Epstein: Who Will He Take Down?

CNN’s rating have been steadily plummeting given their National Enquirer style of reporting that has viewers channel flipping.   Instead of modifying their format and attempting to find a more balanced model, they continue unabashedly promoting false narratives and abusive content. Why?

CNN was owned by Ted Turner a devout liberal with a bit of a temper and some self diagnosed mental disorders who has regularly hobnobbed with the Clintons, John Kerry, Oprah, David Rockefeller and George Soros.

Like Buffett and Gates, Ted Turner was inspired to give philanthropically under the guise of the Giving Pledge, wherein these billionaires avoid estate taxes by donating their wealth to Foundations that they and their children run.  The Foundations are  only required to distribute 5% of the wealth each year to whatever cause is their choice. Typically payroll expenses consume a robust portion of the 5% that is labeled charitable giving.

In 1998, Turner founded the United Nations Foundation with a $1 billion gift – tax deductible for him, and nontaxable to the Foundation.  The purpose of the Foundation is to influence the decision making of UN activities and to promote additional leveraged gifts from wealthy donors.   Board members include Emma Rothschild, Kofi Annan, Timothy Wirth the first Under Secretary of State for Global Affairs under Bill Clinton, and Muhammad Yunus who founded Grameen Bank (initially funded by the Ford Foundation) which was the first pillage into ‘microlending’ targeting women. Microlending is mired in controversy as it is considered predator lending wherein interest rates can be as high as nearly 80%, although the mean typically is 35%.  Most loans must be paid off in six months.

IN essence the UN Foundation determines the who, what, where, and when of all UN activities!

One of the leading organizations developed within the UN Foundation is the “Better World Campaign” whose sole purpose is to strengthen relations between the UN and the United States – including funding.    In essence they are a lobbying group that advocates at Congress to assure that the US “fulfills its financial obligations with the UN including repayment of debt”.   They are also instrumental in determining what NGO’s are funded by the US government, including USAID.

Former Senator, Timothy Wirth’s primary focus while in office was population ‘stabilization’.  Wirth was ‘close friends’ with John Heinz whose widow, Theresa Heinz, married John Kerry.  The population focus aligns with the Buffett philanthropy that is all things abortion, and the Gates Foundation philanthropy that is ‘vaccines’ for children…   A program mired in sterilizations and population reduction.

IN 2018, a former UN Chief, Dr. Andrew Macleod revealed that the UN and a plethora of ‘aid organizations’, aka NGO’s, were at the forefront of pedophilia and sex trafficking.   He has stated that there are upwards of 3300 pedophiles working within the UN alone.   Oxfam, The Red Cross, Clinton Foundation, USAID, Save The Children, Doctors Without Borders have all been implicated in varying degrees with child sexual assault allegations.   The Epstein scandal is only the grain of sand on a vast beach.

Funding these NGO’s through government grants and Foundations provides the mainstay for them to continue their trafficking while purporting to aid children in distress. Their 990 forms tell a different tale.  Microlending is simply another means of infiltrating villages and essentially buying children when the loans are due and 30% interest is unattainable.

Epstein bragged that he bought a 15 year from her Polish parents.

Les Wexner, CEO and founder of Victoria Secrets was Epstein’s only client as a financial advisor.  Epstein was a college graduate, and it is unclear if he was licensed as a financial advisor for Series 7 and 63 transactions.  Wexner supposedly gifted his $77 million Manhattan condo to Epstein where recent raids unveiled sex trafficking and underage girls.  Epstein attempted to cut a deal in which he offered up this $77 million condo as a part of a plea.

Behati Prinsloo, an Afrikaner from Namibia, began her career as a model during her teens, and by 20 had a contract with Victoria Secrets.  In 2010 she embarked on a trip to Haiti to partner with LakayPam, a Haitian orphanage and organization dedicated to helping children…  The company would seem to be nonexistent and Haiti is one of the most infamous scourges of child sex trafficking.  While the government is routinely blamed for the massive problem, oddly, the traffickers, NGO’s, and Foundations are not mentioned.

For example:  The Polaris Project is a 501©(3) claiming to fight human trafficking.  Their Form 990 revealed revenue of roughly $12.5 million in 2017, and exactly one grant totaling $100,000, the remainder was spent on payroll related expenditures, rent, IT etc…

Follow The Money.

In 2018, Joel Davis was arrested for soliciting 2 and 9 year olds for sex.  He was founder of the NGO – The Campaign to Stop Rape and Gender Violence in Conflict.  The steering committee for his NGO included Human Rights Watch (a Soros organization), Physicians For Human rights (a Soros organization), The Global Fund For Women, and others.

Children are trafficked across borders every day and sold.  It is the Project that open borders advocates and likely defines who might be involved in pedophilia activities or simply in the business model.

Ford Foundation, Amnesty International, Open Society Foundation and others actively support ‘prostitution and the rights of sex workers’.   Epstein’s alleged defense was to state that all the girls he engaged with were ‘prostitutes’ and therefore he was the victim.

The twisted core continues find its way back to the UN where sex trafficking is not only indulged, it is a way of operation.

Globally, in 2017 there were 14,894 sex trafficking prosecutions and 9,071 convictions.   It is estimated there roughly 25 million victims generating $150-$200 billion annually.  While the UN has denied virtually all allegations of sexual assaults, rape and trafficking, former UN Chief Andrew Macleod reiterates there are over 3300 pedophiles employed within the UN working for international charities in order to gain access to children.  He estimates they have committed upwards of at least 60,000 rapes.

