Founded in 1923 at Goethe University in Germany, the Institute For Social Research evolved into the Frankfurt School which served as a philosophical facility for Jewish intellectuals. Carl Grunberg was a Marxist. A Bolshevik, Grunberg suffered a stroke in 1929 and left the School to Max Horkheimer, a Jewish philosopher and sociologist. In 1933 The Institute was shut down and Max moved to NYC having befriended Murray Butler, a Fascist who became president of Columbia University, the Carnegie Endowment, and the Pilgrims Society over his lifetime. In 1941 Max left NYC for LA.
The Pilgrims Society is an alliance of the colony America with Great Britain under the tutelage of the Royal Family. Over the years its members have included high value Jews.
As Director of the Frankfurt School, Max inducted other Jewish intellectuals including; Eric Fromm, Herbert Marcuse and Theodor Adorno. Together they formulated a philosophy that merged Marxism with Freud with Stalinism and called it The New Left. They were considered the Great Thinkers who believed in a utopian society ruled over by persons equal to themselves. All others were duly inferiors.
This was also the period when Europe was immersed in the Age of the Renaissance, the eros of the Impressionists, and Picasso. While Artists and Intellectuals rarely crossed, the literary authors of the time became enmeshed in the philosophy of the Artists, including; Shaw, Brecht, Joyce, Eliot, Pound etc…, who saw themselves as socialist Marxists pursuing the philosophical concept of existentialism. In this recalibrated culture, Europe succumbed to the Socialist Marxist Movement under the tutelage of the Frankfurt School.
This was also the birth of atheism wherein God did not exist yet the preponderance of writing was about finding the meaning and purpose of life.
Herbert Marcuse was a philosopher associated with the Frankfurt School who criticized capitalism and Soviet communism in favor of the New Left ideology of a reformed version of Marxism. From 1943 to 1950 he was employed by the Office of Strategic Services (OSS – the precursor to the CIA), bringing the Marxist ideology and Jewish Intellectualism into the US Government, earning him the distinction as “The Father of The New Left’ in the US.
Marcuse joined fellow Jew and former scholar Franz Neumann at the OSS. Retiring in 1951. Marcuse began teaching at Columbia University which had adopted the New Left ideology into its curriculum calling it ‘utopianism’ thru a totalitarian synthesis. While at Columbia, Marcuse recreated the Eros philosophy of free love that inspired the 1960’s hippies and flower children Movement. Which officially became the end of intellectualism.
When Obama went to Columbia, the reason no one remembers him is because he spent his tenure in the Bolshevik Soviet Union when Columbia had a satellite campus there. It was in the Soviet Union that Obama was first groomed under the tenets of Marxist Bolshevism. Presidents are chosen – not elected.
Theodor Adorno (Weisengrund) was a leading member of the Frankfurt School. Adorno befriended Karl Popper who became Soros mentor. He was exiled from Germany and invited by Max Horkheimer to come to the Institutes school in NYC. During their time together, Theodor and Max began to delve into the concept of antisemitism and its sources. Claiming that the root of antisemitism was embedded in psychological distress brought on by technology and the need to blame, which led to their collaboration on Dialectic of Enlightenment. It also led to the realization that blame was an effective tool –
In 1965 Marcuse moved to LA having been fired from his teaching position at Brandeis University for his radical Marxist ideologies where he had as students the anarchists; Angela Davis and Abbie Hoffman.
The Intellectuals were aging, the Impressionists were gone, authors were writing drivel fantasy, and Hollywood was the Nouveau Elite. The Jewish cartel money had effectively bought most of Hollywood and turned LA into little Israel. They took with them the Cultural Marxism of the Intellectuals as their means of Eros to run Little Israel. Marxism was no longer Karl Marx, it had been recalibrated, rewritten and rebranded. Yet anti-Semitism was still an issue.
In 1985 the term Sho’ah which had been used to describe the destruction of the first and second temples was redefined as the Holocaust to emphasize the cremation of bodies. This was achieved via a 1985 documentary by Claude Lanzmann which created a lopsided view of WWII, emphasized the war was only about Jews and thus created a state of victimhood, ie Blame, while eliminating the fact that Hitler’s objective was to remove Communists fearing a Soviet Russia style takeover.
