EU African Colonial Reparations

With the global flap in the wind Climate Change Fund errr, flapping, the EU has found a new and improved way to prop up their financing the redistribution of wealth agenda – “Colonialism Reparations”.

Another good reason for the UK BREXIT given they could be one of the biggest EU targets…

The gist of the bill is based on EU Afrophobic attacks.  The term, Afrophobic, conjures up  unjust prejudicial and racial ideologies in line with Islamaphobia.  Except that Afrophobia is related to ‘anyone of African descent’.   Each ‘national authority’ would thus be required to provide proper “education, housing, health, criminal justice, political participation and migration”.

The reasoning behind the gem of the bill is that the EU created colonialism and slavery throughout Africa and must be held accountable.

What this bill does not seem to address is the fact that hate crimes can occur against any race or culture including Jews, Whites, Christians, women, etc…  Therefore, creating an African agenda is actually quite blatantly – racial and prejudicial.

What is the real purpose?

  1. It opens the door to possible reparations being made to African states in the form of monetary aid.  Given the fall of funding for Climate Change that was being filtered to Africa, and the need for infrastructure to support the current colonialism land grabs, Africa has lost significant $$$$.   As the cabal took control of large swathes of land in Africa for pennies per hector, pushing out the local farmers, they required infrastructure in order to market their new machinized farms.   The Paris Accord Green Fund flapped, and money dried up.  Thus, a new agenda needed to be created to address the cabal’s need to have funding provided by taxpayers instead of from their own wallets.
  2. It creates an even larger welfare budget within individual EU countries that would become the burden of viable taxpayers further spiraling the EU economy into oblivion.
  3. It demonizes nationals as being the aggressors and victimizes immigrants further suppressing the criminal activities that are decimating entire cities throughout Europe.

The EU Commission rarely operates on a level that is not embedded in an alternate agenda.  And this instance is no different than any other.  The media coverage is slim with respect to hate crimes perpetrated by immigrant Afrikaners.  Most governments, specifically Germany’s, have adopted rules for quashing anything related to immigrant crimes.  The police are forced to release perpetrators, and statistically, they are prohibited from making any arrest which could skew the crime rates.

According to Germany’s Deutsche Welle, there were 800 attacks on Muslims last year.  By contrast, the first nine months of 2018 saw 1000 attacks on Jews.  There are roughly 117,000 Jews in Germany, while there are roughly one million Afrikaners (statistics are not available because Germany does not believe in profiling – numbers are based on an estimate done in 2013 before the massive immigration).

Similarly, in France it is illegal to conduct a census that queries race or color, therefore a proper statistic that would qualify as either Islamaphobia or Afrophobic is completely and utterly impossible.  Making the EU Commission’s bill nonsensical and without a shred of basis.

In addition, given Germany doesn’t profile, the number of attacks on Afrikaners could include black on black which would not be racial at all.

The agenda is obviously far from the purported EU Commission statement.  But as we watch Merkel and the growing possibility of her early resignation, it will be interesting to see where she chooses to reside as her country falls…

Russia Sanctions – Meaningless Propaganda.

Germany is defending the need for NATO in order to defend the EU democracies against a Russian invasion. Although Russia has given no intelligencia impression of any desire to attack the EU, the narrative serves a purpose.

Germany and her counterparts do not want to foot the defense bill, and given NATO and the UN have been subsidized by the US for decades, it serves a financial purpose rather than a defense purpose.

In that vein, Germany is also defying the Russian sanctions to punish the evil Putin by opening up a Mercedes car plant near Moscow.   The hypocrisy couldn’t be more abject.   Praising the German-Russian partnership, Germany’s Federal Minister for Economic Affairs and Energy, Peter Altmaier said that he saw great potential for future cooperation with Russia despite “political differences.”

Despite Merkel attempting to justify the trade move, the fact remains, it is all about money. Trade between Russia and Germany amounts to roughly 62billion Euro annually.  The farce of sanctions is thus defined.  It is a political move to create the appearance of doing something to appease constituents who have been led to believe a demonizing fake media agenda.

Cuba.  No different.  Despite levying sanctions for decades to oppose the communist regime, tourism continues to be a source of – money.   Canada is the largest source of tourism revenue, US is second and Germany is third.  Italy, France, Spain, the UK and even Russia enjoy the pristine beaches.  But a large sector of the tourism is actually health related given that the government shifted a tremendous amount of funds to that sector following the sanctions.   While doctors make less than waiters, their education and drive to cure rather than medicate is a sought after industry.

Germany sought to side-step the Iran sanctions in order to create a trade bolster to their economy.  And now Venezuela is finding itself in the middle of a power struggle from outside countries as the frenzy to capitalize on a collapsed economy provides huge potential to make money.

