Liberal Word Manipulation

It was less than a decade ago that the definition of religion was the ‘belief in God’, or ‘gods’.   The criteria was important for many reasons one of which was status as a nontaxable entity.   And then sometime in the morphology of propaganda, religion was redefined and few seem to have noticed. Scholars have thus created a virtual monster with Emile Durkheim infusing this rather convoluted definition: “a unified system of beliefs and practices relative to sacred things, that is to say things set apart and forbidden – beliefs and practices which unite into one single moral community called a church, all those who adhere to them.”

As a result the limits of rationale were pushed to the extreme when the church of spaghetti claimed they filled this criteria. They wore a colander for a headpiece and worshiped – spaghetti.

Another form of Word Art is the creation of an entirely new use for a word such as ‘protectionism’.   Utilized to further condemn Trump, the concept states, “Most of the US trading partners consider its trading policies as manifestations of protectionism.”   Everyone assumes this must be a bad thing and move on without having the most basic understanding of how this statement is grossly manipulated.

“Protectionism is the economic policy of restricting imports from other countries through methods such as tariffs on imported goods, import quotas, and a variety of other government regulations.”

How could ‘tariffs’ be attributed to Trump?   Tariffs were first imposed in the US in 1789. They were the largest source of government revenue prior to the 1913 declaration that called for a federal income tax under Woodrow Wilson, the father of the precipitated fall of income equality.

At one point tariffs were imposed at the rate of 51% in Great Britain, Russia climbed to 73%, Germany was 40% etc…  Trump had yet to be born.  And Protectionism was a global institution.

According to the World Bank, Africa is the largest practitioner of ‘free trade’. The World Bank also states that as a direct result Africa is less industrialized than it was four decades ago.  Oops!

Balanced Trade is Trump’s agenda.   The Balance of Trade is essential in order to maintain comparative absolutes. The US Trade Deficit has grown from $-0- to $891 billion between 1950 and 2018. That deficit has a significant wobbling impact on the US economy while lifting other economies, specifically;   China and Germany. This deficit is partially funded by an imbalance in tariffs.  An imbalance that Trump is diligently working to correct.

So, protectionism was actually at the forefront of Germany, France, Canada, Mexico and China until Trump.

Another nuance that has gone unnoticed is the fact that Global Warming morphed to Climate Change, morphed to Climate Science. Science was likely a creative means to apply legitimacy to a highly charged manipulated ‘bubble’.   That ‘bubble’ has made a few individuals vastly wealthy on its propaganda, including Al Gore.   The Socialists and Progressives clamored aboard the con man’s wagon and began touting the elixir. But few understand where the $$$$ go to ‘fight Global Warming/Science.  Africa is the dominant beneficiary of those $$$$, a continent where there are no global warming ramifications… And the absolute hypocrisy is somehow – lost.

‘Reproductive Rights’ is another bastardization of the English language.   Reproductive means to reproduce which requires the mutual consent of a man and a woman in order to create a child.   Once that child is created, one is no longer desiring the right to reproduce because it has already occurred.   It is no longer a reproductive right, it is now a human right.

The ‘Right’ was initially coined in 1968 by Tehran in which parents were legally allowed the right to determine the number of children they wanted to have and the spacing between.   It wasn’t until 1994 that Cairo, in the midst of an HIV/AIDS crisis, declared that Reproductive Rights were extended to include care for sexually transmitted diseases, and post-abortion care.  In 1995, Beijing made their own determination and stated that the definition was about reproduction and any forthcoming child was the responsibility of both the man and woman involved in said reproduction.

IN 2002, the UN put it’s proverbial arse on the line after being accused of advocating coerced abortions.  The reason for the coercion?   Quite simply – Depopulation.  In order to cleanse that abuse, Women’s Right’s were rewired to emphasize the right to an abortion.   And in essence the coercion became a propaganda tool in which women were the target. And they fell for it.

As a result, the emphasis of Reproductive Rights became – abortion on demand which has absolutely nothing to do with Reproduction Rights, Human Rights, or Women’s Rights.

There are a host of other words that have been artfully redefined; judgment, patriotism, nationalism, and even – Socialism, which has been regurgitated to be defined as:   “an economic and political system where the ways of making a living (factories, offices, etc.) are owned by the workers who run them and the people who depend on them, meaning the value made belongs to the people who make it, instead of a group of private owners.”

