SAFE SPACES: Cultural Segregation

Remember bullies? They have existed since the beginning of mankind. They know no race. They know no gender. They can be subtle or they can be malicious.   They exist in schools, businesses, churches, and neighbors.   They have been portrayed in movies for decades. And as the rise in bullying ran amok in schools, prevention became the mantra.  

Until ‘safe spaces’.

When my kids were growing up they frequently were the target of bullies.   Why? Because. Bullies target whoever they can and if their victim does nothing, they become their dodge ball victim for life.   The solution?   Fight back.

Of course, schools were called in to mediate bullies because often it happened on school premises.   But the problem was never erased, eradicated, or even smudged, because the school solution didn’t work. Bullying as a core is an inherent reactive learned from one’s parents.  Teachers applied bandaids and the bullying evolved into –

Safe spaces.

Today, instead of bullying, we call it “a place intended to be free of bias, conflict, criticism, or potentially threatening actions, ideas, or conversations … student volunteers put up posters advertising that a “safe space” would be available for anyone who found the debate too upsetting.”

For a society bent on tolerance and inclusion, a safe space is literally the extreme opposite.  In an article by VOX, a black woman states that she just wants to sometimes be around only other black women because it’s easier and there is no ‘translation’.   That used to be called ‘segregation’.   But integration changed that.   Forced integration of cultures was seen as the State Solution.   Everyone just needs to get along.   Diversity training arose.   While the Liberal mantra continues to assert that demand, voluntary segregation became the reality.

Wealthy people hang out with wealthy people. Military families hang out with other military families. Blacks with blacks, gays with gays, Christians with Christians, etc…   Exclusively?   Not necessarily.   Neighborhoods are the prime example.   Chinatown in San Francisco.   The Polish community in any given city. The Italian neighborhood in Lakewood.   Safe spaces.

And yet, safe spaces is now embraced by most universities, and a spattering of businesses. It has also given rise to a new burgeoning business model whereby evaluation and training are offered – for a price. Workshops are available to teach ‘respectful behavior’.   There are “Codes of Cooperation”.   The pictures portray happy employees of every diversity sitting together in a boardroom, planting a tree, analyzing reports, etc…

California has made it a law that all companies must have at least one female board member.  Diversity.

Starbucks recently came under fire again because a customer stated they felt unsafe when six police officers came in to order coffee. The officers were ejected because of the ‘one’ complaint.  Safe Spaces.

Nike nixed a shoe that they likely spent millions to create because Colin Kaepernick said it offended him.   A shoe offended him and thus Nike’s CEO scrapped the product line to the detriment of their shareholders.   Segregation.

Diversity: by definition means the inclusion of different types of people having differing elements and/or qualities.   But safe spaces means – exclusion.

Within this hypocrisy, a business can’t win.   Lawsuits have become a cost factor that ‘trickles down’ to the product cost. And the ultimate loser is the consumer. So businesses play the racket and hire diversity experts, provide training workshops, and document with fear lest they miss a box on the new 20 page HR requirements manual.

But it isn’t enough because those that demand diversity, also demand workplace segregation in the form of safe places. The absurdity is laughable when one considers that might mean a separate safe place for each group; women, gays, transgenders, liberals, binary, Hispanic, black, Muslim, Asian, etc… , ultimately transforming an office environment into a clone of complete isolation.

As Google and Amazon attempt to build business cities to accommodate their employees, it will be interesting to see how they create safe spaces for all the diverse diversities. Of course, will Google rent these apartments to its IT PhD’s only, or will the menial laborers have equal digs?   Will the laborers live in the basement?   Will executives live in penthouses?   Will there be separate cafeterias to accommodate safe spaces?

But then Google is well known for its anti-diversity politics, liberal only social morays, as well as its Big Government surveillance of anyone and everyone… The Orwellian vision is quite real.   The Boogeyman is Real!

In essence, segregation is culturally preferred.  But it isn’t politically correct.   So we pretend to want diversity inclusion while promoting safe spaces exclusion and hope nobody figures it out.  Shhhh – don’t tell!

