carrier for his mail was questioned and told the FBI he does not remember such a package.  Which means it was delivered by the creator, or someone hired by the creator.   And somehow, despite all the billions, Soros seems to not have a security system or camera at this property that would have videoed the delivery?

The package with a pipe bomb that the media claims was delivered to DeNiro was actually found ‘near a restaurant DeNiro co-owns’ with Sean Penn and Russell Simons.

Apparently, Biden felt left out of the sympathy fanfare and notified the FBI that surely there was a bomb package for him – somewhere?  So dutifully, they found one sitting in a Delaware post office ready to be returned to sender.  Biden was overjoyed!  He was included after-all.

Eric Holder’s bomb was apparently returned to sender, Debbie Wasserman.

The bomb addressed to Brennan was actually sent to CNN, and had his name misspelled ‘Brenan’.

The one delivered to Hillary and Bill was intercepted during normal mail screening.

The one for Obama was ‘intercepted’ as well – security paid for by US Taxpayers.

Apparently, none of the bombs contained the necessary detonation ‘device’.  They were not meant to blow.   Most were hand delivered.  No cameras apparently caught any deliveries.   There were no notes.

Attached to the bombs was a black paper placard that depicted three erotic looking women painted in white at the top and the meme:  Get Er Gone.   The meme is a takeoff of a book title, “Git R Gone” and is considered Urban language for inspiring action.

According to the FBI, the stamps were licked and contain saliva DNA, and fingerprints were left on the receptacles.

The MSM New York Times issued a ranting attack against Trump for instigating violence while printing a picture and opinion piece in which Trump is assassinated.    Maxine Waters has routinely called for Trump’s death as has DeNiro.   Eric Holder called for actionable violence by all Democrats against all Conservatives.    Waters has also been quite verbal in instigating violence against people in public places that are supporters of Trump. Of course, her rally’s have been rather sparsely populated garnering perhaps 15 or so.

The irony of the NYT statement is lost on their fake news agenda.

But if the pipe bombs had no detonation device, the creator had no intention of hurting anyone, she/he was just sending a warning or colluding in an election sting.  While the spin is that the bombs target critics of Trump, that would indicate every Liberal is a potential target…  given they all criticize and assault Trump.  The spin is simply that – rhetoric.

These bizarre antics of blaming Trump for everything from hurricanes to serial killers, to pipe bombers is a form of mental instability labeled –   ‘fundamental attribution error’, and an attribute of narcissistic sociopathy.    It is a form of control, a need to control, a need to attack, an inability to take responsibility for anything, and a pathological need to lie.

The antics of Debbie Wasserman brought down the DNC.  She disgraced the party and was found by WikiLeaks to have orchestrated fraud within the DNC that may or may not have led to the brutal murder of staff member, Seth Rich.  Refusing to resign, Obama forced her resignation.  She became the most prominent scapegoat.

As such, her name as the sender of the pipe bombs was quite intentional.

But the obvious intent of labeling Trump a disgrace because of his attacks on ‘the media’ is rather an odd rant given the media was not a target, the bomb sent to CNN was addressed to Brennan…Somehow the media thinks they are the target?

Wasserman is a candidate for Florida-23 a mostly democrat district within Broward County.  Broward County is home to student turned national Liberal activist David Hogg.   Today, the FBI stated they are concentrating their efforts on South Florida as they pinpoint the source of the pipe bombs.   It could be interesting…  might explain the crude construction, the wrong addresses, the misspellings…not to mention the fact they were not built to actually detonate.

VOTER Shaming -Manipulating Minds

Posted on by Helena

Mort Zuckerman of the New York Daily News Tabloid has announced that anyone who votes for Trump is a clueless, brainless zombie. Attacking voters is becoming the mainstay of Hillary’s campaign. An interesting way – indeed…

Zuckerman is a Hillary fan and runs a ‘tabloid’, so I guess that pretty much sums up his identity.