Syria is a case in point. Create a fake war.  Destroy an entire country.  And then vie for the contracts to rebuild, create a new economy, and walk away with a flush wallet.   If a country’s government is not willing to board that plane, the country stands to become the next victim.

Citizens will protest, citizens will cry foul, but in the end, that foul is what supports their continued luxuries and necessities.

Until a new mental acumen can devise a way to deviate from this system that has been in play since the beginning of time, we will be subject to its consequences.  Until this layer of global Swampland can be eradicated, they will continue to reap the rewards their inherent greed demands.  The mindset is always – no matter what a person has, it is never enough.   A millionaire wants to be a billionaire, and a billionaire wants to rule the world because billions will buy such.  Greed, boredom, and a bizarre belief that the pawns within this world are there to protect and die for the Queen, remains the monarchial mentality that was and is and is to be.

Until – we say – no.

Merkel is simply looking for a means to prop up a cracking economy in order to give the appearance she is Germany when in fact she is the same Merkel that destroyed Germany.   In her last and final days before resigning, her legacy is at stake, her honor must be upheld, and respect must be reattained.   By any means.

Germany has historically been the instigator of our worst global wars – always within the guise of propping up a cracked economy.

BREXIT: A New Referendum?

The UK’s Labour Party under Jeremy Corbyn has announced that they would back a new and improved referendum to clarify that the people of the UK really don’t support BREXIT at all.  According to Corbyn, having such a vote would instantly erase the chaos that exists in the UK Parliament where tensions are strung tight, voices are loud, and insults are slung with the precision of an AK-47.

Short sided?

Obviously the ploy is to stage a new vote that will be rigged better than the last one to assure the ‘stayers’ a win.  Should that occur, the Parliament can sit back and actually do something of value to earn their keep.  However, it is a highly inflammatory move that could likely send the UK into an all out civil uprising given that the people are quite aware of the corruption.

In keeping with the illusion of fairness, Corbyn says that they will call this a ‘confirmation referendum’ – just to make sure that what was already voted on by the public is really what they still want because he is convinced that the last vote was rigged.

In contrast, Donald Tusk, of the EU Commission has announced that an extension of the March 29 deadline would likely be approved by all 27 member states in the vein of grace and goodwill.  YUCK.

At this point, Theresa May is watering down the BREXIT agreement to such an extent, that in all likelihood, it is no longer BREXIT at all.  Shadow Secretary, Emily Thornberry, went even further tweeting that Theresa May’s prposed deal be put forth before the public, and if they don’t accept it then it is a slam dunk to “remain”!

If it sounds like Blackmail, it probably is blackmail.

One of the major concerns regarding BREXIT is the impact it will have not on the UK, but on the European Union.  Not only is the UK a positive contributor, but with Germany’s growth staggering close to the point of recession, and France embroiled in a budget row excluding the demands of the Yellow Vests, who is going to fund the globalists?

What is interesting is the timing.  Theresa May has implied she will be stepping down from her role this summer.   If in fact a no deal is allowed and an extension is not requested or approved, May will go down in history as the cause.  If an extension is added to the March 29 deadline for three months as Juncker is hinting, that deadline would align with May’s predecessor taking over.   If May is just borrowing time, the resulting chaos that would engulf the UK would coincide with her quick flight to lala land.

The end result would be the sanctioning of the UK by the EU Commission, or an automatic remain injunction, both of which would send shockwaves and likely result in massive protests.

Given the Leave contingent are representative of conservative political ideologies, it follows that the Socialists are the remain.  Socialists dominate the EU Commission.  Germany is a highly Socialist state and Merkel has been at the helm to denounce any negotiation proposal brought forth by May.  Reconfiguring the costs that were born by the UK and distributing them proportionally to the remaining EU members will put Germany in the forefront to absorb the greatest proportion.   Given Germany’s economy has shown signs of cracking, the burden is enough to pull Germany into a recession.  And if Germany falls, the EU falls.

Hedge Funds are poised to react quickly to buy or short the pound, and the profits will revert to those holding the puppet strings.   But until the game is over, everyone is poised, hand ready to hit the red button – sell or buy…

Europe’s Female Leaders: Merkel, May, Wallstrom – Femme Fatale FAILURES

Germany continues its attempt to vilify Trump while treading lightly as they dip their pinky toes into a possible recession at the making of their Socialist, Communist government. 

The Socialist liberals don’t like Trump’s wall, they hailed Obama’s ‘fence wall’, which was erected for the same purpose, but side with Pelosi in regard to the anti-humanitarianism a wall evokes.   Of course, they did nothing about the Berlin Wall which was created as a prison to keep people in – as opposed to keeping illegals – out.  It was the US under Reagan that brokered the fall of the Berlin Wall to allow free access among nationalized Germans.