This film gave the Jews their forever victimhood status which is still used today throughout nearly every discussion between non-Jews (Goys)and Jews. In fact, in her book, The War Against The Jews, Lucy S. Dawidowicz claims there were two wars simultaneously – WWII and a ‘racial war’ against Jews. Recreating the entirety of a war to which General Patton famously claimed before being suicided, “I fought on the wrong side”. Meaning the Bolsheviks prevailed.
Today, The New Left is the Green Party merged with the Progressive left merged with the Communist Party, the Socialist Party and cultural Marxist Jews. Their Chosen People status is built on victimhood and the ideologies and philosophies of the Frankfurt Intellectuals. The utopia frequently espoused by the World Economic Forum is framed within this morphology and reflects the Handlers inside the White House, aka Bloomberg.
Bloomberg is Obama’s handler.
Has Rabbinic Judaism has gone off the path, as did New Testament avoda zarah which perverted into a false messiah belief in a physical/historyical man/god. The mussar in the Book of B’midbar that God is not a man that he should lie?
Rabbinic Judaism has gone completely off the path, just as did New Testament avoda zarah which perverted a false messiah belief in a physical/historyical man/god despite the Torah which teaches the mussar in the Book of B’midbar that God is not a man that he should lie.
Rabbinic Judaism, which emerged after the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE, indeed represents a significant shift from the earlier biblical period. It’s characterized by the central role of the Talmud—a vast compilation of discussions, legal rulings, and ethical teachings—as well as the authority of rabbis in interpreting and applying Jewish law. Rabbinic Judaism emphasizes study, prayer, and communal life.
The ethical and moral teachings found throughout Jewish texts—it’s a rich tradition that emphasizes character development, humility, and compassion. Mussar encourages us to cultivate virtues and refine our behavior, aligning ourselves with divine attributes.
Rosh HaShanah יום הזכרון remembers the t’shuva required to annul the vow made by HaShem to obliterate his People and make from the seed of Moshe the chosen Cohen nation. The משנה תורה בנין אב for this understanding: the father annuls the vow made by his minor daughter; or the husband annuls the vow made by his wife. A fundamental נפקא מינא between vows and oath, the former possible to annul whereas the latter impossible to annul.
The middah El remembers the sin of the Golden Calf. Specifically the perversion filth of translating the רוח הקודש שם השם to words like אלהים Jesus Allah etc.
Just as translating the רוח שם השם to words avoda zarah so to perverting the T’NaCH/Talmud common law to Greek/Roman statute law avoda zarah. The Greco-Roman legal systems, influenced by philosophers like Aristotle and Cicero, were foundational for Western jurisprudence. These systems focused on codified laws, formal courts, and precedents. They sought consistency and predictability.
How do we preserve authenticity while engaging with foreign influences? How do Jew guard themselves against assimilation and intermarriage with Goyim? Assimilating foreign legal systems can lead to cultural erosion. Just as translating sacred names risks losing their essence, adopting foreign statutes can dilute the soul of Talmudic law.
What modern scholars study the T’NaCH/Talmud as common law rather than religious Greek/Roman like statute law? Answer: None. Just as the after meal blessing for Hannukka says the wicked Greeks sought to cause Israel to forget the Oral Torah, so too after the Rambam introduced his Greek/Roman prostitute of halachic statute law, Jewish scholarship switched to the study of religious ritual law and abandoned and forgot the warp/weft loom that weave prophetic mussar together with halachic ritualism.
Compare the false messiah narrative of the Gospels abomination. Torah common law stands upon precedents. The precedent to learn the mitzva of Moshiach learns from korbanot. The dedication of Moshiach, the dedication for the pursuit of the rule of justice within the oath sworn lands. Meaning fair compensations of damages inflicted by Party A upon Party B. Only in the matter of Bat Sheva did king David fail to pursue the Moshiach dedication of justice. The false messiah narrative of the gospel abomination radically perverts, like the Golden Calf, the Torah mitzva of Moshiach.
The Sages of the Talmud itself. Their focused upon interpreting and applying common law, & on defining its nature through T’NaCH/aggada scholarship. The distinction between “religious” and “non-religious” legal systems not so straightforward. What traits must a legal system exhibit to be justifiably declared as religious? Often, the assertion that Jewish law exist solely as religious aims to emphasize its distinctiveness from Western legal systems (like the differences between common law and civil law). But this oversimplification fundamentally misses essential nuances.
