Socialism: The US Military – Lesson 101

The ‘darling’ Socialists are quick to bring to light the US government agencies that they deem to be ‘socialist’ in order to defend Socialism as a defacto solution to all that ails the US.   “The Military is Socialist”.   Really?  

It would appear that few are learned in the definition of Socialism:

“The stage in Marxist-Leninist theory intermediate between capitalism and communism, in which collective ownership of the economy under the dictatorship of the proletariat has not yet been successfully achieved.”

If you don’t like that one, here are three more:

  1. any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods.
  2. a system of society or group living in which there is no private property
  3. a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state

The common denominator of these definitions?  Goods. Property.   Production.   Ownership.

The Military does not provide goods.  Does not designate property.  Does not produce goods.  The Military is a volunteer organization in which they members agree to perform services for a wage.  Within that ‘voluntary service’ they are provided certain benefits to add to their wage base.   And if they do not perform according to the designated rules they may be fired.  Granted, the Military is required to have guns and jets and bombs as an adjunct product of their service.   But it is a product of their service – not a luxury.   Cars, houses, clothes, food, toys, etc.. are luxuries produced on our behalf.  Those are the ‘goods’ referred to in the definition of Socialism.  That is the basis of ‘economy’.

In a Socialist ‘economy’ those luxuries disappear.   Shortages become the norm.   In the 1980’s when Poland was governed into Socialism, the waiting period to buy a car was 7 years.  But you were required to advance that cost and wait.  The waiting period to lease an apartment was 5-7 years, but you were required to advance the rent.   Supermarket shelves were empty save for endless bottles of ‘vinegar’.

In Venezuela, they no longer have drinking water.

That – is – Socialism.

The fact that ‘taxpayers’ are charged for that Military wage is a benefit to taxpayers and has existed since the beginning of militaries.   When the Socialists within the US, Gabbard, O’Casio, Sanders, Beto, Warren, etc… reference their embrace of Socialism, they refer to a different definition and are simply attempting to muddle the truth.  Yes the government operates .  It exists.  It is funded by taxpayers for the express purpose of performing duties and overseeing various organizations including the military, including our public school system, our public universities, our police and fire department.

And it is supposed to be – free from bias, free from prejudice, free from propaganda.   As a taxpayer funded enterprise.

Capitalism:  “Capitalism is an economic system based upon private ownership of the means of production and their operation for profit. Characteristics central to capitalism include private property, capital accumulation, wage labor, voluntary exchange, a price system, and competitive markets.”

The basic – the largess discrepancy between the definition ‘acquired’ by the Socialists in defending their rule is ‘economy’.

Which makes their entire defensive platform a house of cards.

They do not even understand the most basic conceptual definition of the platform they espouse. And that makes them ‘uneducated’.

The fact that the pure definitions have to be even be discussed is further evidence that the Socialist education system adopted in the US and the EU has collapsed into a dummied version of apocalyptic proportions in which history, and current events, are corrupted. The burning of books, the burning of knowledge.

The fact that these individuals would support that FIRE, is even more heinous, for it reveals the soul beneath.

It is wearying trying to educate the minds of those who have chosen to bury their heads in the sand.   It is wearying to try and regurgitate what history has already taught.  It is wearying to listen to people who have never experienced the devastations refuse to listen to those who have…

NATO Instigating War With Russia

Why is NATO – and by default the US – igniting a war with Russia?

Phillip Breedlove is NATO’s current commander and has made one of the most inflaming statements yet, warning Europe that Russia intends to attack, thus justifying increased military presence throughout the Baltic states of Estonia, Lithuania, and Latvia. The problem?  What you breed – is what you sow. And Mr. Breed is not being very loving…and what he’s sowing is breeding war.

To add heat to the fray of a tired and weary US military whose homecoming soldiers are routinely neglected, Ash Carter wants to beef up the military presence in Iraq and Syria. All the while Obama and Cameron tell us not to be ‘fearful’, ISIS isn’t a big deal – Russia is the real boogeyman.

But I am fearful – because of Obama and Breedlove and Carter! And the policies and positions they have taken these last seven years.

