FOSSIL FUELS: Neither “Fossil or Nonrenewable”! An Infinite Source of Energy

Posted on May 7, 2021 by Helena

The ‘theory’ that we have been led to believe is that fossil fuels such as oil and gas are nonrenewable sources that form from decayed plants and dinosaurs. In 1870 John D. Rockefeller founded Standard oil company. It became the world’s largest and first multinational conglomeration which earned Rockefeller the prestige as being the first billionaire. In 1892, John D. Rockefeller made the stipulation that these sources of energy, oil and gas, were nonrenewable and scarce so as to justify an inflated value and create for himself vast wealth!

Today, the world holds to this theory despite there being overwhelming evidence that this entire postulation is false.

Solar, wind, and water are termed renewable sources and thereby superior to fossil fuels. But what many overlook is threefold consequences: 1. Solar and wind require created capture fixtures such as panels and windmills. Both of these capture sources require degradation of large swathes of land to manufacture. 2. These capture fixtures have a limited lifespan – ie roughly 20 years before they fail and are hauled to the great land grave, ie more land degradation. 3. The electromagnetic fields created by the windmills are toxic. While studies are nonexistent on humans, a number of studies have determined the fields have a massively negative impact on marine life.

And thus, once again, global populations become the guinea pig experiment. Will the next generation living close to turbines be mutants? Don’t know because we are the trial. Similar to the CoVid Vaccine experiment. We are the Phase IV Trial.

After power plants were built in suburban areas near homes, 30 years later the evidence of the human experiment showed: “There are numerous studies that link living close to power lines with terrible health conditions and diseases. Sadly cancer is one of them, including childhood leukaemia.”

Clean, renewable, abundant energy is likely a myth. And the energy companies are much like Big Pharma; create a new disease, don’t find a cure, and then manufacture countless drugs that will cause massive side effects for which more drugs will be necessary. This same cycle is now evident in the push for Green solar and wind.

In essence these renewables are in fact pollutants, just of a different kind. So we are fixing the carbon pollutant with another medication which will cause more degradation of earth, fewer trees and MORE CARBON!

In 1999, The Deep Hot Biosphere, The Myth of Fossil Fuels was published by Thomas Gold. He argued that earths core layer is not composed of decayed plants and animals at all. Instead our core is comprised of heat loving bacteria which thrive on hydrocarbon, and that hydrocarbon is part and parcel of creation earth. These hydrocarbons are what earth is made from and these hydrocarbons constantly replenish naturally.

Thomas Gold is not the only esteemed scientist to upend the Rockefeller theory.

Freeman Dyson, a physicist, mathematician, and statistician who worked in quantum physics theory , astrophysics, etc… postulated that :

“The scientific consensus that carbon dioxide (CO₂) is a material driver of planetary temperature increases is false. He believed that some of the effects of increased CO₂ levels are favourable and not taken into account by climate scientists, such as increased agricultural yield, and further that the positive benefits of CO₂ likely outweigh the negative effects. He was skeptical about the simulation models used to predict climate change, arguing that political efforts to reduce causes of climate change distract from other global problems that should take priority.”

While Dyson did advocate for finding alternate energy sources, he felt that climate change supporters were a cult pushing for reform without benefit. As in simply another means of making money on false data.

Russian scientist, Dr. Vladimir Kutcherov supported Thomas Gold’s theory. His experiments support the theory that hydrocarbons are naturally occurring elements of our planet. They are constantly being generated and replenished as we use them. These carbons are at the core of earth 100-200 kilometers deep pushed to the surface via heat.

Oil fields tend to reproduce after being dormant 50-60 years per various studies conducted in Russia and the US. Kutcherov has stated:

“we don’t need to find new oil fields or gas fields. All that is needed is to improve the efficiency with how we use the energy.”

How we use the energy means greater efficiency – not conversion to solar and wind which are imperfect, and technically nonrenewable given their means of capture has a 20 year life span. And like Big Pharma pushing pills to fix pills to fix pills, Green energy with a limited life span requires a constant added cost to fix the dead windmill or panel with a new one.