In London, the first consciously Socialist movement was lead by Karl Marx and Mikhail Bokunin, both of whom were Russian Jewish anarchist revolutionaries. Their ideology instituted the Paris Commune in which the concept of Separation of Church and State was instituted to squelch religion and promote secularism. Within 2 months, Paris defeated the principles.

WWI ushered in Socialist Doctrine in the former Tzarist Soviet Russia. Nazi Germany was built on the Socialist Party platform by Hitler. And the EU Commission indoctrinated 28 countries into a massive propaganda wherein an individual, a city, a nation, were subject to the rule of a bastardized monarchial totalitarian select few.

In essence, the rule that leveled the Soviet Union into economic collapse was subsequently modeled by the EU. Thus, the definition was altered from Communist Marxism to Equality and Rights.

Word Art – it isn’t really Art at all, it is simply another tool of manipulation that has been parlayed for the purpose of indoctrination.   And like sheeple, the people baaed and fell onto their backs – caste.

UN Migration Pact: Ponzi Scam

While speaking before the UN General Assembly, Germany’s Merkel made an interesting announcement:  If 2/3rds of the UN member states, totaling 193, vote for the Migration Pact, then The Pact will be adopted for ALL member states and will become legally binding.   To date, there are not nearly enough countries that have opted out.  Therefore, the only way to not be subject to the law of the Pact, would be to completely drop out of the UN.  There are only three countries that are non-members:  Vatican City, Kosovo, and Palestine.

On December 19th, the final vote will determine whether this Migration rule of law will proceed.

The legal issue is inserted because of the new definition of migration – Human Right.  Therefore, while the pact loosely states it is non-binding, in fact the rule of law would pursue a violation of Human Rights against a country that does not comply.   Brought before the International Criminal Court, the UN and its court can recommend sanctions, and demand reparations for ‘victims’.  Acting as a mega-NGO, the UN could create a class-action of migrants that were disallowed into states that refused, and order those UN member states to pay off the migrant for violating his/her Human Right to migrate.

In addition, anyone, including the media, who thereafter references ‘illegal migration’ can be charged with criminal hate speech and subject to jail and fines.

A few days ago, the Leader of the latest Mexican Caravan demanded $50,000 for every migrant that came to Tijuana and was not permitted into the US.  Currently, that would be considered extortion.  Under ICC law, the UN could impose those fees and redefine them as reparation once the Migration Pact becomes law.

The members this UN/NGO would likely target first would be those who refused to sign;  US, Italy, Hungary, Austria, Poland, Australia, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Israel, Switzerland, and Slovakia.

While the Pact claims to be non-binding, the UN gives itself the power to ‘collectively manage’ migration for all countries so as to protect human rights whereby ‘illegal’ immigration no longer exists as borders are open to anyone and everyone.  While the UN claims that member states must still ‘manage borders in an integrated, secure and coordinated manner,” and to ‘increase legal certainty and predictability of migration procedures,’ they are assuring that they, the UN, have no monetary responsibility to assure that borders are orderly.  Nor will they have any financial responsibility to send immigrants to their designated country, those costs would be born by the country’s taxpayers.

Both the Pope and the UN Special Rapporteur, Felipe Morales, have stated that the US needs to buck up and take in anyone and everyone or face charges… given security should not over-shadow Human Rights.

Bottom Line:  this is classic legal double-speak which means that a country is not bound to accept immigrants, however, if they don’t, they may be subject to Criminal Human Rights Violation Charges by the ICC and subject to whatever monetary and other outcomes this court determines.

Migrant Caravan Funding? Catholic Church, Red Cross, Hope Border Institute, University of Texas…

Civil Rights lawyer Mario B Williams out of Georgia is one of the four lawyers who have filed a class action against the Trump administration on behalf of a group of the Caravan attendees claiming, “President Trump continues to abuse the law, including constitutional rights, to deter Central Americans from exercising their lawful right to seek asylum in the United States.”  The lawsuit apparently also refers to Trump as ‘our president’. An oddity since they aren’t citizens…

Mario Williams has been billed as the legal advocate of last resort when your case is so flimsy no one else will take it.  April of 2018, he was headlined in The Seattle Medium for his intent to initiate a $20 million “legal campaign to investigate and uncover the ties of political and business leaders to White supremacist groups. He wants to dig up their secret rivers of money and shame them into cutting off the extremists.”

The money for the campaign is coming from a company called, Libre By Nexus.  Launched by 2 ex-cons in 2013, Michael Donovan and Richard Moore, the firm guarantees bail for immigrants to win their release from detention.

