ELECTION Manipulation: A Global Affair

When reading what I would label the alternate media, ie MSM, from around the world one would think that the US election debacle was simply an anomaly, a blip, a bubble.   Every country is convinced ‘their’ elections are perfectly perfect, and it is only the US that is manipulated.   What an amazingly narrow shrewish view.

When Macron won the presidential election in France in 2017, he won by a ‘landslide’.   This same landslide terminology has been utilized in multiple Democrat election victories across the US.   For Macron there were oddly 11.4 million registered voters who disappeared from the tally – 24%.   An additional 3 million turned in blank ballots and 1 million purposefully ‘spoiled’ their ballot.   And no one thought any of this was a bit unusual.

Macron was backed by the Rothschilds, just 39 years old, terribly immature, and rather unknown.  Yet after eliminating 15 million votes, he won by a ‘landslide’.

In Germany, Merkel won the election with just 33% of the votes. Hardly indicative of a favorable candidate, but given the number of parties represented – so it swung.   Put another way, Merkel lost 67% of the voters and still won.  Not exactly representative of the country. 586,700 votes were tossed and 76% of registered voters voted. The Bundestag has 598 member seats of which Merkel won just 200.   Not sure how this would be considered fair and equitable.

But rarely do Socialist and Communist countries allow election results to be challenged. In fact most communist countries boast of winning by a landslide of 98%!   Often they are the only candidate.

In 2013 Xi Jinping was declared the winner of the presidential election in China.   There were 2956 votes cast and he won with 2952 votes cast for him representing .00015268% of the Chinese population.

North Korea, Kim Jong Il’s election was won with 98.98% of the votes.

But somehow – when a US election is run aground and mired in truckloads of evidence proving massive misappropriation – everyone slowly shakes their head at the dastardly US. Tch – tch.  “This would never happen to us…”

In Spain the Socialist Party Leader won with just 28% of the voter turnout.   How can this possibly be representative of a nation?   Of a voter base of 37million 12.5million did not vote (34%) and 250,000 votes were considered invalid.  DO you suppose shredders were available?   Dominion was headquartered in Spain.

Did Venezuela actually vote for Maduro?

In 2012, there were 150 million registered voters. In 2018 there were roughly 153 million registered voters.   In 2020, somehow that grew to 213.8 million – a growth of 40% in just two years.   How is that even possible?   It would be highly fantastical to believe that 60.8 million kids came of age in 2 years.   The US population records roughly 80 million total people under the age of 19, as in birth to 19. Census declares there are 26.9 million US citizens between the age of 18 and 24 – 55% of whom are registered voters.

What else could possibly account for an increase of 60.8 million ‘registered’ voters?

Net migration to the US was 595,000 between 2018 and 2019, the lowest recorded in a decade.   That would leave 59,205,000 still unaccounted assuming all immigrants were registered to vote as citizens.

SO why would the ‘base’ need to inflate the number of registered voters by 40%?   Because the claim is that 155.1million people voted in the 2020 election.   And that would exceed the 153 million registered voters as per census in 2018 giving the obvious Communist tactic – we WON with 102% of the votes.

Without batting an eye, Hawaii recorded 110% voter turnout.

According to the Center for Election Innovation and Research, a comparison of registered voters between 2016 and July 2020 revealed a ‘decline’ in new registered voters of roughly 350,000.   In other words, not only do we have ‘oddities’ within our voting machines, multiple votes per person, fake people, ballots shred, fake ballots printed in China, we have over 60 million additional ‘registered voters’, an increase of 40% over 2 years and no viable statistic to account for such a massive increase.

These numbers games would seem to have about as much concordance as common core Math:   2+3 doesn’t necessarily = 5, maybe it is just an illusion!  But in France, Germany, China, and Spain, playing a numbers game is simply par when all your out-of-bounds shots just don’t – count.  FOUR!



FRAXIT – BREXIT: Macron Changes Sides

The EU is all a frenzy with visions of plum cakes and $$$$ signs at the prospect of BREXIT.   Bullying the UK and PM Theresa May seems to be their strategy as they demand a blackmail fee of $62 billion which includes pensions, health care costs, benefits, vacations and much more in their tally. A rather arrogant demand that would seem to delegitimize the bounds of integrity.

Unless you are Soros – and nervous.

The terms being demanded are not just about money but include a long laundry list that effectively calls for the UK to remain under the thumb of governance of the EU Commission, including adherence to the Single Market system, and that the UK must continue to abide by the international agreements of the EU.   Both of which rather defeat the entire purpose of being a sovereign nation.

