CLIMATE CHANGE and Land Grabs: Africa Colonized

Given the uptick in Climate Change panic with the advent of la Nina, there are global areas that are at most risk and those at least risk.   Obvious risk prone areas are coastal cities given the rise in oceans, including Texas, California, Florida, and most of the east coast. But where are the regions that will be least impacted and possibly fruitful?

Wherein lies the Truth would seem to be a bit of a dance of Topsy-Turvy!

One way to make that determination would be to look at where the elite are buying land.   Africa.   Africa has enough land to feed the world but its agriculture operations rival those of Caesar – 2100 years ago.   With literally pennies on the dollar, leaseholds and outright purchases rose exponentially from 2000 to present with peak purchases occurring in 2009.   Most purchases are made thru hedge funds, obscuring the identity of the buyers.

In the US there are currently 24,795 farms and ranches for sale across Colorado, Texas, Missouri, Montana, California, Kentucky, Tennessee and Nebraska.   Worryingly – 40% of US farmland is now owned by nonfarmers resulting in a decrease in farmland of roughly 50 million acres since 2000.   Germany, Canada, The Netherlands, and China have been scooping up farmland across the US for the last decade. Their haul now stands at over 36 million acres.

At the same time foreign ownership of African agriculture land has been steadily increasing pushing out local antiquated farmers.   The top five foreign investors are China, US, France, UAE and UK.   The areas most profitable would include; Mali, Congo, Mozambique, Ethiopia, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, and Tanzania. All areas prized for their forests and resources.

Many of the foreign controlled farms are growing sugar cane for the sweet tooth and ethanol production, as well as palm oil for agrofuel.   Hardly anticipating a green reform.   But not only are they fueling fuel, they are not growing sustainable foods and products for local or outsourced consumption. And instead, are creating a cycle of pollution and soil damage:

“…sugar may be responsible for more biodiversity loss than any other crop, due to its destruction of habitat to make way for plantations, its intensive use of water for irrigation, its heavy use of agricultural chemicals, and the polluted wastewater that is routinely discharged in the sugar production process.” ~ World Wildlife Fund

Most of this production is sent to Europe – the socialist capital of all things Green!  At the expense of Africans.

While the land grabs have been decades in the making as positions are solidified, the need for massive infrastructure overhaul in Africa still posed a problem.   Then in 2013, the powers that be created a solution – Climate Change Pandemic.   Moving money.   Governments around the globe could tax citizens in order to divert funds to save the planet.   Only the funds were not used to mitigate climate change they were used to fund the necessary infrastructure for the agriculture land grabs. That fund is called: The Green Climate Fund.

Effective in 2015, the western nations were jumping for joy!   Billions were flowing, and their own wealth was secure. Instead of being depleted, hedge funds and their worshippers were growing exponentially as exports of biofuels became Europe’s suckled grandbaby.

Enter President Trump.   Funding grinds to a halt.  Of Dear Oh Dear Oh MY!    And the need became ever more imperative before the duped masses could realize exactly what was happening. Yes the Climate is Changing.   But making citizens appear to be the cause helped dramatically in fueling guilt. Guilt meant more money.

The End of the World became the mantra. AOC declared we are all going to die in 10 years.   Of course, if that were true, Africa’s infrastructure would hardly be our focus.   The Green Fund confiscated that burden of $$$$$$.   But elites prefer ultra-modern conveniences, slaves, food, destinations, night life!   So cities in Africa became a focus as well.

Money was laundered, money was hijacked, money was diverted, and 10 beautiful cities in Africa suddenly emerged:   Djenne in Mali, Abuja in Nigeria, Johannesburg in South Africa, Luanda in Angola, Windhoek in Namibia, Tunis in Tunisia, Kigali in Rwanda, Accra in Ghana, Libreville in Gabon and Gaborone in Botswana.

