EPSTEIN DEATH: Ghislaine and Brother Mark AT Risk…

Jeffrey and Mark Epstein grew up in a “middle class” family that is more likely considerably less than ‘middle’.   Mark Epstein is 2 years younger than his brother, and claims to have gone to the same undergraduate school as Jeffrey, Cooper Union. Cooper Union’s list of notable alumni previously included Jeffrey, but his name has been redacted. Mark served as vice chair and chairman for Cooper Union between 2007 and 2013.   In 2011 it was stated that the school was near financial ruin having depleted nearly its entire endowment. Having opened in 1902, the school provided full scholarships to every accepted student.   That ended in 2014 when a financial restructure was required. Mark Epstein was found to be complicit.

Founding a silk screen printing company, he managed to squirrel away enough money to buy multiple apartment and condo properties in New York, including a number of units in Manhattan at 301 East 66th Street in the early 1990’s. He claimed he got a tip from Les Wexner, who was reportedly Jeffrey Epstein’s only client, and founder of the Victoria Secret label.  Wexner was also implicated in the Lolita Express and it would thus follow Victoria Secret models were engaged as well.

Maritza Vasquez was a bookkeeper for a modeling agency Jeff invested in and claimed that many of his underage models were housed in Mark’s apartment complex at 66th street.

In an online profile, Mark claims to be a current Director and Board Member of the Humpty Dumpty Institute.   When pulling a Google search on the company, I was given the address hdi.org. Despite the tag line referencing initiatives on child nutrition, instead I was redirected to three separate pages which opened to an online company selling Cialis and Viagra.  Weird…

Organized in 1988, it’s current CEO is William J. Rouhana, also, CEO for Chicken Soup For The Soul. The NGO claims to be affiliated with the UN, Ban Ki Moon and Bill Clinton. Other notable representatives include: Demi Moore, Charleze Theron, Sam Jackson, and Michael and Kirk Douglas.   The newest member announced this May is Rashida Tlaib, the Palestinian protectorate. They claim to be tackling such projects as ‘child trafficking’.

Other notable members of the Board for Humpty Dumpty are a who’s who of Liberalism despite the NGO claiming they are non-partisan: Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Maxine Waters, Sheila Jackson, Al Green, Adam Shiff, etc… etc… All aligned Democrats fighting to impeach Trump and eradicate ‘white nationalism’.

Obviously, Mark Epstein is deeply aligned in the democrat cronyism.

Mark also states he is the owner/founder of IZMO Family of Companies, Dara Partners and OSSA Properties.

Mark, like Jeffery is unmarried, and has no known girlfriends.   As brothers their lives have been intertwined from the onset in all notable business associations.   It is highly likely that Mark participated in these various enterprises along with Jeffrey and would be considered a bounty of information, ie testimony.

Another expert testimonial witness would be Ghislaine Maxwell, the woman who procured the mountainous supply of sex slaves for Epstein and his voluminous book of wealthy elitists.

Neither have been indicted. Which might indicate that a deal was cut whereby in exchange for Jeffrey Epstein’s testimony, these two would be granted immunity. But given Epstein’s demise of murder-by-suicide, that deal would seem to be null.   Meaning both Ghislaine and Mark need ‘protection’ lest they succumb to the same murder-by-suicide pronounced so liberally in the Clinton spectrum.

There is also the highly likely scenario that Epstein had massive amounts of evidence stashed for just such a development via microchip, photos, video’s, whatever, with multiple sources and directions for its security and release given certain circumstances.

While Epstein’s probable murder alleviated his testimony, both Ghislaine and Mark are now at risk for execution given it is plausible they know everything Jeffrey knew and have also received explicit instructions on what to do – to secure their safety.

AFRICA: Follow The Money

Tomorrow in New York City the UN will host a start up fund for the “Global Compact for Safe, Orderly, and Regular Migration (GCM)”.   Launched in September 2016, the intergovernmental pact supporting GCM was approved by164 countries and signed by 152. The countries that did not climb aboard the band wagon include: United States, Austria, Australia, Bulgaria, Chile, Czech Republic, Estonia, Italy, Hungary, Dominican Republic, Latvia, Israel, Poland, Slovakia, Brazil and Switzerland.   Russia signed the agreement but issued a statement repudiating aspects with regard to the ‘cause of mass exodus’ claiming if a nation created the migration they should take on the burden.

The basis of the pact is to allow complete Open Border policy.   Sound familiar?   In addition, the host country will ensure migrants can access basic services and make provisions for both full inclusion of migrants and social cohesion, while supporting multicultural activities through sports, music, arts, culinary festivals, volunteering and other social events.

In other words refugee status, immigration quotas, and immigration restrictions and conditions would be eliminated. Citizens and taxpayers would be required to pay for all the migrants as they acclimate while receiving free basic services.

Obviously, the UN and the Ted Turner UN Foundation have an agenda.

Over the last few decades’ enormous amounts of money have been injected into Africa for the purpose of revitalizing the infrastructure, building exclusive neighborhoods, and buying up large swathes of farmland – called ‘land grabs’.   In addition to billionaire dollars, the money has come in the form of the Paris Climate Accord and in the form of government funded charities and NGO’s, aka taxpayers.