While estimates indicate our oil and gas extraction accounts for roughly 15% of what is on earth’s surface, if we didn’t extract it, it would continue to be pushed to the surface via heat and released into the atmosphere. As a carbon. And conversion to wind and solar would have absolutely no impact on our global carbon footprint!

If in fact our esteemed climate gurus wanted a clean source – then it should be completely clean – and completely constant – before it has true value in the utopian fantasy. If we concentrated our efforts on ‘efficiency’ instead of dated revolution, we might actually conserve planet earth.

Otherwise, these misfits are simply another scourge of Rockefellers looking to be the first trillionaire.

PARIS ACCORD: Africa Slated For Deep State Colonization

Posted on February 25, 2021 by Helena

In January Biden signed an EO re-instituting the US partnership in the Paris Accord. As such the US monetary obligation will be in force. All Funds are distributed to The Green Climate Fund per protocol. And with the UN approval, all funds are supposedly allocated toward sustainable development including alternate energy, clean oceans, food, and environmental health.

Despite the Texas wind/solar failure that resulted in the deaths of 30 people including children, wind and solar remain the singular focus for alternate energy. Post Texas disaster, the entire Board of ERCOT resigned. Although ERCOT did submit a request to Biden’s energy Tzar, Huizenga, for emergency use of coal and natural gas to compensate for the downed wind and solar, in essence it was denied.

In Huizenga’s response, he allowed the use, but submit restrictions based on environmental emission regulations imposed by Biden. Per the letter, should those emission restrictions be violated ERCOT would be responsible for fines, penalties, and other charges.

There are now multiple class action lawsuits instituted. But the focus should reveal that while wind and solar have their value, they are imperfect and backup is essential! Unfortunately, that concept would seem to be only of value to the logical and rational – and not the possessed and short-sighted.

Denmark has announced an ambitious plan to build an artificial island 80 kilometers into the North Sea which will house 600 turbines measuring 852 vertical feet to provide energy for 3 million homes initially, and possibly 10 million at some future point. The estimated cost of construction for the island is $34 billion. The cost for the Turbines will likely exceed $8-$10 million apiece not including transport costs to sea and erection. A likely estimate would be a total cost of $50 billion for the project, bearing in mind that the turbines would require daily maintenance, and removal and replacement every 18 years.

Denmark plans to pay for its 51% share of the project thru the sale of oil and gas. The remaining 49% share will be sold to private investors.

The projected completion date is determined to be 2033. Any excess wind power will be converted to liquid hydrogen which must be contained at -427” F due to its high flammability and explosion hazard. Hydrogen is typically used for jet fuel or submarine fuel. What could go wrong…

Currently turbines shut down when wind speeds are 45-50 mph. Wind speed is greater at taller heights. The taller the object, the more wind speed hence the 852 vertical feet turbines.

There were 31 wind storms on the North Sea between 2010 and 2020, typically lasting a week or more, wind speeds were clocked between 80 and 162mph. There is no data on winds between 50 and 80 mph wherein turbines would be shut off. But the point is that turbines will require frequent shut-downs when situated on the high seas.

At the same time, The World Economic Forum is proposing a Blue Revolution to save our oceans from the devastation of man. They outline ten steps: 1. Freeze the warming, 2. Walk the talk, 3. Consider synthetic cell based sea food, 4. Designate 30% of the ocean protected, 5. Regulate further marine industries and fisheries, 6. Protect Antarctic waters, 7. End plastic pollution, 8. Reform fertilizer use, 9. Detect illegal fishing, 10. Make sure ALL people have a fair stake in the ocean.

Of course, understanding all this mumbo-jumbo becomes more clear when analyzing where and how The Green Fund is actually spent!

The opening statement of The Green Fund website clarifies: “GCF’s investments are aimed at achieving maximum impact in the developing world, supporting paradigm shifts in both mitigation and adaptation. … allocation for particularly vulnerable countries, including Least Developed Countries (LDCs), Small Island Developing States (SIDS), and African States.”.