Jewish law (halakhah) not merely a set of rules; it encompasses narratives (aggadah), morals (derekh ‘erets), and matters of faith (’emunah).
http://efaria.org: Contemporary Halakhic Problems delves into theoretical analysis rather than serving as a practical halakhic guid. What does this statement mean? Contemporary Halakhic Problems by Rabbi J. David Bleich. How does this work delve into theoretical analysis rather than serving as a practical halakhic guide?
The question restated: Rabbi Bleich fails to address the Difficulty/Answer style employed in the Gemara as a model for a courtroom Prosecuting Attorney/Defense Attorney legal debate over precedents.
Rabbi J. David Bleich relies upon Greek logic models rather than Rabbi Akiva’s פרדס logic reasoning system. Greek philosophy compares to translating the שם השם to the words like: אלהים or Jesus, or Allah. Rabbi Bleich theoretical exploration and analysis shares no common ground with Rabbi Akiva’s פרדס logic format.
Greek philosophy, with its emphasis on reason, logic, and systematic analysis, has left an indelible mark on Western thought. Philosophers like Aristotle and Plato sought to dissect reality, categorize knowledge, and establish universal principles. Their methods—deductive reasoning, syllogisms, and formal logic—shaped disciplines from mathematics to ethics.
Rabbi Akiva’s פרדס logic “married” דרוש\פשט with the Aggada and רמז\סוד with the halacha. The Talmud weaves the two together in a warp/weft legal loom. The aggada interprets prophetic mussar of the T’NaCH and this become the p’shat with defines the k’vanna of the halacha as established by רמז\סוד logical/rational reasoning.
Rabbi Bleich, an assimilated Jew draws upon Greek logic models and does not know nor ever even weighs the kabbalah of Rabbi Akiva’s פרדס traditions! Impossible to worship השם לשמה by bowing down to a golden calf.
The פרדס logic format weaves prophetic mussar with halachic ritualism with the purpose to elevate the latter into tohor time oriented Torah commandments.
Rabbi J. David Bleich, a modern scholar, draws upon Greek logic models. His tools—syllogisms, systematic analysis—reflect the Hellenistic legacy. All the commentaries written on the B’hag, Rif, Rosh, Yad Chazkah, Tur, and Shulkan Aruch learn through Greek and Roman law legal traditions and think based upon Greek philosophies of logic!
All the post Rambam Civil War commentaries and legal works engage with Greek and Roman legal traditions. Scholars draw upon Greek philosophies of logic, syllogisms, and systematic analysis. They embrace, they cause to inherit Hellenistic thought, they shape Jewish legal reasoning over time to this very moment to fit in harmony and assimilate with Greek and Roman cultural traditions and customs.
Gershom Scholem, a Conservative Rabbi. He learned the Talmud as a historical book rather than prophetic mussar applicable to all generations. Clearly this man knew nothing about Oral Torah common law other that platitudes and other such fancy nonsense. He failed to grasp the marriage between couples: דרוש\פשט & רמז\סוד. Assimilated Gershom Scholem kissed the golden calf. Talmud commands prophetic mussar not history – just that simple.
Jacob Cordovero tripped up on the Greek influenced/assimilated book – the Zohar. Not the kabbalah made famous during the Middle Ages but the kabbalah which defines the T’NaCH. The latter shapes and defines the k’vanna of the Talmud and not the former. Two fundamentally and opposite traditions.
Rambam Civil War, rabbis forgot the Oral Torah like as in the days threatened by the ancient Syrian Greeks to cause all Israel to forget the Oral Torah as taught by the kabbalah of Rabbi Akiva? The worship of avoda Zara does not qualify as wisdom – just that simple.
The concept of mussar and its focus on ethical and moral development, a cornerstone of Jewish thought, encouraging virtues like humility and compassion. The idea of t’shuva (annulling a vow) during Rosh HaShanah; this annulment of vows, highlights the dynamic relationship between Divine decrees and human actions.
My critique of Rabbi J. David Bleich and other modern scholars they Universally rely on Greek logic models rather than Rabbi Akiva’s פרדס logic system – hopefully insightful. The distinction drawn between Greek philosophy and the פרדס approach highlights a fundamental difference in how knowledge and law are understood and applied.
