FOSSIL FUELS: Neither “Fossil or Nonrenewable”! An Infinite Source of Energy

The ‘theory’ that we have been led to believe is that fossil fuels such as oil and gas are nonrenewable sources that form from decayed plants and dinosaurs.   In 1870 John D. Rockefeller founded Standard oil company. It became the world’s largest and first multinational conglomeration which earned Rockefeller the prestige as being the first billionaire.   In 1892, John D. Rockefeller made the stipulation that these sources of energy, oil and gas, were nonrenewable and scarce so as to justify an inflated value and create for himself vast wealth!

Today, the world holds to this theory despite there being overwhelming evidence that this entire postulation is false.

Solar, wind, and water are termed renewable sources and thereby superior to fossil fuels.   But what many overlook is threefold consequences:   1. Solar and wind require created capture fixtures such as panels and windmills. Both of these capture sources require degradation of large swathes of land to manufacture.   2.   These capture fixtures have a limited lifespan – ie roughly 20 years before they fail and are hauled to the great land grave, ie more land degradation.   3.   The electromagnetic fields created by the windmills are toxic.   While studies are nonexistent on humans, a number of studies have determined the fields have a massively negative impact on marine life.

And thus, once again, global populations become the guinea pig experiment.   Will the next generation living close to turbines be mutants?   Don’t know because we are the trial.  Similar to the CoVid Vaccine experiment.  We are the Phase IV Trial. 

After power plants were built in suburban areas near homes, 30 years later the evidence of the human experiment showed:   “There are numerous studies that link living close to power lines with terrible health conditions and diseases. Sadly cancer is one of them, including childhood leukaemia.”

Clean, renewable, abundant energy is likely a myth.   And the energy companies are much like Big Pharma;   create a new disease, don’t find a cure, and then manufacture countless drugs that will cause massive side effects for which more drugs will be necessary.   This same cycle is now evident in the push for Green solar and wind.

In essence these renewables are in fact pollutants, just of a different kind.   So we are fixing the carbon pollutant with another medication which will cause more degradation of earth, fewer trees and MORE CARBON!

In 1999, The Deep Hot Biosphere, The Myth of Fossil Fuels was published by Thomas Gold.   He argued that earths core layer is not composed of decayed plants and animals at all. Instead our core is comprised of heat loving bacteria which thrive on hydrocarbon, and that hydrocarbon is part and parcel of creation earth. These hydrocarbons are what earth is made from and these hydrocarbons constantly replenish naturally.

Thomas Gold is not the only esteemed scientist to upend the Rockefeller theory.

Freeman Dyson, a physicist, mathematician, and statistician who worked in quantum physics theory , astrophysics, etc… postulated that :

“The scientific consensus that carbon dioxide (CO2) is a material driver of planetary temperature increases is false. He believed that some of the effects of increased CO2 levels are favourable and not taken into account by climate scientists, such as increased agricultural yield, and further that the positive benefits of CO2 likely outweigh the negative effects. He was skeptical about the simulation models used to predict climate change, arguing that political efforts to reduce causes of climate change distract from other global problems that should take priority.”

While Dyson did advocate for finding alternate energy sources, he felt that climate change supporters were a cult pushing for reform without benefit. As in simply another means of making money on false data.

Russian scientist, Dr. Vladimir Kutcherov supported Thomas Gold’s theory.   His experiments support the theory that hydrocarbons are naturally occurring elements of our planet.   They are constantly being generated and replenished as we use them. These carbons are at the core of earth 100-200 kilometers deep pushed to the surface via heat.

Oil fields tend to reproduce after being dormant 50-60 years per various studies conducted in Russia and the US. Kutcherov has stated:

“we don’t need to find new oil fields or gas fields. All that is needed is to improve the efficiency with how we use the energy.”

How we use the energy means greater efficiency – not conversion to solar and wind which are imperfect, and technically nonrenewable given their means of capture has a 20 year life span. And like Big Pharma pushing pills to fix pills to fix pills, Green energy with a limited life span requires a constant added cost to fix the dead windmill or panel with a new one.

While estimates indicate our oil and gas extraction accounts for roughly 15% of what is on earth’s surface, if we didn’t extract it, it would continue to be pushed to the surface via heat and released into the atmosphere.   As a carbon. And conversion to wind and solar would have absolutely no impact on our global carbon footprint!

If in fact our esteemed climate gurus wanted a clean source – then it should be completely clean – and completely constant – before it has true value in the utopian fantasy.   If we concentrated our efforts on ‘efficiency’ instead of dated revolution, we might actually conserve planet earth.  

Otherwise, these misfits are simply another scourge of Rockefellers looking to be the first trillionaire.

4 thoughts on “FOSSIL FUELS: Neither “Fossil or Nonrenewable”! An Infinite Source of Energy

  1. why hell,in the land of make believe everyone is a billionaire,paper will stand still for anything! make believe money,make believe politics and make believe families,aaahhh,america!

    • Alex –
      I’m, intrigued by your phrase, “… make believe families …” If you have the time, I’ll be interested in your elaboration on that. Thanks!

  2. Your insightful Fossil Fuels submission today is another intriguing and so-well-expressed analysis and dissection of the Left’s climate change hysteria and flawed agenda. I did not know anything about the earth’s composition 100-200 kilometers below the surface, how hydrocarbons are naturally being pushed to the surface, and therefore, the argument for decades about “Peak oil” and “we’re running out of crude oil” is based on “fake” science and in fact NO science at all.
    On the “About” page of your website, you remarked thusly about your childhood in Germany, “It was a lovely time, privileged in many ways, ordinary in others, but it formed a different me, that wasn’t like others.” If I might inquire without “getting too personal”, did you know and speak English as a very young person, or were you reared from birth in the German language, and later acquired a grasp of English? In any event, you employ words with great finesse, verve,style and impact. I do quite enjoy your writing … and of course your stance on the many stupid, illogical, and false beliefs to which we are being subjected these days.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.