UN Human Rights Council – or Human Traffickers

The “world” is all in a twitter because the US has dropped out of the UN Human Rights Council – the ship has sailed.  The comments come from interesting sources:   Sweden – whose human rights have spiraled to such an extent that rape, assault, burglary, and murder have qualified them to become a third world country by 2020.  Of course no commentary is ever left unsaid by the UK’s Boris Johnson who just likes to see himself quoted.  The UK Parliamentary has become a crass pit of moral and ethical depravity with screaming, fights, barbs, and sarcastic laughter the new norms.  The English Gentleman is dead.   China says they regret the move. Indonesia has ‘deep’ regret. Of course, the barbs from the UN High Commissioner, Prince Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein, include – snickeringly disappointed but not surprised. 

The Prince himself hails from Jordan where slavery and squalor and over crowded migrant camps house refugees who are given no education, no jobs, no rights.  Jordan, where women are still considered chattel. Jordan, whose human rights are perverted every single day.  Jordan who took in Palestinian refugees between 1947 and 1964 numbering roughly 2 million.  Of those, about 634,000 do not hold Jordanian citizenship and have no rights thereof. Approximately 370,000 still live in the refugee camps – and have no rights..

The UN itself is a body that has been mired in human rights violations for decades.  It’s Peacekeepers charged with prostitution, rape, and sex trafficking.   Essentially, these activities have been funded by the US and the international community.  The UN is a shameful despot of corruption and most likely a large source and contributor to the world’s human trafficking, pedophilia, child trafficking and sex trafficking industries.

The UN is an embarrassment. Prince Zeid Ra’ad has an agenda and is simply using his position within the UN to affect that agenda instead of addressing the real issues that plague the world in Sudan, the Congo, Nigeria, Rwanda, Yemen, etc…

There are numerous arenas of trafficking, but the UN has been charged in Haiti, Bosnia, Ivory Coast, Somalia, Congo, Liberia, Sri Lanka, Central African Republic, Kosovo, Morocco… the list most likely extends to every country where the UN “Peacekeepers” engage.

This is the organization tasked with reporting human rights violations.  They are the worst offenders.  And it has existed for decades…

What is the UN doing to change these gross violations of human rights?  

According to the UN, they have taken a tough stance and now require vetting of deployed officers.  If the UN is for some reason unable to do the vetting, they urge the government where they deploy their officers to do the vetting for them.  If the government has ‘concerns’ about a particular officer, they can be repatriated and replaced.  Ah. Problem solved.

If that doesn’t work, well they wrote a Charter which states that the highest standards of conduct must include;  efficiency, integrity and competence, with zero tolerance for sexual exploitation. I’m sure the pedophiles and rapists are no longer applying for UN Peacekeeper jobs because they don’t meet the Charter standards.

And what has the UN done with regard to the past allegations?

They have ‘substantiated’ 2, the remaining allegations have been thrown out – no consequences.  Which means that these perpetrators are still employed, still receiving benefits, and we will provide them with a nice lucrative pension after they retire.  We taxpayers who have no pension…

Because it is all about money.  Follow the money.   The UN Budget for Peacekeeping?  For the period July 2016 to July 2017 it was $7.87 billion, which was apparently a bit less than the previous year.

Working for the UN is considered great!  Many have the option to work from home, and the payscale is quite generous offering housing, travel and food allowances, benefits, pensions, and free healthcare.  As of 2016, the UN Pension Fund was valued at $56 billion with an annual payout of roughly $2.3 billion. 

This is why the UN exists today – and the only reason.

Trump Border Wall and the UN Hypocrisy

Just as there is not one Middle East country that will create a Palestinian state for the Palestinians, no Muslim country willing to greet them with open arms and a pot of gold, Australia has for years been trying to pawn off their illegals housed in concentration camps on the island of Papua New Guinea – and surprise – no one wants them!  Including Australia.

No one seems deterred by this hypocritical revelation, despite the fact that Australia is governed by a very Liberal government who simply don’t want the riff-raff responsibility.

