guilty until proven innocent

CO Failed Constitutional Law – tries to supersede Federal Law

Posted on by Helena

The Colorado Court’s decision to take Trump off the “Primary Ballot’ is basically doomed before it gets off the ground.   The decision was made without Constitutional due process.   The justices are creating an ‘opinion’ without a trial or conviction.   An appeal has no grounds because there is not a crime.   Opinion – is not law.   Therefore, Trump’s option is to bring it before the Federal Supreme Court which will immediately over-rule as to the Constitutionality – and likely punish the associate justices for their illegal action.

The Colorado Constitutional justices making this decision are not justices, they are associates, they have no Constitutional legal background, and have no legal authority because there has been no conviction.

Essentially, it is a distraction.

Technically, the ruling has been ‘stayed until January 4th’ when holidays are over and Justices return to court.   It is also the same time frame, January 1st, as the release of 177 Epstein associate names that will likely upend quite a few political careers.  The List is based on a civil lawsuit brought by one of the abused against Ghislaine Maxwell.   The names had been sealed from the public, and Federal Judge Preska has called for the List to be ‘unsealed’.   Some of the names include those of minor victims – who will likely remain sealed.

Many of the names on the List have already been mentioned in the media before – however, they are subjects of a lawsuit – a Legal Web of tangled proportions that could result in ‘whistleblowers’ coming forward for immunity.

The Colorado distraction is simply a means of deflection which the Media is all too happy to oblige.   The Justices that voted against Trump do not have a background in Constitutional Law to support their use of the 14th Amendment.  They include:
Richard Gabriel – an “Associate” justice whose specialty is business law.

William Hood III – an “Associate” justice who was previously a District prosecutor.

Monica Marquez – a former deputy AG, her expertise was employment law.

Melissa Hart – prior to being appointed to Colorado Supreme Court, Hart taught legal ethics and professionalism.  She gave a week long class for the Marshall-Brennan Constitutional Literary project which teaches high school students about discrimination.   The Project was created by Jamie Raskin, a far-left Jewish attorney whose ancestors came from Bolshevik Soviet Union.   A Constitutional Law teacher turned Congressman, Raskin refused to certify Trump’s 2016 election win based on Russiagate.   In 2021, Raskin was named the Impeachment Manager for Trump’s second impeachment with regard to the “Insurrection” – for which he was acquitted.

A Federal acquittal vs a Colorado non-trial illegal accusation… is a rather blatant form of election interference.   “The Supreme Court held that under Article III of the Constitution, the federal courts have the final jurisdiction in all cases involving the Constitution and laws of the United States, and that the states therefore cannot interfere with federal court judgments.”

They have no ability to convict Trump to support their argument.   Without a conviction, the entire stage play is simply another judicial comedy that could backfire and see these justices reprimanded for blatant disregard of Due Process.

“Due process of law is application by the state of all legal rules and principles pertaining to a case so all legal rights that are owed to a person are respected.”   Trump was not tried and convicted – his Federal acquittal supersedes their ability to impose this claim of Insurrection.

And once again the liberals have provided the American People with yet another reason to support Trump over every other candidate.  

Saudi’s Framed: Part II

Posted on by Helena

The Middle East is its own power keg of rivalry, no different than various EU countries vying for power amid clashing political ideologies.   Saudi Arabia has imposed itself as the figurehead of the Middle East, much as Germany has pronounced itself as head honcho of the EU.  Saudi Arabia feels that unity is sacred, and when a child gets out of line, that child is sanctioned – Qatar.  Qatar is the rebel child.   The EU has its fair share of rebel children, but when children of these countries get out of line, it is not the business of the US to intervene.  So why would we intervene in the Middle East power struggle?

Placing the US in the position of reigning judgment on the politics of countries in the Middle East is a lose-lose scenario.

And thus, in the vein of ‘Follow The Money’, we are monetarily entrenched to Saudi Arabia – their trade and economic contributions to the US cannot be unraveled.   They have been decades in the making – Trump didn’t create them, but reality is – that’s the way it is now.   As Trump so politely emphasized, one Wapo reporter is not worth scrubbing a $110 billion Saudi deal.

On the table – $110 billion. Why are Democrats and a handful of McCainish Republicans willing to scrub that economic benefit to the US?  What does the Saudi arms deal mean and who does it benefit?

First:   A deal worth $110 billion is nothing to sneeze at – and if it is garnered by Trump, then the Liberals will do anything to uproot it in order to delegitimize Trump.   So a “Con” was created.  If Trump favors the Saudis, he’ll become media fodder in the UN Human Rights squash court –  If he dumps the Saudis, the US economy will tank.

But the con was sloppy. After all the anonymous evidence was found to be laughably faked, the only evidence left is a fuzzy video of Khashoggi entering the embassy – and gasp – no video of him exiting.   That doesn’t mean he didn’t exit – it simply means there is no video of it.

And as of right now that is the sum total of ‘evidence’ being used to convict the Saudis.

Second:   It sounds a lot like the Skripal poisoning evidence – Theresa May’s MI6 released video footage of two Russians walking down the street, the same week of the poisonings! GUILTY.

The Saudi con conveniently aligns with election time.  As did the Trump Dossier.  No coincidence there…   But given the sloppiness of the Saudi con, I would hope it wasn’t based out of MI6.

At any rate, the source at this point seems to be coming from Qatar and Al Jazeera.   The Qatar/Saudi row is waging large and in charge.   And a derailment with Saudis would mean a shift to ‘other countries’ in order to supply what is lost in Saudi trade.  Which can not happen because of the equities, treasuries and real estate holdings – way too complicated.