Encouraging the outflow of Africans to other countries via immigration, war, and disease, vast portions of Africa then become enclaves available as home to the elite. Most of the urban revolution is occurring in the following locales: Cairo, Egypt – Casablanca, Marrakesh and Tangier Morocco – Accra, Ghana – Lagos, Nigeria – Cape Town, Johannesburg, Pretoria, and Durban, South Africa – Mombasa, and Nairobi, Kenya – Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

The elitist suburbs host the wealth of white expatriates while 93% of the unemployed remain black.   Over the last two years upwards of $3 billion has been invested into the renovation of Johannesburg alone. The city boasts a moderate climate, a burgeoning art world, modern shopping centers, a new commuter railway, three public and private universities, and crime surveillance camera’s on every city street corner which has halved the crime rate.

In 2016, for the first time ever a member of the Democratic Alliance Party became mayor of Johannesburg, Herman Mashaba.   The Democratic Alliance Party is comprised of English speaking Afrikaans and is considered Liberal supporting “Open Opportunity Society For All” .  Sound familiar?

Nairobi boasts a vibrant economy as well hosting headquarters for Coco-cola, World Bank, Citibank, BBC, CNN, Reuters, Deutsche Welle, Agence France-Presse, New York Times, and AP.

In 2010, Kenya drafted a new Constitution, the political system was overhauled and infighting became the norm since.   Morocco is predominantly Muslim, Lagos government shifted to the Socialist Party in 2019, and Ghana recently voted in the New Patriotic Party.  Of course, like other countries, the elections are highly contested with allegations of fraud and rigging common. Not unlike just about every country and state in the world now.

The Green Climate Fund which operates to expend donations for the Paris Accord has released its financial statements for 2017.   Of the $100 billion goal, they have collected a total of roughly $5 billion. In 2017, of the $1.9 billion collected, they spent $115 million – 6%. In 2016, of the $1.6 billion collected, they spent $31 million – 8%.   Where oh where does the money go?

The majority of the Green Fund ‘spending’ is in Africa to help women fight ‘climate change’.   ????   Many of the projects focus on Kenya and South Africa. The African continent’s carbon footprint is -0-.   Some of the projects are termed “multiple countries” and include Kenya, South Africa, Morocco and Egypt.

Coincidence?

Some of these projects in Africa are partnered with Agence Francaise de Development (AFD). In 2007, AFD was called into question for its deforestation in Africa. No legal proceedings were brought.   According to the Cameroon National Anti-corruption Commission (CONAC), two front companies, including one controlled by AFD, have been suspected of fraud.   How do they pass the inspection of the Directors in charge of the Green Climate Fund?  Deforestation would hardly benefit ‘Climate Change’.

It would appear that no one is truly auditing the Green Fund other than the Green Fund.   The two co-chairs are from Egypt and the UK.   Directors vary from Iran, Denmark, Germany, Tanzania, Nicaragua, France, Mexico, etc…  Why is Iran a Board Member in the Green Fund?

In order to become a resident of South Africa, one must have resided in the country for five years. Retirement visa’s are allowed if one can prove complete financial sustainability.

The US has the largest immigrant population in the world standing near 50 million. While other countries (Germany, Australia, Canada) boast a high percentage of immigrant population, their state of origin is rather different:   In the US – Mexico, India, Philippines, China and El Salvador dominate.   In Canada –  the UK tops the list with China, India, Italy and US close behind. In Australia – the UK, New Zealand, China, and Italy are the majority.

Why?

Because these countries require self sustaining, highly educated immigrants. Go figure.

Ultimately, an Open Borders For All scenario would cause the US to become a third world country – on the hind of Africa reaping the benefits of elitist money, development – and of course – $$$$$$ while maintaining a black unemployment rate and/or slave labor rate of roughly 40-93%.

THIS IS THE AGENDA.

Epstein: Who Will He Take Down?

CNN’s rating have been steadily plummeting given their National Enquirer style of reporting that has viewers channel flipping.   Instead of modifying their format and attempting to find a more balanced model, they continue unabashedly promoting false narratives and abusive content. Why?

CNN was owned by Ted Turner a devout liberal with a bit of a temper and some self diagnosed mental disorders who has regularly hobnobbed with the Clintons, John Kerry, Oprah, David Rockefeller and George Soros.

Like Buffett and Gates, Ted Turner was inspired to give philanthropically under the guise of the Giving Pledge, wherein these billionaires avoid estate taxes by donating their wealth to Foundations that they and their children run.  The Foundations are  only required to distribute 5% of the wealth each year to whatever cause is their choice. Typically payroll expenses consume a robust portion of the 5% that is labeled charitable giving.

In 1998, Turner founded the United Nations Foundation with a $1 billion gift – tax deductible for him, and nontaxable to the Foundation.  The purpose of the Foundation is to influence the decision making of UN activities and to promote additional leveraged gifts from wealthy donors.   Board members include Emma Rothschild, Kofi Annan, Timothy Wirth the first Under Secretary of State for Global Affairs under Bill Clinton, and Muhammad Yunus who founded Grameen Bank (initially funded by the Ford Foundation) which was the first pillage into ‘microlending’ targeting women. Microlending is mired in controversy as it is considered predator lending wherein interest rates can be as high as nearly 80%, although the mean typically is 35%.  Most loans must be paid off in six months.

IN essence the UN Foundation determines the who, what, where, and when of all UN activities!

One of the leading organizations developed within the UN Foundation is the “Better World Campaign” whose sole purpose is to strengthen relations between the UN and the United States – including funding.    In essence they are a lobbying group that advocates at Congress to assure that the US “fulfills its financial obligations with the UN including repayment of debt”.   They are also instrumental in determining what NGO’s are funded by the US government, including USAID.

