AFRICA: Follow The Money

Tomorrow in New York City the UN will host a start up fund for the “Global Compact for Safe, Orderly, and Regular Migration (GCM)”.   Launched in September 2016, the intergovernmental pact supporting GCM was approved by164 countries and signed by 152. The countries that did not climb aboard the band wagon include: United States, Austria, Australia, Bulgaria, Chile, Czech Republic, Estonia, Italy, Hungary, Dominican Republic, Latvia, Israel, Poland, Slovakia, Brazil and Switzerland.   Russia signed the agreement but issued a statement repudiating aspects with regard to the ‘cause of mass exodus’ claiming if a nation created the migration they should take on the burden.

The basis of the pact is to allow complete Open Border policy.   Sound familiar?   In addition, the host country will ensure migrants can access basic services and make provisions for both full inclusion of migrants and social cohesion, while supporting multicultural activities through sports, music, arts, culinary festivals, volunteering and other social events.

In other words refugee status, immigration quotas, and immigration restrictions and conditions would be eliminated. Citizens and taxpayers would be required to pay for all the migrants as they acclimate while receiving free basic services.

Obviously, the UN and the Ted Turner UN Foundation have an agenda.

Over the last few decades’ enormous amounts of money have been injected into Africa for the purpose of revitalizing the infrastructure, building exclusive neighborhoods, and buying up large swathes of farmland – called ‘land grabs’.   In addition to billionaire dollars, the money has come in the form of the Paris Climate Accord and in the form of government funded charities and NGO’s, aka taxpayers.

Encouraging the outflow of Africans to other countries via immigration, war, and disease, vast portions of Africa then become enclaves available as home to the elite. Most of the urban revolution is occurring in the following locales: Cairo, Egypt – Casablanca, Marrakesh and Tangier Morocco – Accra, Ghana – Lagos, Nigeria – Cape Town, Johannesburg, Pretoria, and Durban, South Africa – Mombasa, and Nairobi, Kenya – Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

The elitist suburbs host the wealth of white expatriates while 93% of the unemployed remain black.   Over the last two years upwards of $3 billion has been invested into the renovation of Johannesburg alone. The city boasts a moderate climate, a burgeoning art world, modern shopping centers, a new commuter railway, three public and private universities, and crime surveillance camera’s on every city street corner which has halved the crime rate.

In 2016, for the first time ever a member of the Democratic Alliance Party became mayor of Johannesburg, Herman Mashaba.   The Democratic Alliance Party is comprised of English speaking Afrikaans and is considered Liberal supporting “Open Opportunity Society For All” .  Sound familiar?

Nairobi boasts a vibrant economy as well hosting headquarters for Coco-cola, World Bank, Citibank, BBC, CNN, Reuters, Deutsche Welle, Agence France-Presse, New York Times, and AP.

In 2010, Kenya drafted a new Constitution, the political system was overhauled and infighting became the norm since.   Morocco is predominantly Muslim, Lagos government shifted to the Socialist Party in 2019, and Ghana recently voted in the New Patriotic Party.  Of course, like other countries, the elections are highly contested with allegations of fraud and rigging common. Not unlike just about every country and state in the world now.

The Green Climate Fund which operates to expend donations for the Paris Accord has released its financial statements for 2017.   Of the $100 billion goal, they have collected a total of roughly $5 billion. In 2017, of the $1.9 billion collected, they spent $115 million – 6%. In 2016, of the $1.6 billion collected, they spent $31 million – 8%.   Where oh where does the money go?

The majority of the Green Fund ‘spending’ is in Africa to help women fight ‘climate change’.   ????   Many of the projects focus on Kenya and South Africa. The African continent’s carbon footprint is -0-.   Some of the projects are termed “multiple countries” and include Kenya, South Africa, Morocco and Egypt.

Coincidence?