Presidential Executive Orders

As elections loom for 2020, Democrats are going to have to answer for their accomplishments since taking over the House majority.   Fixated on Trump demonizing, they have failed to actually do much of anything of importance.   While Congress typically averages the passage of 758 bills per session, a total of eighteen bills have been passed this year, including:

1)   Seven extensions of previous bills

2)   Two bills to further budget appropriations

3)   One bill to recognize a ‘reference’ as a bill

4)   A bill to clarify the pay of VA podiatrists

5)   A bill to authorize the honorary appointment of Robert Dole to colonel

6)   A bill to change the address of a postal facility designated in honor of Captain Humayun Khan

7)   A bill that directs the Secretary of Education to recognize school employees award program

8)   A bill requiring the Secretary of Interior to process agreements regarding Colorado River drought

9)   A bill to expand public target ranges in some states

10)   A bill to compensate federal employees affected by lapses in appropriations

11) A bill to amend the charter of Future Farmers of America

That’s it folks!

In essence what this highlights is the fact that the bigger the government, the less that is accomplished.   Immigration, infrastructure, Medicare, Healthcare, those issues that are most pressing according to The People, are blocked by the House through Pelosi and Schumer.   The only way Trump can bypass the moronic is through Executive Order.

During Clinton’s term he issued 364 Executive Orders.   George Bush issued 165 Executive Orders. And Obama issued 215 Executive Orders, but altered history by utilizing Executive Memorandums as a means to circumvent public outcry. As such, Obama asserted a historic 644 Executive Memorandums and 1186 Presidential Proclamations through January 19, 2017. A vast number of Obama’s orders included the establishment of new agencies within the government including; Office of Urban Affairs, National Economic Council, Economic Recovery Advisory Board, Council on Women and Girls, Office of Health reform, Commission for the Study of Bioethical issues, Council of Governors, etc…, etc…

Despite the fact that even the most liberal within government agree that Obama crossed the threshold of legality in many of his Executive Orders and Memorandums, these transgressions have gone without consequence.

Trump has signed 109 Executive Orders and 42 Executive Memorandums.

Of course, one of the more controversial executive Orders issued by Obama was the Iran Nuclear Deal and the billions in payments to Iran including a massive interest rate for funds held due to sanctions.   The deal was administered and signed by then Secretary of State, John Kerry. The same John Kerry who maintains a majority of his wealth in offshore tax havens, and the same John Kerry who has been found to be secretly meeting with Iran government officials promising to reinstate the Iran Nuclear Deal, despite this being potentially in violation of the Logan Act.

Enacted in 1799, The Logan Act criminalizes anyone negotiating with a foreign government having a dispute with the United States. In addition, Kerry avoided a $500,000 tax bill on his 76 foot yacht by docking it in Rhode Island instead of his home state of Massachusetts.   A move that was seen as rather hypocritical given his continual cry for imposing ‘higher taxes’.

With 23 Democrat contenders for President in 2020, citing their accomplishments for The People as opposed to their personal gains will likely become a dominant debate.

Despite the more obvious issues abounding, Democrats continue to state as their top priorities:

Kamala Harris:   justice for immigrants, blacks and LGBT

Joe Biden:   A mini New Green Deal, anti-Trump and Make America Great Again

Cory Booker:   Anti-lynching, carbon tax for climate change, and rental control

Bernie:   free everything for everybody including all illegals present and future

Buttigeig:   Medicare for all who want it, Green New Deal, LGBT rights

Of course Medicare for all who want it is essentially the package of socialist medicine for the middle class, while the elite will continue to embrace their own private health insurance. LGBT rights are already essentially in effect.   The New Green Deal is scary given the Roosevelt New Deal was administered via Executive Order…   And justice for immigrants is a bizarre concept that bears a load of question marks.

Unfortunately, none of the candidates espouse anything that would make them unique with attainable goals.   But they are united on one common goal – demonize all things Trump and all Trump supporters.

Socialism and Ocasio: A Soros Nazi Collaboration

Ray Dalio is making headlines for stating that the Ocasio backed ‘economic theory’ is inevitable.   If you are like me you have absolutely no idea who Ray Dalio is and why anyone would care what he thinks?   So, I looked him up.