There are no funds allocated to wind farms or solar. No funds allocated to the EU, Russia, Japan, China, or North America. No funds allocated to the ocean. No funds allocated to food access. No funds allocate to fusion.

Current Approved Projects are in; Sudan, Mongolia, Bangladesh, Liberia, Burundi, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Brazil, etc… Many are micro-finance operations, where The Green Fund approved banks will lend money at usury interest rates and share the profits with The Green Fund. All while claiming as a result – reduced emissions.

But Africa’s total emissions output represents less than 1.5% of the globe. Do they intend to state that as a result of their efforts, The GCF has taken Africa from 1.5% to 1%? By contrast, China, US, EU, India , Russia and Japan account for 70% of emissions and $-0- funding for mitigation.

Therefore, The Green Fund will become the newest burgeoning source of massive tax free profits paid for by taxpayers and used to support further advancement in Africa. Because Africa is where the elite focus is singular.

The Cabal intends to colonize Africa for themselves.

In the meantime, North America and Europe will be subjected to a deep freeze as instituted by their protégé, Bill Gates, in conjunction with Harvard. It is likely this deep freeze that John Kerry continually refers to in his nine year timeline, will require a shift of all elites to Africa as the globe is subjected to a miniature ‘ice age’. Spearheading the deflection of the sun’s rays by man-made infused particles, is the means. And sub-Sahara Africa has been determined to be the most viable and only inhabitable place for survival once that agenda has been accomplished. In nine years = Agenda 2030.

This geoengineering was scheduled for approval ‘by an independent advisory board, sometime in February 2021. The scheduled release is June 2021 in Sweden.

FYI: The Green Climate Fund has some interesting Board Members including, among others:

Xia LYU: A Chinese woman who serves as executive VP for WEC Energy which provides the energy for Wisconsin, Michigan, Illinois and Minnesota, the majority of which is based on coal and natural gas.

Ayman SHASLY: A Saudi who works for one of the world’s largest oil companies, Aramco, selling oil to China while working as a consultant to the Ministry of Petroleum.

Wind Turbines & ElectroMagnetic Radiation: No Place To Hide

Posted on February 20, 2021 by Helena

Despite a mixed account of the cause of the electric grid failure in Texas that resulted in an exchange of barbs between Bill Gates and Governor Abbot, wind power and solar power remain controversial as any long term alternative energy source.

The fact remains that the wind turbines did freeze and fail. The fact remains that the solar panels went black as they were covered with snow. Whether these failures could have been mitigated is NOT the fault of the governor – but is wholly the fault of the for-profit companies providing the turbines and the Council that contracts with these companies – ERCOT.

Deflecting that fault reveals a much larger picture.

ERCOT is a non-profit committee formed to oversee and manage the flow of electricity in Texas which is provided by a number of for-profit sources. ERCOT and its board are entrenched in moving Texas toward more wind and solar projects and thus initiate contracts and investments to this end. The CEO, Bill Magness and the Chair of the Board, Sally Talberg, have extensive relationships with companies selling wind turbines and solar panels.

IN ERCOT’s 2019 report, the analysis of deficiency in wind during peak summer months was considered a primary event of concern for 2021. In particular along the east and southern portions of Texas. The report found that transmission transformers of solar and wind to these regions was creating instability and congestion. In fact, the primary discussion of most of ERCOTs studies regarding supply and demand revolved around risks of wind and solar disparities.

According to ERCOTs latest report December 2020, the retirement of all fossil fuel usage is anticipated to occur by 2030. In addition, load factors for the replacement of all gas powered vehicles is considered. Wind and solar are the primary assessed means within what they reference as a “Renewable Mandate”.

In other words, without Governor Abbot’s knowledge or the citizens of Texas, ERCOT is adopting the UN World Economic Forum 2030 Agenda wherein Corporatism will reign and governments will be defunct and nonessential.