As a part and parcel of the blackmail, unless the UK pays up in full, any and all trade will cease.   The top tier trading partners for the UK include; US, Germany, France, Netherlands, Ireland, Switzerland, China, Belgium, Italy and Spain.   The US, Switzerland and China would be exempt leaving a hole of about 40% of their total trade subject to cancellation.

However, from a NET trade stand point, Germany, Norway, Belgium, France, Spain, Italy and the Netherlands are all negative partners amounting to about -$120billion on total exports of about $408billion or roughly 30%.

So, if the UK were to call the bluff, could they create a new market source? And what would be the trade impact on the EU countries attempting the blackmail?

The UK’s top import countries include; Germany, China, US, The Netherlands and France. That would mean Germany, The Netherlands and France stand to lose the most as they rank in the top tier of both highest partners of imports and exports with the UK.

Together, France and the UK account for over 30% of the EU budget, leaving Germany, Italy and Spain holding the proverbial bucket. Italy’s top export partners include; Germany, France, US and UK.   Spain’s top export partners are France, Germany, Portugal, UK and Italy.

The circle becomes ever tighter as we consistently see that Germany is definitely central and would have the most to lose.

Interestingly, this also makes the France election even more pivotal because a Le Pen win could tip the balance and leave Germany holding a suitcase of shredded newspaper in the blackmail heist while facing FRAXIT.   Which could explain why Soros and the Rothschild cabal are shaking in their boots, and ramping up a Macron win so as to put the plum cake pressure on Theresa May.

Utilizing his Socialist charm, Macron recently called all politicians that don’t vote for him “morally weak”.   As in maybe he can guilt or shame them into supporting him? Strange philosophy. But perhaps not so strange when you are worried you are going to lose.

While ‘media polls’ claim Macron is a sure win, they also claimed Hillary was a sure win, Trump was unpopular, and Russia is the scapegoat for any and all things not pro-Soros.   That being said, the election is truly up for grabs.

It is no surprise that Merkel is backing Macron given Germany’s shirt is in the game should Le Pen win and the entire Brussels blackmail would quickly sputter, falter and end in a death spiral.

It could also mean that both Italy and Spain would most likely reconsider their positions as they can’t economically afford to pick up the slack of both the UK and potential France exodus in terms of both $$$$ and migrants.   It would also mean that the poorer more dependent EU countries would be all that was left outside of Germany and the EU Commission would be more like Robin Hood stealing from the rich Germans to give to the poor everyone else.

Ultimately this would destroy Merkel and put Germany on the chopping block. Unfortunately, of the six parties running in the 2017 election cycle, only one is not Socialist/Liberal, AfD, and they have yet to create a following.

Soros Losing Hungary and Macedonia?

A diehard Socialist, Jean Claude Juncker of the EU Commission is backing Macron’s bid for President of France. Juncker was named President of the EU Commission in 2014 after facing off 4 other “Socialists” from: The Socialist Party, The Liberal Party, The European Left, and The Green Party. Talk about a stacked deck?

It was Soros Heaven.

Hungary is attempting to shut down the Soros funded universities and this week Junker and Soros will discuss this newest anti-Soros blockade while threatening to press legal charges.

The spin, as reported by Reuter’s, is that Hungary’s Prime Minister, Orban, is a dictator with ‘authoritarian tendencies’ whose policies run contrary to the values of the EU.

Their biggest fear? That the rule of order will align with Russia and alienate Soros further from control toward the power shift of Globalization and by default a world monarchy.

Soros has already been defeated by the election of Trump instead of Hillary, by BREXIT, and now with Marine Le Pen battling the Soros favorite, Macron.  Any further spears, could send the Soros cabal reeling.   Macedonia and Hungary now sit at the helm.

Macedonia is currently fighting the Open Society takeover of its nation through regime change in collaboration with USAID during the Obama tenure. Further escalated by the release of a report by the European Commission in which they illegally wiretapped the Macedonia Government and claim that their investigation uncovered fraud, corruption, abuse of power, electoral fraud, blackmail, extortion and a host of other crimes.

The purpose? To oust the conservative government, label them corrupt, intervene in a regime change, and institute the preferred Socialist candidate vetted by Soros, Zoran Zaev.

Of course that’s not exactly the position the New York Times took in their evaluation of the political unrest. They favor Socialism.  No surprise there.

At the center of the dispute in Macedonia is a desire to end the Nationalist political and People system and replace it with a government more aligned with the EU’s Socialism project, as well as possibly ‘reunify’ Albania and Macedonia as one nation… Albania is predominantly Muslim and Macedonia is predominantly Christian.

At the helm of Macedonia as of January this year, a massive anti-Soros campaign was initiated.

Soros is desperate to regain control of the European Union as his refugee plan backfired and more nations are looking to back out of the crisis while acknowledging that Soros is at the center of the chaos.  In addition, sovereignty is becoming the new populist movement.