But it isn’t about the wall, it isn’t about humanitarianism, it is about demonizing Trump in light of the reformed Socialist failure toward globalization with Germany at the helm.

Theresa May has informed her closest advisor that she will be resigning this summer two years early amidst the debacle of failing to bring about an organized BREXIT negotiation. Of course, she was the pawn of all pawns in this chess game, expendable, her dignity and respect in an utterly deplorable shambles.  Perhaps she went into this fusion of chaos with ‘eyes wide shut’, but I doubt it, and if she had, certainly she is leaving having completely disgraced the UK and herself, while quite possibly creating a spectacular ‘deplorable’ Fall.  Without shame, without compassion or a voice for her people, her legacy will be an engraving on her headstone, and Les Miserables may be invoked.

Merkel too is likely to leave amidst a deplorable escalation of crime, lacking negotiating tacticals, and an economy that is nose diving radically.  But perhaps that is – the game for the EU.   An economy, a society, must be destroyed before one can truly rule it within a globalized fashion of dictatorship – Hitler was Germany’s own example.  Bringing down the stalwarts;  France, Germany and the UK, would spiral the entire EU aligned countries.

Sweden’s Deputy Prime Minister, Wallstrom,  a self declared ‘feminist’, serves the criminals at the expense of her own women and girls, leaving them without support or retribution in a land that has spiraled into the soulless depths of rape, assault, bombs, fires, and  crime.

These are the women of the EU.  These are the female models – the humanitarians?

Germany’s Deutsche Welle media outlet, a government catered institution much like the Washington Post, prints scathing opinions and articles defiantly anti-Trump while embracing the likes of Pelosi, who would seemingly be wishing, ‘mother may I please’ become President of the US at the ripe age of 80.

Today, DW’s US correspondent, Michael Knigge, would have the audacity to site an argument against Trump declaring a state of emergency to fund the wall given that ‘the US has been in a perpetual state of emergency’ since 1979, which is actually a story drudged up in 2014 during Obama’s reign of terror.   Of course the fact that Germany was the causal force that took the globe into WWI and WWII seems to elude this author.   Perhaps we should delve into the Bolshevik revolution instigated by Germans seeking to overthrow the Russian Monarchy.  Or the 500 year long Germanic invasions of the Roman Empire?

Knigge goes on to ‘ad nauseum’ Pelosify himself as being in alignment with this liberal Socialist who has seemingly garnered a wealth of over $200 million through self-seeking contracts given to her husband, a VISA scam, and insider trading tactics used by herself and infinite other politicians to exploit the system and line their pockets.

In essence, Most, if not all, of Trump’s most vicious critics are angry because he is winning, because their tight apple-cart just got ransacked and dumped, because in all their infinite glory representing an army of 100,000, they still can’t beat one man – Trump!

WHOAH!

Germany and France: Fake a Military Alliance…

Germany and France have announced joint plans to build a, as in one, fighter jet, in their ‘ambitious new defense strategy’.  This one jet may be ready within – two years… or more because first they have to create a ‘concept study for a shared air combat system’, and the study may require two years to complete.

The construction for this fighter jet is a combined effort between Germany’s Airbus and France’s Dassault although funding is an issue and the respective governments are looking for outside ante’s.   Airbus’ military chief, Fernando Alonso, has stated that simply buying a bunch of US made F35’s would be a much less expensive alternative but such a purchase would greatly impact Europe’s sovereignty.   What?

Suddenly, it would appear that Europe has decided it will adopt the anti-Trump agenda of sovereignty – they just won’t announce it to the people.  In fact, the cost of this monstrosity unmanned fighter jet has also been kept under wraps given the tenuous budgets of France and Germany are already squeezed by trade issues and immigration welfare.

What they have announced is a $75 million budget to be shared by Dassault and Airbus to develop the ‘architecture and manufacturing structure’ for the project.  Essentially, it is a committee fee that may or may not determine if the project is even feasible.  And in essence, the spending does little to nothing to advance Europe’s military, and may be a smoke screen or deflection from the fact that their NATO ante remains in the twalette. Previous collaborations have proven quite embarrassing as differing opinions created vast disparities and eventually entire projects crumbled with nothing to show for the $$$$.

Of course, this time will be different.

While Macron made the demand that the venture not include bidding from US Lockheed Martin in order to maintain ‘sovereign rule’, the fighter jet will be fitted with US Nuclear Bombs.  So I guess sovereign only means – sometimes.

