World Health Organization “Foundation”: Gene Editing & Depopulation

The World Health Organization has quietly created a Foundation as of May 2020. Why?   According to their website they will be doing everything WHO is doing so it would at first glance appear to simply be a shadow.   But WHO is limited by its board, the countries funding it, and guidance principles. In contrast, a WHO Foundation will not be subject to these limitations allowing it to create independent Manifestos.  

The WHO Foundation has its own board stacked with pharma affiliates and UN comrades. The newly appointed CEO, Anil Soni, hails from a diverse background of experience including his leadership of the Clinton Health Access Initiative, as well as his time at the Global Fundfounded by Bill Gates.   Hence it would appear that Clinton and Gates have teamed up to redirect a depopulation agenda at a more warp speed effort than the traditional WHO.  TIME would seem to be dwindling.

The Gates Global Fund was established to fight AIDS, Malaria, TB, etc…, all the same hot topics that garner empathy while not serving anything more on the platter than another Gates vaccine. Although it has been mired in controversies regarding misappropriation of funds, fraud, negligence and lack of oversight, it continues to attempt to reinvigorate it’s reputation.  But the damage was done and multiple government organizations stopped funding.  What to do?  What to do?

With all the ruckus focusing on an annoying Pandemic distraction and a vaccine that won’t generate profits until 2021, Gates was losing patience and $$$$$$.   His crisis management of Malaria, TB, HIV, Ebola, etc… all took a backseat in order to focus exclusively on CoVid.   As such, time management needed leveraging and bureaucracy needed to be eliminated. VOILA!   It worked for Clinton, and it has worked for 80,000+ NGO’s – why wouldn’t it work for WHO?

Bored with CoVid, WHO’s spokesperson, Dr Soumya Swaminathan, a pediatrician, released a recent statement in which she determined, “I don’t believe we have the evidence on any of the vaccines to be confident that it’s going to prevent people from actually getting the infection and therefore being able to pass it on.”   In other words some evolved mutated version of CoVid will always be around  just like H1N1 because vaccines don’t work.

The world is weary of CoVid and wants to move on. The mutations have delegitimized the vaccine, and the death toll Gates had predicted through his modeling organization IHME (Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation) has been squarely compromised and foiled for making statements that were highly flammable and ridiculous only to be proven to be ‘false’ or fake. Another reputation down the tube.

While IHME attempts to make algorithmic predications, it has instead become known as the Gates Crystal Ball – the only thing missing is a gypsy.

In reviewing the biographies of various board members of WHO Foundation and IHME, there seems to be a few consistent overlaps worth noting;   1. Nearly everyone comes from Harvard,   2.   Universal health care is a mandated target,   3.   Anyone from the UK seems to be a ‘fallow at the Royal Society’, and 4.   No one seems to have a background in epidemiology or virology, instead ‘genomics’ or gene editing is a common shared passion.

What this indicates is that cures are NOT the focus.   Instead, while pumping out more and more vaccines that have limited or no positive results, but make Gates tons of money, the focus will be on gene editing so as to assure the global survivors ‘genetic perfectionism’ and the absence of any medical, physical or intellectual problems.

The WHO Foundation donations page states they will not accept any donations from entities or associates within the arms, tobacco or alcohol industries.   While funding for WHO is derived by its member states, the WHO Foundation will be another NGO class whereby other NGO’s, corporations, and Foundations may make donations.   Funding will not be restricted, grants will serve the Foundation focus, and given the WHO Foundation is registered in Geneva, tax laws with respect to transparency of returns is murky.

The WHO main organization is completely independent of the Foundation and thus also not required to make their actions, donors or conduct transparent.

In 1998 the UN created the UN Foundation to act in shadow parallel with vaccinations apparently one of their main programs. Their Measles Initiative claims that they are responsible for ‘saving the lives of 1.2 million children” through measles vaccines. Of course there is no evidence, no proof, no documents to support the claims – they are simply algorithm claims without substance.   Guesses.   And no one challenges these claims. It would seem more of an Advertising propaganda rhetoric than a true health metric.   But then, that would be the point – to use the old concept of ‘subliminal seduction‘ parlayed in the 1970’s and beyond.

They learned this tactic from one of their partners, the CDC. The CDC is quite famous for its illustrious play of numbers.   The fine print will always relay the truth ‘these figures are estimates’ (because we have absolutely no idea what the true facts are…) – and the same ‘estimates’ have been used for decades. Because No One challenges the claim – it’s a child’s life!  And so the challenge dies.  Bye, Bye Miss America Pie…

While WHO will continue to wallow in their membership dues and fees and initiative add-on fees, the WHO Foundation is now free to tap unbridled funding from the web of NGO’s, law firms, banks, pharma, etc… in the Pay-For-Play schematic that reaps – not Cures – but ever burgeoning wealth – centralized in the new Global Warming Capital – Africa.