Former Senator, Timothy Wirth’s primary focus while in office was population ‘stabilization’.  Wirth was ‘close friends’ with John Heinz whose widow, Theresa Heinz, married John Kerry.  The population focus aligns with the Buffett philanthropy that is all things abortion, and the Gates Foundation philanthropy that is ‘vaccines’ for children…   A program mired in sterilizations and population reduction.

IN 2018, a former UN Chief, Dr. Andrew Macleod revealed that the UN and a plethora of ‘aid organizations’, aka NGO’s, were at the forefront of pedophilia and sex trafficking.   He has stated that there are upwards of 3300 pedophiles working within the UN alone.   Oxfam, The Red Cross, Clinton Foundation, USAID, Save The Children, Doctors Without Borders have all been implicated in varying degrees with child sexual assault allegations.   The Epstein scandal is only the grain of sand on a vast beach.

Funding these NGO’s through government grants and Foundations provides the mainstay for them to continue their trafficking while purporting to aid children in distress. Their 990 forms tell a different tale.  Microlending is simply another means of infiltrating villages and essentially buying children when the loans are due and 30% interest is unattainable.

Epstein bragged that he bought a 15 year from her Polish parents.

Les Wexner, CEO and founder of Victoria Secrets was Epstein’s only client as a financial advisor.  Epstein was a college graduate, and it is unclear if he was licensed as a financial advisor for Series 7 and 63 transactions.  Wexner supposedly gifted his $77 million Manhattan condo to Epstein where recent raids unveiled sex trafficking and underage girls.  Epstein attempted to cut a deal in which he offered up this $77 million condo as a part of a plea.

Behati Prinsloo, an Afrikaner from Namibia, began her career as a model during her teens, and by 20 had a contract with Victoria Secrets.  In 2010 she embarked on a trip to Haiti to partner with LakayPam, a Haitian orphanage and organization dedicated to helping children…  The company would seem to be nonexistent and Haiti is one of the most infamous scourges of child sex trafficking.  While the government is routinely blamed for the massive problem, oddly, the traffickers, NGO’s, and Foundations are not mentioned.

For example:  The Polaris Project is a 501©(3) claiming to fight human trafficking.  Their Form 990 revealed revenue of roughly $12.5 million in 2017, and exactly one grant totaling $100,000, the remainder was spent on payroll related expenditures, rent, IT etc…

Follow The Money.

In 2018, Joel Davis was arrested for soliciting 2 and 9 year olds for sex.  He was founder of the NGO – The Campaign to Stop Rape and Gender Violence in Conflict.  The steering committee for his NGO included Human Rights Watch (a Soros organization), Physicians For Human rights (a Soros organization), The Global Fund For Women, and others.

Children are trafficked across borders every day and sold.  It is the Project that open borders advocates and likely defines who might be involved in pedophilia activities or simply in the business model.

Ford Foundation, Amnesty International, Open Society Foundation and others actively support ‘prostitution and the rights of sex workers’.   Epstein’s alleged defense was to state that all the girls he engaged with were ‘prostitutes’ and therefore he was the victim.

The twisted core continues find its way back to the UN where sex trafficking is not only indulged, it is a way of operation.

Globally, in 2017 there were 14,894 sex trafficking prosecutions and 9,071 convictions.   It is estimated there roughly 25 million victims generating $150-$200 billion annually.  While the UN has denied virtually all allegations of sexual assaults, rape and trafficking, former UN Chief Andrew Macleod reiterates there are over 3300 pedophiles employed within the UN working for international charities in order to gain access to children.  He estimates they have committed upwards of at least 60,000 rapes.

In supporting the UN, the UN Foundation, and all organizations associated therein, we are supporting sex trafficking.  Given the UN’s extremely untransparent accounting and financial methodology, it is likely that these NGO’s and Foundations are monetarily supporting the covert business of sex trafficking.

MacLeod:   “I was first alerted to it in 1996 while working in former Yugoslavia with the International Committee of the Red Cross. People would talk about a nightclub called Florida 2000, in the Bosnian city of Zenica, where girls of 14 and 15 were working as prostitutes. These children were being trafficked into Bosnia from neighbouring Moldova by individuals working for the UN and Bosnian police. They were used exclusively for the sexual gratification of UN staff. 

Epstein was an active member of the Trilateral Commission:  “The Trilateral Commission was the principal architect of Sustainable Development and Agenda 21, using the United Nations to blanket the planet.”

The twisted core continues find its way back to the UN where sex trafficking is not only indulged, it is a way of operation.   While Epstein would be an idiot to not hold blackmail evidence against the most elite billionaires across the globe, his testimony would certainly leave an untold legacy belying even the powerhouses of the Clintons and Rothschilds.  Given pedophiles do not have a long lifespan in prisons, I imagine his attorneys are sweating’ bullets…

Of course given their respective ages and health, Turner, Clinton, Soros, and Wexner are 2 feet from their own graves, so keeping the allegations in the airwaves indefinitely would provide them with a non-prison passing.

***Zero Hedge has an article defining Agenda 21:   https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-13/what-exactly-agenda-21

 

Germany: The Great Pacific Garbage Patch

Plastic waste has evolved into a catastrophic global problem!   Plastic bags were once considered the best alternative to save-a-tree paper.   They have now become a death trap.   The Great Pacific Garbage Patch is the world’s largest accumulation of plastic. It floats between Hawaii and California.   Of the 2.5 million tonnes of plastic garbage that enters the oceans annually, this patch is host to about 80,000 tonnes, and is the size of three Texas’.   Once the plastic degrades, it becomes microplastics which are commonly ingested by marine life.