Orban, Hungary’s Prime Minister, has evolved from an interesting background. Given a scholarship to Oxford by Soros, initially a Communist sympathizer, later a Socialist, and then most recently he is depicted as a Nationalist and compared to Marin Le Pen and Donald Trump. Within this evolution, he gained the disapproval of Hillary Clinton, George Soros, and the Obama administration who now label him as a Dictator. and want him ousted.

Orban has been demonized by the media since his Nationalist agenda, and like Trump, the call for his assassination has been tendered. Attempts to discredit Orban include accusations that he is being blackmailed by Russia… sound familiar?

The Soros propaganda is wholly lacking in creativity citing the same monotonous accusations against whomever opposes his regime.  And like the protests in the US, his form of revolution is being deployed across the world.  Nip it in the bud!

And so now, with Macedonia and Hungary fighting for their sovereignty, their life, Soros has demanded that the EU Commission intervene and stoke the concept of Dictatorships which disallow his agenda of Socialist takeovers and Muslim immigration. Will he take the next step and create internal chaos? Protests? Civil War?

Where Soros goes, chaos follows.

France Election Meddling – Macron vs Le Pen

With baited breath the France election is descending quickly. Media outlets are earnestly promoting a Russian intervention in the process so as to declare the results invalid should Marine le Pen win. Macron is the groomed favorite created by Soros. Facebook complied with the Soros agenda and shut down over 30,000 accounts deemed ‘invalid or inappropriate’ by Soros standards so as to deflate the Le Pen avalanche. Somehow – that isn’t considered to be “Election Meddling”, instead it is called… Democratic Intervention.

Oh brother.

Election meddling has been going on for at least 70 years and its perpetrators have predominantly included the US, secondarily Russia, and thirdly China. As such the meddling denouncement loses its clout when Chicken Little screams – Fowl…

The first notable meddling came in 1948 when the CIA worked to overthrow the Communist government in Italy. Emboldened by their success, the practice became somewhat commonplace.   Sometimes it is subtle, and sometimes it has taken the form of assassinations, coups, and brutal civil wars – The Congo, Ukraine, Guatemala, and Indonesia, were particularly brutal resulting in hundreds of thousands of deaths. Less brutal regime changes have been employed in Iran, Chile, Czechoslovakia, Nicaragua and even Israel.

Internally, voter fraud has surfaced in the US prompting investigations that reveal outright manipulation, trashing of ballots, faked ballots, illegal voters, and bussing of the elderly to vote twice and thrice.

As a cruel joke, the OSCE was established to oversee the election processes (in addition to their status as another global police) throughout the world and cry – Fowl if they felt something had gone – afoul.  Unfortunately, it would come to light that their nonpartisan – nonpolitical face was actually quite biased and eyebrows were raised. They are funded by 57 member states, and just love to fund their chosen party in elections around the world.

Revenues for 2015 totaled about $242 million Euros of which roughly 70% was allocated to employees and contractors salaries. A rather bloated agency that has no success in anything except gulping tax dollars.

Another monitoring organization is the National Democratic Institute, which is affiliated with the Democratic Party, the Socialist International and Liberal International. Not exactly non-partisan… It is a Socialist agenda funded by US tax dollars through the State Department and USAID.

There is the OAS, Organization of American States, which promotes globalization and works to fight human rights violations, promoting peace, fighting drugs and sustainable development in South America. I’d say – it wasn’t working too well: drug trade is now the most sustainable development and human rights are in the twalette.

There is the Council on Europe, another 1948 creation that has attained laugh status for it’s tenure in doing not much of anything albeit spending money. Headed by Thorbjorn, former PM of Norway, he had the dubious honor of electing Obama as the recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize for his ‘promotion of dialogue in the Muslim world, and his reinstatement of START agreements with Russia’ which were actually in effect since the 1980’s and simply up for renewal.   He served as Vice President for Socialist International – the same affiliate of Madeleine Albright’s, National Democratic Institute.

No coincidence there.

Bottom line, it would appear that all the election overseers for Europe, the US, and South America are aligned with the Democrat Party of the US and Labour Party or Socialist Party of the EU. Seems somewhat of a coup; Mastermind Meddling Manipulation

So we now have The New York Times, CNN, NY Daily News, USA Today, Yahoo, Reuters, The Guardian, and the now infamous Soros portal – Deutsche Weld, all pointing to Russia for meddling in the upcoming French elections. Gee, Chicken Little – fear mongering, hysterical chaotic garbage mind manipulation is so passé.

Take a cue: The fable teaches the necessity for deductive reasoning and subsequent investigation.