But they need to do something given their defense ministers have whispered the fact that most of their current inventory is obsolete or in dire need of costly repairs.

While Trump demanded that the EU countries ante up their fair share of military spending per the NATO Agreement, they have been reluctant.

NATO was created to defend European countries from a “Russia invasion”.   Canada, Turkey and the US came on board after the fact.   Russia came aboard briefly but NATO ejected them after the Ukraine coup.   Like a good deal of the Federal government, NATO has become a nonessential burgeoning expense propped up by the US and a handful of EU countries to conduct military exercises.  While NATO has been an alliance in Afghanistan, and the first Gulf War, it is now mostly relegated to ‘protecting civilians in north Africa’.   Why?  Why is NATO protecting countries that aren’t a part of NATO?

A quick perusal of the NATO site indicates their current projects to be a handful of meetings, shaking hands, and discussing security while taking jaunts to Romania, Slovakia, Macedonia, Kosovo, London and Brussels.   Of course no organization would be complete without creating a sub-feature that addresses ‘equality for women’, as in NATO is now a sponsor for protecting women’s rights.  AH!

Of course the blatantly obvious question in all this military discussion is why are Germany and France creating their own military instead of anteing up their fair share for NATO?   Unless they too believe that NATO has become superfluous.

Time Magazine has an answer: Their justification for the fair share debacle is because the 2% of GDP is simply a ‘guideline’, not mandatory. And therefore, Germany, France and most of the EU are within their right to give NATO money – or not, in any denomination they feel like.   Therefore if a country, such as the US, decided to ante nothing, we would be within that same ‘guideline’ rule.   By George I’ve GOT IT!

It is the same rule that the Paris Climate Accord created, i.e., ‘a guideline’ that neither Germany or France have ever met, and don’t intend to meet in the near future, although a 30 year agenda sounds good because Merkel and Macron will be long gone by then sitting on a beach drinking Mai Tai’s.

I wonder if the $39 billion BREXIT bill is a ‘guideline’?  Given that contracts are not really binding, and $$$ aren’t really available, and rules aren’t really governable?  And organizations are really superfluous… conducting occasional meetings, flying hither and there… while Kosovo ‘peacekeepers’ are really volunteers, but they are multi-ethnic, lightly armed, professional and support the UN.  But Kosovo is not a member of NATO, so why is NATO even there?    I ramble.

Bottom line, France and Germany are trying to give the impression they are doing something constructive toward building a military when in fact what they have is completely unusable, would offer no protection to the people, and they don’t have the money to create a military defense – so instead, they have created a committee to evaluate the construction of a jet and held lots of photo ops to impress the media with a proposal/guideline of a jet that is way too expensive, and they can’t afford.

But it isn’t mandatory…

World Economic Forum -A Soros Hollywood Affair

The Davos Summit or World Economic Forum, is nearly over and they are coming away with some major accomplishments as they prepare to board their Gulf Stream jets and jettison away into the swirl of yellow plume skies…

What have they accomplished so far?

Nothing.  They just talked the talk while ignoring the walk and readied to leave in a surge of CO2 pollution as their 1500 jets blazoned the skies.   It was no different than the G-20 Summit, the G-8 Summit, The Paris Accord Summit, the NATO Summit, the Healthcare for all Summit, The Inspire Summit, the BRICS Summit and the 100+ other annual Summits that are really about a bunch of back slapping politicians, Hollywood actors and self-proclaimed activists who want to hear themselves speak.  Yes – celebrities are invited to attend because the Summit awards artists (actors and musicians) the Crystal Award.  Actors describe their ‘vision of the world’ because of course theirs is pre-eminent.  It has devolved into a Summit of fantasyland narcissists and uber elite narcissists discussing what is best for their subjects, The People.  How droll.

In November 2018, there were no less than 25 separate ‘Summits’, in October there were 21, you get the drift…  These Summits have become a forum for self grandizing.  Do we really believe that the likes of Matt Damon and Cate Blanchett should decide world policies?

Merkel managed to slam Trump and the Deplorables while sending her Foreign Minister to plead with Trump to be like Obama, pretty please.   And Soros, who is an annual attendee, gave a scathing speech about China and XI Jinping while continuing his criticism of Facebook and Google – two major operatives of – Soros.  Soros is furious with Jinping because China continues to move away from his open society initiative toward a more sovereign nation and that is cause for a scurrilous spiel of expletive laced spew!

While the media in the UK and US was cryptic in their reference to President Trump’s nonattendance, Macron, Lavrov, Xi Jinping and Theresa May were all absent as well.  Each sited their own reasoning, which amounted to resolving issues at home.

