TRUMP’S TAXES & FINANCES -A Democrat Nightmare

Maxine Waters is taking her new appointment as Chair of the House Intelligence and Financial Services Committee by issuing subpoena’s against Deutsche Bank, JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America and Citigroup. The reasoning? Trump used these banks to launder Russian money… The basis for the charge is that Trump did business with the banks and repaid most of his loans.  But Deutsche Bank has been hit several times with money laundering fines, and given that Trump has done business with this bank means he is guilty by association…  

Not.

Trump’s finances have become the new plume for the Democrats having lost their two year battle in the Mueller Russia investigation. With demands that Trump release his tax returns, to demands that banks provide an entire history of Trump’s dealings, the pillage continues. At taxpayer expense.

Don’t any of these Congressional officials have a real job?

The very person making the demand for Trump to release his tax returns, Richard Neal of the House Ways and Means Committee, has failed to provide his despite numerous demands.   In fact 90% of Democrats have failed to provide their tax returns.

Does Congress have the power and authority to demand to see Trump’s tax returns?

While the release is considered ‘standard’ and a ‘tradition’, it has never been cited as law.   IRS Section 6103 does not state that any tax return requested by the House must be released. However, based on an obscure law enacted in 1924, that has never been exercised in this manner, or with this objective there is a back door. The law also states that the Treasury can nullify the law if given 30 days notice. Mnunchin states that the request is ‘politically motivated’ and thus the objective is not legal. Constitutionally, the House has to show a ‘need’ in order to make the claim. So Neal and his cohorts concocted a fake agenda wherein they claim to be auditing the IRS’s auditing procedures when it relates to a sitting President.

It is obviously a fake request, and is obviously politically motivated.  As such the law will likely be repealed.

The argument the Democrats are using is the Russia collusion theory. The fact that this entire agenda was already declared null by the Mueller investigation would seem credible enough for a Supreme Court ruling in favor of Trump.   At some point harassment would become a possible legal backlash.

While the 1924 law also states that in this demand viewing Trump’s taxes would have to take place in a closed executive session, never to be made public, Trump could easily argue that Congress is a ‘leak magnet’, and his right to privacy would be violated.

Legal experts all have differing views on the situation and the outcome, but it is likely Trump will let it go to court. In the meantime, Trump will do what Congress is NOT doing, his job.

Mueller Investigation Shifts to NY Attorney General

Any longer, reading Fox News is not much different than reading the New York Times or Washington Post.  It is fodder for bloggers.

The rallying cry among Democrats and Hollywoodites is that:   ‘no one is above the law’!   Err, except for Democrats and Hollywoodites.

Barbara Streisand recently supported just that concept when she defended Michael Jackson’s child abuse and pedophilia charges claiming the victims were now doing just fine, married and having children of their own.  Therefore the crime didn’t exist…

The AG of New York in conjunction with Mueller is going after the Trump Foundation.  But what happened to the Clinton Foundation taking money for bribes, spending only 9% on actual charity, hiring Chelsea for an undisclosed salary, destroying Haiti, on and on Ad nauseam?  And therein lies the rub, and Americans will rightly call foul and subject the slew of corrupt foundations to similar probes.

The problem with opening Pandora’s Box is trying to close it when the locusts are Democrats.  And that is the problem with the New York investigation.    It is similar to the Panama Paper Caper escapade that resulted in – nothing.  Despite the fact that numerous politicians and Hollywoodites were reportedly utilizing the offshore bonanza to hide money so as to evade taxes, while simultaneously supporting tax increases, it faded into obscurity.

It would seem that these law enforcement officials have become so obsessed, they have forgotten what their true job description entails.  Attorney General:

  • Represent the United States in legal matters.
  • Supervise and direct the administration and operation of the offices, boards, divisions, and bureaus that comprise the Department.
  • Furnish advice and opinions, formal and informal, on legal matters to the Presidentand the Cabinet and to the heads of the executive departments and agencies of the government, as provided by law.
  • Make recommendations to the Presidentconcerning appointments to federal judicial positions and to positions within the Department, including U.S. Attorneys and U.S. Marshals.
  • Represent or supervise the representation of the United States Government in the Supreme Court of the United States and all other courts, foreign and domestic, in which the United States is a party or has an interest as may be deemed appropriate.
  • Perform or supervise the performance of other duties required by statute or Executive Order.

When the US Justice Department spends two years investigating a sitting President, instead of providing advice For The President, it would seem that Department has relinquished its duty.   Is derelict in its duty.  And creates a void for its future existence.

What happens to actual criminals?

In fact, they, the criminals, have room to breath knowing that resources are sequestered elsewhere.

As the Democrats defend  the shift laid upon the New York Attorney General to find criminal activity in the Trump family, they subject themselves to a similar upending!  It is common knowledge that hundreds of Foundations and NGO’s are corrupt to the core – most lobbying for Socialism and democrat causes.

Despite the obvious obsession to victimize one man while the criminal conduct of hundreds of democrats should now be the focus of investigation and indictment, they seem to have hung their intellect on a hook outside the door.   Not only will this upset the possibility of a Democrat victory in 2020, it could very well be their end.

The unintended result of the Mueller probe has been to find illegal collusion between the FBI, Clinton, and Obama and his administration.  The unintended finding of corruption could spill into Biden’s campaign for President.   And could dispel any chance of a last minute announcement by Michelle Obama as well.

Retribution is likely.   As comes found out, there are no second chances.