Greek philosophy, with its emphasis on deductive reasoning and systematic analysis, indeed contrasts sharply with the holistic and integrative approach of Rabbi Akiva’s פרדס logic. The פרדס system, which marries דרוש\פשט with Aggada and רמז\סוד with Halacha, creates a dynamic interplay between narrative and law, ethics and ritual. This warp/weft relationship described – essential for understanding the deeper meanings and intentions behind the commandments.
The Av tuma influence of Greek and Roman legal traditions on post-Rambam Jewish scholarship quite significant. The adoption of these foreign legal frameworks leads to a dilution of the unique qualities of Talmudic law, and its deep roots in prophetic mussar and the oral traditions.
Gershom Scholem and Jacob Cordovero, as mentioned, represent different approaches to Jewish mysticism and law. Scholem’s historical perspective and Cordovero’s engagement with the Zohar reflect the diverse ways in which Jewish thought has evolved, sometimes at the expense of traditional methods like those of Rabbi Akiva.
Do any rabbinic authorities today do t’shuva on the Golden Calf on Yom Ha’Din Rosh HaShanna? Has modern day assimilated Judaism erased assimilation to the customs of ancient Greeks and Romans, as HaShem threated Israel following the sin of the Golden Calf? The long confessions repeated over and over again in the Yom Kippur dav’ening so completely unnecessary – a waste of time, just that simple.
The framers of the Shemone Esrei excluded a rabbinic וידוי within the language of the Shemone Esrei. If tefillah stands in the stead of korbanot and korbanot require a וידוי, where in the language of the Shemone Esrei exists the וידוי דאורייתא?
What distinguishes a וידוי דאורייתא from a וידוי דרבנן? How has rabbinic Judaism failed to ask this fundamental but basic question!
How has rabbinic judaism failed to refute the false messiah narritive of Jesus death and resurrection for Original Sin, by teaching that the revelation of the Oral Torah 13 tohor middot made atonement for the sin of the Golden Calf?
Yom Kippur makes atonement for the sin of the Golden Calf, translating the רוח הקודש שם השם to words like אלהים, Jesus, or Allah Av tumah. Avoda zarah the Av tumah of death. The secondary “sins” covered by atonement for the primary “sin” of avoda zarah ie the second Sinai commandment, simply not necessary. Why? The toldot follow after the Avot.
T’shuva learns from the Torah precedent of a father annulling the vow made by his minor daughter, or a husband who annuls the vow made by his wife. This בנין אב interprets the k’vanna of HaShem doing t’shuva and not obliterating Israel and making the Cohen nation from the seed of Moshe.
Purity of faith shares no common ground with what a person personally believes. Tohor faith: the Sanhedrin common law courtrooms making fair restitution of damages inflicted by Party A upon Party B.
Chag Sukkot serves as proof that Yom Kippur makes atonement for the sin of the Golden Calf: confusing the Spirit Name of the 1st Sinai commandment with words which the lips of Man can frame and pronounce. The word אדוני effectively means הבדלה- discern the difference between A vs. B in a legal damages dispute. A man understands the limitations of his words. A living man breathes a spirit of life. A dead man does not; words cannot cause a dead man to live again. The resurrection from the dead, the 2nd blessing of the Shemone Esrei the spirit of HaShem which breathes life into the Avot, this same spirit breathes life into all generations of Israel – the toldot. Hence שמע ישראל ה’ אלהינו ה’ אחד. The 3 Divine Names refer to the spirit that quickened the lives of the Avot. The generations who breath these שם השם spirits raise the lives of the Avot from the dead within their own lives! Not the living spirit of the Avot. Rather the living spirit of the שם השם which gives life to both the Avot and all later generation toldot of the Avot.
After the Day of Atonement – for the sin of the Golden Calf, Moshe removed the Mishkan from within the midst of the Congregation. So too Israel builds the sukkah outside the house where he lives. The Name of HaShem does not dwell within the Sukkah but rather dwells within our hearts. Hence Tefillah a matter of the heart.