It is predicted that by ‘2030’ over half of Africa’s population will be living in these “Garden Cities”.   Of course, living doesn’t necessarily mean in a means of wealth, it simply means that as more wealthy move to these cities, they require servants.   Today, 60% of Africa’s youth are unemployed.   While AOC and the Quad Clan want the US to be on par with communist Africa in terms of wage and employment, that statistic might scare the bejeebies out of Americans if they understood what that meant in reality!

  1. Africa’s mean wage is roughly $10 to $1500 per month.  That would be considered the new happy income for Americans.
  2. Africa unemployment ranges in the rough of 20% to 35%.   No problem, those elites making $1500 per month could simply support those who didn’t work.
  3. Africa’s home ownership rate by Africans doesn’t even register existence.  Happy.
  4. Poverty rate in Africa as measured by earning less that $5.50 per day – is 86%. With 40% of the population earning less than $2.00 per day.

This is the landscape of society that our current progressive and socialist politicians advocate for the US to match.   So You Will Be – HAPPY!  And equal.

They will be the landowners.   They will hire the slaves. They will live luxury lifestyles.   And climate will continue to evolve and devastate regions leaving in its wake untenable loss of agriculture.   Outside of Africa.

In the midst of this Climate shift, the Bill Gates community wants Americans to consume less beef and milk given cows have an intensely negative impact on the environment.   But the US actually ranks in 4th place for the total number of beef cows. India has 3x as many as the US, Brazil has 2.6x, and China has about 2% more.   Phasing out the cattle across the globe in order to preserve our climate simply means that the cost of beef will be prohibitive for the commoners.

Of course – the plebes and peasants won’t notice because they will be too busy foraging for water and crickets.

PARIS ACCORD: Africa Slated For Deep State Colonization

In January Biden signed an EO re-instituting the US partnership in the Paris Accord.   As such the US monetary obligation will be in force. All Funds are distributed to The Green Climate Fund per protocol.   And with the UN approval, all funds are supposedly allocated toward sustainable development including alternate energy, clean oceans, food, and environmental health.

Despite the Texas wind/solar failure that resulted in the deaths of 30 people including children, wind and solar remain the singular focus for alternate energy.   Post Texas disaster, the entire Board of ERCOT resigned.   Although ERCOT did submit a request to Biden’s energy Tzar, Huizenga, for emergency use of coal and natural gas to compensate for the downed wind and solar, in essence it was denied.

In Huizenga’s response, he allowed the use, but submit restrictions based on environmental emission regulations imposed by Biden.   Per the letter, should those emission restrictions be violated ERCOT would be responsible for fines, penalties, and other charges.

There are now multiple class action lawsuits instituted. But the focus should reveal that while wind and solar have their value, they are imperfect and backup is essential! Unfortunately, that concept would seem to be only of value to the logical and rational – and not the possessed and short-sighted.

Denmark has announced an ambitious plan to build an artificial island 80 kilometers into the North Sea which will house 600 turbines measuring 852 vertical feet to provide energy for 3 million homes initially, and possibly 10 million at some future point.     The estimated cost of construction for the island is $34 billion.   The cost for the Turbines will likely exceed $8-$10 million apiece not including transport costs to sea and erection.   A likely estimate would be a total cost of $50 billion for the project, bearing in mind that the turbines would require daily maintenance, and removal and replacement every 18 years.

Denmark plans to pay for its 51% share of the project thru the sale of oil and gas. The remaining 49% share will be sold to private investors.

The projected completion date is determined to be 2033.   Any excess wind power will be converted to liquid hydrogen which must be contained at -427” F due to its high flammability and explosion hazard.   Hydrogen is typically used for jet fuel or submarine fuel.  What could go wrong…

Currently turbines shut down when wind speeds are 45-50 mph.   Wind speed is greater at taller heights. The taller the object, the more wind speed hence the 852 vertical feet turbines.

There were 31 wind storms on the North Sea between 2010 and 2020, typically lasting a week or more, wind speeds were clocked between 80 and 162mph. There is no data on winds between 50 and 80 mph wherein turbines would be shut off. But the point is that turbines will require frequent shut-downs when situated on the high seas.