When the media create fear with Russian flyovers and Chinese buildup, they fail to talk about the increased military presence of NATO and the US in all of Europe and the Middle East. A buildup that sparks confrontation and requires defensive action. And if China and Russia were pushed too far, we stand a very real chance of losing. Large. Because Russia and China have signed a military cooperation agreement similar to the US and Europe and unlike the US they haven’t depleted their men or their resources of weaponry.

When the Russian SU-27 buzzed the USS Cole in the Baltic Sea, the men on board the ship were smiling. Why? Because they were impressed. It was a show and it gave them a chance to appreciate showmanship. Everyone knew the jets had no weapons – but the Cole did carry a payload. Everyone knew that the ship was far, far from home and very close to Russian territory. Everyone knew it was sailing near Kaliningrad, a Russian federation… but the media didn’t provide that little tidbit.  Why?  Because it might have altered the perspective.  and manipulating opinion is – the new mainstay.

If we spent half as much time fixing our economy as China instead of destroying entire countries, we might actually have  a country built on national pride.  But we don’t, so we haven’t, and we grin and bear it.

Imagine if a Russian destroyer were hanging out 40 miles from San Francisco… What do you suppose our reaction might be? And if one of our jets buzzed the Russian destroyer would Russia be ‘allowed’ to shoot it down? Would it be a justified shoot?  C’mon Kerry!  C’mon Carter!  At least have the decency, the ego, the self respect to pretend to be a viable leader – with a small ‘l’.

The USS Cole was sailing off of Poland – according to US media. Which is true, but the entire truth is that it was sailing near Kaliningrad Oblast, a Russian Federation situated between Poland and Lithuania. It houses a radar station that was specifically built to counter NATO aggression movements. The radar site is extremely strategic for its tracking and surveillance capabilities. It’s purpose and position is to counter potential missile attacks from NATO.

Because of this, Russia keeps a strong permanent military presence in the region. They have a Marine Brigade, an Artillery Brigade, and Missile Brigade, an Air Brigade, Radio Battalion, and more. This is a vital area for Russia defense. Therefore, to be conducting ‘training exercises’ nearby – one can astutely anticipate that the exercises might get buzzed… Mr. Breed.

Mr. Breedlove is no innocent when it comes to controversies:

In 2015, Germany slammed Breedlove for being a super hawk and promulgating dangerous propaganda via instigating a NATO presence that was overly aggressive and could push us into a war no one wants.

Breedlove claims that Russia launched a military intervention in Syria, but failed to note that it was with the permission of Syria, the US and Europe.

Breedlove has consistently used the Ukraine coup as justification for all of NATO’s aggression when the coup was a failed maneuver and made the US look weak as a result.

NATO is based in Brussels, the same Brussels that also hosts a major junket of ISIS members including the ones responsible for the Paris attacks.  How did he miss that one?

Breedlove is entrenched in the spiral globalists including; George Soros, Rockerfeller, Ford Foundation, Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral commission, Committee of 300 and The Aspen Institute. These same units are fundamentally tiered to demonize Russia and China who refuse to acquiesce to the Open Society-One World Order campaign.  Breedlove is simply another pawn to convey this agenda – and doesn’t realize he is dispensable. A voice of doom.

In the meantime, with Breedlove’s adamant approval, NATO continues to train the Ukrainian military and special forces, giving them mass amounts of weapons and provoking tensions that didn’t exist until the meddling began in 2014.  Essentially, we have NATO/US surrounding Russia and if that doesn’t deserve a ‘response’, then we are fools for thinking otherwise – as in,  ‘cross that line, I double dare you… but if you do, we have every right to retaliate with a global war that will involve all of Europe, Russia, and by defacto – China, Brazil, India, Pakistan, Australia, Canada, and whoever gets caught in-between.’   Consider it global population control.

What message does NATO send? Is it defensive – or offensive? How should one react to these provocations? Germany – for one – is livid. Because the provocation is in reality a call to annihilate Europe. Not by Russia, but by NATO as they defend Europe from the enemy with one hand and destroy Europe with the other hand.

But – don’t be fearful…