Australia boasts that its net migration is roughly 178,000.  But the editing doesn’t reveal that the vast majority are highly skilled workers.  Even for skilled migrants the rules are stiff with an age cap of 50.   While Australia claims to have available upwards of 16,000 visa’s for refugees, their actual acceptance rate is about 6000 per year. Strict health and character assessments are in place to determine whether a person is eligible.

Still, despite these minimal queues, despite the concentration camps where refugees have been languishing for years, Australia has the audacity to promote an ad wherein Trump is slammed and ridiculed for his Build The Wall policy.   The ad was sponsored by a libertarian group based in the US with Chapters throughout the world, wearechange.org, and headed by Luke Rudkowski.

Libertarians believe that the way to curb immigration is through our welfare system, as in stop offering illegals benefits and they’ll stop coming here.   While it is true that illegals follow the money like everyone else, look at Socialist Germany and Sweden, walls do work, and history is a lesson. But I agree that working in conjunction is a necessary deterrent and the overall savings will be extensive.

The numbers are mixed. Despite Ron Paul claiming the Bush fence/wall in Texas was worthless, Federal data suggests it curbed illegal crossing by as much as 89% over the five year period during which it was built.  In addition, the Director for Research at the Center for Immigration Studies, has concluded that the savings isn’t a simple immediate welfare cost scenario, but includes the cost of illegal children obtaining US status and rights therein, including healthcare, food stamps and education.

Ron Paul proposes eliminating Federal Welfare entirely.  While that may sound like a plan on the surface, in reality it would never pass Congress and is therefore a useless solution.

Even Liberal Germany built a wall in Munich which surrounds a migrant encampment and was commissioned by locals to ‘protect’ those in the outlying neighborhood.

Why are walls so vilified?  They have been a part of our global structure since the beginning of time.

Deterrents claim there is a psychological price and a humanitarian duty to take care of everyone.  But what if instead of simply allowing unlimited immigration, contries pooled their funds and resources to make the corrupted, crime riddled countries safe?   Oh, that’s right, we already do – it’s called the UN.

“The duties of United Nations are numerous like providing cooperation in international law, international security, development of economy, social progress, human rights, and peace in the world”

How’s that working for ya?  Obviously, it’s not.  In fact, it has failed miserably on every front despite a transparent budgetof … oh, that’s right, it’s not transparent, nor does any country have the right to designate what their funds should be spent on, this is determined by the General Assembly.  All 193 members of the General Assembly have an equally weighted vote, without consideration of their funding.

According to the UN, El Salvador is clearly on its way in its sustainable development program which is characterized by its comprehensive and inclusive program.   The UN continues to implement and follow-up on El Salvador’s goals in its development program…

Honduras too has a UN Development Program in place which is monitored and guided by UN officials in collaboration with the government to increase food security, drinking water, education, modernization and development…

“Mexico has taken the decision to participate in U.N. peacekeeping missions, taking part in humanitarian tasks that benefit civil society”.

Given these are the three main countries that contribute to the illegal immigration to the US, it would appear that the UN missions are not reflective of the mass exodus.  The UN has stated that illegal immigrants from these countries should be designated as ‘refugees’, instead of illegal immigrants thus giving them protective status.  Gangs have taken over many of these countries, they have become the ruling drug lords, the mafia, and the over-lords.   The situation in these countries is worse than ever – despite UN peacekeeping, UN humanitarian efforts, UN aid, UN, social progress, UN security and UN law.

Perhaps the most controversial aspect of the UN is that they provide aid in the form of food – but it is delivered to the hands of the corrupt government to distribute, the same corrupt government that caused the crisis in the first place.

Even more topsy-turvy, El Salvador ‘sends peacekeepers’ to other countries, despite their internal chaos.  So while El Salvador is rated a refugee state by the UN, they send El Salvador peacekeepers to help in Mali and Haiti.   The logic is – well – illogical.