Sea turtles can have as much as 74% of their weight in ‘plastic’. Albatross chicks – 45%.

It has been analyzed, researched, photographed, and reported on for a decade…   But no one has done – anything.   In essence, it epitomizes the political fray of committee’s to analyze committee’s to do – nothing.

The Great Pacific Garbage Patch – is one of five such floating islands in the world.

This month, 1400 delegates from around the world gathered at the UN and spent 12 days negotiating the problem of dumping plastic waste into our oceans.   The end-all agreement states that countries will have to ‘monitor and track movements of plastic waste”.   Germany intends to lead the pack by announcing it will ban straws and plastic bags by – 2030.   Reminiscent of Germany stating it would comply with the Paris Accord 2015 – which has yet to occur.

The media is aghast that the US was the only country not to accept this agreement. But then it isn’t a worthwhile agreement. And this is why:

The largest ocean based plastic pollution is discarded fishing gear, representing 46-50% of all plastic debris in the oceans.   The top ten countries polluting the oceans the most include: China, Indonesia, Philippines, Vietnam, Sri Lanka, Egypt, Thailand, Malaysia, Nigeria, Bangladesh and Brazil.

But that isn’t the whole story, because many countries, including the entire EU have for decades transported all their plastic waste to China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Vietnam and Thailand.

The main sources as a whole of plastic waste are; bottles, tubs, trays and pots. Plastic bags and straws are not even identified.   And thus, once again, the real problem is not addressed.

According to DW.com, Germany is quite proud that it has been allowed to join an international waste coalition headed by Coca-cola, Pepsi, and the WWF whose core concern is “preventing waste”.   But apparently, the author/journalist didn’t exactly do his due diligence, because the coalition is called, The International Food Waste Coalition, which is concerned about wasting food – not plastic.

Not only was the UN summit the most ridiculous waste – of time, it reveled in an agreement that will do absolutely nothing to mitigate the problem. Thus abstaining, the US did us all a favor in not wasting precious time or resources doing more ‘studies’ while our oceans and marine life die.

However, there is a much more interesting potential solution that was accidentally discovered last year by two biologists:

Discovered in a Japanese recycling center, a bacteria had formed on the plastic bottles that was degrading them. It is a naturally occurring enzyme that speeds up the process of degradation so that recycling is a much easier and a faster process. But it is still in its infancy. While it has yet to be refined, the process could make one of the leading end waste products, bottles, more pliable for degradation into a recyclable product.

Shipping waste to other countries is not just the EU, many developed nations do so while telling the public that it will be – recycled. In fact, it isn’t, and the waste is simply dumped in the ocean.  The Problem is the fact that the media tends to omit these rather blatant facts and instead demonizes the US – because it can then demonize Trump.   But this is a decades long agenda – and the EU is likely the largest guilty convict.

Basically, the UN meeting is asking the 186 nations of the world to chart where they send the plastic waste so they can then determine if it will end up in the ocean.   In reality, nations will ‘cook the books’, and nothing will change.  While in reality a new and improved lobby of committees will be formed, all mired in graft, corruption, and bribes.

But, it ‘looks good’, when in fact it is yet another ridiculous fakery of monstrous proportions wherein political correctness masks a true environmental catastrophe that far explodes the concept of manmade global warming.

This is undeniable.   This is man-made.   There is NO scientific consensus that would attribute this catastrophe to anything but – the ignorance of man. And at the end of this 12 day discussion wherein 1400+ delegates were wined, dined, flown, hoteled, partied, and carboned their footprint into a far greater foray than the entire dinosaur population…. They all boarded their private gas guzzling jets – went home – and took time off for all their intensive labor to have some R&R because they – deserved it.

When analyzing the major litter sources that plague ‘beaches’, the list includes, by rank: food wrappers, bottle caps, bottles, bags, straws, lids, utensils, and cigarette butts.

Oddly, the alliance of 186 countries failed to mention that food wrappers and bottle caps account for more than double the pollution of bags and straws. It is interesting that these items did not even get mentioned, thus, no remedial ban or recycle program addresses these concerns.

But hey, Germany is proud to slap it’s back along with the other 186 countries and the UN, and proclaim a demonstrative success because they have decided that action needs to be benched, while more studies need to determine what, where, when and how….to add to the decade fray of – studies already done at a cost of millions.

So – How’s That Workin’ For Ya?

Socialism In The US House…takes hold

With the Democrat House filing into DC they bring with them a new host of Socialists.  And one might gasp except that in 2010 the Socialist Party released a list of 70 Congressional Democrats who were also members of the Socialist Party of America.   They endorsed none other than John Kerry and Obama.  In the latest election 15 Socialists were elected to office across the US.  While the numbers may seem small from a percentage standpoint, they do reveal an evolution.   The EU Commission is comprised of Socialists, the UN is run by Social Democrats, and still, despite the collapse of Venezuela, the push continues.

In every Socialist state, the first death is that of the Middle Class.   Those who have much, have more, and those who had nothing, have something.   The fact that those who had nothing was a high percentage is what keeps the power operating.  Until it collapses.

And so the question arises, why does it collapse?

