Facebook And The Rise of Socialists in US

Zuckerberg has now found himself in the unholy crossfires of not just Hillary, but Soros, who has aligned with Trillium Asset Management’s CEO, Mat Prasky, to call for Zuckerberg’s resignation.  Why? Because Facebook bloggers have had the audacity to malign Soros in their posts.  

Facebook found itself in the doghouse with Hillary as she blamed it for her presidential bid loss due to ‘negative posts’ that Zuckerberg did not promptly censor, like a good Socialist/Communist should.  Soros finds himself in the same predicament and has decided the analytics are too permissive and must be wholly liberal.

Full Circle:   Trillium bills itself as a “Green Fund” and Prasky upholds that ideology within his Board memberships including Social Venture Network which has honored such notable companies as Green For All.  Green For All was launched at the Clinton Global Initiative in 2007 by founder, Van Jones, who sits on the Board of Social Venture Network .  Van Jones served as President Obama’s advisor for Green Jobs and has been covered extensively by CNN, New York Times, USA Today and The View.  Like Obama, Jones’ monetary rewards would seem to coincide with his two published books, which like Obama’s made the NYT best seller list.

Jones is backed by the NAACP, Ebony, Rockefeller, Rolling Stone, Elle, Time Magazine, World Economic Forum, etc…  He has worked with Moveon.org under Soros, and The Center For American Progress under Podesta.  Jones is a viable Socialist candidate being groomed for a future presidential bid.

Facebook is recognized as a most powerful exploitive tool to gain control of and create a person’s ‘opinion’.   Although Zuckerberg is aligned with Hillary and Soros, he did not shore up fast enough, and the Cabal needs to take over in time to assert a Coup of American politics if not in 2020, then in 2024.

And the new rumbling isn’t so much the progressives per se, as the Socialists who run under the guise of the Democratic ticket because they haven’t yet gained the necessary power to act independently.  It would appear, according to various Socialist party websites, that their tactic is to capitalize on a growing base, hide within the Democrat party until 2023 when they plan to rise up within the call for a “Revolution” reminiscent of the Bolsheviks.

College students lean toward Liberal Green agenda’s without any understanding of Socialism and its massively destructive ramifications.  Creating a Green profile platform for 2024 will secure their support.  Van Jones is black.  With the radical dysphoria infused in the US by the Liberals to divide whites and blacks, that population segment will further splinter and Jones will rise as a Socialist black man advocating for people of color and youth. The Democrat Party will likely collapse as the old suits die off and their crimes gain traction in the media. This die off will push traditional Democrats toward the Socialist Party.

According to the website, Democratic Socialists of America, during the midterms they voted in 4 congressional candidates, 12 nationally endorsed elected officials, 30 locally endorsed elected officials, and 35 locally endorsed ballot initiatives in Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Hawaii, Rhode Island, DC, Montano, Maine, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Minnesota, New York, North Dakota, Massachusetts, Maryland, Missouri, Oregon, Texas, Tennessee, and Washington.

Their event schedule for November 18th:  How To Do Targeted Advertising On Facebook.

Oddly, many people in the US are not educated in the ideology and history of Socialism, what it means, what it entails, and historical leaders who attempted to govern under this dictatorial means:

1)   Venezuela is the most recent catastrophic result of a Socialist government policy.  Nicolas Madura is the current President ruling under the United Socialist Party under a program that has been referred to as authoritarian and dictatorial and has been instrumental in the complete chaotic collapse of the entire economic and social system plague by an inflation rate of 1million percent.

2)   The National Socialist Workers’ Party or the Nazi’s were the children of Hitler. Germany was in a free fall and in 1931 during the Great Depression, Hoover called a moratorium on WWI reparations to Germany causing widespread collapse of banks and industries.  1933 Hitler came to power under the guise of freeing Germany from the tyranny of economic collapse.

3)   The Bolsheviks were factions within the Russian Social Democratic Party following the ideology of Socialist, Karl Marx.  Lenin was a dictator who became leader of the Socialist Revolution ultimately throwing Russia into Communist rule for decades.

The US is not without socialist reforms; welfare, Medicaid, public schools, etc…  But just as Germany has instituted more and more control over citizen’s freedoms, so has the US with the assistance of the media as they redefine and recreate history to virtually ‘uneducate’ The People.

You cannot have globalization without Socialism.  You cannot have Socialism without a dictatorship government.  While Merkel appears more and more defeated as she calls for the UN to be the governing world body, this remains the agenda amidst a splintering EU, an uninformed Macron, and a collapsing Theresa May.

The common denominator for Venezuela, Hitler and the Bolsheviks was ‘Youth”.  Garner the youth, call for a revolution, and institute a civil war.  I believe that is the same call the Socialists are advocating in the US today… Buyer Beware.