Some of these projects in Africa are partnered with Agence Francaise de Development (AFD). In 2007, AFD was called into question for its deforestation in Africa. No legal proceedings were brought.   According to the Cameroon National Anti-corruption Commission (CONAC), two front companies, including one controlled by AFD, have been suspected of fraud.   How do they pass the inspection of the Directors in charge of the Green Climate Fund?  Deforestation would hardly benefit ‘Climate Change’.

It would appear that no one is truly auditing the Green Fund other than the Green Fund.   The two co-chairs are from Egypt and the UK.   Directors vary from Iran, Denmark, Germany, Tanzania, Nicaragua, France, Mexico, etc…  Why is Iran a Board Member in the Green Fund?

In order to become a resident of South Africa, one must have resided in the country for five years. Retirement visa’s are allowed if one can prove complete financial sustainability.

The US has the largest immigrant population in the world standing near 50 million. While other countries (Germany, Australia, Canada) boast a high percentage of immigrant population, their state of origin is rather different:   In the US – Mexico, India, Philippines, China and El Salvador dominate.   In Canada –  the UK tops the list with China, India, Italy and US close behind. In Australia – the UK, New Zealand, China, and Italy are the majority.

Why?

Because these countries require self sustaining, highly educated immigrants. Go figure.

Ultimately, an Open Borders For All scenario would cause the US to become a third world country – on the hind of Africa reaping the benefits of elitist money, development – and of course – $$$$$$ while maintaining a black unemployment rate and/or slave labor rate of roughly 40-93%.

THIS IS THE AGENDA.

Was Jesus an Immigrant? Genghis Khan and Hitler were.

Migration has taken a giant leap as it is now become a ‘Jesus was an immigrant’ verse.  Effectively, nearly everyone is some sort of immigrant, but as usual, that statement is meaningless for the world is very different today, laws are different, society is different, and wisdom needs to replace empty statements.  Every country has in place immigration laws.   The purpose of immigration laws is to maintain boundaries of right and wrong, just like every other law we are required to obey.   Changing the law, not breaking it, is the core.  There are infinite inhumane observances in every country, and as such people fall through the cracks. 

But apparently, immigration isn’t really about humanity or human rights, according to a UN document re- released dating from in 2000.  According to the UN, the crisis was about Europe’s falling workforce, in particular male workforce.  The crisis was about funding future pensions.   It was about local populations falling behind.

The male population within the refugees and immigrants descending on Europe represent over 84%.   They leave their women behind, their wives, their daughters.  This has a twofold consequence; the country left behind – has no male workforce, the country going to – has a disproportionate male dominance.

In Syria, the women are begging for the men to return home.  Merkel says no.  Merkel says they belong to Germany now.

In Sweden, 90% of unaccompanied minors were male.   The very liberal, Justin Trudeau, in 2016 announced that only females, accompanied children, and families would have access to Canada’s immigration.

Historically, when the ratios of male/female become skewed, crime rates rise, rape rises, and prostitution rises.   Because most of the immigrants coming to Europe are of a lower socioeconomic class, their chance of finding a spouse is significantly reduced, thus starting a family, having children and actually ‘solving’ the problem of population won’t span a generation.  Instead, it will bring a skew of sexual energy that cannot be contained.

Perhaps that is why Germany adopted the legalization of Prostitution, in an attempt to provide an outlet for the skew and attempt to level the need to rape.   Unfortunately, prostitutes cost money, and the immigrants don’t have the funds, nor the inclination, nor the belief system in that regard.  When immigrants are mostly male, uneducated, and in poverty they are not considered viable spouses and will not solve the need to secure ‘pensions’ as productive members of society.   So essentially, the immigrant solution initiated by Merkel in conjunction with the UN will ultimately have the reverse effect and tilt the axis of violence, welfare, and the economy.