Opinion pieces are rampant in this discussion, most recently Bloomberg’s op-ed attempted to sway the discussion of Venezuela, and instead highlight the vast progress and effectiveness of Bolivia’s Socialist President, Morales.    The opinion piece claims there is a right way and a wrong way to do Socialism and lists Venezuela as the wrong way compared to Bolivia as the right way.  Noah Smith, the author of the piece bills himself as a neoliberal on his Twitter status.

But is Bolivia really a ‘right’ way, or is the author simply attempting to validate Socialism?

Bolivia’s President Morales continues to win re-election, not because his policies are good for Bolivia, but because he has given something to a population that had nothing, and virtually eliminated the Middle Class in the process.  He is elected by the poor, the 40% of the population living below poverty line.   Despite being given vast free assistance from Cuba and Brazil, Bolivia continues to rank in the bottom bowels of South America’s economy, ranked just above Venezuela.  Somehow Noah Smith didn’t read that far.

Bloomberg’s, Smith, cites the fact that they have GDP growth… and makes the claim that illiteracy has been eradicated.  Unemployment is made up of unskilled laborers, and skilled workers are in high shortage.  Corruption is rampant, a dictatorial rule is leveraged, while only 40% of the youth population continue school after the 4thgrade, and 20% enter secondary school, UNESCO has declared the country to be wholly literate.   In case you are math challenged, UNESCO warns that the rate can not be higher than 100%…   Unlike Florida which typically allows upwards of 140% of the population to vote.   I digress.

In terms of World Ranking – Bolivia is followed by Zimbabwe.

Not exactly a stellar record to use in support of Socialism.

The splintering and demise of the Republican and Democrat Parties is parlayed.

While Noah Smith argues that Socialism didn’t destroy Venezuela, hyperinflation did, he rather bizarrely refuses to acknowledge what caused ‘hyperinflation’.   It is humorous to note that Venezuela is referred to as the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela – it followed the exact same ideologies and principles as Morales does now in Bolivia.  The Bolivarian Revolution in 1999 ushered in Chavez as the savior of the Republic.  He vied for ‘socialism or death’.   Chavez government was called the Bolivarian government.  He created a new Constitution – as did Morales.  They support social welfare, social property, communes, universal healthcare, and of course, redistribution of wealth.

The only difference between Bolivia and Venezuela is that Chavez introduced Socialist policies beginning in 1999, Morales took office in 2006, Bolivia simply hasn’t reached the same crescendo – yet.

While the Soviet Union took decades to rise from the ashes of it’s socialist/communist rule instituted by the Bolsheviks, Venezuela and Bolivia don’t have the machismo or brute intellect to know how to recreate failing economics despite being rich in natural resources.  Reading of the demise of Venezuela, it reads as a static version of Bolivia’s current crisis and stagnation – crime rates soaring, riots, protests, inability to redirect industry from oil, vast resources left untapped, education crisis, etc…

Despite Noah Smith attempting to frame Socialism as simply mishandled, he has shown that his own understanding is rather pathetic.    But what he isn’t noticing is the fact that while both ruling parties in the US are crumbling, fracturing, and called out as failures (thank you Romney), the evolution of Socialism historically appears as a saving solution only to completely destroy the country so relegated – from within.

The EU is only now waking up to their own demise promulgated by the Socialist/Communist regimes of Merkel, Macron, and May.  Sweden is Falling faster than the Twin Towers, and Norway is a close second.   But then, that is the plan…

We The People, have that authority.  It is a choice.

UN: Syria End Game

Trump wants to bring home all remaining troops in Syria.  Mattis disagrees and submits his resignation.  Democrats want to impeach Trump for pulling troops.  And the UN – they want to hold a Council Commission meeting in 2019 to force Syria to be ruled by – the UN.   It ain’t over until the fat lady sings!

Why would the UN be involved at all?

Apparently, the entire peace process has come to a standstill because the UN demands a Constitutional Committee made up of 150 members chosen and affirmed by Russia, Iran, Turkey and the UN.   Syria has no say.   These 150 constitutional reform members will redraft Syria’s constitution and hold a new and improved Presidential election 18 months hence.   The UN special appointee to the Security Council for Syria, Staffan de Mistura, takes full self lauding credit for everything positive, and denies responsibility for anything negative, 350,000 deaths, and has spent four years working to find a ‘resolution’.  Now his four year term is up and as of December 31sthe will be replaced.

It would appear that a significant hurdle is the UN’s arrogance in finding that, “The United Nations alone, he stressed, has the legitimacy and mandate to “bless” a Constitutional Committee”.   In the meantime, Assad wants to build and has taken contracts from a number of countries and businesses who see the future potential – as in, $$$$.

“Following yesterday’s briefing, members of the Security Council paid tribute to the Special Envoy’s work, pledged support for his successor and reaffirmed their support for a Syrian-led political process shepherded by the United Nations.”    In other words, the UN is determined to have their hand, arm, and shoulder heavily weighted in anything Syria, most likely because the UN has numerous NGO favorites with whom their contracts for reconstruction would benefit.

The US special representative for Syria, Jim Jeffreys, was not even at the meeting having canceled his appearance.   The reason for his cancellation could be aligned with Mattis resignation, or simply the innate futility of the situation, run by a nearly defunct United Nations, which is intent on the creation of committees to regulate committees which regulate – committees.    A parallel to the Swamp that Trump is widely attempting to dissolve.

Part and parcel of the meeting included an argument regarding the purported ‘White Helmets’ who were portrayed by the media/UN as a humanitarian group aimed at helping the children and women amidst the war zone.   According to Syria and Russia, they were terrorists disguised to disrupt and create further chaos in a disingenuous ploy to skew perception and were actually in the forefront of gas attacks, deaths, and casualties.