Building a wall, we only follow the security measures imposed by over 65 countries across the globe.  Is it a psychological ploy to compare a Mexican border wall with the Berlin Wall, as though no other walls have existed.   The Berlin Wall was done to encamp people and deny them freedom. There was no intent of ‘protection’, it was a jail.  End of comparison.

Humanitarian?   It means that immigrants will follow the rules of law and request permission to immigrate – just as they are required to do in most countries – especially in one of the strictest – Australia.  End of humanitarian guilt.

Obama and Kerry: Negotiating with Global Leaders

While the press is fixated on personal jabs at Trump, McCain at personal jabs at Trump, there is a rumbling beneath the surface that is growing exponentially.   Despite the fact that Obama is no longer president, he continues to act as though he is meeting with foreign dignitaries across the globe from the presidents of China to India to France, to Germany, to Singapore, Australia, New Zealand, Japan to the infamous Farrakhan leader of the Nation of Islam.  

John Kerry is also making world tours under the guise of his former status as Secretary of State, most importantly meeting with heads of state in Iran.   Kerry is also running around the globe speaking at the UN as the US representative while fomenting division as he speaks with France’s Macron, with the European Union foreign policy chief, and with Germany’s president, Steinmeier.  Coincidentally, today Steinmeier (who rarely comes out of the proverbial closet to offer an opinion on anything) made front page news as he slams Trump for alienating what was formerly known as the ‘global community” and for not backing the Iran deal…

Simultaneously, Michelle Obama is making tours representing herself as the ‘forever First Lady”, and Hillary is raising money across the globe purportedly in the guise of book tours.

Theories circulate as to the radical flurry of these comrades-in-armswho seemingly are securing their place, their name, their power – as a potential transfer of power underlying the rumbling in the US White House.   Impeachment or coup, they are desperate to secure their grab of righteous authority.

But these trolls of the White House are losing ground as Trump continues to drain The Swamp and reveal the corruption that has plagued our government for decades.   A bitter war is being fought as we stand idly on the sidelines.   Most of The People are completely unaware of the magnitude of this purging.   Most are not privy to the layers upon layers that have slowly been built only to find that as one layer is uncovered and displaced, ten more are revealed.

James Baker – FIRED 

Lisa Page – FIRED

Mike Kortan, FBIAssistant Director for Public Affairs – FIRED

Josh Campbell, Special Assistant to James Comey – FIRED

David Laufman, Chief of the Justice Department’s Counterintelligence and Export Control Section [NAT SEC – HRC email invest]- FIRED/FORCE

John Carlin, Assistant Attorney General – Head of DOJ’s National Security Division – FIRED/FORCE

Sally Yates, Deputy Attorney General & Acting Attorney General – FIRED

Mary McCord, Acting Assistant Attorney General – Acting Head of DOJ’s National Security Division – FIRED/FORCE

Bruce Ohr, Associate Deputy Attorney General – Demoted 2x – cooperating witness [power removed]

Rachel Brand, Associate Attorney General – No. 3 official behind Deputy AGRosenstein – FIRED/FORCE

It is interesting that despite these revelations, many within even the conservative ranks and Libertarian ranks, are still unsatisfied.  As though it isn’t ‘enough’, it isn’t ‘fast enough’, it isn’t enough players…   They speak with the same entitlement and impatience that one would normally expect from within the Liberal Democrat ranks.   Perhaps it is simply a societal anomaly of everything must happen immediately without the business and political insight of rules of order, of cause and effect, and of thorough research and investigation.

While Kerry’s actions of colluding with the ‘enemy’ are categorically illegal under the Logan Act, Obama continues to traverse a skimming line that is carefully announced within the vein of Foundation work – much like the Clinton Foundation skimming that was regurgitated just a year+ ago.   But given there were no real consequences paid by the Clinton’s for their corrupt funding, Obama has nothing to preclude him from playing the same game.

At least not – Yet.  

Israel Bombs Syria – IAEC Cries FOUL!

The International Atomic Energy Commission (IAEC) is crying foul for the Israeli attack on Syria yesterday.  As an ‘independent’ agency tasked with defining, and monitoring nuclear activity, it is their assertion that they should have been privy to the documents that Netanyahu is using as evidence to support the Israeli bombing.

