Syrian President Assad gave a state interview in which he claimed there was not enough evidence to support the US statement that Baghdadi had been killed any more than there was verifiable proof Osama bin Laden had been killed. In this interview he references an interesting concept that has been considered before; Baghdadi was a CIA asset.
This would explain why Susan Rice and Obama went ballistic when told Baghdadi had been killed – without their permission.
Assad claims that the director of these unsubstantiated claims is always the same – America. But it isn’t America, it is who is running the show. And in failing to acknowledge this very important difference Assad could easily fall into the same agenda – is it Communist Soviet Union, or Capitalist Russia? Is it Ottomon Empire or the Middle East? Nations come and go based on the government that leads. And Assad would do well to recognize that President Trump is not his predecessors.
While the New York Times has mentioned The Deep State, when ex-CIA Deputy Director, John McLaughlin, made the reference in a campaign promoting impeachment, the conspiracy that was – was officially outed. Joined at the event by former FBI Director, Andy McCabe, and former CIA boss, Brennan, McLaughlin stated, “This is not an institution (referring to the CIA) that is not in a chain of command that makes or implements policy.”
Obviously, there are parallel universes with respect to ‘truth’ and the ‘CIA’. And the history of Baghdadi is note worthy within that above statement:
In 2004 when Bush was president, US forces captured the first Baghdadi in Fallujah considering him to be a low level member of al Qaeda. He was placed in Camp Bucca detention center in Iraq under his civilian name Ibrahim Awad Ibrahim al-Badry. Ten months later he was released unconditionally. Why?
In 2006, Condoleezza Rice gave a press conference about The New Middle East in which she stated, “what we’re seeing here [in regards to the destruction of Lebanon and the Israeli attacks on Lebanon], in a sense, is the growing—the ‘birth pangs’—of a ‘New Middle East’ and whatever we do we have to be certain that we’re pushing forward to the New Middle East [and] not going back to the old one.”
Within the plan was a redrawing of each countries territory in the Middle East to conform to this New and improved plan utilizing the ‘unleashing of forces of constructive chaos’, according to Rice. At the time, Lebanon was considered the focal point, the birth pang. In 2006, Israel launched a full blown attack on Lebanon displacing 1 million Lebanese and 500,000 Israelis.
The United States under Bush, Britain under Tony Blair, and Israel under Ehud Olmert were aligned in this redrawing scheme. Former US National Security Advisor, Brzezinski, alluded to the fact that the target was considered the Eurasian Balkans and would represent a coup toward ultimately chaining Russia. The map would significantly reduce the size of Turkey, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia while creating new states within these borders that would be effectively owned and run by the US, UK and Israel.
In 2006, ISIS rose as the Islamic State of Iraq. Its leader, or General, was – Khalil al Zawi, he was also known as Al-Baghdadi. In 2007, a US Brigadier General, Kevin Burgner, claimed that Baghdadi did not even exist and that he was really a staged elderly cleric whose voice was used over a picture that was a fictional character. An intermediary to Osama bin Laden made the same claim. In 2008, another claim to support this was floated by a spokesperson for Hamas-Iraq. The US Deep State chose not to comment.
Throughout 2007 to 2010, there were numerous reports of al-Baghdadi’s capture and death by the Iraqi Ministry. Then in April 2010, it was announced once again that al-Baghdadi was killed by a joint effort of US and Iraqi forces. Joe Biden was quoted as saying, “the killings were potentially devastating blows to the terrorist network.” Whether he even existed was never really addressed or confirmed.
An ISIS website was cited as concurring that Baghdadi’s death was real and Abu Baghdadi succeeded in becoming the new leader of ISIS. The CIA announced this fact.
In 2013, two photos emerged showing McCain in Syria with the Free Syrian Army and a man who looked very much like Baghdadi in the background. There is no claim the photos were shopped, but there are conflicting accounts as to who the man really is. However, the fact that McCain was in Syria at all meeting with rebels is a bit disconcerting. McCain’s communications director, Brian Rogers, denied the picture was of Baghdadi and said instead this man was a high ranking official in the Northern Storm Brigade. Ultimately, the Northern Storm Brigade was found to be affiliated with ISIS.
Two years earlier, McCain was in Benghazi while it was held by rebels looking to oust Gaddafi. McCain was in Ukraine during the rise of protestors seeking a coup in 2013, and again supporting the rebels as they fought against the residents of Donbas.
The internet defines Deep State As: “a form of clandestine government made up of hidden or covert networks of power operating independently of a state’s political leadership, in pursuit of their own agenda and goals. Examples include organs of state, such as the armed forces or public authorities, intelligence agencies, police, secret police, administrative agencies, and government bureaucracy. A deep state can also take the form of entrenched, career civil servants acting in a non-conspiratorial manner, to further their own interests. The intent of a deep state can include continuity of the state itself, job security for its members, enhanced power and authority, and the pursuit of ideological objectives. It can operate in opposition to the agenda of elected officials, by obstructing, resisting, and subverting their policies, conditions and directives. It can also take the form of government owned corporations (CIA) or private companies (NED, NGO’s) that act independently of regulatory or governmental control.”
Who created ISIS? Was it the Deep State in order to achieve the agenda for a New Middle East through what Condoleezza Rice termed ‘constructive chaos’? Is the New Middle East part of the agenda for the New World Order? As we watch time and again conspiracy theories playing out as fact, perhaps we should pay more attention.
The CIA is rogue. There are those that think that Soros is actually an operative for the CIA. Or could Soros be running the CIA?