The post Rambam Civil War perversion of the Torah, where Israel forgot the Oral Torah like the mitzva of lighting the lights of Hannukka forwarn. G’lut Jews lost the wisdom to do mitzvot לשמה. No rabbinic authority today teaches that while the lips can pronounce the שם אדוני, tefillah as a tohor time oriented commandment learned from קריא שמע דאורייתא requires the k’vanna of blowing the שם השם comparable to and like the blowing of the shofar on Rosh HaShanna. The Cohen Ha’Gadol pronounced the שם השם on Yom Kippur. Hence on Rosh HaShanna the Talmud teaches the blowing of the shofar!
Not that the Name – to sacred to pronounce – narishkeit. Rather the שם השם a spirit that no man can pronounce with his lips. This Name simply – not a word. Hence the sin of the Golden Calf where Israel perverted and defiled the Spirit Name unto a crude Human words like אלהים, Jesus, or Allah. This understanding highlights the gravity of the sin of the Golden Calf, where the Divine spirit was reduced to a humanly pronounceable word, thus defiling its sanctity.
The subject of tohor vs tumah learns from the revelation of the Oral Torah on Yom Kippur – the 13 tohor middot. These middot, toldot of the Name breath breathe as spirits rather than words. This fundamental distinction separates in like manner Torah common law from Greek and Roman statute law. The latter has no awareness of tohor/tumah spirits which a man breaths within his heart and unto the souls of his family and neighbors, people and world.
This understanding indeed sets Torah common law apart from Greek and Roman statute law. The latter, focused on codified rules and formal legal structures, lacks the spiritual dimension of tohor/tumah which permeates Jewish law. Torah common law, with its emphasis on the spiritual and ethical dimensions of human actions, recognizes the impact of these spiritual states on individuals and their relationships, as expressed through tohor opposed by tumah middot.
Prophetic mussar, it serves to define the k’vanna of the 13 tohor middot toldot of the שם השם לשמה. Prophetic mussar interprets the intent behind the stories as found in both Talmudic aggadah and Geonic Midrashim. The latter serves as the primary commentary to learn and understand Talmudic aggadah.
The warp/weft relationship of the Talmud weaves aggadic mussar together with halachic rituals. Weaving one with the other makes a garment … a tohor time oriened Av Torah commandment! The Talmud’s structure, weaving aggadic mussar with halachic rituals, creates a comprehensive garment of Jewish law and practice. This warp/weft relationship ensures that ethical teachings (mussar) and legal practices (halacha) are not separate but interwoven, each informing and enhancing the other.
By integrating these elements, the Talmud creates commandments that are not only legally binding but also ethically and spiritually enriching. This approach ensures that the practice of mitzvot (commandments) is done with the right k’vanna (intention), aligning actions with the Divine will.
The sin of the Golden Calf by which the Rambam, Tur, and Shulkan Aruch perverted T’NaCH Talmudic common law unto Greek Roman statute law, herein defines the sin of the Golden Calf through the generations. The adoption of foreign legal frameworks represents a profound deviation from the original spirit and intent of Jewish law.
The sin of the Golden Calf instructs through a משל\נמשל metaphor. The worship of a physical idol compares to calling upon HaShem using “PHYSICAL WORDS”. The Divine cannot be fully captured or represented by human language or physical forms; simply nothing in the Heavens, the Earth or the Seas compares to the Spirit Name of השם which absolutely requires tohor middot spirits breathing from within a living heart.
Just as the Golden Calf was a physical idol that could not truly embody the divine, using “physical words” to call upon HaShem falls short of capturing the infinite and ineffable nature of the Divine spirit. The Divine name, השם, requires tohor middot that breathe from within a living heart. This means that true connection with HaShem goes beyond words and involves embodying divine attributes like ה’ ה’ אל רחום וחנון וכו.
This Oral Torah defines the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. The church denies this revelation because it contradicts the Gospel narrative that Jesus atones for the Original Sin of Adam as taught by the Jewish agent provocateur, the infamous Apostle Paul.
The Oral Torah revealed at Horev: ה’ ה’ אל רחום וחנון וכו, these spirits define the פרדס logic system kabbalah taught by rabbi Akiva. The entire Talmud and Midrashic literature stands upon the revelation of the 13 tohor middot to Moshe at Horev on Yom Kippur.