At the same time, The World Economic Forum is proposing a Blue Revolution to save our oceans from the devastation of man.   They outline ten steps: 1. Freeze the warming, 2. Walk the talk, 3. Consider synthetic cell based sea food,   4.   Designate 30% of the ocean protected, 5.   Regulate further marine industries and fisheries, 6. Protect Antarctic waters, 7.   End plastic pollution, 8. Reform fertilizer use,   9. Detect illegal fishing, 10. Make sure ALL people have a fair stake in the ocean.

Of course, understanding all this mumbo-jumbo becomes more clear when analyzing where and how The Green Fund is actually spent!

The opening statement of The Green Fund website clarifies:  “GCF’s investments are aimed at achieving maximum impact in the developing world, supporting paradigm shifts in both mitigation and adaptation.   … allocation for particularly vulnerable countries, including Least Developed Countries (LDCs), Small Island Developing States (SIDS), and African States.”.

There are no funds allocated to wind farms or solar.   No funds allocated to the EU, Russia, Japan, China, or North America. No funds allocated to the ocean. No funds allocated to food access. No funds allocate to fusion.

Current Approved Projects are in;   Sudan, Mongolia, Bangladesh, Liberia, Burundi, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Brazil, etc…   Many are micro-finance operations, where The Green Fund approved banks will lend money at usury interest rates and share the profits with The Green Fund. All while claiming as a result – reduced emissions.  

But Africa’s total emissions output represents less than 1.5% of the globe.  Do they intend to state that as a result of their efforts, The GCF has taken Africa from 1.5% to 1%?    By contrast, China, US, EU, India , Russia and Japan account for 70% of emissions and $-0- funding for mitigation.

Therefore, The Green Fund will become the newest burgeoning source of massive tax free profits paid for by taxpayers and used to support further advancement in Africa.   Because Africa is where the elite focus is singular.

The Cabal intends to colonize Africa for themselves.

In the meantime, North America and Europe will be subjected to a deep freeze as instituted by their protégé, Bill Gates, in conjunction with Harvard.   It is likely this deep freeze that John Kerry continually refers to in his nine year timeline, will require a shift of all elites to Africa as the globe is subjected to a miniature ‘ice age’.   Spearheading the deflection of the sun’s rays by man-made infused particles, is the means. And sub-Sahara Africa has been determined to be the most viable and only inhabitable place for survival once that agenda has been accomplished.   In nine years = Agenda 2030.

This geoengineering was scheduled for approval ‘by an independent advisory board, sometime in February 2021. The scheduled release is June 2021 in Sweden.

 FYI: The Green Climate Fund has some interesting Board Members including, among others:

Xia LYU: A Chinese woman who serves as executive VP for WEC Energy which provides the energy for Wisconsin, Michigan, Illinois and Minnesota, the majority of which is based on coal and natural gas.

Ayman SHASLY: A Saudi who works for one of the world’s largest oil companies, Aramco, selling oil to China while working as a consultant to the Ministry of Petroleum.

CLIMATE CHANGE: EU’s NEWEST GOALS – having failed all previous goals…

Now that the Pandemic is about to be displaced, the EU is busily looking for other means to help spend Tax Dollars on behalf of the poor.   Just not the poor in EU countries – the poor in poor countries – like Honduras or Guinea.   All in the name of Climate Change!

The Greta infused EU is back at the drawing board creating ‘pledges’ and ‘goals’ and new guidance for reaching climate desires via and input of $425 billion per year for the next decade!   Climate is NOT cheap.     The previous ‘pledge’ was to reduce greenhouse gases by 40%. The new pledge is to reduce them by 55% – by 2030.   Why?   Because the European Commission says so.

Proposals haven’t been delineated, but the number sounds good and makes the Commission appear to be doing something when in fact they do very little. Indeed.