Lest we forget, initially, Obama supported Al Nusra, among others, before determining they were a segment of ISIS.  It is partially because of these riffs, that the Constitutional Council is at a standstill unable to trust a UN or US or EU proposal.

Most Americans, as in The People, not the government,  just want other countries to rule themselves and let the chips fall where they may.  The obstructionist approach has had huge grievance effects, and The People are weary.

The conflict in Syria was initiated by US President, Obama to oust Assad.  But it didn’t go exactly as planned, and unlike the Ukrainian Revolution that saw an immediate flight of Yanukovich, Assad stood by his country to the end.  Personally, I have no opinion on Assad, although the media has certainly been brutal in their portrayal, but given they have been equally bludgeoning toward Trump, Melania, and anyone aligned with them, I can no longer have any committed opinion about – anything via media presentation.

That being said, Assad may very well be Syria’s Trump.  And the Truth lives in Alice’s Wonderland.

In that venue, we have just been made aware of the fact that the CNN Journalist of the Year, Claas Relotius whose articles were picked up by  CiceroFrankfurter Allgemeine SonntagszeitungNZZ am SonntagFinancial Times DeutschlandtazDie WeltSZ-MagazinDie WeltwocheZeit Online and Reportagen, completely and wholly fabricated his stories in which demonizing the US was a theme.

He is One – of perhaps hundreds.   And so, in that vein, we can not rely on media interpretation, sensationalism, opinion, or in-depth journalism.   We can not rely on anything that occurred during the entire Obama administration.  We can not rely on our intelligence agencies.

What we do know?

The UK, Germany, France, The Netherlands, and Sweden governments are not our allies, and haven’t been for at least decades.   They may be allies of a power elite shadow – but they are completely and utterly anti-The People.

That being said, it is important to re-analyze the events of the past to dissect what the true agenda was that is our current present, in order to determine who and what is the truth in moving forward to the future.

Because, it is a fair bet, it is nothing like what what we were fed.

Africa’s Expatriate Wealthy Demand UN Climate Change Billions…

More clarity into the UN Climate Change Pact has been revealed – perhaps somewhat inadvertently by Deutsche Welle.   For all intents and purposes, Africa has already fallen.  China, the EU and to a lesser extent the US have taken over the five largest cities including;  Congo’s Kinshasa, Nigeria’s Lagos, Egypt’s Cairo, Tanzania’s Dar es Salaam and Angola’s Luanda.   According to the EU, these cities face ‘extreme risks’ from climate warming. And funds need to be made available immediately to mitigate the losses that the EU might encounter as they have ramped up business exploitation for over a decade…or two.

Luanda:  A valuable port city, the official language is Portuguese.   They host a Chinese community, a Latin American community and of course, a sizable Portuguese community.   While 53% of locals live in poverty, lack clean drinking water, have limited electricity, and live in squalor housing, luxury construction for the wealthy is booming!     The government has solicited a Chinese firm to build what they call ‘social housing’.  The 53% slum population will be removed from the streets and housed in these facilities so that additional renovation, infrastructure and luxury housing construction can continue for the wealthy expatriates.

Kinshasa:  Located along the second largest river in Africa, The Congo, primary language is – French.   Affluent residential and commercial areas and three universities are flanked by an ever shifting slum community.   Every year, as wealthy development inside the city continues unabated, the slums are shifted to the outer periphery.   The UN has a headquarters in Kinshasa and as recently as 2016 deployed ‘peacekeeping troops’ to stabilize unrest.   NGO’s play a prominent role in the local government, including the Belgium Development Agency.  China has an $8.5 billion loan outstanding for infrastructure development.   Corruption is rampant, poverty is rife, and war is a constant – to eliminate the undesirables and allow room for the new wealth.

Dar es Salaam:  The city experienced one of Africa’s fastest urbanization rates as businesses were opened and prospered, growth in the construction sector with multi-story building, bridges and roads.  Tanzanian Banks headquartered in the city started to run more proper,and the Dar es Salaam stock exchange expanded.  The Harbor proved to be the most important in Tanzania and prominent for entrepot trade with landlocked countries like eastern Rwanda, Burundi and Zambia.  The CBD skyline hosts tall buildings, among them the 35-floor PSPF Tower, finished in 2015, and the Tanzania PortAuthority (TPA) Tower, currently under construction. Diplomats and expatriates revel in the white sands of Oysterbay and Coco Beach.   According to the UN, 70% of locals live in slums.   But not to worry, with squash courts, white sand beaches, a darts club, golf, soccer and fitness clubs throughout the wealthier sectors, the city is insulated from the riff raff.

Lagos:  2/3 of the cities population live in slums…

Do you see the pattern yet?  Need I say more?

In other words, Africa has been systematically developed by China and the EU for a wealthy expatriate contingent.  That contingent desires better infrastructure, water, power, and retail in order to sustain their lifestyle.   The local population will ultimately be housed in barracks where they will not defray the views, and will be available for labor at the behest of the lords and ladies.   These countries all host a largess youth population averaging over 50% of the entire population, making the labor force more valuable.  They have a huge emigration population residing in the US, EU, and UK, while the wealthier residents that live in these cities come from the US, the UK, and the EU.

This is – the shift.  

