UN = Global Regulator/Police

The UN believes that migration ‘slows the aging process’.  But it’s not a fountain of youth, it’s a bizarre demographic concept that only the UN could create.

Because two thirds of the global population over 60 reside in under-developed countries, the UN believes that migrating the younger generation to developed countries will slow the aging process…   Of course, they admit that ultimately these young migrants will age to being over 60.

Who writes this stuff?

In the meantime, the UN states that these young migrants will buy houses, buy cars, contribute to capitalism and consumerism, and be a great lift to the developed world’s societies.   Per Dr. Phil – “How’s that workin’ out for ya?”   Because right now about 95% or more of immigrants in the EU and US are on welfare which simply drains society.

In addition, what happens to the countries that have lost their youth and now are supposed to survive with only their aged?   With no one to support them and with the loss of manpower, wages, and welfare contributors, those countries populations will simply die and leave a vast vacant country.

What the UN proposes is so immature in their evaluation one wonders the intellectual capacity of these members.   Undeterred, in 1982, the UN prepared a ’62 point ‘Vienna International Plan of Action on Aging’.   In 1991 they drafted 18 Entitlements for older people and in 1999 they created International Old People’s Day. And the Piece de Resistance, in 2002 they held a conference in Madrid where they created a new and improved resolution in which the well-being of older people was ‘recommended’.

I wonder how much this is costing… all these plans and conferences and recommendations?

I looked up the 4 day excursion/conference in Madrid and found that the UN didn’t do much of anything in 2002 so maybe that explains their obsession with aging.   Over the course of a year they held five conferences. By contrast, in 2005 they jetted about for 28 conferences to New York, Geneva, Paris, Thailand, Japan, Germany, Hong Kong, and the Grenadines where they discussed ‘decolonization’.  Grenada is a Commonwealth of Queen Elizabeth II.

By 2006, the UN was holding 52 conferences having elevated their significance and authority to such ideologies as world tourism, human rights, migration, climate control, regulating the internet, disarmament and so on.

Suffice it to say, the UN has grown into a global governance of everything without ever asking The People if they want this international police system.   Under Ban Ki Moon, the number of high ranking officials increased by 47% in New York and 27% elsewhere. The Secretary-General is the chief administrative officer of the United Nations. Although the Secretary-General is “appointed by the General Assembly upon recommendation of the Security Council,” Article 101 of the U.N. Charter grants him authority to appoint U.N. staff

In other words, it’s a good ole boys club that has no transparency, a huge budget paid for by member states (US picks up about 25% of the tab), and acts as the world’s Globalist Government without any People ever voting for ‘anyone’.  They are not required to reveal salaries and travel expenses, and pensions like normal bodies of government, they operate without any accountability, and we’ve been duped into accepting this massive power without even a peep…

Trump?

Trump – Blackmail or Threats by NWO?

When something smells ‘fishy’ it is usually because it stinks!

In 2009, Soros gave an interview in which he claimed that in order to have a New World Order, the only way to bring China into it would be to put them at the helm. Or at least, have them think they were at the helm. Because China is only opposed if they are not the Holy Grail.

In 2016, Putin kicked out the Rothschild cabal from ever entering Russia again. Soros already had a Russian bounty on his head, but with the unmasking and proverbial boot given the Rothschild’s, Russia became a lost cause, albeit a source of vilification.

One of Soros major concerns in instituting the New World Order, was a Russia – China alliance that could disembowel the entire writings of the New World Order according to Garp. Dismantling that relationship could potentially take one of two forms;   1) vilify Russia to the point that a China relationship will hurt China’s economy, or 2) create a new relationship with China to lure it away from one with Russia.

With the election turning topsy-turvy on the Soros Cabal, vilifying and denigrating Trump wasn’t having the effect that they wanted. Trump’s anti-China and Pro-Russia stance had the ability to completely destroy decades upon decades of hard work. And then – suddenly We The People witness a dramatic change, a different Trump, and a flipped rhetoric.

What Happened?  

