Constitution Party – A Cult Built in Fakery

In 1991 a new and improved Party was created in the US, it is called the Constitution Party.  Ever hear of it?   Neither had I, but you are in good company.  NO one I have talked to has ever heard of this anomaly party.  They have 0 seats in the House and 0 seats in the Senate, identify as extreme fundamental right wing Conservatives with strong southern Baptist ideals.   Their entire US membership is 97,893 which would be roughly .02% of the US population.  Their colors are – wait for it … red, white and blue.  And their newest cult leader is Pastor Chuck Baldwin.

Mr. Baldwin received his ‘Bible’ diploma from an unaccredited, correspondence school.  His political policies include:  The elimination of the New World Order which he states will immediately vanquish itself upon his election because God so ordained him.  He will abolish all personal Federal income taxes and replace them with an across the board 10% tariff on all imports.  He believes the US should return to the gold standard and advocates for tapping oil reserves in Canada, the Dakota’s and the Gulf.  He believes that America was founded as a haven for Christians, opposes the Patriot Act, Wants to abolish the US department of Education, promotes militia believes in the sanctity of life, detests drinking, considers homosexuals perversions, a movements across the US, and believes that the US has succumbed to a matriarchal society that needs to be suppressed and subjugated to conform to strict Evangelical doctrines.  He advocates for the immediate quashing of the UN and the confiscation of all UN real estate by the government.

His one claim to fame is that Ron Paul endorsed his Presidential election in 2008 – despite the fact that NO ONE per se, has ever heard of him outside his cult.

He has become the Party spokesperson for the .02% affiliates that believe he would constitute a Constitutional President.

While many of his platforms are not wholly, in their essence, derogatory, the arrogance that he would ever be able to effectuate any of them – is unequivocally – derogatory. And, a bit scary.  He obviously has no conceptual understanding of government, the Senate, the House, or, much of anything real.

If in fact this Party had a following, one might be concerned for the fanatical cultivism it exudes, but a .02% following will never equate to anything of consequence. As such, they are more of an annoyance, much like the Ocasio-Cortez Green Party that irritates both Democrats and Conservatives with its flamboyant idiocy and relative unintelligent knowledge of history, politics, economics, or the world at large.

When asked what their Constitutional Party has accomplished, the answer is generally a spew of personal attacks reminiscent of liberal agenda’s wherein if you haven’t an answer, attack the character of the person asking the question.  If they had actual numbers behind them, they might be a legitimate threat to society as a whole, but they are so infinitesimally small they are merely a fly to swat on one’s leg in the midst of the humid heat of summer in Florida.

They are nothing.

However, if you have the occasion to attempt to discuss anything with them, buyer beware, because they have a lethal wicked tongue that will attempt to spew denigrating verbiage to support a non-existent platform that will never even make a dent in the reality of politics – anywhere.

In review, Chuck Baldwin’s credentials bear witness to some sketchy if not bizarre falsehoods.  While his supposed BA and MA degrees came from a ‘non-accredited’, correspondence school, he claims to be a lawyer and a Pastor despite offering no evidence of either.  He claims honorary doctorate degrees were imposed on him by Christian Bible College which currently boasts a full time staff of – 28 and an entire undergraduate admission of 377.   Unfortunately, this college does not have a doctorate degree program and thus has no ability to honor an honorary degree in such.   Oops.

As such, the man, his Party, is pushing a fake person, with fake degrees, who is obviously a fake Christian, attempting to fake his way into a Presidential election and supported by Ron Paul who has completely lost credibility and is venturing into senality. Baldwin thus has managed to not only denigrate the Constitutional Party, Ron Paul, and anyone so affiliated, he is a clown, a mockery of a person who has an agenda within a possible support of .0 to .02% of the population.

And Bev, Clay, and all 98,000 of you swarmees – you have been conned by a really bad conman who didn’t even try to be legitimate, you should be ashamed for not conducting ANY due diligence and following a cult agenda that is so obviously poor, fake, and convoluted, even the most basic research can destroy the fakery.

Trump Border Wall and the UN Hypocrisy

Just as there is not one Middle East country that will create a Palestinian state for the Palestinians, no Muslim country willing to greet them with open arms and a pot of gold, Australia has for years been trying to pawn off their illegals housed in concentration camps on the island of Papua New Guinea – and surprise – no one wants them!  Including Australia.

No one seems deterred by this hypocritical revelation, despite the fact that Australia is governed by a very Liberal government who simply don’t want the riff-raff responsibility.