Elections: Toxic Masculinity or Liberal Fear

Phraseology flying, the slogan, ‘Toxic Masculinity’ has been thrown around like a sucker punch used to berate and escalate – well toxic attitudes.  Because that’s exactly what it does – it creates another division, another form of hypocritical hate speech, driven predominantly by left leaning women and – sigh, men.  Of course men say it as though they are mind deployed aliens whose brains have been harvested, much like the radical ‘White Men’ slander punches.

While the word was first used in 2004 in a book discussing different types of men and their masculine tendencies, also called hegemonic masculinity, it didn’t become a  popular demonizing phrase until 2013 when it was defined in Geek Feminism Wiki as ‘one of the ways in which Patriarchy is harmful to men’.

Since then it has been liberally dribbled about by Hollywood and the MSM to socially demean certain men, and sometimes men in general, much like the ‘white men’ phenomena.  We hear Robert DeNiro spew spittle and profanity about our President, calling on people to harm him and anyone associated with him because of Trump’s ‘toxic masculinity’.  Of course DeNIro completely misses the carnival mirror depicting himself that makes most of us nonHollywooders cringe with creepiness as he is most obviously ‘toxic masculinity’ in it’s full frontal explosion.

I read it in obscure places like Mike Frost’s blog, a Reverend and academic at a school in Australia. Of course, in his small opinion, it would seem fodder to make commentary about – Trump.  I commented on one of Mr. Frost’s blog posts – once – only for him to grandiosely attempt to ridicule me and denounce me personally.  Why?  Because I offered a ‘different opinion’ regarding his claims.  In other words, Mr. Frost was exhibiting ‘toxic masculinity’.

I have been the victim of it on even the most bizarre of platforms – dating sites.  Where instead of acceptance and conversation, I became the brunt of attack and hatred.  Toxic masculinity.  But not from Trump, not from conservatives, in fact it seems to be most oppressively used by Liberal minded men and women in a clearly hypocritical, log in the eye fashion.

It comes on the flames of liberals claiming they are about peace, love and inclusion while finding all kinds of people they feel shouldn’t be included in the inclusion:  white men, conservative women, conservative men, conservative black men, masculine men, feminine women, stay at home moms, anyone wearing a hat that states Make America Great, any animal owned by anyone conservative… because we are the hate mongers.

Since 2015, there have been well over 170 protests (based on days not cities) against Donald Trump. Most of them are not about anything except – we don’t like you.  That would be over a period of roughly 3 years, or roughly five each month.

During Obama’s entire two term administration there were… 8.  We didn’t much care for him.  We didn’t like his policies.  We didn’t like his agenda.  We simply turned him – off.

The peaceful vs the peaceful…

Conservatives don’t attend protests often.   Rallies? Yes, they are positive events, they signal support and victory and hurrah.  But Protests and riots are about demonizing, threatening, violence and destruction.  If we have an issue, it is best served in a written content.

These are both men who were elected by The People.

Hitler advocated for violence.  Soros advocates for violence.  Eric Holder, Maxine, Cher, Handler, Kathy  whatshername, Behar, Robert deNiro, and a multitude of Hollywood Liberals advocate for assault and violence.  It is an obvious linkage.  And yet, still, conservatives do not protest.  We attend rallies to support someone, but most often the masks, the violence, is perpetrated in the name of – peaceful Democrat/Socialists.

The left is advocating Revolution.  Why?  Because they didn’t get their way…  They are superior, and thus feel that they should have their way.   It is an infantile behavior.  In the name – of peace, tolerance and hugs for all.

In essence it is born of fear.  A fear of losing their ‘toxic Hollywoodism’.  Their feelings of superiority and fear of the truth that will ultimately be revealed that is far more devastating than just the couch fame protocol which we have all been guilty of accepting, breeds – fear.

I imagine the Hollywood Executives, the one’s whose hands are bloodied in money, are going nuts as their profits plummet amid the childish antics of their $$$$ pool of actors as they make public fools of themselves and derail 50% of the viewer base.  Not exactly a ‘business’ move, but then they are after all – ‘entertainers’.  Nothing more.    And in that – protests are simply another means of entertaining – themselves.

The Kinks coined it quite well in a phrase in which they depicted Hollywood as ‘celluloid heroes’, in other words, fake, transparent, not real.

It is the conservatives in Hollywood who hide.  They are the ones who fear blacklisting, rapprochement, and hate from the ‘pacifist liberals’.

Oddly, all of this multiple decades long globalism, fascism and toxicity, is blamed on Trump.  Find a person to horde all the blame for every wrong doing during the history of mankind, is the mantra.  I doubt there is any person, any couple, in the history of mankind who has been tasked with rising above the acrimonial amount of blame and hysteria and rancid comments as Donald and Melania Trump.