What Soros offered was a new and improved United Nations that would rule the world under the tenants of his open society premise instead.  He emphasized repressive regimes with IT monopolies that his open society could not ‘destroy’ so as to initiate his plan to infiltrate his own monopolies (Facebook and Google) which espoused his ideals and rules of order and chaos.

But Soros anger may have a core point to his blistering, blustering anger.  According to Zero Hedge, of the 12 biggest Billionaires in attendance, Soros was the only one to have secured a net lost in the last ten years amounting to – 61%.  And he’s peeved!   Everyone else saw their wealth expand exponentially including the top tier Zuckerberg at 1853%, Marc Benioff at 829% and Steven Schwarzman at 486%.

The venue menu included a Caesar salad for a mere $48, a club sandwich for $42.50, and a hamburger for $41.  But hey, given that state taxpayers foot the bill… nyeh.

At the end of it all, everyone goes back to their respective country, yawns, and continues along the same path they were on the previous week, the previous month and previous years as though nothing has changed.  Those that desperately want globalization return home to push – globalization, and those that don’t, push sovereignty.   It is a waste of time, money and pollutants.

And yet they continue ad nauseum each and every year.

I applaud Trump for shrugging it off.

So what happened at the 2018 Summit – a Year in Reflection?

Soros stated that Trump wanted to create a mafia state.  Soros blasts Social Media giants because they didn’t garner him the US election as he demanded.   Dhragi hits out on Trump comments on the dollar.   Soros tells the EU they should prop up Africa’s economy.   Soros hits out on China and Russia totalitarianism.  Soros says Trump is a temporary phenomena who will disappear in 2020.  Soros says the survival of the world is at stake because of Jinping and Trump.

Do you see a pattern… help me please!  The entire summary of the summit was about what ‘Soros Said’.

And some pundit, Jennifer Jacobs, a White House spokesperson for Bloomberg, is aghast because Trump dared to schmooze upwards of 15 company executives while in attendance.   I mean, isn’t that what everyone – does?

The bottom line. Soros speeches indicate he is deathly afraid of Jinping and Trump – not even Putin was awarded the typical demonization reprimand. What is most telling is the fact that Soros unabated fear would seem to highlight the fact that he has lost his ju-ju (to borrow a word from a friend), and he is sliding into obscurity and failure.  I imagine for a man of Soros character, failure is far worse than Hell.

Climate Change: The Magnetic North is Shifting

The media is busily denigrating the US for our heinous lack of adherence to lower emissions and meet the ‘goals’ of the Paris Climate Accord.   Forbes refers to us as “The Ugly Face of America”.   While citing percentages with self grandizing authority and blaming Trump for pulling out of “Obama’s Clean Power Plan”, Forbes does not articulate the fact that Obama’s plan did – nothing.   The US remained second highest producer of CO2 emissions behind China throughout Obama’s administration rule.   Obama did make a ‘call’ for more renewable, and he did make a ‘commitment’, but those are words – just as the entire Paris Accord is a body of goals and words without any rule.

Germany’s largest power station is fueled by coal, as is Denmark’s, Australia, Chile, India, Serbia, Poland, etc…  The largest power station in the US is Hydroelectric.   The 20 largest power producing facilities in the world are Hydro and nuclear with the exception of two, one in China and one in Japan.   And despite Forbes using Germany as an example to model, they failed each and every standardized goal set by Merkel who has now pushed that agenda to a possible – 2030.

Politicians routinely spew a plethora of rhetorical word-plays which the media regurgitates as fact when they are simply legalistic word-plays.   Throw in a few get out of jail free cards like ‘our aim’, ‘our path’, ‘our goal’, and when those ideals are not met – ‘we never promised’ is the free card.

But Germany isn’t the only country to backslide on their commitments, China, the world’s largest polluter, has pushed the punchcard to 2030 as well.    But even if those 2′ goals are attained, according to the UN the ‘goals’ are not even remotely effective and collectively all countries would have to increase their goals five fold to effect the necessary 1.5’ commitment.

In other words, even if every country collectively meets the Paris Accord goal of 2’ by 2030, they will still fall short of the necessary goal by 25%. And it is a fair guess that by then the entire Accord will have fizzled into nothing given no one has the funds to ante up – especially if the EU ends up footing the bill for the UN and their own military defense and their burgeoning immigration welfare.

In the Trump Blame Game, what exactly did Trump change with respect to Obama’s Climate Control policy?

1)   He hired an EPA Minister that the left doesn’t like, who subsequently resigned after threats.

2)   He lifted ‘some restrictions’ on greenhouse emissions from coal plants.

3)   Eased restrictions on millions of acres of land that had been protected for the “Grouse”.