Suddenly, despite Trump’s previous adamant campaign proclamations, not only is China now our good buddy and Russia the arch villain, but the banking cabal of the Rothschild’s is upheld with Yellen remaining at the helm of the Federal Reserve.  OUCH!

Something happened.  Either Trump has been blackmailed – or he has been threatened. The New World Order has a way of finding the leverage it needs to accomplish it’s task whether it be simple assassination, or the gifting of a person’s ‘dreams’.   But coercion is an absolute.

For McCain that dream would appear to be a beautiful wealthy wife who would never divorce him no matter ‘what’ he might do. He is assured of the doting young thing and surrounded by wealth.

For Obama it was fame! He lavishes the limelight – book publications, Hollywood, television, center-stage these are his dreams – not his father…

With the about face of Trump, and his sudden lacking normal intensity, I would hypothesize that his blackmail was more of a threat of harm than a gift of his ‘dream’.   An Either – Or, scenario. The alligators came out of the Swamp.

It is worth noting that since that ‘Either-Or’ took effect, the media have been relatively silent, the frontpage bashing, the fifteen deplorable articles per page have been nearly eliminated and in some instances replaced with praises and pansies.     The ogre portrayals have lightened and even the evening news is light on Trump and heavy on world affairs.

Even the photos of Trump reflect a change, no longer is he raising Hell, he appears more like he is ready to cry. ;  as in he got – whooped.   Politico, a quite Liberal outlet is claiming he is Clintonian. And praise is lavished on Kushner, the same Kushner who went over Bannon’s head and called for the missile strikes on Syria and for more implications of Russian complicity.

Backing NATO, backing Yellen, backing China, vilifying Russia, bombing Syria, harboring Comey, and silent on charges against Obama and Hillary over the ‘eavesdropping’, all bear witness to the defeat of glory at the hands of an undeniable, indefinable ‘threat’.

While it feels eerily like The Body Snatchers, in reality, blackmail and/or threats are more the Swamp modus aperendi.  In the end – it does not bode well…

Sharia Law: Guilty Until Proven Innocent

There is an epidemic in our country of false accusations. It is so prevalent that even attorneys are jumping on the band-wagon in defense of those falsely accused whether it is harassment, sexual assault or homicide. What makes this so devastating is that in many of these cases, the accusation isn’t simply a misunderstanding or an undefined law, it is instead a malicious, brazen attack that has the potential to absolutely eradicate a life.  

In these cases, the life is the purported aggressor, and in fact the victim is the perpetrator. Knowingly, and with malice.

Little attention is given to the false claim when it is proven inaccurate, instead, the ‘victimhood’ has swung to a fierce pendulum – something like ‘feminism’.   Everyone is convicted of their supposed crime before any evidence is provided. We see it on college campuses, middle schools, in communities, gyms, cliques, and even in our military.

But it starts in an infancy of agenda that allows it to metastasize.

When it happens in society, too often Chicken Little has no idea the enormity of the accusation, no clue that it can gain momentum and have devastating effects that even result in suicide. But ignorance is never a justification.

Recently, a college was provided with an accusation, and before any evidence was produced, they assumed they criminality and took immediate action. What this embraces is the antiquity of justice in which a person is considered guilty – until proven innocent. A complete trashing of our judicial system.

But nonetheless, we embrace it.

Where is it’s origins?

Communism supports the axiom that a person must prove their innocence. So when the US adopts this precept, we become closer and closer aligned with the Communist agenda. As the US unconsciously moved closer to Socialism and thus Communism by default, a variety of societal morays followed course.

Feminism in particular advocated for all men to be considered guilty immediately upon the accusation of sexual assault so as to embolden women to come forward when they were afraid.   While rape in it’s truth is never condoned, false accusations for vengeance have become a spiraling atrocity that society has chosen to ignore. And as such, false claims of harassment and even homicide have become the nouveau bourgeoisie.

