SAFE SPACES: Cultural Segregation

Remember bullies? They have existed since the beginning of mankind. They know no race. They know no gender. They can be subtle or they can be malicious.   They exist in schools, businesses, churches, and neighbors.   They have been portrayed in movies for decades. And as the rise in bullying ran amok in schools, prevention became the mantra.  

Until ‘safe spaces’.

When my kids were growing up they frequently were the target of bullies.   Why? Because. Bullies target whoever they can and if their victim does nothing, they become their dodge ball victim for life.   The solution?   Fight back.

Of course, schools were called in to mediate bullies because often it happened on school premises.   But the problem was never erased, eradicated, or even smudged, because the school solution didn’t work. Bullying as a core is an inherent reactive learned from one’s parents.  Teachers applied bandaids and the bullying evolved into –

Safe spaces.

Today, instead of bullying, we call it “a place intended to be free of bias, conflict, criticism, or potentially threatening actions, ideas, or conversations … student volunteers put up posters advertising that a “safe space” would be available for anyone who found the debate too upsetting.”

For a society bent on tolerance and inclusion, a safe space is literally the extreme opposite.  In an article by VOX, a black woman states that she just wants to sometimes be around only other black women because it’s easier and there is no ‘translation’.   That used to be called ‘segregation’.   But integration changed that.   Forced integration of cultures was seen as the State Solution.   Everyone just needs to get along.   Diversity training arose.   While the Liberal mantra continues to assert that demand, voluntary segregation became the reality.

Wealthy people hang out with wealthy people. Military families hang out with other military families. Blacks with blacks, gays with gays, Christians with Christians, etc…   Exclusively?   Not necessarily.   Neighborhoods are the prime example.   Chinatown in San Francisco.   The Polish community in any given city. The Italian neighborhood in Lakewood.   Safe spaces.

And yet, safe spaces is now embraced by most universities, and a spattering of businesses. It has also given rise to a new burgeoning business model whereby evaluation and training are offered – for a price. Workshops are available to teach ‘respectful behavior’.   There are “Codes of Cooperation”.   The pictures portray happy employees of every diversity sitting together in a boardroom, planting a tree, analyzing reports, etc…

California has made it a law that all companies must have at least one female board member.  Diversity.

Starbucks recently came under fire again because a customer stated they felt unsafe when six police officers came in to order coffee. The officers were ejected because of the ‘one’ complaint.  Safe Spaces.

Nike nixed a shoe that they likely spent millions to create because Colin Kaepernick said it offended him.   A shoe offended him and thus Nike’s CEO scrapped the product line to the detriment of their shareholders.   Segregation.

Diversity: by definition means the inclusion of different types of people having differing elements and/or qualities.   But safe spaces means – exclusion.

Within this hypocrisy, a business can’t win.   Lawsuits have become a cost factor that ‘trickles down’ to the product cost. And the ultimate loser is the consumer. So businesses play the racket and hire diversity experts, provide training workshops, and document with fear lest they miss a box on the new 20 page HR requirements manual.

But it isn’t enough because those that demand diversity, also demand workplace segregation in the form of safe places. The absurdity is laughable when one considers that might mean a separate safe place for each group; women, gays, transgenders, liberals, binary, Hispanic, black, Muslim, Asian, etc… , ultimately transforming an office environment into a clone of complete isolation.

As Google and Amazon attempt to build business cities to accommodate their employees, it will be interesting to see how they create safe spaces for all the diverse diversities. Of course, will Google rent these apartments to its IT PhD’s only, or will the menial laborers have equal digs?   Will the laborers live in the basement?   Will executives live in penthouses?   Will there be separate cafeterias to accommodate safe spaces?

But then Google is well known for its anti-diversity politics, liberal only social morays, as well as its Big Government surveillance of anyone and everyone… The Orwellian vision is quite real.   The Boogeyman is Real!

In essence, segregation is culturally preferred.  But it isn’t politically correct.   So we pretend to want diversity inclusion while promoting safe spaces exclusion and hope nobody figures it out.  Shhhh – don’t tell!