While Germany has been labeled Europe’s biggest brothel, it is estimated that 63% of its sex workers are foreign.    Germany has a law in place that brothels must register and get a license to operate.  If they serve alcohol, they must get a restaurant license as well.  Despite these regulations, Germany also admits that most brothels are owned by organized crime, those known to be trafficking guns, drugs, and humans.  So essentially, the German government, in accordance with UN instruction, is condoning organized crime in order to support the massive immigrant population that Merkel thinks will resolve the lacking functioning workforce through a cultural socio diversity that has no education or moral norms.

This has absolutely nothing to do with Human Rights.

The Caravans of immigrants honing in on the US-Mexico border are typically in the 80% range of male dominance.    They are typically uneducated, without resources, and thus often resort to criminal activities in order to survive.  They leave behind their women and children to fend for themselves in their country.

It is much like the adage; give a man a fish and he eats for a day, teach him to fish and he is independent.   If our hearts are truly about helping the immigrant, then teaching them to fish means ‘in their own country’ with ‘their female population’ so as to maintain the balance and not further shift the axis of genders.

The countries with the largest skew in gender are Qatar, India and China.   In Qatar, the skew is represented by a slave labor force.  In China it was an imposed birthing law. And in India it was a ‘value’ added belief in which male children would contribute more than female.   India also has some of the most brutal rape statistics. While China and its media consider any statistics or information on this to be strictly censored, an interesting article by a young female from the UK who studied in Xiamen provided insight into the rallying call for prostitutes and rape in a country where gender skews are among the highest.

Many countries, including Australia, have in place laws that require immigrants to be able to prove their monetary self sufficiency, and/or their employability, so that their benefit to society is factored.  So why is the US so often targeted despite housing 11 million illegal immigrants and 44 million legal immigrants?  Statistically, it is a bizarre assault.

Was Jesus an immigrant?  NO.  He was a citizen of the Roman Empire.  Genghis Khan was defect immigrant via his conquests…   Hitler immigrated to Germany.   That didn’t work out so well.

In the end, what Merkel in Germany, and the Obamaites in the US are advocating is not the human right to immigrate, it is the slave labor right that is advanced in a monarchial society wherein historically, poverty was amassed and subjugated to the rule of the King and his court.  It is what created the mass exodus of Europeans to the Americas in the first place.

Migrant Caravan Funding? Catholic Church, Red Cross, Hope Border Institute, University of Texas…

Civil Rights lawyer Mario B Williams out of Georgia is one of the four lawyers who have filed a class action against the Trump administration on behalf of a group of the Caravan attendees claiming, “President Trump continues to abuse the law, including constitutional rights, to deter Central Americans from exercising their lawful right to seek asylum in the United States.”  The lawsuit apparently also refers to Trump as ‘our president’. An oddity since they aren’t citizens…

Mario Williams has been billed as the legal advocate of last resort when your case is so flimsy no one else will take it.  April of 2018, he was headlined in The Seattle Medium for his intent to initiate a $20 million “legal campaign to investigate and uncover the ties of political and business leaders to White supremacist groups. He wants to dig up their secret rivers of money and shame them into cutting off the extremists.”

The money for the campaign is coming from a company called, Libre By Nexus.  Launched by 2 ex-cons in 2013, Michael Donovan and Richard Moore, the firm guarantees bail for immigrants to win their release from detention.

Libre is a for-profit company that has annual revenues topping $30 million and over 6500 clients.  Their fees include a $14 per day ankle bracelet that clients must wear until their court date which is typically 3-4 years in the future.  That tallies to $33,215,000.   The daily cost to Libre for the bracelet is $3.   They are currently the subject of a lawsuit claiming the bracelets frequently don’t even work, and their niche is ‘predatory’.

With upwards of 14,000 scheduled to arrive sometime around November 25th, detainees will likely be referred to Libre via Mario Williams. Libre could thus easily double their current revenues if they added just another 6500 to their coffers of ankle bracelets.

Follow The Money.