In an attempt to bow to the whims and wills of the feminists, the courts have spiraled into bully pulpits that sentence innocent 19 year old boys to life in prison.   It is a far larger epidemic than we know, and the number of defense attorney’s entering the field are fully aware that this is far greater a disease than we can imagine.

It is an uphill battle to exonerate these ‘victims’ given that most cases are decided on he said – she said evidence, which shouldn’t be evidence at all except that the Communist Feminism Movement changed all that.

Unfortunately, when our own government and media adamantly support guilty claims the sway on The People is that this is normal – albeit the ‘new normal’. The ethical and moral implications are never considered, because revenge, vengeance, retaliation, is more important.

Today, when I hear people defending the Trump bombing of Syria, the justification is always, “Well, he had to show them who is boss” or ‘He had to show he was more powerful’, or “He puffed out his chest and now everyone knows he is for real”… Really? Is that what it takes? Because that’s who we call the bully in school, the abuser in a family, and the hawkish sloth in government.

That is not respectful, judicial, or Christian. How many died as a result?

In essence, the US has tossed aside it’s judicial humanity in favor of Communist or Sharia preference. And while waiting is never easy, no one ever said – law is easy – but they did say it was Just – as in, Innocent Until Proven Guilty.

I don’t support it in harassment, in sexual assault, in homicide – or in government. Because when we shelve our law – we embrace – Chaos.

Syria; Chemical Weapons?

The Syrian war is such a universal mess it is completely unfathomable why. The list of countries bombing Syria includes: US, UK, Germany, France, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Iraq, Qatar, Belgium, Bahrain, Australia, Canada, Netherlands, Italy, Turkey, and UAE.   And yet – with all that in play – ISIS, comprised of about 100,000 fighters by best guess, has actually – grown…

Five years later, a country is completely destroyed, but ISIS and al Qaeda seem to be doing just fine. What kind of military intelligence is conducting this massive catastrophe?   In WWII, Hitler’s army was comprised of over 18 million.   In the Gulf War against Iraq we fought against 650,000 troops and it lasted one month.

We have fake videos showing faked casualties, faked attacks, and apparently a complete inability to determine who is doing what where because we don’t seem to know who is bombing whom at any given time and so the rhetoric is US vs Assad.

Adding to the confusion, weapons are being sold indiscriminately to all related countries by both the US and Russia. It used to be that we could verify who was doing what via satellite imagery, but those too have been doctored to present false information.   So we turned to witnesses on the ground. But they have no factual bearing either as each side presents their propaganda witness.

Recently the US press has begun a campaign of parading previous Syrian victims as their source of information. Hillary capitalized on this propaganda method during her campaign, and the media have recently jumped osn the proverbial bandwagon creating chemical weapon victims. One, used to work for the Clinton Global Initiative… and the other one claims to have escaped after the August 2013 chemical weapon attack, only to show up in the US in September 2013 and start a Twitter account in English…

It’s interesting to note who is retweeted on this Twitter account of Mr. Kassem Eid. It would include Kenneth Roth of Human Rights Watch, a George Soros organization. There is Liz Sly of the Washington Post. The Daily Beast who has on it’s board Chelsea Clinton. The Syrian Network For Human Rights, a UK based organization that was an offshoot of the Syrian Observatory of Human Rights, both one man shows located in the UK. And the very shadowy Eliot Higgins or Bellingcat also from the UK , a stay at home dad married to a Turkish woman who suddenly rose to fame as a weapons analyst…

The information being parlayed is always the same, makes statements of fact without any corroborating evidence, and is continually restated, reTweeted, rehashed by the mainstream media. The idea being if you say it enough, if multiple sources say the same thing – then it must be factual and evidence is no longer necessary.

Now we have Fox News using the fact checker of The Washington Post against Rice, and the mire is so thick we cannot possibly know what is fact or fiction. It is no different than asking Hillary who’s on first in Benghazi!   All it proves is that Rice is going down and she is the Democrat’s scapegoat.