The virtual meeting took place at a virtual summit to discuss the virtual Paris Agreement that has changed nothing – virtually!   Each nation must submit a plan called an NDC which outlines their goals and means of achieving set goals every five years.   Of course this years required NDC plan will likely not be met because of the Pandemic wherein virtual goals and plans are somehow exempt – because, well it was a goal, not a real commitment…

Germany’s greenhouse emissions have actually risen since the Paris Accord from 765.9 million tons to over 805 million tons in 2019, representing an ‘increase’ of 5.2%.   They have arbitrarily decided to use 1990 as a point year for reduction targets. IN 1990 Germany’s emissions were 1,003 billion tons, which gives them a head start in the attainment of the 55% goal by 20%!

Playing with numbers.

The original goal, pledge, was a reduction of 20% by 2020 at a cost of $100 billion per year.   No one actually attained that goal – NDC plans weren’t provided, and the world continued onward albeit with a Greta scream meme to encourage everyone.

Meanwhile US levels have fallen to roughly 1990 levels from a peak in 2007.

Germany’s stated plan to ‘reduce’ emissions is to tax carbon at the airline level given they contribute 19% overall as compared to the power industry which contributes 44% of emissions.   Of course taxing power might lead to people dying – so that’s not an option.

During the Clinton years, renewable energy use in the US virtually tanked from 11.58% to 6.78%.   Of course China, which has the largest footprint of dirty emissions at nearly 30% of global greenhouse – is not a part of the Green Fund, has committed nothing, and continues to ramp up fossil fuel production.  But apparently, no one seems to mind what China does.

So where has the Green Fund invested all the pledged billions to date?   Mongolia, Costa Rica, Argentina, Guatemala, Latin America, Bangladesh, and unnamed islands ‘in the pacific’ among a host of other countries predominantly in Africa.    None of which have much of any actual footprint to reduce.   So the Green Fund isn’t actually established to help the countries contributing to emissions, it is to help obscure countries which have no emissions.     Many of these projects are instead related to ‘micro-finance’ – ie, loaning dollars at usury interest rates sometimes in excess of 30-40%, ie gouging – poor countries!

Maybe Greta should manage the funds…

France is in nearly as good of shape as Germany if the base year is 1990.   France has already reduced emissions by roughly 16% before leaving the gate having peaked in 1979!   Despite the Paris Accord and all the pledges,  emissions have actually increased in France since the Paris Accord at a rate of 1.8% per year since 2015.

Obviously the Accord has produced nothing, the goals have not been met, and the documents to show reductions have not been prepared.   However, given instances of Fraud within the Green Fund, they have unilaterally decided to create the High Level Advisory Group to bring transparency to the flow of money.   Given the fund is based in Korea, no financials have ever been forthcoming.   Of the $100 billion per year funding goal, to date they report a total funding of just $8 billion, representing a shortage of $92 billion – 92%.

Somehow this catastrophic failure of goals and pledges and commitments and documents and funding has not deterred the European Commission from upping the ante!   And in the US we face the potential of the very corrupted John Kerry being appointed to Biden’s cabinet of climate advisors putting US taxpayers into the pool of fraud.   Like most of Hollywood, Kerry’s footprint alone is probably equivalent to Costa Rica.   Kerry and his wife own upwards of 6 homes, 2 yachts, 12 cars and a jet plane.

Kerry, Obama and Biden all have beachfront homes valued in excess of $3 million to $15 million each, replete with heated pools – and no solar….

Should Biden manage to defraud the US election in total, expect your taxes to be paying for The Green Funds newest investment drive in such lovely places like Rwanda, Iraq, Azerbaijan, Haiti, Burundi, etc…   Countries NOT on the list would include ALL EU member states, Canada, US, Australia, etc…etc…etc…

The Green Climate Fund – A Soros Child

A funny thing happened on the way to the Forum, everyone cheered, but no one Changed… Germany has declared that it will not meet it’s Climate Change goals for 2020, China says it’s emissions will continue to rise through 2030, and France is mum, as in maybe no one in Paris will notice they have actually done – nothing. Six countries in the EU boast that they have met their goals as stipulated by the EU Commission; Hungary, Croatia, Greece, Bulgaria, Portugal and Romania. YEAH! Except they already complied as of 2014, because their goals were minimal and the economic crisis required ‘belt tightening’, so technically in order to meet goals they had to do – nothing.