The name of Mario Williams firm is, ‘Nexus Derechos Humanos’.  It lists as its parent and funding company – Nexus Services Inc., the same parent company of Libre By Nexus.   The lawsuit filed against the Trump administration is funded by Nexus Services, Inc whose founders are Michael Donovan and Richard Moore.  They do not want their pool of caravans to be squelched and thus deprive them of an ongoing revenue stream.

Located in Verona, Virginia, they operate a number of subsidiary companies within their particular brand including a charity called Nexus Caridades.  Their business plan continues to expand and they have moved into real estate offering rental housing for immigrants – at a price.

While CEO Donovan continually claims that they are not in this for the money, they are doing this simply from their hearts… the fact remains it is a highly profitable venture – they never attempted to sustain a charitable organization.  They are capitalistic capitalizing on a deficiency caused by caravans of illegal immigrants demanding free reign in the US.

And so, the question keeps returning, who is behind the funding of these caravans?

Certainly, Flores of Pueblo Sin Frontera is named continuously, but an even grander ulterior motive is levied by Hope Border Institute.  Comprised of various Monsignors and Deacons of the Catholic church, University of Texas, New Mexico State University, and others, their website claims that many Catholic migrant shelters in Mexico are core in the creation of the caravans “within the framework of symbolic reenactments during Easter season of the Stations of the Cross (Via Crucis), or Christmas-time posadas (the novena commemorating the pilgrimage in search of shelter of Jesus’ migrant family).”

Catholic Deacons can not act without the approval and sanction of Pope Francis.

In addition they provide a list of those who are initiating ‘direct organization’ in each country:  “…in Honduras by COFAMIPRO (Comité de Familiares de Migrantes de El Progreso) and in El Salvador by COFAMIDE (Comité de Familiares de Migrantes Fallecidos y Desaparecidos del Salvador); another similar organization in Honduras is the Comité de Familiares de Migrantes Desaparecidos del Centro de Honduras (COFAMICENH).”

All of this is at the core of US aid which is channeled to Mexico for the so-called “Southern Border Plan” as part of the Mérida Initiative. Originally developed to thwart the trafficking of drugs and money laundering, the Clinton, Bush and Obama administrations diverted funding to help drug treatment, instead of drug flow – thereby allowing the influx of drugs and trafficking while creating a burgeoning ‘treatment program’.  Another capitalist idea shadowed in a social program!  Follow The Money!

Hope Border Institute claims that US regime coups have been instrumental in causing the collapse of countries as corruption is cultivated and chaos then reigns. One such coup was promulgated in 2009 by the Obama administration on Honduras wherein a fraudulent election was aided by US government agencies to insert Porfirio Lobo Sosa of the National Party.  He has since been indicted for helping to protect drug organizations, corruption, redirecting funds, etc…

They go on to claim that these caravans are a “messianic moment reflected in the emergence of a powerful new transnational migrant rights movement, that is undermining long held orthodoxies regarding the imperatives of state sovereignty within the context of migration policy and human rights. All of this also lays the basis for fully incorporating migrants as collective subjects as to the mass human rights crimes  which have been committed against them with convergent responsibility on the part of the US and Mexico, within the framework of Mexico’s incipient transitional justice process, and of a convergent process on both sides of the border.”

In other words, the US and Mexico are fully responsible for the human rights violations of Honduras, El Salvador, and Guatemala, and thus the US must now pay for these violations by chaos and violence if necessary and by accepting the flow unconditionally which now averages 450,000 annually.

Honduras’ COFAMIPRO, and El Salvador COFAMIDE are backed by The Red CrossThe International Committee of the Red Cross has embarked on what they term a “Movement” in the publication of the Red Cross Red Crescent Magazine. Their front page issue on the website highlights:  Beyond Borders; Building Trust and Protecting Migrants…”

So you wanted to know who is behind the caravans…

Want to know why Pope Francis keeps pushing for the US to be open arms and open borders?

They are likely – a major funding source…