4)   Approved five oil and gas companies permission to use seismic airgun blasts to search for oil and gas in the ocean.

5)   Lifted the block for the Keystone XL Pipeline.

6)   Sent to the appeals court a request to quash the Youth Climate Lawsuit – that no one knows diddly about.

7)   Cleared production of oil and gas wells in the Arctic.

8)   Signed a bill to clean up the plastic pollution in our oceans.

9)   Disbanded an ‘Air Pollution Review Panel’.

10) Extended the ban on mining near Yellowstone.

11) Rolled back Obama rules that oil and gas companies must monitor and mitigate the release of methane gas.

The ‘science’ of climate change is actually theory based.    However, in the midst of this climate theory, there is something radically occurring within the earth’s core.   The Magnetic North Field is moving at a speed 4-5 times normal.   “Magnetic fields are essential for life on Earth. That is because the magnetic field protects the planet from cosmic rays and charged particles from solar flares.  If we didn’t have the magnetic field protecting the Earth, then the atmosphere would become stripped of its atoms and the radiation from the solar wind would irradiate all life on Earth.”

The earths magnetic field protects life on earth by shielding it from radiation and moderating our climate.   Over the last 200 years, the magnetic field has weakened by about 15%.   Pole reversals occur naturally with the magnetic field ‘shifting’.   This core shift can be gradual or rapid and defines our shifting climate and radiation.   Some scientists believe these ‘historical shifts’ have been the causal factor in the eradication of Neanderthals and possibly the dinosaurs, etc…

Scientists explain that these shifts create ozone holes and cause charged particles to bombard Earth’s atmosphere during solar storms which would punch holes in Earth’s atmosphere.   It is believed in scientific circles that this weakening would directly effect those species that rely on geomagnetism for navigation, including bees, salmon, turtles, whales, bacteria and pigeons.

This shift has been tracked for about 160 years, the same timeline used to define ‘climate change’.

Currently the shift is occurring at the rate of 40 to 55 km per year.   In 1900 the pole was located in Canada, today it is closing in on Siberia.  So what comes first, the chicken or the egg?   Given that science states that this magnetic shift occurs every 200,000 years, and humans were hardly creating CO2 emissions back in the day, I think it is safe to say in this instance the chicken, the core, is the initiator, and humanities outcome will be the egg.

That said, no amount of Paris Accord ‘goals’ will have one rat’s arse on the outcome.

UN Migration Pact: Ponzi Scam

While speaking before the UN General Assembly, Germany’s Merkel made an interesting announcement:  If 2/3rds of the UN member states, totaling 193, vote for the Migration Pact, then The Pact will be adopted for ALL member states and will become legally binding.   To date, there are not nearly enough countries that have opted out.  Therefore, the only way to not be subject to the law of the Pact, would be to completely drop out of the UN.  There are only three countries that are non-members:  Vatican City, Kosovo, and Palestine.

On December 19th, the final vote will determine whether this Migration rule of law will proceed.

The legal issue is inserted because of the new definition of migration – Human Right.  Therefore, while the pact loosely states it is non-binding, in fact the rule of law would pursue a violation of Human Rights against a country that does not comply.   Brought before the International Criminal Court, the UN and its court can recommend sanctions, and demand reparations for ‘victims’.  Acting as a mega-NGO, the UN could create a class-action of migrants that were disallowed into states that refused, and order those UN member states to pay off the migrant for violating his/her Human Right to migrate.

In addition, anyone, including the media, who thereafter references ‘illegal migration’ can be charged with criminal hate speech and subject to jail and fines.

A few days ago, the Leader of the latest Mexican Caravan demanded $50,000 for every migrant that came to Tijuana and was not permitted into the US.  Currently, that would be considered extortion.  Under ICC law, the UN could impose those fees and redefine them as reparation once the Migration Pact becomes law.

The members this UN/NGO would likely target first would be those who refused to sign;  US, Italy, Hungary, Austria, Poland, Australia, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Israel, Switzerland, and Slovakia.

While the Pact claims to be non-binding, the UN gives itself the power to ‘collectively manage’ migration for all countries so as to protect human rights whereby ‘illegal’ immigration no longer exists as borders are open to anyone and everyone.  While the UN claims that member states must still ‘manage borders in an integrated, secure and coordinated manner,” and to ‘increase legal certainty and predictability of migration procedures,’ they are assuring that they, the UN, have no monetary responsibility to assure that borders are orderly.  Nor will they have any financial responsibility to send immigrants to their designated country, those costs would be born by the country’s taxpayers.

Both the Pope and the UN Special Rapporteur, Felipe Morales, have stated that the US needs to buck up and take in anyone and everyone or face charges… given security should not over-shadow Human Rights.