We also now know that the riff between Bannon and Kushner was about Syria. Kushner won – and Syria was bombed without any verifiable evidence other than a statement made by the White Helmets, an organization created in and funded by the UK that ultimately shifted its funding to the US taxpayers. There are photos and videos linking them to complicity with al-Nusra. For their propaganda, they use the Aleppo Media Center to provide ‘pictures’ for release to US and UK media. The authenticity of these photos is questionable…at best.  And certainly completely and openly biased.

Tillerson blaming Russia for their failure to eliminate the chemical weapons in Syria is childish. The OPCW, a Norwegian organization, was tasked with the elimination. They work in cooperation with the UN. It’s latest news brief has declared that they are ‘investigating the claim of chemical weapons use in Syria’. Below is what the OPCW stated in 2016 with regard to the continued use of chemical weapons:

“At a time when the likelihood of states using chemical weapons has become distant, non-state actors – in Syria and Iraq – have not only sought to acquire such weapons, but have also used them. What this means is that chemical terrorism is no longer a theoretical proposition or even imminent threat, but a stark reality. It is also a reality that could affect many more of us across the globe over coming years as foreign fighters return to their homelands with experiences gained in Syria and Iraq.”

There are six countries known to house stashes of chemical weapons: US, Russia, Egypt, Israel, North Korea and South Sudan. However, what the OPCW acknowledges is that ‘non-state actors’, as in terrorists, have stockpiles that cannot be contained.  Recklessness was the Democrat and Republican war hawks agenda, The People are more concerned about the Saudi’s than Assad where Sharia Law, beheadings, human rights violations, war mongering in Yemen, ethnic cleansing, and genocide are all tolerated for some reason… could it be The Swamp back-scratching???

Syria War – ASK THE PEOPLE

ASK the people – not the POLITICIANS.  This is NOT what we want!  This will undermine everything and cater to the Soros agenda.  Chaos!  He is – smiling.

I truly can not believe the stupidity of analysts that want to start a war with Assad. What the heck will that accomplish? Bombing would hit even more civilians, possibly US troops that we don’t want anyone to know are there, and ‘moderate rebels’ that we claim to support.  Not to mention the casual Russians…  How will that go down in international relations? This is such a McCain/Democrat/Soros laughable fraud, I can’t believe we would even consider such a farse.

The argument on the ‘right’ is that Trump will ‘appear weak if he doesn’t order a war/attack’. Which implies we are willing to go to war based on ‘saving face’???

This of course could also lead to even greater Russia animosity, Iran animosity and the entire caliphate agenda of the Middle East. If we become integral, we are ushering in WWIII. And that is simply not acceptable.

Where is the evidence? Our President demands evidence for our local and national conspiracies, and yet is NOT asking for evidence that Assad is the culprit based on such media citations as ‘Assad dropped chemical bombs on civilians’. This is the same President who has declared the media is incompetent and faked.

C’mon Trump!  Are you willing to put America into a war based on media hype?  Because – you will be impeached – by the same people that put you in office!

You are being led into the same cull that made Bush rake us into a horrific war in Iraq which systematically was the catalyst for the devastation of entire countries and mass exodus of refugees and displaced immigrants.  Not to mention – deaths, veterans, physical causalities, and the demise of our compassion.

Only a Dictator can keep Muslims in line.

That is a proven fact.

Trump is falling into the exact same sullied pit that took down Bush and ultimately made him a pawn of Soros.

When the ‘sides’ are so bizarrely collaborative, this is a strategy that we have never fought before. We knew that Nazi’s were Nazi’s’. They didn’t mask themselves as something else. We knew who the Jewish people were. This is different and can not be addressed from the same military strategy as has been deployed in past wars.

A war with Assad will only create an even greater game for ISIS and al-Qaeda. They will expand, they will begin to infiltrate Spain, Portugal, Italy, and Germany as is their quest. It is to conquer what was the Ottoman Empire under the Sunni, Saudi, caliphate.

The Sunni caliphate that embraces Sharia Law, mass beheadings, lashing of women, multiple wives, religious intolerance and every freedom that we take for granted. We are fighting – on the wrong side! And The Swamp is leading the battle cry!