Mueller Investigation Shifts to NY Attorney General

Any longer, reading Fox News is not much different than reading the New York Times or Washington Post.  It is fodder for bloggers.

The rallying cry among Democrats and Hollywoodites is that:   ‘no one is above the law’!   Err, except for Democrats and Hollywoodites.

Barbara Streisand recently supported just that concept when she defended Michael Jackson’s child abuse and pedophilia charges claiming the victims were now doing just fine, married and having children of their own.  Therefore the crime didn’t exist…

The AG of New York in conjunction with Mueller is going after the Trump Foundation.  But what happened to the Clinton Foundation taking money for bribes, spending only 9% on actual charity, hiring Chelsea for an undisclosed salary, destroying Haiti, on and on Ad nauseam?  And therein lies the rub, and Americans will rightly call foul and subject the slew of corrupt foundations to similar probes.

The problem with opening Pandora’s Box is trying to close it when the locusts are Democrats.  And that is the problem with the New York investigation.    It is similar to the Panama Paper Caper escapade that resulted in – nothing.  Despite the fact that numerous politicians and Hollywoodites were reportedly utilizing the offshore bonanza to hide money so as to evade taxes, while simultaneously supporting tax increases, it faded into obscurity.

It would seem that these law enforcement officials have become so obsessed, they have forgotten what their true job description entails.  Attorney General:

  • Represent the United States in legal matters.
  • Supervise and direct the administration and operation of the offices, boards, divisions, and bureaus that comprise the Department.
  • Furnish advice and opinions, formal and informal, on legal matters to the Presidentand the Cabinet and to the heads of the executive departments and agencies of the government, as provided by law.
  • Make recommendations to the Presidentconcerning appointments to federal judicial positions and to positions within the Department, including U.S. Attorneys and U.S. Marshals.
  • Represent or supervise the representation of the United States Government in the Supreme Court of the United States and all other courts, foreign and domestic, in which the United States is a party or has an interest as may be deemed appropriate.
  • Perform or supervise the performance of other duties required by statute or Executive Order.

When the US Justice Department spends two years investigating a sitting President, instead of providing advice For The President, it would seem that Department has relinquished its duty.   Is derelict in its duty.  And creates a void for its future existence.

What happens to actual criminals?

In fact, they, the criminals, have room to breath knowing that resources are sequestered elsewhere.

As the Democrats defend  the shift laid upon the New York Attorney General to find criminal activity in the Trump family, they subject themselves to a similar upending!  It is common knowledge that hundreds of Foundations and NGO’s are corrupt to the core – most lobbying for Socialism and democrat causes.

Despite the obvious obsession to victimize one man while the criminal conduct of hundreds of democrats should now be the focus of investigation and indictment, they seem to have hung their intellect on a hook outside the door.   Not only will this upset the possibility of a Democrat victory in 2020, it could very well be their end.

The unintended result of the Mueller probe has been to find illegal collusion between the FBI, Clinton, and Obama and his administration.  The unintended finding of corruption could spill into Biden’s campaign for President.   And could dispel any chance of a last minute announcement by Michelle Obama as well.

Retribution is likely.   As comes found out, there are no second chances.

Just as Hillary went ballistic when she discovered her Presidential win did not occur, Obama and Biden will in all probability be ransacking the House for their abject ineptitude at getting ‘caught’.   Because, despite the MSM attempt to detract from the result of the Mueller investigation results, the fact remains that Trump now has the upper hand to indict.

It is not unlike the Nixon attitude, albeit the Democrat Party in this instance;  The ultimate thought was that Nixon didn’t deserve to to be President because he got caught. It was acknowledged that politicians overwhelmingly did what Nixon did, but his stupidity was his crime.

The slew of Democrats implicated in corruption and collusion will be called out – except it just might be their fellow Democrats who do the calling out in retribution for their failure.

While Trump can do what TRUMP does best – Make America Great Again!