Q?  A radical supporter of Truth.

Conservatives.  A hodge podge of Americans wanting to know the Truth.   Feeling energized.  Feeling confident.  And weary of decades of subservience.

This is the moment of Truth.  Do you stand for your self?  Or do you stand with dignity, honor and God?   This is NOT toxic masculinity – it is Toxic Hollywoodarity, and they are masks, fake faces, celluloid, speaking scripts, and wishing they were something more than a lowly actor.

Because, in the end, they will be – left behind.

Is Trump Hitler in Disguise?

The media – liberals – Democrats and Hollywood have all jumped on the bandwagon declaring Trump is Hitler in disguise… The point of course is to drag out one of the most heinous men in history and label a Presidential candidate with this ominous title. He isn’t alone, other candidates were compared to Hitler, including; Obama, Bush, Reagan and Nixon. Each time, the idea is to attempt to create a wave of horror.

These same people like to declare that Putin is a replica of Stalin. Others brought to light similarities between Stalin and Obama. FDR was likened to Mussolini! There were the supposed Marxist quotes from Hillary likening her to Lenin. Woodrow Wilson is now a racist. And a prestigious ivy league professor labeled Truman, “America’s Stalin”.

It has become so commonplace, that we don’t even listen because we know it is overused, slanderous and without basis. And sometimes, it is just simply – comical. When labeling a person demonic or evil, it is good to know who that evil really was and what he believed:

Hitler:

*He began his political career in prison after having failed a coup attempt in Bavaria.

*While in prison he wrote, Mein Kampf, which defiled all Jews as being innately ‘evil’.

*Therefore, the statement that the Germans had no idea what Hitler proposed – is adamantly, fundamentally – false.

*In 1938, Hitler was Time Magazine’s Man Of The Year

*In 1938, Hitler annexed Austria into Germany

*One of Hitler’s main goals was to expand Germany’s territory

*In 1939, he attacked Poland and Czechoslavakia

*In 1939, Hitler was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize

*Hitler hated Communism and Marxist doctrine, and believed that the Jewish people were attempting to take over the world thru their communist agenda.

*He believed that the eastern slavic countries were inferior, the people should be enslaved and their resources confiscated.

*Hitler wanted to destroy Russia (Soviet Union)

*He was considered a “National Socialist”

*He was against abortion and contraception

*While he held women to the highest of esteem as Mothers whom he considered ‘national heroes’, he felt that the concept of working women was a Marxist plot

Absolutely, none of these characteristics, beliefs, or actions can be attributed to Trump or his policies. The most blatant of which is the concept of National Socialism which embraces a large government, government regulation, government law, and government justice within the frame of a Nationalist view of one’s country.

In fact, there is one person who does embrace Hitler and ideology of the Nazi regime – George Soros, the same man who pulls the strings for Obama and Hillary. The overt agenda being world domination.

When I read of how Trump compares to Hitler, the language is largely verbal assaults against him without any factual backing: He demonizes people. He bullies his opponents. He’s not a Good Ole Boy politician. He encourages violence. He is racist. He belittles women.

  1. Demonizes people: actually, he demonizes the press, so it makes sense that the press would become defensive and demonize him back. He feels the press is manipulated, biased, and covert. About 90% of the US media is owned by roughly 6 corporations, including; CBS, Viacom, NewsCorp, Comcast/NBC, Disney and Time Warner. Of those, CBS, NewsCorp, Comcast/NBC, Time Warner and Viacom all contributed to the Clinton Foundation.
  2. Bullies Opponents: This has to be comical given every candidate bullies other candidates. Period.
  3. Not A Good Ole Boy: This is what encourages us to get away from the politicians that rule with an iron fist of corruption. Congress has an approval rating of between 11% and 13%. Those are the Good Ole Boys…
  4. He encourages violence: Against ISIS… and discourages the US initiative of coups and war mongering… While we know for fact that the violent protests and riots are funded by Soros with paid protesters backing Hillary.
  5. Racist: Too hot of a topic to tackle without backlash, but suffice it to say that there is not a person on this earth who we can say is not racist in some manner. Emails revealed that Hillary was pandering to black people. During the Clinton presidency, the prison population, which is comprised mostly of blacks, grew from 855,000 to over 2 million.
  6. He belittles women: While he has made some provocative comments that were disparaging and misguided, many, if not most, have been taken out of context, some I don’t even find offensive at all, and others are not about ‘women’ so much as they are about a societal or dervish personal attack. Something that Hollywood, the media, and Hillary lavishly share in …

    I always cheer up immensely if an attack is particularly wounding because I think, well, if they attack one personally, it means they have not a single political argument left.” 
    ― Margaret Thatcher