Damn it Trump! Don’t fall prey and lead us into the Swamp – be larger, be wiser, and see the wolves for who they are and what they want.

No one really gives a dang about a “Red Line”, what we care about is Truth – Justice – Truth – and Rising Above the Media Propaganda! If we hold course, if we give Syria back to their own way, and concentrate on the US, we have a chance.   But the minute Trump becomes enamored with the false justice that has no evidence – he has lost his support, his respect, and his agenda.

Syria is the catalyst – true.  But reviewing the military and Obama administration that glorified al-Qaeda and ISIS – is the game.  Targeting Assad has gotten us into where we are today.  Targeting the Syrian government has allowed ISIS to expand exponentially.  Continuing the Obama agenda – is not going to solve the problem.

Give Assad his country.  Let him lead his people as the Muslims need to be led.  This is NOT our way, we can not make them like us, and we should finally realize this is simply a Saudi agenda for domination, and genocide.

Syria’s Chemical Attack: al-Qaeda and why

Once again the media is coming to a conclusion without any investigative journalism whatsoever – and again this one took less than five minutes to find…

Chemical weapons have been cited in Idib Syria as killing over 70 people including many children. A horrific act of malicious warfare without any gain but civilian terror, pain and death.   So who is responsible, who committed this atrocity? That is the core question.

February 2017, Idib was controlled by two rebel factions who were initially working together against the Assad regime; Jabhat Fateh al-Sham (JFS) and Ahrar al-Sham.   JFS was formerly named el Nusra, an al Qaeda affiliated group that was originally backed by the US until alternate media pointed out the fact that they were actually the bad guys and the Obama regime’s support was a bit bizarre.

So, they were named a terrorist group.

In February, power struggles begin to shift and the two rebel groups started fighting each other. And because the international community was embarrassed at being outed for supporting an al Qaeda affiliate, they told other rebel groups to distance themselves from JFS. To the point that JFS was not included in peace talks led by the UN. So the UN requested JFS bee excluded – and they were royally peeved!

So what we have is two adversaries controlling parts of Idib – one being an al-Qaeda affiliate and yet the western, McCain cry is ‘It’s the government’!!  Hmmm.

Six different rebel groups consolidated to oppose JFS. They were not happy campers. As a result, infighting has been extensive since February – leading up to massive US drone strikes on JFS that have killed 100 of their senior fighters. At this point there are perhaps 20-30 different factions of rebels all splintered but holding to a loyalty of either ISIS, al Qaeda, or what we call ‘moderates’.

Commanders of one faction are routinely sought by other factions, and splits occur nearly daily causing the old faction to ‘rename’ itself.

Fast forward, a conference was scheduled in Brussels to decide the fate of Syria. It is to be held April 5th and 6th. JFS was not invited. Tuesday, April 4th, a chemical weapons attack occurred and the media immediately claims it was the Assad government. Why? Because it’s an easy story that requires no research.

In fact, twice before major peace talks chemical weapons attacks occurred. Once in 2013 and again in 2016. The motive? Destabilization. Keep the country in chaos. Create a false reality.

In 2013, the Khan al-Assal chemical attack using the same ‘sarin gas’ hit a government controlled area in Aleppo killing civilians and government forces. Each time there is a chemical attack the rebels blame the government and the government blames the rebels.

Given the new pressure to give Syria back to Assad, logically he would have no rationale to conduct an attack. However, no one can really know for sure as the fingers immediately point elsewhere – something like Madame Rice in the US…

In September 2013, OPWC oversaw the complete elimination and destruction of all declared chemical weapons then possessed by the Syrian government.

The notion that the rebels, aka al-Nusra, are incapable of making a chemical bomb are ridiculous at best. In 2013, CNN reported that it is a well known fact that al-Qaeda was producing chemical weapons as far back as 2006 and using them in Iraq. And according to the CIA, at the time, there was no evidence to suggest that al-Qaeda was pealing back its efforts to create more chemical bombs.