Madelaine Albright has announced that, “there is a special place in Hell for those women who do not vote for Hillary”! Ouch! Again, attack the voters? Belittle the voters? Condemn them to an eternity in Hell?

I don’t think those kind of attacks are going to muster support for our esteemed Hillary and might actually have the reverse effect – as in narcissistic overload.

While attacks are the mainstay of politics with Republicans attacking each other, name calling, whipping up frenzied rhetoric, refocusing on their alternate party candidate, etc… attacking the voters is most definitely a new agenda that the Hillary’s have captured and patented.

Gloria Steinem added to the obtuse tactic by attempting to shame women who were voting for Sanders just to get the ‘boys’ to notice them.

While both Cruz and Rubio have been implicated in voter shaming by purportedly sending out mailers to individuals and calling out their voting record and publicizing their neighbor’s voting history, the tactic is considerably different. It is encouraging voters to vote – as opposed to damning them to Hell and calling them names. While Rubio’s and Cruz’s ethics have been challenged by this, Hillary’s are for some reason acceptable.

Voter shaming report cards were routinely used by the Democrats in 2012. In fact, Democrats have the dubious honor of creating the tactic. MoveOn.org (a Soros organization) discovered that the letter shaming tactic motivated people who wanted to fit in and do the right thing. As a result they saw it worked famously and may have been instrumental in killing Romney’s presidential run. An interesting note is that the mailers specifically targeted ‘Progressives’, as in Hillary is a “Progressive Democrat” – a label she still cannot define.

The shaming letter is rooted in the concept that people are sheep and follow whatever the Jones’ do, say and act. While the impact isn’t just to vote, the strategy is to create an awareness of a particular candidate in an otherwise unaware person. It presumes the person’s head is empty and therefore can be filled with the ideologies of the letter creator. And while the tactic may be good in that it derives results, we suddenly find that it’s creator, the Democrats, are crying foul!  Launching attack ads, media views, and headlines against the letter shaming is so incredibly hypocritical it is comical.

Given their tactic has been hijacked, the Dems are now resorting to inflaming libelous tactics. Zuckerman, Albright and Steinem have taken the concept to the extreme, calling voters names, condemning them to Hell, etc… That’s a lot more personal. It is offensive! And it imposes on the attacker a rather cynical and dubious nature that creates more than a cringe effect, instead it creates a reaction of anger. The motivation is to make voters feel so badly about themselves and so afraid they are stupid, they will hide and not vote at all for fear of being labeled a scurrilous zombie.

In psychology, what happens when a person is being shamed and mocked?

They and their friends and supporters dig their heels in that much more resolutely! They become united. It creates a protectionist behavior toward the person being shamed, and a revilement toward the shamer.  The effect, the shamed gets more attention and the shamer is vilified.  When politicians shame each other, while we may cringe and hate it, they are all on board and so to some extent we have to accept it.  It is different.

But as voters, we do NOT have to accept shaming! A united front is much more powerful than one rooted in fear!

Child Sex Trafficking – The New Norm

Posted on by Helena

Pretty Woman – remember the movie? A prostitute and her best friend openly talked about their choice to make money by selling sex. It was portrayed as just another means of making a living. It should be legal after all because women should have the right to do with their bodies whatever they please.

But of course it wasn’t pretty, it wasn’t legal and the ‘pimp’ was never mentioned.

As a society, we pass through era’s of extreme wherein rights are confused and cross boundaries of ethics, morality and values. The line is muddied to allow behavior that ordinarily we would never condone. But it comes from a place of vindictiveness. It comes from a place where freedom is manipulated to represent something perverse. And then the freedom slips and the pendulum ultimately betrays someone else on the other side.

Sex trafficking, child trafficking, slavery. Why do we as a society do so little to mitigate this kind of slavery? Our focus is on black vs white all while truth would have it as our children. The statistics are staggering, albeit rough. Estimates give the industry a tab of anywhere from $9 to $32 billion in annual revenues. The number of children drawn into the industry in the US is also a rough figure from 100,000 to 300,000. Pimps are said to handle 4 to 6 girls. Each girl brings in about $150,000 per year. Denver has the second highest pay at an average of $31,000 per week.