The amount of spending Qatar has with the US is a fragment of what Saudi Arabia contributes.   But the infighting is rooted in 1)  the Muslim Brotherhood – for which Qatar is entrenched, and  2) Iran – for which Qatar is aligned.  3) Khashoggi is head of the Muslim Brotherhood.

And therein is the core of the silly attempt to make a reporter possibly stage his own disappearance so as to ignite a war reminiscent of WWI wherein: 

“On 28 June 1914, Gavrilo Princip, a Bosnian  Serb Yugoslav nationalist, assassinated the Austro-Hungarian heir Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo, leading to a diplomatic crisis.    On 23 July, Austria-Hungary issued an ultimatum to Serbia; interlocking alliances quickly drew in all the major European powers with their respective colonial empires and the conflict rapidly spread across the globe.”

Unfortunately, not unlike most edited fragments of history, even the insinuation of Princip as the assassin is subject to scrutiny.   Was he any more guilty than modern scape-goats and framed assassins?  I don’t know, another blog.

Ultimately, WWI was ignited by the death of one man and resulted in the casualties of over 40 million thereafter.

Who benefitted then is who would benefit now?

The war mongers:  The Banks.  The Cabal.  Pharmaceutical and military Corporations.   The drivers are estimated to count around 100,000.

Who loses?   Everyone else.

Why did this one death frame an entire World War?

World Wars I and II have been said to be rife with scandal and corruption, wars that could have easily been avoided, except for the Cabal’s influence.  The Federal Reserve and WWI were completely aligned.   The idea for WWIII has been levied for a number of years, and would certainly be fuel to a Liberal agenda for control, population eradication, and profit – the never-ending greed profile as defined in “Follow The Money”.

Back to the Saudis:   One thing that has become a mainstay of the liberal agenda is the fact that they draw their plots from history – as though they can’t create anything new or intelligent.   The rape agenda.   The false dossier agenda.   The hack.  Always the same, always leaving a trail of grease and smut.

So who would benefit from a derailment of the Saudi military agreements – Iran and  Qatar.  And all those who have aligned their investment interests $$$$$ in Iran based on the Iran Deal that was upended by Trump.  This would include Germany which is desperate to legitimize their trade and needs the bump in their economy.

While we are left with the redundant question – who would benefit from a disruption in Saudi-US relations – it is interesting to watch Rubio demand the new judicial decree ‘guilty until proven innocent’.  Where have we heard that before?  A sloppy con and a scream of guilty…Rubio just outed himself quite finely.

Sharia Law: Guilty Until Proven Innocent

Posted on by Helena

There is an epidemic in our country of false accusations. It is so prevalent that even attorneys are jumping on the band-wagon in defense of those falsely accused whether it is harassment, sexual assault or homicide. What makes this so devastating is that in many of these cases, the accusation isn’t simply a misunderstanding or an undefined law, it is instead a malicious, brazen attack that has the potential to absolutely eradicate a life.  

In these cases, the life is the purported aggressor, and in fact the victim is the perpetrator. Knowingly, and with malice.

Little attention is given to the false claim when it is proven inaccurate, instead, the ‘victimhood’ has swung to a fierce pendulum – something like ‘feminism’.   Everyone is convicted of their supposed crime before any evidence is provided. We see it on college campuses, middle schools, in communities, gyms, cliques, and even in our military.

But it starts in an infancy of agenda that allows it to metastasize.

When it happens in society, too often Chicken Little has no idea the enormity of the accusation, no clue that it can gain momentum and have devastating effects that even result in suicide. But ignorance is never a justification.

Recently, a college was provided with an accusation, and before any evidence was produced, they assumed they criminality and took immediate action. What this embraces is the antiquity of justice in which a person is considered guilty – until proven innocent. A complete trashing of our judicial system.

But nonetheless, we embrace it.

Where is it’s origins?

Communism supports the axiom that a person must prove their innocence. So when the US adopts this precept, we become closer and closer aligned with the Communist agenda. As the US unconsciously moved closer to Socialism and thus Communism by default, a variety of societal morays followed course.

Feminism in particular advocated for all men to be considered guilty immediately upon the accusation of sexual assault so as to embolden women to come forward when they were afraid.   While rape in it’s truth is never condoned, false accusations for vengeance have become a spiraling atrocity that society has chosen to ignore. And as such, false claims of harassment and even homicide have become the nouveau bourgeoisie.

In an attempt to bow to the whims and wills of the feminists, the courts have spiraled into bully pulpits that sentence innocent 19 year old boys to life in prison.   It is a far larger epidemic than we know, and the number of defense attorney’s entering the field are fully aware that this is far greater a disease than we can imagine.

It is an uphill battle to exonerate these ‘victims’ given that most cases are decided on he said – she said evidence, which shouldn’t be evidence at all except that the Communist Feminism Movement changed all that.

Unfortunately, when our own government and media adamantly support guilty claims the sway on The People is that this is normal – albeit the ‘new normal’. The ethical and moral implications are never considered, because revenge, vengeance, retaliation, is more important.

Today, when I hear people defending the Trump bombing of Syria, the justification is always, “Well, he had to show them who is boss” or ‘He had to show he was more powerful’, or “He puffed out his chest and now everyone knows he is for real”… Really? Is that what it takes? Because that’s who we call the bully in school, the abuser in a family, and the hawkish sloth in government.

That is not respectful, judicial, or Christian. How many died as a result?

In essence, the US has tossed aside it’s judicial humanity in favor of Communist or Sharia preference. And while waiting is never easy, no one ever said – law is easy – but they did say it was Just – as in, Innocent Until Proven Guilty.

I don’t support it in harassment, in sexual assault, in homicide – or in government. Because when we shelve our law – we embrace – Chaos.