In 2013 it was also reported that as Assad had lost control of Aleppo, and bio-pharmaceutical infrastructure was destroyed, looting of these laboratories was witnessed and the suspected looters were al-Nusra.

This information was released via a report produced by bio warfare and terrorism experts Jill Bellamy van Aalst and Olivier Guitta.     In the report, they state:

“The fact that this looting took place in the Aleppo area where the rebellion—and in particular Al Nusrah—is very strong tends to confirm that AQ may potentially be in possession of biological agents.”

So. What we have is conclusive stipulation by the CIA and UN that al-Qaeda and al-Nusra both have had access to chemical weapons in Iraq in 2006 and again in Syria in 2013.   We have the OPWC claiming they oversaw the elimination of all of the government controlled chemical weapons in 2013. And we have multiple chemical weapon attacks – since.

These attacks typically coincide as occurring just prior to a peace talk. The latest peace talk stood to favor Assad.

Even if we conclude that Assad didn’t turn over all his chemicals, “Who has the MOTIVE?” It is insane to make conclusions like this without evaluating the truth and the evidence. But our Media feels impassioned and emboldened to do so thereby acting as Judge, Jury and Executioner.

Fox’s Fake News: Syria by Russia Design

Fox News has headlined an article in which it claims; “In Syria there are more war crimes, more peace talks and more radicalization by – Russia Design”.   Huh. Where’s the proof?   Their primary source citation is The Institute For The Study of War. Sounds impressive – right?   Until, unless one does a bit of research and it is easily disseminated:

The CEO is a Kimberly Kagan. The first, most obvious foul is the fact that her husband’s brother is married to Victoria Nuland. The same Nuland advocating for war with Russia. The same Nuland deciding who should run Ukraine after the coup – Nuland.

The second most obvious foul is that this obscure little non-profit, The Institute for The Study of War, claims it gets all it’s funding from Raytheon, General Dynamics and DynCorp.   As in no conflict of interest there!   So for all the call to arms The Institute will pass the arms contracts to their funders.   Nice tight package.

Third foul, Fox News is using the very credible Institute For The Study of War which had within it’s bowels, Elizabeth O’Bagy.   A registered Democrat, she lied on her resume that she had earned her PhD from Georgetown, and was used by war-mongering McCain and Kerry to assist in evaluating the need to go to war with Syria. After she was disgraced and fired from The Institute, 2 weeks later McCain hired her on his personal staff as a ‘legislative assistant’.   Another tight package.

Jonathan Maunter of The Institute was used as a source for another Fox article in which the author claimed – “Russia and Assad Bombing of Civilians Continues as UN Peace Process Staggers”.   According to the website for The Institute, Maunter doesn’t even work there???   Oops.  In this article they also reference the Syria Institute as a reliable source.

The Syria Institute is run by 33 year old Valerie Szybala and was formed September 2015. They apparently get their funding by asking for donations via Facebook…  They claim to be aligned with the ever famous – Foundation For Justice and Development. This non-profit is so non-profit it doesn’t even have to file a Form 990 because they don’t make enough money. It refers comments to Ismael Basha, who is an unknown.

The man writing these incredibly opinionated and flagrantly unsourced, propaganda/articles is George Russell, described as an “Editor at-large at Fox News”. Outside of that his bio includes a recommendation by The Economist, the Rothschild media outlet.

Good Grief Charley Brown – Is that the best you can do Fox?

In conclusion: We have an aging journalist with not much presence other than Fox since 2004 and a probable link to Liberal ideologies via The Economist, who utilizes as his sources for articles weak, Liberal, agenda oriented, Nuland connected, war-mongers, and organizations that barely exist and have just recently been formed by people that appear to by Syrian or Saudi…

Given that Fox is partially owned by the Saudi’s, the Saudi connection to discredit Assad and demonize Russia via propaganda that is easily shred by anyone with five spare minutes, makes the entire fiasco rather pathetically childish.

FOX – shame on you! What a Sham.