ALL aligned in concordance with the Sustainable Development Program initiated by the UN wherein the real enemy isn’t climate change, or pandemics, or Trump – the true enemy that needs to be eradicated is humans.    HUMANS  are the common enemy, they cause of all the symptoms. ~Club of Rome.

Bill Gates: The Vaccine Pandemic Epidemic…

As of 2015, there were about 1.56 million nonprofit charities in the US, and 86,000 Foundations.   Total assets held by the charities were $3.67 trillion.   That is accumulated wealth. It represents an increase of 256% since 1998.   Never taxed. Active in lobbying within limits.    

As of 2018, Bill Gates Foundation alone held assets valued at $47.85 billion.

In the early 1800’s Americans had created charities and voluntary associations such as hospitals, orphanages, seminaries, churches, etc…

There are four main Federal Agencies that disburse US tax dollars to NGO’s:   USAID – budget $41 billion, National Endowment for Democracy – budget $168 million, Middle East Partnership Initiative – $7.3 billion (as of 2016) and US Institute of Peace – $38.6 million.   In addition, foreign aid amounts to $40-$50 billion. States also use taxpayer funds to support NGO’s.

In the ordinary world, when an individual donates to a charity it is a tax deduction if the person itemizes. But when taxpayer funds are donated by the federal or state government – no tax deduction is inferred, and taxpayers are not given a choice where or how those dollars are disbursed. It is something like double-dipping.

Shouldn’t taxpayers be given a tax deduction for the charities our Federal and State government – fund?

In 1998, the UN created the UN Foundation – a charity – and simultaneously created the UN Fund for International Partnerships as a sort of ‘coordinating middleman’ because the Foundation was incapable of actually administering its funds. The Foundation partners with UNICEF, CDC, Red Cross, WHO, and the Global Polio Eradication Initiative.   30% of the funding for the Global Polio Initiative comes from Gates.   We know that Gates is the primary funder of WHO.   So who is running what – why and how?

And as a result, the Gates vaccine for polio was adopted – globally. Qud Pro Quo – or tit-for-tat. According to a, ‘since deleted Market Watch Report from 2019’, the polio vaccine is likely to reach a $1.630 billion revenue source – annually by 2024. Despite the fact that the polio rate in the US is ummm … -0- for the last 40 years, the vaccine is still a recommended childhood prescription to the tune of 4 recommended inoculations.   While the hype would have us believe that the vaccine eliminated all polio in the US as of 1976, the bell curve had plunged to near zero – years before the vaccine.

Natural immunity.

But Gates is NOT natural.   He has 2 very inter-related focus’s; 1. Vaccinate the world for everything so as to make him/me mega $$$$,   and 2. Depopulate the world so the true King can rise to power.

And in this twisted vision, emerges the real Health Crisis. The real Health Emergency.   We are pumping chemicals into the bodies of children whose immunity is still in its growth – for diseases that haven’t existed for decades.

Running out of diseases requires new and worldly diseases – CoVid 19 filled that prescription. Not necessarily through actuality – but with the help of the Friends Gates had bought, it filled a void that Gates needed.

So how does one man control the world’s most respected organizations?

NIH, one of the most respected health organizations in the US is sitting on $110.5 million in undistributed assets. Annual executive payroll is $2.58 million and out of a total revenue of $63.4 million in 2018, it disbursed in the form of US grants per its charitable charter $15 million, the largest recipient of which would seem to be – itself… under the guise of IRS code 170(c)(1) – which references a ‘state academic university’ without referencing the actual university.

I sit at my desk with a spectacular view of Pikes Peak and watch the variety of people responses walk down the sidewalk – and the street – sometimes couples who live in the same household distancing 20’ or more and wonder, “was this just a test to see what could be done in such a relatively short period of time?”   Who were the rebels and who were the lemmings?

And of course, – the now $4 trillion question – why?

How could governors decimate their entire state knowing the fakery?   What kind of person could they be?   Or are they blackmailed? Are children threatened in the blackmail? Or are they really so self consumed that their own perversities are at stake…

Within this – I do believe that President Trump knows far more than we can even imagine.   I think his intentions are honorable.   And I believe that without him we would have succumbed to communism in 2017.   I know that I have no control of what happens, but I also realize that moral, ethical, and verbal support are paramount!   And if we fail these very basic ideologies, we are essentially curling in a ball and doing absolutely – nothing.

Don’t be a caste sheep.   Don’t wait for someone else to lead you.   Trcensorshipump is fighting for our basic Freedoms… are you?

AFRICA: Follow The Money

Tomorrow in New York City the UN will host a start up fund for the “Global Compact for Safe, Orderly, and Regular Migration (GCM)”.   Launched in September 2016, the intergovernmental pact supporting GCM was approved by164 countries and signed by 152. The countries that did not climb aboard the band wagon include: United States, Austria, Australia, Bulgaria, Chile, Czech Republic, Estonia, Italy, Hungary, Dominican Republic, Latvia, Israel, Poland, Slovakia, Brazil and Switzerland.   Russia signed the agreement but issued a statement repudiating aspects with regard to the ‘cause of mass exodus’ claiming if a nation created the migration they should take on the burden.