It wasn’t that many years ago that the idea of a, ‘Corporate run America’, was envisioned by the liberals and democrats as an evil takeover. Yet somewhere along the way, this agenda was embraced by both democrat and republican politicians, thus forming a uniparty system. A conspiracy theory concept – became a reality.

Of the top ten wind projects envisioned for 2020, 4 were in Texas commissioned by ERCOT. There are eleven offshore wind farm projects in various stages of completion by for-profit companies: Dominion, Orsted, Avangrid, Eversource, Con Ed, Equinor, Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners, National Grid, and US Wind. Orsted is involved in 5 of those projects.

Founded in 2019, Orsted is a Danish conglomeration of First Wind, D.E. Shaw & Co., and Ospraie Management. Ospraie Management is a NY Hedge Fund investor group partnering with Soros Fund Management and General Atlantic.

General Atlantic was founded by Charles Feeney who joined the Bill Gates Giving Pledge. Bill Ford is the current CEO and Chair of Atlantic. He also serves on the board of BlackRock, National Committee on US-China Relations, McKinsey Advisory Council, and – Endeavor. Endeavor CEO Linda Rottenberg co-chairs the World Economic Forum.

WHEW! Agenda 2030. Follow The Money.

Wind and Solar are hedge fund owned and operated industries promoted within the WEF 2030 Agenda. This is the $55 trillion industry espoused by Kerry in his doomsday for all unless he get’s his portion of that $55 trillion…

Wind Turbines life cycle is roughly 20 years although components fail far earlier and require replacement as part of the annual/daily maintenance requirement. Load factors also play a part in determining the overall lifespan of a turbine. At the end of its life, the turbine is cut into three pieces and – buried. The current cost of each commercial turbine is $3-$4 million installed. Decommissioning is an additional cost. As of 2019, it was estimated that decommissioning would cost roughly $530,000 per turbine. These costs are ultimately born by the consumers while the profits are hedged for the elite.

While offshore turbines have gained providence, they come with their own set of issues: destroying bird habitat, destroying fishing industries, interruption with Navy requisites, and the sheer added cost of infrastructure. A proposed solution would be to create ‘floating’ turbines’ in deep water. The obstacles entail extensive radioactive transmission lines, transformers, maintenance operations, maritime disruption and security. In addition, because turbines emit electromagnetic energy, they can potentially disrupt electromagnetic signals in telecommunication, radar and navigation.

While the effects of EMF on humans is definable with fertility and cancer as prime issues, the impact on marine mammals such as whales and dolphins is considered a significant reason for inadvertent ‘beaching’. It has also been found to be one of the main culprits in our dying population of bees; altering their character, changing their behavior, and impacting reproduction.

It isn’t just wind turbines; cell phones, cell towers, power lines and wireless all expose vast amounts of EMR into our environmental field. This radiation effect is not deflected by our earth’s atmosphere or ozone. Thus it is absorbed by people, animals, oceans and plants. In small amounts the damage to DNA is relative, in large amounts it can be deadly.

As such, are the technological innovations which cause a plethora of artificial electromagnetic radiation increases adding to or even wholly responsible for the ‘global warming’ theory? Will this poisoning be more deadly than a Pandemic? While killing off human populations, the tenuous balance of our eco-system will also fail creating an even faster spiral. This is what going GREEN entails. It is the alteration of our planet, our DNA, and all life forms herein.

It isn’t a liberal vs conservative issue. It is an AGENDA.

And there is No Place To Hide.

Alternative Energy: Antiquity of Wind & Solar. Nuclear Fusion – The Future

Posted on February 16, 2021February 17, 2021 by Helena

As the Global Freeze encapsulated large swathes of countries, a sour lesson was learned with regard to so-called “Alternative Energy”. Despite All The Kings Men putting together the best scientists and engineers to build Wind Turbines and Solar Panels, somehow it didn’t occur to them that snow and ice might bring them all to a complete dysfunctional halt. Frozen turbine blades required de-icing by helicopters fueled by gas, too little too late. And solar panels went black, buried in snow.