Okay.   But who/what is The International Atomic Energy Commission?  

They were initially created in 1957 to act independently of the UN, except that they report directly to the General Assembly of the UN…  Oops.

In 2005, their former Director General, whose four year terms began in 1997,  extended 2001 and 2005, Mohamed ElBaradei, and the IAEC were jointly awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.   It was his inspection in Iraq that preceded the invasion for Chemicals of Mass Destruction.   He later was quoted as claiming that inspections should take more time after it was deemed that they in essence were never discovered to exist – and his assessment was flawed.  Sorry Iraq.   ElBaradei was instrumental in the 2011 Revolution which ousted Egypt’s Mubarek, as well as the 2013 coup again in Egypt.  He belongs to the Constitution Party which he founded in 2012 and advocates “Revolution” – within “Liberal” ideals…

In fact, all the founding members of the Constitution Party consider themselves Revolutionaries.   Not sure exactly how the Nobel Peace Prize governors determine what defines “peace”?

Nobel Peace Prize?

He has also been quoted as saying that Israel poses the biggest threat to the Middle East!  In other words, this man of peace who was ‘neutral’ and awarded the Nobel Prize For Peace, has in fact been a demonstrative anarchist with an agenda against Iraq, Iran and Israel…calling for war, destruction, annihilation and anarchy.   Huh.

The current Director General, Yukya Amano, belongs to the Liberal Party and previously worked as a civil servant for the UN.    He was Chairman of the IAEC at the time it was awarded the joint 2005 Nobel Peace Prize, although it is oddly unclear what Peace they achieved?

Apparently, the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to these joint efforts for their efforts to “deter nuclear energy from being used for military purposes”.   Unfortunately, it is unclear exactly what they accomplished as this is not stated in any descriptive format and is prelude to their anarchist revolutionary coups…

So what we have is a UN Agency, that is actually ‘NOT” a UN Agency, which is tauted as being “Independent”, but is headed by Liberal Revolutionaries who have participated in violent coups, as being the ‘go to’ agency to make first determinations whether the documents Netanyahu espouses, are in fact, authentic?

Because, they are the UN?  And in dire need to prove they are worthy of their Budget?

Like all UN Agencies, the IAEC has expanded it’s trough into Climate Change, ecosystems, women in positions of power, nuclear workforce capability, medical imaging, cancer, and a host of efforts to justify their $500 million per year budget which grossly failed Chernobyl and Fukushima.

What have they accomplished?   Not really anything.

What their website does lack is any discussion about Iran and the Iranian deal instituted by Obama and supported by Merkel and Macron.   In fact, their latest report, March 2018, states that Iran is in full compliance.   In fact, Director General Amano released a press report stating that:   “As of today, I can state that Iran is implementing its nuclear-related commitments,” he said in his introductory statement to the Board. “The JCPOA represents a significant gain for verification. It is essential that Iran continues to fully implement those commitments. If the JCPOA were to fail, it would be a great loss for nuclear verification and for multilateralism.”

Oops.

Obviously, given Netanyahu’s document evidence, the IAEC has absolutely no idea what is going on, and as another UN Agency is completely and utterly inept merely voicing/reading a prepared statement that justifies their existence.

Who to trust?

This topsy-turvydom of information is rife with misinformation, delusion, fakery, corruption, propaganda, and manipulation.   Do you believe Bibi?   The UN AIEC?   Assad?  Iran?

Of course, this is the point of it all – to defraud the populace and make truth so confusing as to obliterate logic and delude us into a fantasy or illusion wherein the magician presents – a slight of hand…

Africa Land Grabs and Agenda 2030 – A UN Ponzi Scheme

The UN is attempting to fund the African Land Grabs through the implementation of Agenda 2030 and Agenda 2063 utilizing public, government and private money that they call ‘wealth redistribution’ or simply ‘sharing’.  