In supporting the UN, the UN Foundation, and all organizations associated therein, we are supporting sex trafficking.  Given the UN’s extremely untransparent accounting and financial methodology, it is likely that these NGO’s and Foundations are monetarily supporting the covert business of sex trafficking.

MacLeod:   “I was first alerted to it in 1996 while working in former Yugoslavia with the International Committee of the Red Cross. People would talk about a nightclub called Florida 2000, in the Bosnian city of Zenica, where girls of 14 and 15 were working as prostitutes. These children were being trafficked into Bosnia from neighbouring Moldova by individuals working for the UN and Bosnian police. They were used exclusively for the sexual gratification of UN staff. 

Epstein was an active member of the Trilateral Commission:  “The Trilateral Commission was the principal architect of Sustainable Development and Agenda 21, using the United Nations to blanket the planet.”

The twisted core continues find its way back to the UN where sex trafficking is not only indulged, it is a way of operation.   While Epstein would be an idiot to not hold blackmail evidence against the most elite billionaires across the globe, his testimony would certainly leave an untold legacy belying even the powerhouses of the Clintons and Rothschilds.  Given pedophiles do not have a long lifespan in prisons, I imagine his attorneys are sweating’ bullets…

Of course given their respective ages and health, Turner, Clinton, Soros, and Wexner are 2 feet from their own graves, so keeping the allegations in the airwaves indefinitely would provide them with a non-prison passing.

***Zero Hedge has an article defining Agenda 21:   https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-13/what-exactly-agenda-21

 

Sexual Abuse of Children

Sexual abuse of children is rampant.   It isn’t confined to Priests and Dioceses. The very charities that are called to protect children are in fact repeatedly found to perpetrate sexual abuse and prostitution. The organizations that are called to oversee these NGO’s are also complicit.  

In Canada, Bill 89 was recently passed that was endorsed and lobbied for by the charity, Save The Children. The Bill was quite controversial as it added a provision in which Social Services may legally take possession of children from their parents if the parent is deemed to not embrace ‘gender identity’.   This could constitute child abuse.

In one account, a Canadian couple were banned from fostering, their foster children taken away, because they refused to tell the children the Easter Bunny was real.

The rules within Social Services are ambiguous. Case workers have been criticized as too aggressive and too lenient. But “Child Protection Services” has taken on morality as a tool to claim abuse.

Many charities and NGO’s have been infiltrated and mobilized to effectively take control of our children and submit them to the ‘state’.   In Cuba, a couple received a 2 year jail sentence and fine for homeschooling their children. In Germany the same law exists and is radically enforced. The reasoning?   The state wants full control of child indoctrination. That’s called ‘communism’.

Save The Children has been mired in various scandals including sexual abuse and internal harassment. It’s International Chairman resigned last year claiming the allegations are so prevalent, he could no longer have his name attached.   Oxfam has been implicated in Haiti prostitution.   British Red Cross has admitted to a number of harassment cases.   Restless Development is facing internal charges of rape. The United Nations ‘peacekeepers’ have allegations dating back decades, most – conveniently dismissed. And yet, Charity Navigator does not take these situations into account when rating a charity – instead it is all financially evaluated.

In California, if the state determines that a child is uncontrollable, the state courts have ruled that the child becomes the property of the state.

CPS can immediately take children from their families without a court order if:

  • There is a present and immediate threat of physical or sexual abuse.
  • Leaving the children in the home is not safe or best for the children’s welfare.
  • CPS made reasonable efforts to prevent or eliminate the need for removing the children from the home.

The obvious open ended statement being “leaving the children in the home is not safe or best for he children’s welfare”.   What does that mean?

The US currently has roughly 400,000 to 450,000 children in foster care. In Germany the number is roughly 120,000. California ranks first with number of children in foster care – 60,000, Texas is second with about 30,000 and Florida is third with 23,000.   Substance abuse has been identified as the most common factor in the continued rise of US children in foster care.

But a ranking of drugs as the biggest problem by state put Florida at 30, Texas at 37 and California at 41. When it came to drug addiction ranking – DC held the title for number 1.

So the equation of drug use to foster care would not seem to be the most prevalent cause.

There are in fact huge discrepancies in these states with regard to ethnicity. In California, 53% of foster care children are Hispanic and 20% are black.   In Texas, 44% are Hispanic and 21% are black. And in Florida 31% are black and 16% are Hispanic. According to Child Trends, the number one cause for entry into Foster Care in California is “neglect” at 75%, whereas substance abuse accounts for only 10%.

According to California Law, the following are defined as ‘neglect’:

  • Clothes are ill-fitting, filthy, or inappropriate for the weather.
  • Hygiene is consistently bad (unbathed, matted and unwashed hair, noticeable body odor).
  • Untreated illnesses and physical injuries.
  • Is frequently unsupervised or left alone or allowed to play in unsafe situations and environments.
  • Is frequently late or missing from school.

There is so much legal ambiguity and corruption within the system that too often the stories of Child Protection acting more like Nazi Protection is perpetrated resulting in over the top cases wherein parents are illegally jailed, children are taken without proper cause, and just irrational judgment.

In one story a toddler fell out of his crib, was taken from his parents even though the CPS investigator reported he was healthy and happy at home.

The problem is not a US problem, it is a universal problem:   In Norway, a three-week-old child was taken away from his mother in 2008 based on doubts about her ‘parenting abilities.’ The child was placed in foster care and the mother was allowed only twelve hours of contact per year with her son. Ultimately, all visitation rights were denied, the mother’s parental rights were removed, and the child was put up for adoption.”

Funny thing is – we don’t see the outrage or the advocacy or the compassion extended to these injustices by our liberal, Democrat and Hollywooders. Although they are spiked about juveniles in detention at the border…  Odd.