So, despite the humbra of toxic words, toxic air hovers large and in charge.

Apparently, The Green Climate Fund is the body tasked with collecting and disbursing pledged funds from countries across the globe.   A quick overview: Japan has disbursed roughly 50% of pledges, Germany a third, The Netherlands a third, France roughly half, China -0-, UK about 2/3, and US 1/3, India -0-, and South America -0.

Of the $10 billion collected by The Green Climate Fund, roughly $45 million was spent on Administrative Expenses in 2017, and $35 million in 2016. Apparently, these hard working Board Members work on average – 10 days per month.   According to the 990 Tax Return dated 2014, it would appear that they raised about $88 million paid some salaries and operating costs and banked the balance. In 2017 they needed to create a investment fund management IT system to handle all the cash… Poor Babies.

Their latest project includes solving the Ethiopian drought problem thru an investment of $45 million to be developed over a five year period.   So far, they haven’t actually ‘done’ anything except draft a proposal – funding = $0.   They have pledged $38.5 million toward Columbia in order to improve the ecosystem.   This too is a proposal for which no actual work has been done and no money disbursed.   They have pledged $57 million to Argentina in the form of a “Loan”, $0 actually disbursed. There is an outstanding pledge grant of $31.4 million to Egypt for infrastructure rebuilding, nothing disbursed. A grant of $26.9 million to Nauru, the world’s smallest island, for the purpose of developing a climate resistant port. No dollars disbursed.

In fact, it would appear that the funds are primarily targeting ‘infrastructure and water shortages’. Both of these issues are certainly important, they just aren’t about changing the global warming trend that the fund stipulates to be their purpose.  So why are they funding these projects?

Who are the recipients? Namibia, Morocco, Senegal, Maldives, Ecuador, Mali, Gambia, Tualu, Armenia, Vietnam, El Salvador, Fiji, Peru, etc…

A Few Examples:

Malawi: USAID has been working with the government of Malawi for years to help mitigate agricultural shifts and provide drought security. USAID budget request for 2018 was $15.4 billion. So why is the Green Fund duplicating USAID?

Maldives: They have been battling a losing battle as the sea’s rise and the islands are swamped. Their 2008 government plant to abandon ship and relocate was dismissed and a $10 billion contract with the Saudi’s was initiated whereby they would secure their shipping route safety and develop the islands for tourism relocating thousands of local people. So is The Green Fund actually collaborating with the Saudi’s?

Ecuador:   Ecuador has been raising it’s fist to resolve water issues for years. The government has made some radical changes, particularly in energy investment and diversity. Partnering with the European Commission thru EUROCLIMA, they have spent $4.2 billion on energy projects.   They are currently funded by the REDD+ Program within the UN. So why is The Green Fund duplicating funding projects?

It would appear, that The Green Fund is simply a duplicate board tasked with billions of dollars in funding whose purpose may very well be to create a slush fund to give the appearance of battling Climate Change, aka, Global Warming, when in fact it is sustaining the infrastructure, agriculture and energy growth of third world countries. To what ultimate goal?  

Given it’s purported goal is to raise $100 billion per year, it should be noted that it’s Board of Directors is predominantly comprised of Arabs, Africans, and various representatives from the Netherlands, many of whom seem to be devoid of a background, with the exception of the Globalist, Leonardo Martinez-Diaz. He has written extensively on globalizing emerging and developing countries in order to create a Global Order. He is a Global Director at Sustainable Finance Center at the World Resources Institute.

World Resources Institute partners with the George Soros – Open Society Foundations.

And there you have it: The Green Climate Fund, which is demanding contributions in the range of $100 billion annually, is utilizing those funds to create a global network of developing countries so as to ultimately incorporate their governments into a unified One World Order. Climate Change/Global Warming are simply tag phrases to sucker the funds for – The Greater Good of the Order of George Soros.