The first windmill was created in Persia in the 9^th century. The first use of solar power can be traced to sometime around 400 BC.

Respectively, 1200 and 2400 years later, this is the best solution that science has been able to provide. They are flawed and they are ancient methods. And scientists should be ashamed.

In 1954, the CERN laboratory was created to study Nuclear Research via particle fusion. It took them over 50 years before they completed the construction of the Large Hadron Collider which came to be known as The God Particle. Steven Hawking believed that the Collider was capable of creating a black hole large enough to suck the entire universe into it destroying mankind. Thus the thematic God Particle. Thus Hawking was not simply skeptical – but considered scientists – rather stupid.

The Cern experiments include nuclear fusion as an alternative energy source, creating blackholes, determining how the universe was created, and time travel.

Nuclear Fusion is the forerunner for a number of startups funded by Gates, Bezos, Jack Ma, etc…, that are attempting to formulate that energy into a viable alternative sometime in 2030 or beyond. Until that time, we really have no other alternative which makes shutting down oil, gas and coal just ‘stupid’.

The ultimate concept of fusion is that the power would be so condensed in form that one glass of water would provide all the heat and electricity for one person’s lifetime. It is noncombustible. It is clean. It is not a resource. It is infinite. But it is at best 10 years in the future.

By contrast, the average home requires upwards of 20 solar panels. Of course that average would not apply to Bill Gates and the Hollywood Climatologists given their homes are roughly ten times larger. Note: Bill Gates homes do NOT utilize solar.

Those same solar panels have a lifetime, as do wind turbines, which roughly equates to about 18-20 years. At which point they are useless and must be buried in the graveyards.

It is estimated that by 2050 78 million metric tons of solar panels will have been buried. To put that into perspective, the average capacity of a landfill is – one gate ton. There are currently 1250 landfills in the US. Where oh where are we supposed to put the other 77,998,750 tons?

I am not sure how these rabid scientists and engineers anticipate the reality. But their IQ would appear to be on par with – stupid.

There are currently about 60,000 wind turbines in the US. Many have already reached their lifespan and are dead. Most of these 60,000 will be defunct by 2030. These turbines would require 450,000 cubic yards of landfill for burial.

It is estimated that without either solar or wind turbines consuming landfill capacity in the US, in 16 years – or by 2037, the US landfills will be at full capacity. And like every other country we will begin dumping our waste into the oceans.

What oh what will environmentalists say then?

So what exactly have scientists been doing for the past 2400 freaking years?

Science did not translate to technology and godlike proportions until relatively perhaps 200 years ago. Prior to that they didn’t do a whole lot of self righteous ego calamities given science was on par with – philosophy. Like Plato. Or Aristotle.

Doctors and such have only elevated their professions to the nth degree in the last 100 years!

Pharma has only existed for about 80 years.

In the span of reality – they are infants.

And according to the very esteemed Steven Hawking, scientists could be the impetus to the annihilation of the entire universe and mankind in their inflated ego and recklessness.

But the mantra of the liberal elite and the 8^th grade Hollywood climatologists is “Follow The Science”.

Why?

Simply, to replace God.

Why?

Because as long as people adhere to, and believe in, and have faith in, God, they can not be cowered, usurped, controlled, and devoured into the pits of communism. And communism is an empty soul. A robotic deviance without creativity, desire, individualism, humanity, space, compassion and love. Under communism, humans revert to animal wherein their only focus is survival. Food. Shelter. Propagation. And the world becomes as it was in the Beginning.

Nuclear Fusion would appear to be an amazing future source of energy. To be sure! But given it is a decade away at least, a prudent economist would acknowledge that destroying what is viable today thus creating a void of energy – is simply – STUPID.

Germany: A Welfare State Subsidized by the US

Posted on September 15, 2019September 15, 2019 by Helena

Germany has pledged to spend $40 billion on climate change initiatives claiming the goals established under the Paris Accord might now be reached by 2030 (although Germany failed to meet goals in 2015, 2018, and 2020). The plan is to stimulate the purchase of electric vehicles, provide more electric power stations, tax polluting vehicles, improve heating systems and charge a green tax on airfare.