While Nero watched – The Roman Empire Burned…  And while we have been diverted by media silliness, Africa has been bought and sold to the highest bidders and is now the target of multi-national corporations as they seek to reap her rewards through a series of UN Agendas.

And the new micro-lending platform is – crypto currency!  Which explains why suddenly Soros has done a complete about face and started investing in this voodoo money.  But he isn’t alone by any means.  FinComEco, a British firm employing former Ministers and Bankers has been accumulating crypto loans.  American International Agriculture Group is busily setting up shop in Algeria.  GMEX Group, Blockchain Commodities, Chinese companies, all see the potential ravaging to be gained.

Within their chain of companies they provide genetically engineered seeds, and genetically enhanced animals which they sell to the impoverished farmers that have been displaced by the Land Grabs with money generated by the UN in its programs to end poverty and ‘share the wealth’ while creating lending bubbles and high interest rates of return – temporarily – until the swap bubble bursts.  WHEW!

The first Africa Agenda was introduced in 1992 under the surname, Rio Declaration on Environment and Development.  It generated a lot of attention, but failed to do anything despite its grandioso plugging. The UN simultaneously created the Kyoto Protocol after the Montreal Protocol was a valueless failure in 1987.

The Montreal Protocol was supposed to protect the ozone layer.  After a bunch of countries signed on, it was considered a huge success!  The Kyoto Protocol was created in 2005 to fight Global Warming through the reduction of greenhouse emissions.  The US never ratified this agreement and Canada, Russia, Japan and New Zealand withdrew in 2012.  The UN is busily making Agendas and Protocols, but the agenda would seem to be to further their agenda…more than anything else.

What these nice squeaky Protocols did create was a market derivative scheme called “Emissions Trading”.  Permit credits to pollute are sold and traded like a commodity.   The largest program is the European Union Emission Trading Scheme.  They even have a spot market where they can buy futures and options internationally.   California has it own such trading market, as does the US, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, Switzerland and the UK.

Follow the Money.

Therefore, we can assume that these UN Agendas will create pockets of trading wealth as well for masses of large corporations.  With the land grabs effectively concluded in Africa, the next agenda was to get government money to fund the infrastructure for the corporate agriculture tracts. Climate Change, the Paris Agreement was supposed to fill that void of funding need, but seemed to fall on its face.  Hence the UN needed to create Agenda 2030 and Agenda 2063 for the purpose of creating heartfelt needs to end ‘poverty’ in Africa through wealth ‘sharing’.

Who has signed on to these Agendas?  The UN and African Union leaders.   The African Union Leaders just recently unveiled their brand new headquarters in Ethiopia that cost $200 million and was built by and gifted by – China.  Although record keeping of land leases in Africa are scarce, it is estimated that China now holds as much as 100 million hectares of agriculture land.

Of course the African Leaders don’t mind China taking over their country at all because a good portion, if not all the money is pocketed and transferred to offshore accounts like the Panama Paper Caper.

Land Grabs have also been concluded in South America where Soros and Gates purchased large swathes for production purposes.

Owning the world’s food and water supply is a heady agenda.  Using the UN to grab money from governments, aka taxpayers, to fund their products that they will later sell at a premium to the taxpayers that funded them – is even headier.  I’m sure they are laughing all the way to the bank…

Reproductive Rights! I have the right not to fund your abortion…

Reproductive Rights! Yes. Women have the right to not become pregnant. Rape? Less than 1% of all abortions in the US take place as a result of rape or incest, whereas, 70% of all abortions occur because the woman feels: she can’t afford it, she is not ready, or relationship problems. Overwhelmingly, abortions are thus simply a personal choice. Reproductive rights? Yes. Women have the right to not become pregnant and not get raped.

Ireland allows abortion only in specific circumstances; if the mother’s life is at risk. Ireland is its own sovereign nation, but apparently the UN wants to control that sovereignty. The UN and The Center for Reproductive Rights are fighting to change Ireland’s law concerning abortion.