One of the more interesting points within this headline is the fact that the Green Deal is referred to as a ‘theory’.   It isn’t a plan. And thus has little substance except that ‘those who devised this theory’ believe it is inevitable.   What is the definition of ‘theory’:   “a hypothesis assumed for the sake of argument or investigationan unproved assumption. An abstract thought.” Likening it to the New Deal of FDR is completely inappropriate as the core basis are wholly polar opposite.

Rarely, if ever, has the term been applied to economics. It is routinely used in the philosophy of science to project an idea when the idea cannot be upheld by actually facts and evidence.   Somewhat like – utopia.

Who is Ray Dalio?

A billionaire who espouses the egregious damnation of income inequality in the US. And like his allies in the Cabal, Dalio is hailed by the media as a philanthropist, having amassed his fortune as a hedge fund manager.   As a philanthropist, his latest 990 IRS form indicates a slew of interesting philanthropic donations from his Foundation including; the Robin Hood Foundation whose Board members include such notables as Gwyneth Paltrow, Diane Swyer, and – Harvey Weinstein, to name a few.   In 2009, George Soros gave the foundation $50 million.   Its stated mission is to alleviate poverty in New York City.

Various media outlets have their version of statistics showing that half of NYC residents live near poverty. Poverty rates among schoolchildren soars as of 10/2018.

Within a ranking of one of the largest charities in the world, how is it that Robinhood has yet to make a dent in NYC?

Hefty salaries, hefty use of part time and sub-contract employees, hefty investments in Europe ($13.4 million), and Central America ($74.4 million), fundraising events in the millions that produce a negative profit, grants to various organizations in Connecticut and Pennsylvania, might indicate a different agenda.

But this would be the world of NGO’s.   They rob from the poor to profit the rich.

The newest and most prolific recipient of grants is the National Philanthropic Trust, a donor-advised fund which boasts assets in the billions…   And the Khan Education Academy which provides education for the elite and wealthy, including Bill Gate’s children.

The actions vs the words.

The income vs the agenda.

The charity vs the reality.

Ocasio Cortez opened Pandora’s Box when it was discovered that her mentor had created a slew of organizations within different levels of IRS safety nets in order to hide contributions and contributors.   Since this revelation, it has been revealed that each and every Democracy aligned foundation utilizes this same web in order to try and hide the source and the gift. In essence a charity can legally create webs of sub charities with different IRs criteria, so as to hide where charity is really being divested.

For example:   Bill Gates could create a charity under a different genre allocation 501©(4) to fund charity 501©(3), thereby allowing concealment of the donors.   But the web may be extended ever larger and entail upwards of dozens of variant charities – all exempt from tax, wherein the real benefactors of the charity are actually the Board and Executives. And the charity is only responsible to support 5% of their funding in real charitable causes.

This is the Warren Buffet Pledge Corruption. And like The Swamp, this is much more prolific than we can possibly imagine. These Foundations and charities are funneling trillions – not billions.     And that is why Ray Dalio says that Ocasio’s Socialist/Communist Manifesto is ‘inevitable’.   Because his and countless other’s billions are behind this Global Coup.

One need only look to the organizations and Foundations that share their ‘philanthropic’ exchange of $$$$ to realize that there is no charity at all, it is a funnel scheme disguised by the mask of the wolf to appear as a friend of the sheep, only to whip out – the snake.

They are all intertwined, and this will ultimately be their downfall, because a 501©(3) is required to list their grants, and an easy research into each of these organizations reveals that none of them actually have any impact on their stated charitable cause, and instead, are really a housing of investments reaped tax free under a guise of charity:

Bill Gates Foundation – value of assets over $50.7 billion.   Assets are undistributed funds.

Warren Buffet Foundation – vast majority goes to Planned Parenthood.   Despite the Buffett mandate to give to the poor – he remains one of the wealthiest at over $82 billion in net worth.

These are the bullwarts who lament the income inequality, and poverty in the US…