As of 2016, 84 coal plants provide 42% of electric power. While Germany has tried to reach sustainable renewable power through wind, solar, and biofuel, with emphasis on wind, a huge snag put a dent in that scheme. Wind farms that were supposed to have a useful life of 20-25 years are dying after 15 years, five years before their financial breakeven. Dismantling the worthless windmills is costly, includes transportation to a windmill ‘dump’ and has created a windmill graveyard.

But hey, Germany has a balanced budget, and a great economy! Right?

That is particularly true however, it is due to the fact that Germany initiated unfair trade tariffs with the US and has consistently refused to meet their 2% of GDP obligation on defense spending. In 2017, Germany spent just over $45 billion representing 1.2% of GDP. Why the shortfall if they have the money within the budget ‘surplus’?

Because they don’t want to pay, its FREE socialist money extracted from US citizens.

Out of 26 EU countries comprising NATO, 3 contribute their fair share or more: Greece, Poland and Estonia.

The US has 35,000 troops and 13,000 civilians stationed in Germany for defense. When the US asked Germany to ante in some troops to aid in the Syrian conflict – Germany declined stating ‘they couldn’t move hastily’.

Rules of engagement – they decried!

We defend Germany. US taxpayers pay for the shortfall of 23 EU countries including Germany so that Germany can have a balanced budget. In fact, in 2014 Germany’s surplus budget was .6%. If they had held to their contractual obligation for defense, they would have had a budget deficit. Each and every year. And instead of their debt shrinking – their debt would have been growing – just like the US.

In fact, including Germany 9 EU countries had a surplus budget, and eight of the nine contributed 25%-80% less than the required 2%: Netherlands, Sweden, Czech Republic, Denmark, Luxembourg, Bulgaria and Austria.

In essence, this means US taxpayers have been subsidizing the EU’s wealth to the detriment of our own trade and budget.

Germany’s response?

They have determined that by 2024, they ‘hope’ to reach a 1.5% defense spending level… Obviously contractual obligations between the EU and the US are meaningless to Germans. Nationalist pride – for Germans, disdain for the evil Americans.

Back to wind energy.

Wind turbines cost about $4million each. There are roughly 30,000 wind turbines in Germany today. That would require an investment of $120billion. Given the legal ramifications, Germany now has a two year wait for a wind turbine permit. Issues have arisen that have hit the industry, including; distance from residential neighborhoods, legal disputes, a shorter lifespan than estimated, conservation, noise and endangered species killed by the blades. And by 2021, thousands of the existing turbines will be demolished as they have outlived their lifespan, lifeless monuments.

So how will Germany supply the electricity for the mandated electric cars? Coal. That dirty, nasty coal that makes Germans sneer at the US.

$40 billion for electric cars to run on coal fired electricity generating plants – while demanding the US continue subsidizing the EU’s defense spending on NATO.

NATO has obviously outlived itself and become ‘nonessential’.

But Germany and France in particular need NATO as long as the US pays for it. Germany’s military is a disaster. Their equipment is obsolete. Jets and helicopters useless junk. Merkel’s own military plane – defective. A total of 3300 deployed military personnel. Dysfunctional weapons. Unfit naval vessels. If Germany were attacked today, they would be obliterated without the US. The US pays 14times what Germany and France each contribute to defense despite the US economy being just 5 times that of Germany and 6 times that of France.

So while the German economy looks inspiring from a simplistic view, the truth is it has thrived on the back of US taxpayers for decades while defending unfair tariffs and providing -0- military strength. Of course the Germans don’t like Trump. Trump has vowed to make Germany, France and the EU responsible for their defense obligations while normalizing tariffs. That will eliminate any surplus while creating a truth, a real Germany, economically accountable, reliant on its own defense.

Germany is essentially a welfare state of the US. And Germans have come to believe they are entitled to US taxpayer income ‘redistribution’ to prop up their wealth.