Australia boasts that its net migration is roughly 178,000.  But the editing doesn’t reveal that the vast majority are highly skilled workers.  Even for skilled migrants the rules are stiff with an age cap of 50.   While Australia claims to have available upwards of 16,000 visa’s for refugees, their actual acceptance rate is about 6000 per year. Strict health and character assessments are in place to determine whether a person is eligible.

Still, despite these minimal queues, despite the concentration camps where refugees have been languishing for years, Australia has the audacity to promote an ad wherein Trump is slammed and ridiculed for his Build The Wall policy.   The ad was sponsored by a libertarian group based in the US with Chapters throughout the world, wearechange.org, and headed by Luke Rudkowski.

Libertarians believe that the way to curb immigration is through our welfare system, as in stop offering illegals benefits and they’ll stop coming here.   While it is true that illegals follow the money like everyone else, look at Socialist Germany and Sweden, walls do work, and history is a lesson. But I agree that working in conjunction is a necessary deterrent and the overall savings will be extensive.

The numbers are mixed. Despite Ron Paul claiming the Bush fence/wall in Texas was worthless, Federal data suggests it curbed illegal crossing by as much as 89% over the five year period during which it was built.  In addition, the Director for Research at the Center for Immigration Studies, has concluded that the savings isn’t a simple immediate welfare cost scenario, but includes the cost of illegal children obtaining US status and rights therein, including healthcare, food stamps and education.

Ron Paul proposes eliminating Federal Welfare entirely.  While that may sound like a plan on the surface, in reality it would never pass Congress and is therefore a useless solution.

Even Liberal Germany built a wall in Munich which surrounds a migrant encampment and was commissioned by locals to ‘protect’ those in the outlying neighborhood.

Why are walls so vilified?  They have been a part of our global structure since the beginning of time.

Deterrents claim there is a psychological price and a humanitarian duty to take care of everyone.  But what if instead of simply allowing unlimited immigration, contries pooled their funds and resources to make the corrupted, crime riddled countries safe?   Oh, that’s right, we already do – it’s called the UN.

“The duties of United Nations are numerous like providing cooperation in international law, international security, development of economy, social progress, human rights, and peace in the world”

How’s that working for ya?  Obviously, it’s not.  In fact, it has failed miserably on every front despite a transparent budgetof … oh, that’s right, it’s not transparent, nor does any country have the right to designate what their funds should be spent on, this is determined by the General Assembly.  All 193 members of the General Assembly have an equally weighted vote, without consideration of their funding.

According to the UN, El Salvador is clearly on its way in its sustainable development program which is characterized by its comprehensive and inclusive program.   The UN continues to implement and follow-up on El Salvador’s goals in its development program…

Honduras too has a UN Development Program in place which is monitored and guided by UN officials in collaboration with the government to increase food security, drinking water, education, modernization and development…

“Mexico has taken the decision to participate in U.N. peacekeeping missions, taking part in humanitarian tasks that benefit civil society”.

Given these are the three main countries that contribute to the illegal immigration to the US, it would appear that the UN missions are not reflective of the mass exodus.  The UN has stated that illegal immigrants from these countries should be designated as ‘refugees’, instead of illegal immigrants thus giving them protective status.  Gangs have taken over many of these countries, they have become the ruling drug lords, the mafia, and the over-lords.   The situation in these countries is worse than ever – despite UN peacekeeping, UN humanitarian efforts, UN aid, UN, social progress, UN security and UN law.

Perhaps the most controversial aspect of the UN is that they provide aid in the form of food – but it is delivered to the hands of the corrupt government to distribute, the same corrupt government that caused the crisis in the first place.

Even more topsy-turvy, El Salvador ‘sends peacekeepers’ to other countries, despite their internal chaos.  So while El Salvador is rated a refugee state by the UN, they send El Salvador peacekeepers to help in Mali and Haiti.   The logic is – well – illogical.

Building a wall, we only follow the security measures imposed by over 65 countries across the globe.  Is it a psychological ploy to compare a Mexican border wall with the Berlin Wall, as though no other walls have existed.   The Berlin Wall was done to encamp people and deny them freedom. There was no intent of ‘protection’, it was a jail.  End of comparison.

Humanitarian?   It means that immigrants will follow the rules of law and request permission to immigrate – just as they are required to do in most countries – especially in one of the strictest – Australia.  End of humanitarian guilt.