Macron, Merkel and May allow unlimited migrants to take over their flailing countries, while their own wealthy emigrate to Africa and then demand that their cities and townships meet the standards to which they are accustomed while providing a largess slave labor force at their disposal.   All, provided for via the Climate Change, Global Warming Hoax demanding $100 billion annually to fund – their colossal compounds in the continent most affected by global warming – Africa.

They have sold their countries, their people, to the ravages of immigrant terrorists while moving to the same continent that the immigrants are fleeing.  Albeit with a purse of $100 billion paid for by you – and – I.  Sure, open the borders to more illegal ravaging.   The end game has been in play for possibly two or three decades.  The resources, the climate, the beaches, were always the draw.  But how to rid these lavish sultan cities of the scourge?

Open borders.

And if you thought this was a ‘white supremacy’ racist agenda, think again… Obama.

UN Migration Pact: Ponzi Scam

While speaking before the UN General Assembly, Germany’s Merkel made an interesting announcement:  If 2/3rds of the UN member states, totaling 193, vote for the Migration Pact, then The Pact will be adopted for ALL member states and will become legally binding.   To date, there are not nearly enough countries that have opted out.  Therefore, the only way to not be subject to the law of the Pact, would be to completely drop out of the UN.  There are only three countries that are non-members:  Vatican City, Kosovo, and Palestine.

On December 19th, the final vote will determine whether this Migration rule of law will proceed.

The legal issue is inserted because of the new definition of migration – Human Right.  Therefore, while the pact loosely states it is non-binding, in fact the rule of law would pursue a violation of Human Rights against a country that does not comply.   Brought before the International Criminal Court, the UN and its court can recommend sanctions, and demand reparations for ‘victims’.  Acting as a mega-NGO, the UN could create a class-action of migrants that were disallowed into states that refused, and order those UN member states to pay off the migrant for violating his/her Human Right to migrate.

In addition, anyone, including the media, who thereafter references ‘illegal migration’ can be charged with criminal hate speech and subject to jail and fines.

A few days ago, the Leader of the latest Mexican Caravan demanded $50,000 for every migrant that came to Tijuana and was not permitted into the US.  Currently, that would be considered extortion.  Under ICC law, the UN could impose those fees and redefine them as reparation once the Migration Pact becomes law.

The members this UN/NGO would likely target first would be those who refused to sign;  US, Italy, Hungary, Austria, Poland, Australia, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Israel, Switzerland, and Slovakia.

While the Pact claims to be non-binding, the UN gives itself the power to ‘collectively manage’ migration for all countries so as to protect human rights whereby ‘illegal’ immigration no longer exists as borders are open to anyone and everyone.  While the UN claims that member states must still ‘manage borders in an integrated, secure and coordinated manner,” and to ‘increase legal certainty and predictability of migration procedures,’ they are assuring that they, the UN, have no monetary responsibility to assure that borders are orderly.  Nor will they have any financial responsibility to send immigrants to their designated country, those costs would be born by the country’s taxpayers.

Both the Pope and the UN Special Rapporteur, Felipe Morales, have stated that the US needs to buck up and take in anyone and everyone or face charges… given security should not over-shadow Human Rights.

Bottom Line:  this is classic legal double-speak which means that a country is not bound to accept immigrants, however, if they don’t, they may be subject to Criminal Human Rights Violation Charges by the ICC and subject to whatever monetary and other outcomes this court determines.

UN: Climate Change…

The UN has a headlined article referencing climate change and the devastating effects sit has had on Africa.  Specifically, they cite Lake Chad which covered approximately 10,000 to 25,000 square km in 1983 and today fluctuates between 1500 and 2000 km.  The problem with the UN statement?  Lake Chad has been eroding since 5000 BC when it is estimated to have covered roughly 1 million km.

But the UN is still demanding that the member countries fork over $100 billion per year to defend against the travesties of climate change that is causing;  droughts, floods, conflict, hunger, famine, poverty, greater migration, political instability, Ebola, stress and lack of resilience.  They feel that the African governments are forced to syphon off money to combat these disasters when the money could be used for education, social programs, healthcare, and business development. Citing the cause of the current droughts to be the abnormally strong El Nino cycle, El Nino representing the warm cycle and La Nino the cool.  Of course, as with any graph, your starting point can significantly alter ones perception.

1980 seems to have been a particularly peak year according to the various methodology graphs which show a decidedly less El Nino impact since.   The previous comparable to the 1980 impact was in 1895 and again in 1910.  Not a lot of CO2 emissions then.  And hence the debate, at least as promulgated by the UN.

Most, if not all, scientific journals describe El Nino as a ‘natural phenomenon’.  In a nutshell, El Nino is caused by weakening trade winds. The trade winds are caused by a combination of convection air currents and the Earth’s rotation.  What would cause them to weaken?

The scenario becomes an argument of the chicken and the egg, which comes first?   Globalists argue that global warming causes weakened trade winds.  But if that were true, prior to industrialization the Oscillation Index would never oscillate – it would be static showing a beginning causal human effect. But it doesn’t.  Which leads to the alternate argument, weakened trade winds effectuate warming conditions.

Trade winds are a function of the pressure gradient of the atmosphere over the ocean.  And science has yet to determine what causes that pressure gradient change.   They can tell you what happens – but not why.

“Atmospheric pressure is caused by the gravitational attraction of the planet on the atmospheric gases above the surface, and is a function of the mass of the planet, the radius of the surface, and the amount and composition of the gases and their vertical distribution in the atmosphere.”