The basis of the pact is to allow complete Open Border policy.   Sound familiar?   In addition, the host country will ensure migrants can access basic services and make provisions for both full inclusion of migrants and social cohesion, while supporting multicultural activities through sports, music, arts, culinary festivals, volunteering and other social events.

In other words refugee status, immigration quotas, and immigration restrictions and conditions would be eliminated. Citizens and taxpayers would be required to pay for all the migrants as they acclimate while receiving free basic services.

Obviously, the UN and the Ted Turner UN Foundation have an agenda.

Over the last few decades’ enormous amounts of money have been injected into Africa for the purpose of revitalizing the infrastructure, building exclusive neighborhoods, and buying up large swathes of farmland – called ‘land grabs’.   In addition to billionaire dollars, the money has come in the form of the Paris Climate Accord and in the form of government funded charities and NGO’s, aka taxpayers.

Encouraging the outflow of Africans to other countries via immigration, war, and disease, vast portions of Africa then become enclaves available as home to the elite. Most of the urban revolution is occurring in the following locales: Cairo, Egypt – Casablanca, Marrakesh and Tangier Morocco – Accra, Ghana – Lagos, Nigeria – Cape Town, Johannesburg, Pretoria, and Durban, South Africa – Mombasa, and Nairobi, Kenya – Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

The elitist suburbs host the wealth of white expatriates while 93% of the unemployed remain black.   Over the last two years upwards of $3 billion has been invested into the renovation of Johannesburg alone. The city boasts a moderate climate, a burgeoning art world, modern shopping centers, a new commuter railway, three public and private universities, and crime surveillance camera’s on every city street corner which has halved the crime rate.

In 2016, for the first time ever a member of the Democratic Alliance Party became mayor of Johannesburg, Herman Mashaba.   The Democratic Alliance Party is comprised of English speaking Afrikaans and is considered Liberal supporting “Open Opportunity Society For All” .  Sound familiar?

Nairobi boasts a vibrant economy as well hosting headquarters for Coco-cola, World Bank, Citibank, BBC, CNN, Reuters, Deutsche Welle, Agence France-Presse, New York Times, and AP.

In 2010, Kenya drafted a new Constitution, the political system was overhauled and infighting became the norm since.   Morocco is predominantly Muslim, Lagos government shifted to the Socialist Party in 2019, and Ghana recently voted in the New Patriotic Party.  Of course, like other countries, the elections are highly contested with allegations of fraud and rigging common. Not unlike just about every country and state in the world now.

The Green Climate Fund which operates to expend donations for the Paris Accord has released its financial statements for 2017.   Of the $100 billion goal, they have collected a total of roughly $5 billion. In 2017, of the $1.9 billion collected, they spent $115 million – 6%. In 2016, of the $1.6 billion collected, they spent $31 million – 8%.   Where oh where does the money go?

The majority of the Green Fund ‘spending’ is in Africa to help women fight ‘climate change’.   ????   Many of the projects focus on Kenya and South Africa. The African continent’s carbon footprint is -0-.   Some of the projects are termed “multiple countries” and include Kenya, South Africa, Morocco and Egypt.

Coincidence?

Some of these projects in Africa are partnered with Agence Francaise de Development (AFD). In 2007, AFD was called into question for its deforestation in Africa. No legal proceedings were brought.   According to the Cameroon National Anti-corruption Commission (CONAC), two front companies, including one controlled by AFD, have been suspected of fraud.   How do they pass the inspection of the Directors in charge of the Green Climate Fund?  Deforestation would hardly benefit ‘Climate Change’.

It would appear that no one is truly auditing the Green Fund other than the Green Fund.   The two co-chairs are from Egypt and the UK.   Directors vary from Iran, Denmark, Germany, Tanzania, Nicaragua, France, Mexico, etc…  Why is Iran a Board Member in the Green Fund?

In order to become a resident of South Africa, one must have resided in the country for five years. Retirement visa’s are allowed if one can prove complete financial sustainability.

The US has the largest immigrant population in the world standing near 50 million. While other countries (Germany, Australia, Canada) boast a high percentage of immigrant population, their state of origin is rather different:   In the US – Mexico, India, Philippines, China and El Salvador dominate.   In Canada –  the UK tops the list with China, India, Italy and US close behind. In Australia – the UK, New Zealand, China, and Italy are the majority.

Why?

Because these countries require self sustaining, highly educated immigrants. Go figure.

Ultimately, an Open Borders For All scenario would cause the US to become a third world country – on the hind of Africa reaping the benefits of elitist money, development – and of course – $$$$$$ while maintaining a black unemployment rate and/or slave labor rate of roughly 40-93%.

THIS IS THE AGENDA.