Bottom Line:  this is classic legal double-speak which means that a country is not bound to accept immigrants, however, if they don’t, they may be subject to Criminal Human Rights Violation Charges by the ICC and subject to whatever monetary and other outcomes this court determines.

Fox News: The Trojan Horse Embracing Liberal Progressives

Deutsche Welle has once again uploaded its hypocrisy in slamming Russia’s Putin for hypocrisy. Apparently, Putin is a hypocrite for attending the 100th birthday celebration of Nobel laureate Alexander Solzhenitsyn who upheld the right of freedom of speech.  What was Solzhenitsyn a critic of?  Communism, Bolshevik Dictators, Lenin and Stalin.   He was born in 1918 when Russia’s Tsar and family were brutally murdered and the Bolsheviks ushered in the dictatorship Communist rule destroying Russia’s economy and sending society into chaos.   Exiled for decades he loved his country and returned to Russia in 1990 becoming a vocal proponent of Vladimir Putin!   Solzhenitsyn believed Putin would reinstate Russian Nationalism, freedom and prosperity.  His theme when he died was that “Men Have Forgotten God” – a reference to the communist/socialists who are devoutly atheist.

Apparently, DW.com failed miserably to research this friendship and instead used a fake demonization agenda to ridicule Putin.   Of course, the fact that Merkel herself was a Communist before she was a Socialist seems to elude the Media.

While the MSM have created innumerable ‘Fact Checker’ sites to discredit Trump for ‘Pinocchio’s’, they rarely if ever fact check themselves!    And recent articles discrediting Trump have suddenly begun to rise from the ashes from a place one might not ordinarily  conceive…

Fox News is now publishing articles and opinion pieces that are just – well, wrong.  ‘A Statistician Assistant Professor is weighing in on the cost of the Border Wall’.   The fact that she would have absolutely no knowledge of construction costs, engineering, material costs, labor costs, or even what exists already in terms of The Wall, would seem irrelevant.   If I was building a house, a store, an office building, I don’t think I would hire a ‘statistician’ and don’t know of any contractor that has.    But she is – anti-Trump.

Brennan too is given the opportunity to voice his demand that Trump be killed, and never hold office again, and Fox News glibly reports this as a static fact.  What Fox failed to note is that Rand Paul called out Brennan as being mentally unstable and thus his security clearance was revoked.   As in, the man worships demons.

So what happened to Fox News?

In 2017 they hired Noah Kotch to be Editor in Chief and Vice President of Digital for Fox News.  His background resume reads like a true Liberal:  CNN, Washington Post, NBC, and ABC.  His appointment would align with the takeover of Fox from the staunchly conservative Ruport Murdoch by his son James and wife Kathryn, also in 2017.  Between 2007-2011, Kathryn Murdoch served as Director of Strategy & Communications for the Clinton Climate Initiative.  James and Kathryn have a Foundation (no surprise – legal speak for diversion of money to non-taxable) wherein a link on their foundation website reverts to a page for EDF and an anti-Trump ad.   Apparently, James and Kathryn hobnob frequently with the Clintons, most recently at the wedding of two of the next generations most wealthy Indians;  Isha Ambami and Anand Piramal.  Mz. Ambami’s father is worth $66 billion and is Chairman of Reliance Industries.  Anand’s father is worth a measly $4.3 billion.

Reliance is a massive conglomerate involved in oil, petrochemicals, biotechnology, retail, aerospace, banking, pharmaceuticals, pipelines, media, solar, etc… and the Murdochs were on the guest list.

Kathryn Murdoch has announced her support for the upcoming platform, The Correspondent, which is slated to be launched soon and will uphold values ‘wholly different than those of Fox News’, embracing diversity and combating prejudice while supporting ‘progressive realities’.

James Murdoch was instrumental in removing O’Reilly and Ailes from their positions in Fox News.  He has made it clear that shifting to a more progressive liberal view will be the new Fox News.

The media censorship is expanding brutally.  With Blogs more and more becoming the last bastion of anything – not liberal or socialist leaning.   I imagine those venues will be attacked next and their content censored, but then effectively that is already being done by Google.  Recently, Google’s CEO was sportingly embarrassed when it was revealed that their analytics showed a picture of Trump when typing in a Google search for ‘idiot’.   Interestingly, when I typed in ‘corruption’, I got a picture of Hillary.

It will be interesting to see what happens to the last two conservatives employed by Fox:  Hannity and Carlson.  Will they convert their politics?  Will they sell their souls?