Atmospheric Pressure is governed by Atmospheric Tides. The Tides can be affected by:

 

“The reason for this dramatic growth in amplitude from tiny fluctuations near the ground to oscillations that dominate the motion of the mesosphere lies in the fact that the density of the atmosphere decreases with increasing height. As tides or waves propagate upwards, they move into regions of lower and lower density. If the tide or wave is not dissipating, then its kinetic energy density must be conserved. Since the density is decreasing, the amplitude of the tide or wave increases correspondingly so that energy is conserved.”

So we are back to defining The Chicken And The Egg:

Some of the classic causes of these changes include; a change in the Earth’s tilt, alteration in the Moon’s density and/or configuration, changes in the ‘tropics’ deforestation, etc… , and possibly weather manipulation – when nations try to alter El Nino and Al Nino to effect war, rain, snow, optimal weather for special events – The Olympics, etc… they alter the natural phenomenon.   And don’t know how to reinstate it.   So instead, they blame the causal factor elsewhere – a Distraction.

So, in other words, while Scientists are still fighting over the conundrum of The Chicken And The Egg, they are certain that when it comes to Climate Change it is….   They don’t know.

What exactly does the UN propose to do with $100 billion per year?

Spend it on Africa of course.  How?  By “empowering women to be effective climate action champions”, “supporting governments with improved information climate warning systems”, and “improving food security”.   Straight off the UN website.

Why Africa?

To understand the motives, one needs to understand who supports the UN.   It is increasingly clear that The People, do not.  That would leave ‘governments’.   Governments who have abdicated the power of The People, and chosen to bear Law, make decisions, pass legislation, and act quite like a Monarchial system.   It is our history.

Subordination.

Lately, we have all tossed about the terms Socialism and Communism, and yet, we have alluded to the ‘reign’ of Obama, and Queen Hillary, and perhaps not given those labels their fair due.   Because, in essence, in order to own the globe, one needs a “Supreme Leader”, a King/Queen, to dominate and officiate, and enslave.  As this earth has done for thousands of years – until now.

Today, that effect is more complicated.   People are more educated.   Wealth has been spread more liberally.   And everyone in Hollywood, the low lifes of the Monarchial times, today think they are ‘the monarchy’.   The Rulers.

In the end, you have to try and conceptualize the amount of money the UN is asking – $100 billion per year.   In addition, to their budget.  In addition to all the subsidiary budgets.  USAID. UNICEF.   Etc…

In conclusion, the UN’s worthiness and purpose have significantly deteriorated in the last decade or so, since Obama came to ‘reign’.  And perhaps it was really decades earlier, but Obama brought it to the surface, brought light to the corruption that he embraced and lived.

Not to say Obama was not simply a cog in the skew or puppetry would be short-sighted. Although egos would seem to dictate that most everyone we think are aligned, also think they are ‘worthy’ and elite.   And therefore believe they will be the few – saved.

Only to learn they are – the least.  It is ultimately – in your heart.

Trying to unravel the entire scheme of the Cabal is like trying to define the universe!  Not even Hawking could do that!   And yet, we are stubborn, and try.   The Cabal is an interesting lineage that dates thousands of years into our history which apparently we can only retain for 100 days.???   

UN Salaries and Benefits Package

The UN Pay Scale for entry level ranges from about $44,000 to $60,400, and the highest grade is roughly $195,000.   Not extravagant…  But it doesn’t tell the whole story.

Salaries are adjusted higher depending on what country the employee is assigned.   New York is ranked an uptick of approximately 67%, therefore the base of $44,000 would automatically adjust up $29,480.  If the employee is assigned to Africa, the base is applied.  This uptick is called a ‘Post Adjustment”.   If someone is reassigned to a lower indexed country, the employee can maintain the higher Post Adjustment for six months until the lower rate starts.

They are exempt from taxes.  Anyone who speaks a second language is automatically upgraded by 20 months in the pay scale increments.   Rental subsidies.  If someone is assuming duties above their pay scale and not promoted, they receive a ‘special post allowance’.   If you are married and/or have dependent children, you receive Dependency allowances.  In the US, such allowance is $2929 for the first child and $1025 for secondary child per month.   If you are assigned outside your home country, your children are also subsidized by an ‘education grant’, for the US this amounts to $43,000.  If you choose to send your children to a boarding school the cost is 100% absorbed by the UN up to about $15,000.

All travel expenses are picked up 100%, however, if you are ranking officials in the UN your travel expenses are reimbursed 155%.   If you are assigned to a less friendly country, you are eligible for a ‘hardship allowance’.   There is a ‘non-removal allowance’ which I don’t understand and a ‘mobility allowance’ which is a vacuum of garble.

Home leave is granted every year and is in addition to vacation time, it is typically 12 days.  Annual vacation is 30 days, sick days are allowed variably, maternity is 22 weeks, paternity is 8 weeks, 10 official holidays, and adoption leave is open-ended.

Repatriation allowance is available when the employee is required to leave their assignment.  Termination allowance is available upon …termination.  And a ‘Death Grant’ is payable to the spouse and children should the employee die while employed.

Health insurance is picked up 100% for employee and all dependents.   Pension plans provide 2/3 paid by UN and 1/3 by employee.  Life Insurance is paid by UN, a Special Death Benefit is paid for by UN when the death is a result of employment.

There are roughly 38,000 to 40,000 on the payroll, although the UN isn’t exactly sure how many.

Every Taxpayer in the US is paying for this.  Every Taxpayer in France and the EU is paying for this.

So.  How do you feel about the UN now?