Libre is a for-profit company that has annual revenues topping $30 million and over 6500 clients.  Their fees include a $14 per day ankle bracelet that clients must wear until their court date which is typically 3-4 years in the future.  That tallies to $33,215,000.   The daily cost to Libre for the bracelet is $3.   They are currently the subject of a lawsuit claiming the bracelets frequently don’t even work, and their niche is ‘predatory’.

With upwards of 14,000 scheduled to arrive sometime around November 25th, detainees will likely be referred to Libre via Mario Williams. Libre could thus easily double their current revenues if they added just another 6500 to their coffers of ankle bracelets.

Follow The Money.

The name of Mario Williams firm is, ‘Nexus Derechos Humanos’.  It lists as its parent and funding company – Nexus Services Inc., the same parent company of Libre By Nexus.   The lawsuit filed against the Trump administration is funded by Nexus Services, Inc whose founders are Michael Donovan and Richard Moore.  They do not want their pool of caravans to be squelched and thus deprive them of an ongoing revenue stream.

Located in Verona, Virginia, they operate a number of subsidiary companies within their particular brand including a charity called Nexus Caridades.  Their business plan continues to expand and they have moved into real estate offering rental housing for immigrants – at a price.

While CEO Donovan continually claims that they are not in this for the money, they are doing this simply from their hearts… the fact remains it is a highly profitable venture – they never attempted to sustain a charitable organization.  They are capitalistic capitalizing on a deficiency caused by caravans of illegal immigrants demanding free reign in the US.

And so, the question keeps returning, who is behind the funding of these caravans?

Certainly, Flores of Pueblo Sin Frontera is named continuously, but an even grander ulterior motive is levied by Hope Border Institute.  Comprised of various Monsignors and Deacons of the Catholic church, University of Texas, New Mexico State University, and others, their website claims that many Catholic migrant shelters in Mexico are core in the creation of the caravans “within the framework of symbolic reenactments during Easter season of the Stations of the Cross (Via Crucis), or Christmas-time posadas (the novena commemorating the pilgrimage in search of shelter of Jesus’ migrant family).”

Catholic Deacons can not act without the approval and sanction of Pope Francis.

In addition they provide a list of those who are initiating ‘direct organization’ in each country:  “…in Honduras by COFAMIPRO (Comité de Familiares de Migrantes de El Progreso) and in El Salvador by COFAMIDE (Comité de Familiares de Migrantes Fallecidos y Desaparecidos del Salvador); another similar organization in Honduras is the Comité de Familiares de Migrantes Desaparecidos del Centro de Honduras (COFAMICENH).”

All of this is at the core of US aid which is channeled to Mexico for the so-called “Southern Border Plan” as part of the Mérida Initiative. Originally developed to thwart the trafficking of drugs and money laundering, the Clinton, Bush and Obama administrations diverted funding to help drug treatment, instead of drug flow – thereby allowing the influx of drugs and trafficking while creating a burgeoning ‘treatment program’.  Another capitalist idea shadowed in a social program!  Follow The Money!

Hope Border Institute claims that US regime coups have been instrumental in causing the collapse of countries as corruption is cultivated and chaos then reigns. One such coup was promulgated in 2009 by the Obama administration on Honduras wherein a fraudulent election was aided by US government agencies to insert Porfirio Lobo Sosa of the National Party.  He has since been indicted for helping to protect drug organizations, corruption, redirecting funds, etc…

They go on to claim that these caravans are a “messianic moment reflected in the emergence of a powerful new transnational migrant rights movement, that is undermining long held orthodoxies regarding the imperatives of state sovereignty within the context of migration policy and human rights. All of this also lays the basis for fully incorporating migrants as collective subjects as to the mass human rights crimes  which have been committed against them with convergent responsibility on the part of the US and Mexico, within the framework of Mexico’s incipient transitional justice process, and of a convergent process on both sides of the border.”

In other words, the US and Mexico are fully responsible for the human rights violations of Honduras, El Salvador, and Guatemala, and thus the US must now pay for these violations by chaos and violence if necessary and by accepting the flow unconditionally which now averages 450,000 annually.

Honduras’ COFAMIPRO, and El Salvador COFAMIDE are backed by The Red CrossThe International Committee of the Red Cross has embarked on what they term a “Movement” in the publication of the Red Cross Red Crescent Magazine. Their front page issue on the website highlights:  Beyond Borders; Building Trust and Protecting Migrants…”

So you wanted to know who is behind the caravans…

Want to know why Pope Francis keeps pushing for the US to be open arms and open borders?