The Frankfurt School emerged during the interwar Weimar Republic period. Critical Theory engaged with the real world. It sought to understand and transform society, not merely theorize about it. It focused upon making a critique of modernity, capitalist society, and mass culture. It made a reinterpretation of Marxist concepts like commodification, reification, and fetishization.
Marx introduced the concept of commodification in his analysis of capitalism. It refers to the process by which goods, services, or even human labor become transformed into commodities, for sale in the open market-place.
Reinterpretation by the Frankfurt School: They explored how commodification affects not only economic relations but also cultural practices, social interactions, and personal identities. Commodification wasn’t just about goods; it was about the pervasive influence of market logic on all aspects of life. The Frankfurt School critiqued how commodification led to alienation. People became estranged from their own labor, their creativity, and even their identities.
Marx introduced the concept of Reification: the process by which social relations, abstract concept or human activities become transformed into seemingly objective, natural things or commodities.
Marx used the term Fetishization to explain how commodities (goods and services) assume a mystical aura in capitalist society. Something like how black magic injects spirits into dead objects.
Reification and fetishization are intertwined. Reification turns social relations into things, while fetishization imbues those things with mystical significance. Both concepts reveal how capitalism alienates us from the true social relations behind commodities.
The Frankfurt School’s Critique extended reification beyond economic relations. It wasn’t just about goods; it was about how capitalist society turned everything into commodities. Cultural practices, social interactions, and personal identities—all became subject to market logic. Reification alienated individuals from their labor and obscured the true social context behind these processes.
The Frankfurt School’s Critique of Marx’s Fetishization, explored how fetishization extended beyond commodities. It included cultural phenomena, ideologies, and even political figures. Fetishization of celebrity culture turns individuals into quasi-magical icons, obscuring their humanity. The culture industry (mass media, entertainment) perpetuated fetishization, creating standardized tastes and conformity.
After World War II, the geopolitical landscape shifted dramatically. The rise of the Cold War, the division of Europe, and the dominance of the United States as a superpower reshaped intellectual priorities.
The Frankfurt School’s critique of the culture industry (mass media, entertainment, advertising) remained influential. However, it didn’t always translate into widespread societal change. The Frankfurt School’s decline in direct influence was shaped by historical events, academic shifts, and generational changes. Yet, their critical lens still informs discussions about culture, capitalism, and society.
Does Israel view Hamas & the PA as legitimate political parties which won their 1994 & 2006 general elections?
As of 2024, Israel has diplomatic ties with 165 of the 192 member states of the United Nations. As of 2022, 28 of the 193 UN member states do not recognise Israeli sovereignty. UN condemnations together with the overreach of international courts who have no jurisdiction over Israel – Chapter VII UN condemnations of Israel, absolutely perceived as a direct threat to Israeli sovereignty and security. Such actions interpreted by Jerusalem as legitimising international intervention or sanctions.
The following 11 countries do not recognise Hamas as a Palestinian government: Israel, Australia, Japan, the US, Canada, Jordan, Egypt, Syria, Brazil, New Zealand, and Britain. It’s important to note that while these countries share a similar stance on the illegitimacy of Hamas and the PA, the exact reasons and the depth of their agreement might vary.
Arab racist nationalism emerged in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, advocating for the independence and unity of Arab peoples, and highly influenced by the 1930s rise of German Nazism hatred against the post WWI Versailles Allied dictated treaty imposed upon defeated Germany.
This ideology often viewed the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine as a threat to Arab identity and territorial claims. Many Arab leaders and intellectuals perceived the Zionist movement as a form of Western colonialism. They argued that Jewish immigration and statehood were imposed by external powers (like Britain and later the United States) at the expense of the indigenous Arab population.
The influx of Jewish immigrants to Palestine raised fears among Arab populations about losing demographic and political control. Arabs in the region worried that a Jewish state would marginalize their rights and status. The 1947 UN Partition Plan, which proposed a division of Palestine into separate Jewish and Arab states, was rejected by Arab leaders. They argued that it was unjust to allocate land to a Jewish state, particularly given the demographic majority of Arabs in the area at the time.
Arab nationalism also emphasized solidarity with Palestinians, viewing the struggle against Zionism as part of a broader Arab struggle against colonialism and for Arab self-determination.
