GERMANY INSTITUTES TOTALITARIAN RULE

Germany just took the next step to a full blown totalitarian regime!   Sovereign states within Germany are no longer sovereign and the Bundestag has given itself complete control over the entire country.   Within their first actionable move they are interning all residents thru the end of June – more likely indefinitely.

The dictator rules include:   1. Personal contact are restricted to one household plus 1 outside person.   2. Curfew from 10pm to 5am.   3.   Nonessential shops can only allow entrance of a person if they provide a negative virus test and an appointment.   If the incidence rate exceeds 150, the shop is shuttered to curbside pickup only.   4.   Schools closed if incidence rate exceeds 165. 5. Funerals limited to 30 attendees.

Germany’s Bundestag president declared curfews work because when looking abroad “…ALL countries that have regained control of high infection figures have resorted to curfew restrictions in phases”.   Given the 100% possibility is near 50%, I guess throwing out a number seemed like a good justification – albeit a false one.

Meaning Sweden decided to let nature take its course and has not mandated masks, quarantines, or closures.   Their death rate ‘with CoVid’ is 1.5%. By contrast, Germany’s death rate of confirmed cases is nearly double despite calamitous lockdowns, closures, and an economic spiral.

Nonetheless, Germany’s Deutsche Welle claims Sweden’s success is renegade – responsible for loss of life – and topping European charts in infection rates.   Infections that – recover at a rate nearly 2x that of Germanys. Yet Germany, Spain, Italy, France, all the major countries in the EU have a caseload 3-4 times that of Sweden. Someone apparently forgot to notify the Bundestag of the factual truths.

Germany Vs. Sweden:

Sweden’s death rate has actually been on a constant decline since 1988.   Wholly not satisfied with this actuality, the UN projects that a reversal will begin in 2022 and increase by 7% as of … 2100.   Ah!

Germany’s overall death rate is a full 2 points higher than Sweden.   Sounds like someone is a bit miffed given their own statistics reveal a miserable failure.

Sweden’s economy contract by 2.8% in 2020 – Germany’s economy contracted 9.7% as of August 2020.   While it bounced back somewhat, 2021 has been mired in brutal lockdown measures which will surely leave the once greatest EU country in the twalette.

It would appear, Germany is desperate to attack the one country that rose above the fray and survived!

Germany Politics:

Of course, as I have been stating, the Green Party in Germany has suddenly taken the Numero Uno place in the pending re-election. Merkel’s named successor, Armin Laschet , is known as a liberal supporting mass immigration. He is a definitive ‘Wilbur Milktoast’ who made his feeble rise in politics on the heels of predecessors simply resigning leaving the post open to him.   it would appear, his election as the milktoast candidate for the CDU was based on his inability to win.

By contrast, the Green Party selected a woman who is significantly younger than Laschet, and went to the London School of Economics – which is the equivalent in all things, including embracing Marxist ideologies, of Harvard. Her background includes membership in Alliance 90, which has roots in Socialism and Communism, advocating for Revolution.  How wonderful!   Maybe we should send her some of our best BLM and ANTIFA rioters!

She is active with the World Economic Forum in promoting escalating Climate Change Initiatives.  Because she is afterall – Their Candidate!

GREEN PARTY:  

According to the UN”s Antonio Guterres, “Countries need to submit ambitious new nationally determined contributions (MONEY) that were designed by the Paris Agreement. Their climate plans for the next 10 years must be much more efficient.”

He also urged that climate commitments and plans must be backed with immediate action, and that the trillions of dollars invested by mostly richer nations for domestic COVID-19 recovery, be aligned with the Paris Agreement on climate change and the Sustainable Development Goals, and that subsidies directed to fossil fuels be shifted to renewable energy.

“Developed countries must lead in phasing out coal – by 2030 in OECD countries, and 2040 elsewhere. No new coal power plants should be built”.     He continued to assert that global inequalities will expand if Climate Change is not reversed and we don’t give them all our money!

Apparently, despite ALL the global lockdowns, the screeching halt of production worldwide, the economic and mental destruction of vast swathes of the population – it wasn’t enough and somehow greenhouse gases and carbon dioxide emissions continued to increase unabated.  Imagine that?  How could it be??

Wouldn’t that indicate that man is not responsible – and man – can do nothing?   But then again, the measurements of dire warning are based on a time span of 150 years.   Not the 4 billion years estimated to be the life of earth.   Which would represent .00000375% of earth’s climate history.  So our esteemed climate scientists are making determination based on factors that have a ratio algorithm measure of .0000000375.