And today the UN has over-reached again and declared that Ireland and Scotland are violating the human rights of children by compelling them to take part in Christian classes in school. Both of these nations are predominantly Catholic/Christian accounting for over 84% of the citizens in Ireland. The parents have no objection. But the UN is declaring that they, the UN, will decide what is best for the children of these sovereign nations.

We know who the UN is – an organization that was formed to perform international cooperation… Obviously they have expanded on that definition considerably and now would fancy themselves the overseers of all nations, all parents, all people. They will decide what is best for my children.

Who is the Center For Reproductive Rights: An ngo funded by; Soros Open Society, Hewlett Foundation, Buffett Foundation, Wellspring Advisors, JPB Foundation, Laura Arnold and HJW Foundation.

Their 990 tax return shows they had gross receipts of over $16.67 million in 2014. Of that, they spent about $740,000 on marketing, $12.76 went to wages (76.5%), travel and conferences was $1.37 million, and rent was $1.8 million. Of their $35 million in assets, $10 million are in investments and $14+ million in cash. Sounds like a pretty lucrative gig for a charitable organization protecting ‘reproductive rights’!

The Buffett Foundation was by far the largest donor. Managed by Allen Greenberg, according to it’s 2014 – 990, their total contributions to CRI was $14,230,000. The foundation is considered ‘enormously’ non-transparent and is headed by Turkiz Gokgol, a Turkish woman who previously worked for Pathfinder International. Founded in 1957, Pathfinder was a part of the eugenics movement advocating for sterilization. Pathfinder is now an NGO whose primary purpose and function is ‘birth control in Africa, Asia and South America’.

The other key figure at the foundation is Tracy Weitz, previously employed by Planned Parenthood. I think the agenda is pretty clear –

The Buffett Foundation also backs, International Projects Assistance Services, which manufactures a hand held suction pump used in developing countries to initiate abortions. The stated advantage to their device is that it does not require a doctor to perform the abortion and may be used by local midwives… and such – as in self-administered abortions.

Who is behind the human rights issue for children? The National Secular Society based out of London. They feel that religion is a threat to ‘open societies’, and that secularism protects the basic liberties of all citizens… except the religious of course. In seeking to create equality and unity, this Society wants to eradicate the beliefs of the majority and they have enjoined the UN to work for them.

The problem is that these organizations who claim to be “standing up for the minorities”, are actually attempting to quash the majorities thru control and suppression. Communism was a form of control and suppression that thrived within a secular state. And while the argument that religious institutions should not have a role in the state could just as easily be argued that secularism should not have a role in the state, the family, or the rights of religious peoples.

Having ‘nothingism’ is a faith. And pushing that nothingness on everyone, and not just the ‘minorities’, is bullying and suppression.

The UN and these NGO’s would be better organized to target states that behead, kill, torture, and maim its citizens, burn women alive and rape as a societal norm: Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Ukraine are currently at the forefront and yet – the UN simply claims it will again extend a ‘watch and wait’ while the deaths continue unabated…   Priorities.

Personally, I think we have forgotten what democracy means – it is a voting right in which the majority make the decision.  Instead, the UN, the NGO’s, would have us believe that the minority should determine how the majority lives.

Abortion?  Apparently, because my government grants billions of dollars to various pro-abortion organizations, my tax dollars are complying despite the fact that nearly 70% of Americans do not support this.

Religion?  According to a 2015 Gallup poll, 78% of Americans identify with a Christian religion.  Yet my tax dollars will not support this because that would be ‘devisive’.

The point – hypocrisy reigns King.

CHILD SEX ABUSE – A UN Model For Scandal

We read about the scandals, and then they simply disappear. Months and years pass and there is no justice. The victims remain victims, the perpetrators buy their way out and life moves on. The UN is involved in the case involving French soldiers who have been accused of sodomy and rape of young girls and boys as young as 9. The charges were initially levied early 2014 but were suppressed from the press. It wasn’t until the report was ‘leaked’ that the allegations were actually investigated. In fact, the UN has done – absolutely nothing.