Who is buying?

Research has shown that for the most part, those paying for sex span the gamut of normalcy. Average Joe, regular job, perhaps married or in a relationship, and not really sure why he pays for sex. They are out of touch with their feelings and with values. They have buried their feelings of hatred toward women and find prostitution a release. The buyers tend to have feelings of anger and contempt toward women and dehumanize them as being property subject to their sexual whim. The average life span for a prostitute is 34. Prostitutes have the highest rate of ‘workplace’ homicide than any other ‘profession’.

Years ago, I wrote about the relationship between children raised in day care settings and the long term effects that might have on their inability to bond. Children raised in daycares are not touched as often, are not tended to in a nurturing, fretting motherly way. They are confined in a small space competing for attention with 20 to 30 other children. They are only 2, 3 and 4 years old, but their life has been institutionalized. Everything about their life is regulated by people they barely know. Turnover in teachers is high and thus even this bond is typically destroyed over and over again.

I know this because I once owned a day care. We catered to 70 children and I vowed that my children would never have to attend. Daycare had become a drop point for parents who didn’t want to be parents. But that isn’t how daycare started. It began with a more noble cause at heart in the administration of Head Start. I volunteered there as a child with my mother. The purpose of Head Start was to allow single mothers a chance to get off welfare by having a safe place to tend to their children while they trained for a good job. But it morphed.

Today, daycare is by far the norm. It’s given fancy names like Piaget and Montessori, a learning environment. But in truth, it remains – daycare, a drop point for mom’s who don’t really want to be moms. It is used by the poor, the middle class and the wealthy. It is the pendulum at full swing in the opposite direction. And we are now seeing some of the effects – including an inability to bond.

Sex is used to create a bond that is lacking. Porn isn’t enough because there is no interaction. In a research study done in the UK, some men claimed they had some delusion that sex with a prostitute might lead to a relationship, others claimed it was simply a release, an act without emotion. But even more interesting, a good portion of the men said they knew the woman was in an involuntary setting and they felt no desire to help. They really just didn’t care.

The sex trafficking business is only so profitable because it has a steady stream of buyers. Eliminate the buyers and the market collapses, it is simple economics.

So how do you eliminate the buyers?

First, foremost and easiest should be to make solicitation illegal for the buyer. But while that may appear an easy solution on the face, few states in the US and few provinces in Canada actually act on this proposal. Police arrest the prostitute, the buyer leaves, and everything goes back to normal the next day. Why? Because men want to believe that a prostitute is performing consensually, it is prettier, it is Pretty Woman. And because, our media would have us believe that this trade is just as it was since the beginning of time. But it’s rise may link to the empty feelings of abandonment, being raised in a daycare institution, and having no other model to feel a sense of morality. As such, it becomes an entitlement. “I deserve it” attitude.

If we can’t move past the first hurdle and create a morality and legal issue on the part of the buyer, the industry will continue to abduct and traffic whomever they can because money is the driver. Statistics show a small percentage of pimps or traffickers being arrested. And most return to the job because it pays and they haven’t the education to do anything else. There have been a few buyers prosecuted, but the numbers don’t support any real effort to curb the activity. Media reports tend to put the victim label on the Madame or even the Pimp and certainly the buyer – he didn’t know – Most often, the only victim, the girl, the prostitute, is the one punished.

How do you retrain buyers?

It starts with raising your own children. It starts with nurturing, instilling values, living values, and filling the voids of emptiness. It means teaching compassion and evolves into education. It means defining sex as something very special to be shared only with a spouse. It means giving back a child their life, whether it is your own, or the abducted one sold and humiliated, and given the status of property. It means when you think looking at porn is harmless – you are engaging in the trafficking of children. And that child could be yours.