global freeze

Alternative Energy: Antiquity of Wind & Solar. Nuclear Fusion – The Future

Posted on by Helena

As the Global Freeze encapsulated large swathes of countries, a sour lesson was learned with regard to so-called “Alternative Energy”.   Despite All The Kings Men putting together the best scientists and engineers to build Wind Turbines and Solar Panels, somehow it didn’t occur to them that snow and ice might bring them all to a complete dysfunctional halt.   Frozen turbine blades required de-icing by helicopters fueled by gas, too little too late. And solar panels went black, buried in snow.

The first windmill was created in Persia in the 9th century.   The first use of solar power can be traced to sometime around 400 BC.

Respectively, 1200 and 2400 years later, this is the best solution that science has been able to provide. They are flawed and they are ancient methods.     And scientists should be ashamed.

In 1954, the CERN laboratory was created to study Nuclear Research via particle fusion.   It took them over 50 years before they completed the construction of the Large Hadron Collider which came to be known as The God Particle.   Steven Hawking believed that the Collider was capable of creating a black hole large enough to suck the entire universe into it destroying mankind.   Thus the thematic God Particle.  Thus Hawking was not simply skeptical – but considered scientists – rather stupid.

The Cern experiments include nuclear fusion as an alternative energy source, creating blackholes, determining how the universe was created, and time travel.

Nuclear Fusion is the forerunner for a number of startups funded by Gates, Bezos, Jack Ma, etc…, that are attempting to formulate that energy into a viable alternative sometime in 2030 or beyond.   Until that time, we really have no other alternative which makes shutting down oil, gas and coal just ‘stupid’.

The ultimate concept of fusion is that the power would be so condensed in form that one glass of water would provide all the heat and electricity for one person’s lifetime.   It is noncombustible.   It is clean.   It is not a resource.   It is infinite.   But it is at best 10 years in the future.

By contrast, the average home requires upwards of 20 solar panels. Of course that average would not apply to Bill Gates and the Hollywood Climatologists given their homes are roughly ten times larger. Note: Bill Gates homes do NOT utilize solar.

Those same solar panels have a lifetime, as do wind turbines, which roughly equates to about 18-20 years.   At which point they are useless and must be buried in the graveyards.

It is estimated that by 2050 78 million metric tons of solar panels will have been buried.   To put that into perspective, the average capacity of a landfill is – one gate ton.   There are currently 1250 landfills in the US.  Where oh where are we supposed to put the other 77,998,750 tons?

I am not sure how these rabid scientists and engineers anticipate the reality.  But their IQ would appear to be on par with – stupid.

There are currently about 60,000 wind turbines in the US.   Many have already reached their lifespan and are dead.   Most of these 60,000 will be defunct by 2030.   These turbines would require 450,000 cubic yards of landfill for burial.

It is estimated that without either solar or wind turbines consuming landfill capacity in the US, in 16 years – or by 2037, the US landfills will be at full capacity. And like every other country we will begin dumping our waste into the oceans.

What oh what will environmentalists say then?

So what exactly have scientists been doing for the past 2400 freaking years?

Science did not translate to technology and godlike proportions until relatively perhaps 200 years ago.   Prior to that they didn’t do a whole lot of self righteous ego calamities given science was on par with – philosophy.   Like Plato.   Or Aristotle.

Doctors and such have only elevated their professions to the nth degree in the last 100 years!

Pharma has only existed for about 80 years.

In the span of reality – they are infants.

And according to the very esteemed Steven Hawking, scientists could be the impetus to the annihilation of the entire universe and mankind in their inflated ego and recklessness.

But the mantra of the liberal elite and the 8th grade Hollywood climatologists is “Follow The Science”.

Why?

Simply, to replace God.

Why?

Because as long as people adhere to, and believe in, and have faith in, God, they can not be cowered, usurped, controlled, and devoured into the pits of communism.   And communism is an empty soul. A robotic deviance without creativity, desire, individualism, humanity, space, compassion and love. Under communism, humans revert to animal wherein their only focus is survival.   Food. Shelter.   Propagation.   And the world becomes as it was in the Beginning.

Nuclear Fusion would appear to be an amazing future source of energy.   To be sure!   But given it is a decade away at least, a prudent economist would acknowledge that destroying what is viable today thus creating a void of energy – is simply – STUPID.

The Ego of Science: Global Freeze

Posted on by Helena

As the “Bomb Cyclone” envelops the east coast, global warming scientists are rallying round the icicle desperately trying to convince everyone that this is a common evolution of a Global Warming schism. As such their ego’s are frayed and fear for their scholarly name rules their psyche.

To quote Sir Isaac Newton, “For every action there is an equal opposite reaction”. And this can be found in the ego of science today. For every scientist making a conclusion in favor of man-made Global warming, there is an equal force reaction of a scientist denying the account.  Hence – it becomes a theory, as there is no consensus of evidence.

Case in point: Mother Jones, a trendy Liberal media outlet, is quoting Dr. Jennifer Francis, a researcher of arctic climate change, who states that the warming in the Arctic changes the jetstream which causes ‘extreme weather conditions around the globe including floods, extreme cold, extreme heat, droughts, etc… ‘   In other words, every single weather condition known to mankind can be traced back to her specific research field – the Arctic.

Enter Dr. Ed Berry, a physicist who utilizes the ego of scientists to support his conclusion that manmade Global Warming is a farcical idea easily disproven by the insertion of one proven conclusion – CO2 does not drive climate.

“The scientific method says we can never prove an idea is true. We only can prove an idea is false. To approach truth, we discard fiction. Since we can never discard all fiction, science is never settled.”

This rationale is supported by Dr. Murray Salby who has written a textbook on the subject, and Dr. Willie Soon, who has proven that there is no correlation between earth’s temperature and CO2.

Francis’ claim that the jetstream is altered by a warming arctic is an idea, a presentation without evidence or scientific data to uphold the ‘idea’. And yet, this philosophy of thought is held out as scientific proof… when in fact it is one person’s theory. Science does state that the jetstreams are a factor of 1) solar radiation, and 2) earth rotation. Period.

Science has taken leaps and bounds in its self defense. The flu vaccine is mass marketed each year and now includes infants as young as 6 months. What is in the vaccine?   MSG, sugar, formaldehyde, polysorbate 80, various antibiotics, sucrose and sorbitol, thimerosol which contains mercury, fertilized chicken eggs, aka egg protein, and the virus itself – YUM!  

As is the case with every vaccine, all of these ingredients are said to be ‘safe and effective’.   Sort-of. With the current flu crisis shooting across the globe, the CDC has issued a precaution because, well, the vaccine is actually only, maybe, possibly, sort-of 10% effective. And yet they encourage everyone to ante up and pay the price.

As to the scientists who diligently create the concoction each year – eh.

There are hundreds, if not thousands of scientific theories that were accepted as factual truisms that were later proven false; phrenology, static universe, expanding earth, blank slate, Martian canals, etc… Each time the argument prevailed that these theories were fact, and society blindly accepted sometimes for hundreds of years before learning they were simply pseudo ideas.

The ego is a fragile part of every human, however when a person is purporting to persuade an entire global population, greater care must be exercised in making statements – as in the shepherd leading his sheep.

Science is an art, subject to the eye of the beholder. When we put science on a pedestal likening it to a god, we are treading dangerous ground – and the consequences could be eternal.