Facebook And The Rise of Socialists in US

Zuckerberg has now found himself in the unholy crossfires of not just Hillary, but Soros, who has aligned with Trillium Asset Management’s CEO, Mat Prasky, to call for Zuckerberg’s resignation.  Why? Because Facebook bloggers have had the audacity to malign Soros in their posts.  

Facebook found itself in the doghouse with Hillary as she blamed it for her presidential bid loss due to ‘negative posts’ that Zuckerberg did not promptly censor, like a good Socialist/Communist should.  Soros finds himself in the same predicament and has decided the analytics are too permissive and must be wholly liberal.

Full Circle:   Trillium bills itself as a “Green Fund” and Prasky upholds that ideology within his Board memberships including Social Venture Network which has honored such notable companies as Green For All.  Green For All was launched at the Clinton Global Initiative in 2007 by founder, Van Jones, who sits on the Board of Social Venture Network .  Van Jones served as President Obama’s advisor for Green Jobs and has been covered extensively by CNN, New York Times, USA Today and The View.  Like Obama, Jones’ monetary rewards would seem to coincide with his two published books, which like Obama’s made the NYT best seller list.

Jones is backed by the NAACP, Ebony, Rockefeller, Rolling Stone, Elle, Time Magazine, World Economic Forum, etc…  He has worked with Moveon.org under Soros, and The Center For American Progress under Podesta.  Jones is a viable Socialist candidate being groomed for a future presidential bid.

Facebook is recognized as a most powerful exploitive tool to gain control of and create a person’s ‘opinion’.   Although Zuckerberg is aligned with Hillary and Soros, he did not shore up fast enough, and the Cabal needs to take over in time to assert a Coup of American politics if not in 2020, then in 2024.

And the new rumbling isn’t so much the progressives per se, as the Socialists who run under the guise of the Democratic ticket because they haven’t yet gained the necessary power to act independently.  It would appear, according to various Socialist party websites, that their tactic is to capitalize on a growing base, hide within the Democrat party until 2023 when they plan to rise up within the call for a “Revolution” reminiscent of the Bolsheviks.

College students lean toward Liberal Green agenda’s without any understanding of Socialism and its massively destructive ramifications.  Creating a Green profile platform for 2024 will secure their support.  Van Jones is black.  With the radical dysphoria infused in the US by the Liberals to divide whites and blacks, that population segment will further splinter and Jones will rise as a Socialist black man advocating for people of color and youth. The Democrat Party will likely collapse as the old suits die off and their crimes gain traction in the media. This die off will push traditional Democrats toward the Socialist Party.

According to the website, Democratic Socialists of America, during the midterms they voted in 4 congressional candidates, 12 nationally endorsed elected officials, 30 locally endorsed elected officials, and 35 locally endorsed ballot initiatives in Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Hawaii, Rhode Island, DC, Montano, Maine, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Minnesota, New York, North Dakota, Massachusetts, Maryland, Missouri, Oregon, Texas, Tennessee, and Washington.

Their event schedule for November 18th:  How To Do Targeted Advertising On Facebook.

Oddly, many people in the US are not educated in the ideology and history of Socialism, what it means, what it entails, and historical leaders who attempted to govern under this dictatorial means:

1)   Venezuela is the most recent catastrophic result of a Socialist government policy.  Nicolas Madura is the current President ruling under the United Socialist Party under a program that has been referred to as authoritarian and dictatorial and has been instrumental in the complete chaotic collapse of the entire economic and social system plague by an inflation rate of 1million percent.

2)   The National Socialist Workers’ Party or the Nazi’s were the children of Hitler. Germany was in a free fall and in 1931 during the Great Depression, Hoover called a moratorium on WWI reparations to Germany causing widespread collapse of banks and industries.  1933 Hitler came to power under the guise of freeing Germany from the tyranny of economic collapse.

3)   The Bolsheviks were factions within the Russian Social Democratic Party following the ideology of Socialist, Karl Marx.  Lenin was a dictator who became leader of the Socialist Revolution ultimately throwing Russia into Communist rule for decades.

The US is not without socialist reforms; welfare, Medicaid, public schools, etc…  But just as Germany has instituted more and more control over citizen’s freedoms, so has the US with the assistance of the media as they redefine and recreate history to virtually ‘uneducate’ The People.

You cannot have globalization without Socialism.  You cannot have Socialism without a dictatorship government.  While Merkel appears more and more defeated as she calls for the UN to be the governing world body, this remains the agenda amidst a splintering EU, an uninformed Macron, and a collapsing Theresa May.

The common denominator for Venezuela, Hitler and the Bolsheviks was ‘Youth”.  Garner the youth, call for a revolution, and institute a civil war.  I believe that is the same call the Socialists are advocating in the US today… Buyer Beware.