The Arab States absolute refusal to recognize and respect Israeli self-determination has caused Israel in its own right to reject and denounce Gazan, and area A of the PA, based upon the defunct Oslo Accords – to likewise reject the Palestinian right to self-determination. That as of June 2024, 146 of the 193 member states of the UN unilaterally recognize a Palestinian state serves as conclusive proof that these countries oppose direct face to face negotiations between Israel and Arab refugee populations which currently have no country of their own; that these countries seek some international dictate which treats Israel as a protectorate mandate territory.
That Israel has no authority to determine its own international borders. That foreign nations, some of which do not even hold diplomatic relations with Israel possess the right and authority to dictate peace terms and borders upon the Jewish people. As if Jews maintain the status of exiles who had to endure the Middle Ages feudalism slanders: the Jews poisoned the wells, killed Christian babies to make matza for Passover, and their ensuing pogroms which culminated in the Shoah – the systematic murder of 75% of European Jewry in less than 3 years.
Israel consequently does not view Hamas or the PA in Samaria as a legitimate political party. The 2006 Palestinian general elections in Gaza and the PA election in Samaria prove nothing. Neither Gaza or the PA in Samaria have held any election thereafter.
Both Hamas and the PA did win a plurality of seats in their respective one-time elections, Israel, along with many other countries, considers both Hamas and the PA as a terrorist organization. This designation stems from Hamas & PA stated goals, which include the destruction of Israel, using “From the River to the Sea” propaganda, as proof of the continued PLO commitment to armed struggle to destroy all Jews.
Therefore, Israel’s refusal to recognize Hamas & PA electoral victories, based on the assessment that Hamas and the PA maintain the original PLO covenant – fundamentally opposed to a peaceful resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The fictional legitimacy of the election results that established both Hamas and the PA as Palestinian “governments”, simply secondary to Israel’s security concerns and its assessment of both Hamas & PA maintenance of the original PLO ideology and actions.
Israel’s stance – heavily influenced by security considerations. Both Hamas and the PA – viewed through the lens of their commitments to armed struggle and hostility toward Israel, seen as direct threats to Israeli self-determination and security. The original PLO covenant, which included objectives against the existence of Israel, continues to shape Israeli perceptions of both Hamas and the PA. Israel argues that these organizations maintain ideologies that are fundamentally opposed to a peaceful resolution of the conflict.
Specifically, which countries agree with Israel that Hamas and the PA together both exist as illegitimate political actors, rooted in the Arab 1948 ideology which absolutely and fundamentally rejects the idea that dhimmi Jews share equal rights to self-determination?
The U.S. designates Hamas as a terrorist organization and has expressed skepticism about the PA’s governance, particularly regarding its effectiveness and commitment to peace. Egypt also views Hamas with suspicion due to its affiliation with the Muslim Brotherhood, which poses a threat to the Egyptian government. Egypt often mediates between Israel and Hamas but does not recognize Hamas as a legitimate actor.
The UAE has taken a more pragmatic approach, normalizing relations with Israel through the Abraham Accords. It views both Hamas and the PA as impediments to peace and stability in the region. While Jordan has a significant Palestinian population and supports Palestinian rights, it is cautious about Hamas due to its radical ideology and the potential for instability it brings to the region. Similar to the UAE, Bahrain and other Gulf states have shown a willingness to engage with Israel and have expressed concerns about the governance and actions of both Hamas and the PA.
Germany, as an EU member state, could potentially break with France over a call for an arms embargo against Israel. Germany and France have different foreign policy priorities and approaches when it comes to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Germany has generally maintained a close relationship with Israel, emphasizing dialogue and cooperation.
Germany could choose not to support a French-led call for an arms embargo against Israel, especially if it perceives such a move as detrimental to Israel’s security or damaging to the relationship between the two countries.
Israel has told António Guterres that he is persona non grata in Israel. Does this preclude the Israeli breakage of all diplomatic relations with the UN and the expulsion of the UN from Lebanon, Gaza, Samaria and Israel?
This status specifically targets Guterres as an individual, meaning, he emphatically – unwelcome in Israel. It does not, as yet extend to the whole of the UN as an organization. However the disgrace and corruption of both UNWRA and UNIFIL does strongly indicate that Israeli distust of the UN has reached a critical breaking point.