But then today’s climatologists have a really tough time predicting the weather for – tomorrow.  So by all means, let’s continue to use those verifiable algorithmic guesstimates in order to justify the full implementation of a global totalitarian regime! 

SAFE SPACES: Cultural Segregation

Remember bullies? They have existed since the beginning of mankind. They know no race. They know no gender. They can be subtle or they can be malicious.   They exist in schools, businesses, churches, and neighbors.   They have been portrayed in movies for decades. And as the rise in bullying ran amok in schools, prevention became the mantra.  

Until ‘safe spaces’.

When my kids were growing up they frequently were the target of bullies.   Why? Because. Bullies target whoever they can and if their victim does nothing, they become their dodge ball victim for life.   The solution?   Fight back.

Of course, schools were called in to mediate bullies because often it happened on school premises.   But the problem was never erased, eradicated, or even smudged, because the school solution didn’t work. Bullying as a core is an inherent reactive learned from one’s parents.  Teachers applied bandaids and the bullying evolved into –

Safe spaces.

Today, instead of bullying, we call it “a place intended to be free of bias, conflict, criticism, or potentially threatening actions, ideas, or conversations … student volunteers put up posters advertising that a “safe space” would be available for anyone who found the debate too upsetting.”

For a society bent on tolerance and inclusion, a safe space is literally the extreme opposite.  In an article by VOX, a black woman states that she just wants to sometimes be around only other black women because it’s easier and there is no ‘translation’.   That used to be called ‘segregation’.   But integration changed that.   Forced integration of cultures was seen as the State Solution.   Everyone just needs to get along.   Diversity training arose.   While the Liberal mantra continues to assert that demand, voluntary segregation became the reality.

Wealthy people hang out with wealthy people. Military families hang out with other military families. Blacks with blacks, gays with gays, Christians with Christians, etc…   Exclusively?   Not necessarily.   Neighborhoods are the prime example.   Chinatown in San Francisco.   The Polish community in any given city. The Italian neighborhood in Lakewood.   Safe spaces.

And yet, safe spaces is now embraced by most universities, and a spattering of businesses. It has also given rise to a new burgeoning business model whereby evaluation and training are offered – for a price. Workshops are available to teach ‘respectful behavior’.   There are “Codes of Cooperation”.   The pictures portray happy employees of every diversity sitting together in a boardroom, planting a tree, analyzing reports, etc…

California has made it a law that all companies must have at least one female board member.  Diversity.

Starbucks recently came under fire again because a customer stated they felt unsafe when six police officers came in to order coffee. The officers were ejected because of the ‘one’ complaint.  Safe Spaces.

Nike nixed a shoe that they likely spent millions to create because Colin Kaepernick said it offended him.   A shoe offended him and thus Nike’s CEO scrapped the product line to the detriment of their shareholders.   Segregation.

Diversity: by definition means the inclusion of different types of people having differing elements and/or qualities.   But safe spaces means – exclusion.

Within this hypocrisy, a business can’t win.   Lawsuits have become a cost factor that ‘trickles down’ to the product cost. And the ultimate loser is the consumer. So businesses play the racket and hire diversity experts, provide training workshops, and document with fear lest they miss a box on the new 20 page HR requirements manual.

But it isn’t enough because those that demand diversity, also demand workplace segregation in the form of safe places. The absurdity is laughable when one considers that might mean a separate safe place for each group; women, gays, transgenders, liberals, binary, Hispanic, black, Muslim, Asian, etc… , ultimately transforming an office environment into a clone of complete isolation.

As Google and Amazon attempt to build business cities to accommodate their employees, it will be interesting to see how they create safe spaces for all the diverse diversities. Of course, will Google rent these apartments to its IT PhD’s only, or will the menial laborers have equal digs?   Will the laborers live in the basement?   Will executives live in penthouses?   Will there be separate cafeterias to accommodate safe spaces?

But then Google is well known for its anti-diversity politics, liberal only social morays, as well as its Big Government surveillance of anyone and everyone… The Orwellian vision is quite real.   The Boogeyman is Real!

In essence, segregation is culturally preferred.  But it isn’t politically correct.   So we pretend to want diversity inclusion while promoting safe spaces exclusion and hope nobody figures it out.  Shhhh – don’t tell!