They are likely – a major funding source…

Refugees, Terrorism… and Human Rights?

A friend of mine recently tried to rationalize the immigration of Middle Eastern refugees as similar to how the US embraced the influx of Cubans and Mexicans for decades. She feels we are being hypocritical and we just need to ‘love and embrace’ each one and they will be fine. She asserts that the Cubans have gone on to enrich our society and cultivate new prosperity in business and the economy. And in some respects she is right, but her rational is pitted.

Cubans left Cuba because of Communism, the same Communist agenda proposed by Bernie Sanders who now wants to take his agenda and back Hillary. Cubans typically hate the liberal agenda, they remember what Communism looked like, their hunger, their oppression, their ruin. They embraced the US and brought with them a desire to integrate and make a new life. Most settled and remained in Florida where about 1.2 million reside. They excelled in business, in sports, in entertainment, and became – American – subject to American laws.

Muslims. While in our hearts we want to believe, we want to embrace, we want to be tolerant and respect the integration, too often we find terrorism. Too often we are met with violence. Too often our laws are superimposed with Sharia laws that are intolerant, murderous, and based on a decree to spite the neck of those who disagree with you – as in behead.

In 2013, Muslim terrorists carried out 4 attacks in the US, in 2014, there were three, in 2015 there were four, and in 2016, so far there have been between 4 and 6, depending on which source classifies the attack. While some mainstream media pundits claim that non-Muslims make up the majority of terrorist attacks, including Jews and Christians, like any statistic, the numbers can be arranged to feed a specific agenda.

The newest drivel is a report that claims between 1980 and 2005 non-Muslims perpetrated 96% of the crimes with ‘leftists and Latino’s’ leading the pack at 66%. Eliminating property crimes, which are not exactly considered terrorism, and focusing on acts that resulted in terrorist related deaths, the statistics change dramatically!

When adjusting the data to calculate ‘terrorist related deaths’, Muslims accounted for 24% while making up less than 1% of the population. I’d say that was a significant number that bears scrutiny and security.

Some media outlets go so far as to eliminate terrorist attacks completely and redefine them as ‘guerrilla offenses’ or ‘resistance maneuvers’. Typically, history is brought up, wherein the US is again faced with the American Indians – a criminal act, but then we can assert thousands of years of historical terrorism that misses the point. The point is NOW.

And the comparison with Cuban immigration – becomes moot.

So why is it that our media is so bent on glorifying Islam and Muslims and downgrading terrorism? Why do they want to redefine and rewrite the truth?

Hillary believes that referencing ‘radical Islam’ will alienate the peaceful Muslims and make them join ISIS… But if they weren’t radical, they would be supporting the notion that radical Islam needs to be eradicated… Right? They would be fighting alongside Americans – instead of against them. They would be accepting our laws, instead of replacing them. And while there are some that do – it is difficult to know if they are sincere.

Laws in Middle East: All matters of ‘personal status’ are mandated according to a Religious Court where penalties include dismemberment, lashings, and death. Under our laws, this would constitute a violation of human rights, it would be classified as torture which is a violation of UN laws. If a woman is raped she is considered to have committed the crime of infidelity and punished. In 2015, the Saudi government carried out over 157 known public beheadings. January 2016, the Saudis beheaded 47 people in one day.

This is the sweet Sharia that we need to embrace with love…

So how do the Saudis get away with these tortuous violations of human rights? Well, they currently chair the UN human rights panel.

Amnesty International Shame!

Amnesty International wants to legalize prostitution.

Who is Amnesty International? First, their stated objective is “…to prevent and end grave abuses of human rights and to demand justice when those rights have been abused.” But a sub-text incorporated in the reports is to push for sexual rights, including abortion. In addition there are two distinct legal entities; the organization which is an NGO, not a charity, and the Charitable Trust which funnels money to the organization.

Within the UK Charitable Trust – 60% of it’s expenditures are for ‘research’, 17% are spent to generate income, and just 17% is used to promote human rights. Their largest Donor, Comic Relief Charity, has been embroiled in their own scandals including the charge that they were investing donor contributions in tobacco, alcohol – and arms while promoting alcohol abstinence and anti-war rhetoric. Their ballooning wage cost now accounts for 76.5% of their total annual budget! As a result, the Charity decided to make it’s reports – less transparent.