The growing frustration with the UN’s effectiveness and its agencies’ actions could indicate that Israel approaches a critical break-point in its tolerance for what it views as inadequate support for its security and sovereignty. While the current measures focus on Guterres, ongoing dissatisfaction could lead to calls for more drastic actions against UN operations in the region. However, such decisions would be complex and could have significant diplomatic repercussions.
Israel’s positioning reflects deep-seated frustrations with the UN and its agencies, particularly in the context of the latest UNGA Chapter VII ultimatum against Israel. Israel often views UNGA resolutions as biased against it, particularly those that criticize its policies in the UN 242 propaganda declaration “occupied territories”. Jordan invaded Israel in the June 1967 war and not the reverse! Resolutions invoking Chapter VII of the UN Charter, which can authorize action to maintain or impose international peace and security – particularly concerning to Jerusalem.
The UNGA most recent issue of a Chapter VII ultimatum which threatens to take actions under Chapter VII, Israel perceives as a direct threat to its sovereignty and security. Such actions interpreted as legitimizing international intervention or sanctions. Israel’s national security simply a paramount concern, and any perceived attack on its legitimacy or actions directly leads to heightened tensions. The Israeli government will respond strongly to what it sees as hostile actions by & from the UN.
Israel’s responses to UN actions can impact its relationships with other nations, especially those that support or oppose UN initiatives. This dynamic may influence diplomatic strategies and alliances in the region. Israel’s complex relationship with Hamas, the PA, and international entities like the UN, driven by deep-seated security concerns and historical grievances which date back to slanders made throughout the Middle Ages. The perspectives of various countries reflect a mix of geopolitical interests, historical ties, and security assessments, leading to a nuanced international landscape regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Funny how Jews have always been the persecuted. No matter where they go (even Israel), there is persecution, especially since WWII, when and since they have really blown the top off the tent in crying persecution, holocausts and making it pay. Money lenders at 35% interest…or more. In looking into Talmudic Jewish bankers during WWII, it is said that they said their own brothers and sisters would have to be sacrificed for the cause….of making money. Jews killing Jews. Hitler and Nazism was backed by the Vatican, whose bankers were Talmudic Jews, both groups who keep to the Babylonian creed. The Jews are NOT the chosen people, never were. The Israelites/Hebrews were and only until they denied Jesus as the Messiah and had him murdered and then they blamed Pontius Pilate, when this man was not in favor of Jesus’s execution and tried to dissuade the Jews from it. The Israelites were always defying and disobeying God’s law, but denying the Messiah was the final straw. The Pharisees continue to live amongst us and have not changed.
Definitely a fabulous nutshell analysis! If you ever want to volunteer your time and insights- I’ll be listening
Noise. The Talmud serves as the model of Jewish courtrooms once Jews reconquer our homelands. Just that simple. You jabber about the Torah commandment of Moshiach but your not under the law of Torah common law and know nothing of Torah commandments including the Moshiah. Your gospel counterfeit compares to the Czar secret police “Protocols of the Elders of Zion”. You do not know the difference between Phariseeic Judaism vs Saduceeic Judaism. LOL Just an blabber mouth Goy idiot. “God’s Law”: nu idiot what differentiates between Statute Law from Common Law? Which Law is “God’s Law”?
The year 1933 seems to be about the right time for them to be properly driven out of Germany.
The supremacy attitude of those leftists is obvious, and, they also wanted to control the money.
Russia and Red China will not allow it. Ukraine is a loss. Nationalism is growing. The Handlers must have some plans underway, military action seems to be their only option.
truly rubbish… where are the source citations to verify a lot of this?
So let me get this straight – you and Gary Null have been wiped clean off all social media – your website taken down – your articles presented without CITATIONS. And you choose to make your last mark in this world as a bully, wasted, soulless, shill?
You were of course unable to refute a single thing in the article.
And, you are unable to construct an actual sentence. No sale. I will go with Helena.
Thank you.
wondering if you were able to conect any of this with the Tavistock Institute?
https://helenaglass.net/2024/06/17/black-nobility-meets-the-committee-of-300-and-pope-francis/
https://helenaglass.net/2022/08/30/new-world-order-via-mind-control/
https://helenaglass.net/2024/06/16/black-nobility-and-the-creation-of-history-11th-century/