Just as Hillary went ballistic when she discovered her Presidential win did not occur, Obama and Biden will in all probability be ransacking the House for their abject ineptitude at getting ‘caught’.   Because, despite the MSM attempt to detract from the result of the Mueller investigation results, the fact remains that Trump now has the upper hand to indict.

It is not unlike the Nixon attitude, albeit the Democrat Party in this instance;  The ultimate thought was that Nixon didn’t deserve to to be President because he got caught. It was acknowledged that politicians overwhelmingly did what Nixon did, but his stupidity was his crime.

The slew of Democrats implicated in corruption and collusion will be called out – except it just might be their fellow Democrats who do the calling out in retribution for their failure.

While Trump can do what TRUMP does best – Make America Great Again!

Roger Stone Indictment

The Republican that Wasn’t – Richard Painter, ethics attorney, calls out Roger Stone.

According to Deutsche Welle, Roger Stone is a ‘long time Trump advisor’ and is the link to collusion between the Trump campaign and Wikileaks.   This revelation comes according to Richard Painter, a former Bush White House ethics lawyer who is an outspoken critic of Trump, is affiliated with the far-left leaning Campaign Legal Center, and who ran for the Minnesota Democratic Farmer Labor Party while previously claiming to be a Republican for Bush, before becoming an Independent running as a Democrat – who lost quite soundly.  Painter is also a commentator for CNN – the same CNN that had leaked information on the Roger Stone Indictment that was a staged scene worthy of el Chapo.

This is the voice of reason according to Germany’s Deutsche Welle.  Where the heck did they get him?   Soros.

Painter is also Vice Chair for Citizens For Responsibility and Ethics, CREW, a far-left liberal leaning organization whose Chairman, David Brock, is aligned with various Soros organizations including Media Matters, American Bridge, and American Independent Institute parlays a rabid Anti-Trump Agenda.  Building a base by filing complaints against Republican and Conservative organizations, the organization’s main task is to bring down – Trump.

But Deutsche Welle felt this person, Richard Painter, was fair fodder to disclose collusion between Trump and Stone and WikiLeaks and Russia.  Ah!

Despite being a 501©(3) prohibited from engaging in partisan or political activities, CREW has managed to far surpass that IRS legal point without even a slap on the wrist.

In the interview with Deutsche Welle, he states that the fact that Mueller indicted Stone is evidence that:  “collusion between high-ranking officials in the Trump campaign and WikiLeaks to obtain documents stolen by the Russians in the 2016 election. There is other evidence of course of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians. So this clearly closes the loop and makes clear that the Trump campaign was colluding with the Russians, with WikiLeaks to obtain damaging emails that have been stolen from Hillary Clinton and the DNC.”

From a strictly legal standpoint;  a)  an indictment is NOT evidence of anything. And  b)  Mueller has already stated that there is no evidence of collusion between the Trump and Russia.   And c)  Stone stopped working for the Trump campaign in 2015 with Trump saying he was fired, and Stone saying he quit. The DNC hack occurred in May 2016.

It would appear that by making these statements, Painter, as a lawyer, is putting himself in a position of libel and slander. 

Painter continues these bizarre statements by claiming that  this also proves that Jared Kushner, Donald Trump Jr, and Trump were all in Trump Tower together “…meeting with the Russians to talk about incriminating dirt on Hillary that they wanted to get.”

For an attorney, Painter is clearly painting himself into a defamation lawsuit potential.

But his statements just plow on.

He highlights the fact that this Indictment is clearly the link for the circle that will bring Trump et al ‘down’ because Manafort was convicted, Gates was convicted and Cohen was convicted.   But wait – yes, all of these individuals were convicted – on charges of tax fraud – not Russian collusion.  Nyeh – details.

And for his piece-de-resistance, Richard Painter goes to the height of legal deception by stating:   “It is very dangerous for the United States, because as the prosecutors move closer and closer to Donald Trump and senior members of his campaign — including his own family — we are very concerned that his irrational behavior is going to increase. And that is a dangerous situation when he is in control of nuclear weapons and has as much power as he does.”

The implication being that Trump will detonate a nuclear catastrophic bomb annihilating the globe should he be impeached.  Painter then calls for Trump to resign immediately as he most assuredly faces criminal charges along with his family members.

This interview couldn’t be more impertinent, more false, or more speculative and defaming, and is truly grounds for defamation beyond comprehension!  The fact that Deutsche Welle, a government financed taxpayer funded media outlet would have the audacity to publish such drivel is purely a vindictive agenda promulgated by the failing Merkel presidency, and a desperate Soros.

The Indictment itself makes statements that are not proven including;   “The DNC – thru Company 1 – publically announced that it had been hacked by Russian government actors.”  An announcement – is not evidentiary conclusion. The crux of most of the Indictment is that Stone had communicated with WikiLeaks through an intermediary August 2016, three months after the DNC hack.  In addition, Mueller’s Indictment states that WikiLeaks is actually a Russian mole.  Unproven.  Biased.  And most definitely a Hillary take-em-all-down tantrum.

The entire Indictment, this ridiculous interview with Painter, the means with which Stone was served and arrested, the CNN exclusive media crew skulking at Stone’s house to film the verbose episode ALL so REEK of Clinton, it is impossible to come to any other conclusion.  The fact that an attorney, Painter, would subject himself to such massive defamation speaks to his legal acumen and without doubt his character.

Not even the most liberal New York Times is biting on this drivel.