Amnesty’s stated interest in legalizing prostitution is to provide health care availability for ‘sex workers’. But health care is available to everyone whether you are a prostitute or not, it’s called socialized medicine and Obamacare. Their other stated reasoning is to claim that sex is an inalienable right and making prostitution illegal infringes that right.

But how is this a “grave abuse of human right”? Who are they really trying to protect?

Founded in 1961 by Peter Bennenson, a Jewish man, he stepped down due to ill health in 1964. By 1966, Mr. Bennenson claimed Amnesty had been infiltrated by British Intelligence and asserted improper conduct by members of the executive. An investigation ensued that shattered Amnesty’s reputation. Bennenson resigned and new executives were named.

The British Newspaper, The Observer, recently made the following statement about the new Secretary General of the organization, an Indian, Salil Shetty:

…the situation caused by Shetty’s sacking of staff working on core issues such as women’s rights and the death penalty: “Amnesty was one of 20th-century Britain’s greatest gifts to the world. Now it is a wreck.”

Amnesty Internationals reputation has a history of illegal issues, and even terrorist links according to NGO-Monitor:

Despite claims that it takes NO funding from political partioes or governments, it has received funding from the UK, The European Commission, The Netherlands, Norway and the US.

Amnesty paid off two executives over 833,000 euros to leave the organization. A part of the payoff was absolute silence regarding the facts.

In 2103 they were found to be working with an organization whose co-founder, Abd al-Rahman bin ‘Umayr al-Nu’aymi (Nu’aymi), was accused of financing Al Qaeda and its affiliates in Syria, Iraq, Somalia and Yemen,

In 2010, anti-semitic posts on it’s Facebook page, and statements made by its executive director of Finalnd’s branch were considered in violation of its ‘unbiased status’ and could be challenged as inciting hatred.

In 2012, their crisis response manager was found to be making hate statements against Jews.

In 2010, a staff member was suspended after she made allegations that Amnesty was aligned with a Taliban supporter.

In 2015, it was revealed that an amnesty campaignor was actually a leader of Islamic Jihad. Lastly, for a number of years, Amnesty has actively campaigned against Israel and the Jewish people calling for strikes, embargo’s, tribunals and radicalism.

Amnesty International is heavily funded by George Soros.

Think Progress, a George Soros blog, is pushing the legalized prostitution agenda claiming that – “sex workers and sex advocacy groups generally support the proposal, saying decriminalization or legalization is the best way to keep sex workers safe and healthy without increasing the number of trafficked women or minors involved in the sex industry.”

Think Progress sites another organization as advocating for the decriminalization, Human Rights Watch. But this organization is also funded by Soros who initially empowered it with no less than $100 million.

So, exactly what would be accomplished by the decriminalization?

Currently there is an ongoing investigation in the UK over illegal sex trafficking that dates back for decades, involves over 1400 politicians, entertainers, sports stars and the like, and estimates the number of victims in the hundreds of thousands. While the ‘investigation’ gets little press coverage, if prostitution were to suddenly become legal, what happens to the case? Would they be exonerated because prostitution is now legal?

Would sex trafficking be left to proliferate and profit as it has been shown to do in Germany since they legalized prostitution?

Bill Clinton has been named in the sex trafficking allegations charged against Epstein. If prostitution is legalized, what happens to those allegations?

If prostitution is legalized, is rape also? What happens to all the illegal and underage sex trafficking, do those boys and girls lose their right to protest their slavery? Will perpetrators, pimps and the like simply assert everything was consensual? Will the entire burgeoning industry be immune as prosecution becomes too difficult? And will children and stolen slaves be the silent victims?

Contrary to the whitewash, the illegal sex trafficking involves sex slavery, it involves underage children, and it is heinous. In the US alone, estimates put the number of children at over 300,000. Pimps generate $150,000-$200,000 per child – the younger, the more money. It’s a multi billion dollar business, and I imagine there are a lot of wealthy CEO’s, politicians, and entertainers that would love a piece of the action – physically and financially. Making it legal, gives them peace of mind. And relieves them of the hefty cost of bribery.

The US government estimates that 2-4 million people are victims of sex trafficking annually. Of those, 50% are children. Drugs are used to manipulate and confine. The average age of victims is 11-14. And lets be real. Victims are subject to HIV, drug addiction, rectal trauma, sleeping disorders, psychological disorders, fear, depression, guilt, shame, ptsd, death, threat of family harm, and the list goes on and on!

This is not the happy hooker portrayed by Amnesty, Human Rights Watch and Think Progress! This is a means of protecting the perpetrators and generating a profound increase in victims. SHAME!