FCC

AI vs Word Salad Interview: False Advertising Fraud

Posted on by Helena

Free Speech is muddied.   Kamala wants to drown us in censorship by the Disinformation Police while the media selectively edits and uses AI to create false interviews.  Under pressure, 60 minutes released the unedited version of Kamala Harris’ word salad interview revealing an incompetent bungled response vs the AI clean version.  Not only was the message altered in its bumpy hems and hahs, but the actual content was completely reframed.   AI. 

Who created the AI version?  Was it authorized by the White House?  The FCC Chairman, Jessica Rosenworcel, yes she’s Jewish, claims Trump’s threat to revoke the license of CBS which aired the AI version of Kamala’s interview is a threat to ‘free speech’.  But AI is not a person therefore Constitutional Rights of any nature do not apply.  What does apply is – FRAUD.

Legally, had 60 minutes provided a ‘disclaimer’ indicating that the word salad had been replaced with AI – that would likely suffice.   The misrepresentation is the legal call against CBS.   We were warned that AI would circulate in this election via voice as well as photo and video AI representations.  The photos inserting Kamala into a stadium have been rampant.  A green screen fixation.   People have commented that various rally’s didn’t happen – they didn’t exist.  That would be fraud.

FCC laws do not address this caveat of false representation. Therefore, the FCC has little legality over Trump’s threat to pull their licensing but the FCC does have the authority to assert ‘False Advertising’ against CBS.  The fact that CBS ultimately released both versions works in their favor – the fact that they have not come clean on their AI usage works against them.

33 US CODE – 931

(1)

Any claimant or representative of a claimant who knowingly and willfully makes a false statement or representation for the purpose of obtaining a benefit or payment under this chapter shall be guilty of a felony. 

CBS knowingly made the representation and benefited in payment and are thus guilty of a felony.

This is why Trump can make the licensure of CBS subject to legal action.  The First Amendment applies to The People.  CBS violated the First Amendment due to ‘false advertising’.

The First Amendment is also clear that ‘censorship’ based on disinformation does not exist.  It does include the regulation of;  threats, fighting words, child porn, obscenity, defamatory speech and false advertising.  There is a distinguishing definition between disinformation vs misinformation;  Disinformation is deliberate knowingly making false statements vs misinformation is more of a ‘dang I forgot or didn’t know’ mistake.

Disinformation would apply to Fauci, NIH, CDC and Big Pharma.  Misinformation would apply to someone who didn’t know all the facts.

Once again, this raises the legality of using AI in any manner without a Disclaimer.

AI Voiceovers:

Companies offer TTS – Text To Speech availability to anyone willing to pay the price.  “Free Unlimited downloads. Most Fluent & Conversational AI voices.”  This particular company advertises that it is ‘trusted’ by;  Doordash, Hyundai, Moderna, Reuters, Salesforce and Equifax.  “Realistic AI Voice Models for Generating Expressive Speech”.

Another AI voiceover company advertises – “Generate natural sounding voiceovers and dubs in multiple languages.”  This one is ‘trusted’ by;  Honeywell, Pfizer, Cisco, Splunk, Glencore, vmware…  Just pick your language.

AI Videos:

Text to video in 8 seconds.  Or, Image to video – works on your Mac or Apple devices.  You can create your own Avatars!  Trusted by;  UBS, NBC, BBC, Target, Netflix, Amazon, Google, Merck, and Meta.

ALL ABOARD THE TRAIN.  

Congress seems to have no idea how to regulate this phenomena and have instead resorted to “Ethics”.  Be ethical in your usage…  Use Ethic Guidelines such as sustainability, fairness and dignity.  Yes – they actually say this.  Their biggest concerns are with AI Bias and as Kamala noted, “The racial bias in AI”.

In an even more insane development, concerns that robots can be sentient and subject to ‘artificial suffering’ would need to be addressed.  Therefore they should be granted rights and compassion is an ethical legal standard currently on the table within the frame of regulation.  Mistreatment of robots is a concern from a philosophical standpoint and is hampering the initiation of regulations…

 

Disclaimer:  This segment includes the use of AI in the form of avatars, text, voiceovers, and phantom images and videos. Therefore, this is animation and cannot be construed as reality in any manner, shape or form. 