When the report was leaked to French authorities in 2015 by a UN employee, the employee was suspended. That does not look as though the UN is acting with integrity and concern whatsoever! They purposefully classified the information and sat on it. Of course, in doing nothing, the abuse continued unabated and they, once again, became complicit. In legal terms, by doing nothing about the child sex abuse, the UN became a conspirator in the scandal.

Why didn’t the UN act?

Thirty suspects have been named. But still no one has been charged with a crime. The charges must be proven. How? And therein lies the problem with child sex abuse cases in general.

A similar story came to light in 2008 about Canadian soldiers serving in Afghanistan witnessing sodomy and rape at military bases. One soldier claimed that he witnessed a young boy wearing a wig somewhat askew and smeared lipstick being led into a room where he was systematically sodomized by troops. When the soldier asked his commanding officer if they could intervene he was told to ignore it because it was just ‘their culture’. Child sex abuse – is a culture?  Another soldier heard an Afghan army officer raping a young boy. When he saw the young boy afterward, his bowels and lower intestines were falling out his body.

Inquiries were made. And nothing was done.

When did we become the advocates of the rapists?

It’s not the first time the UN has turned a blind eye to rape and child sex abuse. In 2001, they were accused of actually running a child sex trafficking and prostitution organization in Bosnia. UN police were on traffickers payroll. The Bosnia UN head, Jacques Klein was transferred to Liberia. While in Liberia, the same accusations were made.  Klein disappeared.  NO one was arrested because, you see, UN peacekeepers have diplomatic immunity from being charged with any crime while in their host country.

So if the UN is complicit in child sex trafficking, why are they also the international police?

In 2010, the UN Stabilization Force in Haiti was found to repeatedly rape and prostitute young girls, very young girls. The list is nauseating; Haiti, Bosnia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Cambodia, East Timor, Guinea and Kosovo have all reported the same UN atrocities. These are the so called “Peacekeepers”, 120,000 worldwide. So, how does one become a UN peacekeeper?

The UN has tasked itself with providing peace, security, human rights and social development. Salaries range from $37k to $120k annually and are completely ‘tax exempt’. In addition they offer; rental subsidy, dependency allowance, travel and shipping expenses, assignment grant, hardship allowance, hazard pay and rest and recuperation break. Vacation time is allotted between 18 and 30 days in addition to ‘home leave travel’ to renew your social, cultural and family ties and a pension plan that becomes effective after six months.

In order to qualify as a police peacekeeper the requirements state; younger than 62, 1 year of driving experience, a 60% or above passing score for language proficiency, five years of professional experience, basic computer skills and a firearms test.

In the Congo, UN peacekeepers managed to rape several hundred young children rationalizing that the older children might have AIDS. No one was prosecuted. The same continuation of abuse remains without justice. Often the crime is changed to prostitution alleviating the perpetrator of any transgression. It would seem that although the UN representatives gasp and remark at the heinous atrocity, the file is then – filed.

If we aren’t protecting the children – if they haven’t the value or worth – then why bother? The UN has become the model for all organizations pursuing the trade of child sex trafficking. In a report released this year, UN ODC Director, Antonio Maria Costa, stated, “many governments are still in denial.” A strange hypocrisy given the denial of the UN in its own history of horrific child sex abuse and trafficking. Of 155 countries in the report, 62 had NO convictions. Costa’s advice? We need to step up the fight.

So what’s the solution?

  1. foremost, absolve peacekeepers and their superiors  right to immunity from prosecution
  2. immediate suspension of pay which will give cause to speedier court hearings rather than the languishing 2-5 years
  3. potential house arrest or deportation so that no confrontational contact can be made with victims
  4. all legal fees and expenses should be treated as the cost of the perpetrator, the UN may not have any monetary or intrinsic influence or intrusion in the legal proceedings

Above all – make the UN accountable.  They can not police what they participate in – child trafficking and child sex abuse.  If they are the wolf in the hen house, we need a house made of bricks, not sand.

Personally I don’t understand why they pay no taxes…

**Photograph Courtesy of Marcus Decherd