Putin Threatens US With Missile Targets…

The Media spin is most definitely eye rolling, but more provocatively angst is how incredibly misleading the story outline is regarding Putin threatening the US with missile targets.  The newest Russia allegation is claiming that Putin is threatening the US, and how should the US react?   Let’s take a look at what was actually said and why…

The scare tactic story is devised to further demonize Russia by the liberal left.  In fact, the US through NATO has deployed hundreds of nuclear missiles throughout Europe aimed at one principle target – Russia.   This military posture was heightened during the Obama administration to goad Putin into a potential defensive war.   Using eastern bloc countries, Obama systematically installed missile defense systems along the Russian border.   The provocation was obvious and Putin reacted emphatically denouncing the move and claiming it jeopardized the balance of peace.

Fast forward.

NATO and the EU Socialist blocs hate all things Russia and Putin.  The simplistic reason is because Putin refuses to submit to the same Protocols that have taken hold of parts of South America, Canada, Australia, parts of the EU and the US – prior to Trump.   The entire point of globalization is to create a one world government which is not possible unless you have subjugated every country.  Russia has been the most prominent holdout, and thus is the flagrant scape goat for demonizing.   Prior to Trump, the liberal administration was emphatically onboard.   Under Trump – not so much.

Recently liberal media outlets began the propaganda campaign of claiming Putin had declared strike targets against the US.  The media failed to ‘finish’ the quote:   “… in the event of aggression against Russia .”  Or: “State TV channel Russia-1 has presented a list of five US decision making centres that will become likely targets for Russia’s Zircon hypersonic missiles deployed on submarines if Washington decides to attack Moscow using its missile arsenal.”  If.  

In other words, Putin announced a defensive/offensive strategy should the US attempt to bomb Russia. To do or say anything less would be incredibly – well, stupid and militarily absurd.  Putin’s job is to protect his country.

Russia became a tremendous propaganda tool during the Obama rein of terror.   Every news outlet was instructed to virtually copy/paste articles seemingly written by the CIA under the Direction of Petraeus, Panetta and Brennan. Brennan was particularly interesting in that Obama claimed they “shared a similar philosophy”.  It was Brennan who oversaw the CIA investigation over the Russian/Trump collusion in the 2016 election.   I imagine that was paramount in their ‘shared philosophy’.  Brennan virtually drooled over Hillary.

Using the INF Treaty as grounds for the riff, the media ignores specific elements of the Treaty that make it completely worthless for the US.   The Treaty is only applicable to the US and Russia.   In other words, all other countries in the world can build and deploy an unlimited number of land based short and intermediated range ballistic and cruise missiles.   No one else is bound to, or a party of, this Treaty.  The Treaty was created during a time of transition, the end of the Cold War.   Today, both Putin and Trump recognize that it is ineffectual, dated, and superfluous in a very changed demographic.

Allegations of violations are a distraction.  The enemy has shifted.   And the Treaty needed to go away.

It is rather bizarre that the same media that claim Trump is in collusion with Russia, also claim the withdrawal from the Treaty by the US and Russia was symptomatic of the demise of US and Russian relations…   Obviously, you don’t collude with a country you perceive to be your enemy.  In fact, the media was likely fed a story line and the propaganda meme went full throttle.

The fact that the Treaty only applied to the US and Russia – not NATO, Germany, UK, North Korea or China… is clearly the main reason for the withdrawal from the INF Treaty as the US grows ever closer to identifying exactly who are our real allies, and who – is not.  And Russia’s statement that they will defend themselves against an attack – is simple juju jargon for all the misfits in the MSM.

ELECTRONIC WARFARE: The Corporate Strategy for Liberal World Order

The Munich Security Council is slated to meet this week with diplomats and politicians from possibly 100 countries represented.  Founded in 1963 by Ewald-Heinrich von Kleist, its motto is “Peace through Dialogue”.

The 2018 Conference resulted in the German Foreign Minister accusing Russia, China and the US of undermining the ‘liberal world order’.  Which is true – thankfully, but a rather unpeaceable aligned dialogue.

The 2017 Conference was a tennis match of the US vs Germany chipping away at defense spending, NATO, and demands for a more ‘responsible America’.  And while the bantering was evident on all fronts, some of the guests’ in attendance were notable:

Bill Gates warned that a biological weapon, a genetically modified species, could be used by terrorists, or governments, that would infect computers and infiltrate through the system into monitors/screens around the world and transpose an infectious virus that could kill 30 million people.

Today, the military is developing drones fitted with lasers, which is the equivalent of an unlimited gun magazine, that could take out potentially hundreds or thousands of people in seconds.

The Chinese and US militaries have developed Artificial Intelligence capability which can maneuver the drones and have shown success in beating human pilots.

Russian Navy boats are now being equipped with a newly developed weapon that can presumably cause the target to hallucinate and thus be unable to defend itself or properly aim an attack.  The weapon works by flooding the human nervous system with more light than it can process. In the past, systems using a flood of light or sound have been used for crowd control, but those are Flintstone compared to the advancements made as of today.

In 2015 Chris Roberts, a hacker who founded cyber security firm, One World Labs, announced that he could use his basic laptop computer to hack into the systems of airplanes and control the flight pattern, speed, altitude and direction.   He was forced out of his company which was then reorganized by Mark Turhan and Russell Cohen, and investigated by the FBI.

Conspiracy theories now abound regarding the truth of the 2014 disappearance of Malaysian Airlines 370, wherein 20 employees of the global tech giant, Freescale, perished. Within months of this tragedy Freescale was merged with NXP Technologies a Netherland company for $40 billion.

Freescale was heavily involved in military and defense operations including:   IFF, electronic warfare, HF Radio, Missile Guidance, Avionics and Battlefield Communication.  Freescale has a history of developing various target chips for military warfare.  Electronic Warfare includes radar jamming and deception, electronic masking, and … ‘reprogramming.’   Given M370 detection was not visible on radar, speculation over the use of a cloaking device has been shuffled around.  In addition, the sphere of conspiracy follows:  Blackrock and T Rowe Price each hold roughly 10% of the outstanding shares of NXP, the merged predecessor to Freescale.  State Street Corp owns about 5%.  Blackrock owns 10% of T Rowe Price and about 8% State Street.  Blackrock is the brainchild of Jacob Rothschild.

It was around this time frame that remote car hacking was also revealed wherein a car’s speed, braking, and steering could be externally controlled by a laptop computer.

It would appear that the essence of these warfare tactics is to diffuse the need of a military altogether and reprogram or redirect security into the hands of corporations utilizing engineering expertise and Artificial Intelligence to control targets from the perspective of corporate directives as opposed to national safety.

Ultimately, that would mean the militaries as we know them would become superfluous.  It may also give rise to why Germany and Merkel refuse to construct a military per the NATO Agreement, and per the need for defense. The next generation of military will be Corporations, so why would Merkel spend money on what will be a superfluous organization in a few short years…

This also reveals why the INF Treaty with Russia is defunct and useless.  It exposes why the US has no need to implement this treaty given Nuclear is not the enemy, it is not what we should fear, it is the Bull in a China Shop that has been emptied of china.  It is outdated, out-maneuvered, and a dinosaur in relative weaponry.   Nuclear is – a Distraction.

While the media professes that a deranged Trump is in control of the Nuclear Red Button, the Cabal is rapidly and rabidly gaining control of the Biologic and Electronic Warfare with Jacob Rothschild at the helm and that Agenda is truly deranged, maniacal, and deserving of fear.

Years ago my father co-authored a book on military intelligence and defense.  It is completely obsolete at this juncture as Corporations begin the inevitable takeover.