Mika Brzezinski Opens Pandora’s Box That Could Shutter Google, Twitter and Facebook

Posted on by Helena

Mika Brzezinski of MSNBC has called for Twitter CEO, Jack Dorsey, to shutter President Trump’s account because he is calling out Joe Scarborough for potentially being involved in the murder of his former internist.   In so doing Brzezinski makes name calling of our sitting President free speech vs libel or slander while demanding censorship. Her tirade did not end with simple name calling, but was then infused with a skewer of character assassination, professional assassination, and germ assassination – all while not wearing the dastardly mask she reviles him for not wearing.

Quite a mouthful to be sure. But then Brzezenski has publicly criticized Clinton and Sanders too.   It is unclear if she actually likes anyone. Of course, it bears reiterating that Mika and her first husband James Hoffer divorced amidst allegations she was having an affair with Joe Scarborough… It is also noteworthy that the three books euphemistically ‘written’ by Mika were published by Harvey Weinstein’s Book Company, including her memoire which was published in 2010 when nobody knew her name… which in and of itself has the ability to entirely destroy her feminist career.

Free speech under the First Amendment does allow for name calling, but when that speech can be shown to incite harm or violence, censorship and legal repercussions are available.   For a public media platform censorship is regulated by the FCC.

While the laws are milky to say the least, FCC regulations state that it is ‘illegal for broadcasters to intentionally distort the news’.   This opens a Pandora’s Box within Mainstream Media which has a verbose history of intentionally distorting the news!  And Brzezinski may have just derailed her Liberal team.

To date – the Media have yet to be legally called to the plate for distorting the news.

And that nuance would likely come under much greater scrutiny once President Trump is reelected.   

What is Censorship according to the FCC?   “Censorship in America is the act of altering, adjusting, editing, or banning of any or all media resulting from the presumption that its content is perceived to be objectionable, incendiary, illicit, or immoral by the Federal Government of the United States.”   And while Twitter claims it has the right to create it’s own determination of objectionable content, this would seem to directly infringe on FCC rules.   Given Facebook, Twitter and Google are all defined as Public media, they are subject to even greater regulation than a private company and hence could be investigated and possibly prosecuted for their censorship ‘creativeness’.

As such, Mika Brzezinski may have inadvertently opened up a can of worms that could see these public giants defending their tactics in a federal court.   And she would thus be the pawn that was played.

In such a case, it would likely be Jack Dorsey’s legal team chiding Mika to shutter her mouth lest she completely cave the left’s ideal of censorship at will and free speech for one party only.   Something they have coveted for many decades when the CIA took control of MSM during the MKUltra conspiracy turned truthism.

While Mika may believe she is some kind of Leftist Leader, she is likely about to be somewhat berated for her lack of understanding of basic Swamp Control ideology.   And her reputation will become fodder for all aspiring conservatives to wipe the twalletes.

While President Trump ‘alludes’ to the possibility that Mika’s husband, Joe Scarborough, may have had something to do with the death of his intern, when speaking outside of script, she challenges legal speech.   And it is well known that when Dems speak outside of their scripted voice, they make fatal mistakes.

President Trump is actually a genius in his egging this fatal flaw.   He knows what he says will illicit an emotional response – and an emotional response is likely to cross the lines of – legality.

It is reminiscent in her fatal flaw of using denigrating and deriding comment to assail Pompeo in a light that would rile the gay community.   She exceeds her filter and will ultimately be brought to the plate by those who she believes are her advocates, but see her as a flight risk to their agenda.

The current haze of notoriety that Mika is currently reveling in may come to an abrupt halt as her understanding of the sensitivity of the Liberal Swamp is derailed and her disservice is called to the plate.

In reality, the double standard of Brzezeniski is an interesting psychological profile of a person who believes herself above law, above criticism, above basic moral and ethical ideals as she continues to spew division, hatred, divisiveness, and unapologetic disgust toward sitting President.

As such, FCC regulations could ultimately shut down MSNBC for allowing the vitriol and incitement thus depriving her of her very lucrative 1% salary of well over $2 million per year – as she purportedly champions for the little people while a contributing donor to charity of $-0-???

It is a tenuous line the Democrats are traversing – and it would be a prudent person who recognized the destruction to their own party their actions could levy…Mika might learn the hard lesson that she is – expendable in this regard.