Impeachment Hearing: Class 101

The President Trump impeachment hearings have descended into what would be viewed as a clown show at best. Key witnesses are coming forth having actually witnessed nothing, testimony is continually altered or changed, and new witnesses are called by the Democrats as they realize their old witnesses are collapsing:

Bill Taylor’s aide claims he overheard a conversation between Sondland and Trump in which he heard Trump ask about the ‘investigations’.   That would indicate the phone call was on speaker.   But it wasn’t – it was a cell phone call at a busy noisy restaurant on July 26th  in Kiev. The aid has not testified – his name is David Holmes and he is a counselor at the US embassy in Kiev.

In 2013, David Holmes was appointed by Obama as Director for Afghanistan.   In June 2013, he was present at a national security meeting held by Obama along with the newly appointed Avril Haines formerly serving as Director of the CIA before being appointed Obama’s deputy counsel.

According to Taylor, his aide told him that Sondland called Trump on his cell phone and Holmes claimed he could hear both sides of the conversation. Yet afterward, Holmes asked Sondland what President Trump ‘thought about Ukraine’. If he had heard both sides of the phone call, why would he ask this question?   Sondland replied with a shrug, Trump cares about the Biden investigation. That amounts to chit-chat.

Trump notified Congress that he would be holding up military aid to Ukraine in June, no one objected. Zelensky won the election on July 21st.  Holmes, Taylor and Sondland were all in Ukraine on July 26th.   Trump had no idea what kind of president Zelensky would make, Ukraine had been mired in corruption and war for 5 years, and his meeting with Zelensky would not take place until the end of September.

Nothing in this testimony says anything about Ukraine aid.

So far, we have an aid who claims he heard two sides of a cell phone conversation in which nothing is discussed except Sondland’s meetings. The aid then makes conclusions that Trump is bribing the newly elected Zelensky and runs home to tell his boss, Bill Taylor what he thinks he knows.   Bill Taylor then relays in hearings what his aid thinks he might have heard, but didn’t really, because Ukraine aid was never discussed, however Sondland was miffed because President Trump didn’t care about Ukraine but asked about the investigation that Biden had coerced the then prosecutor to drop or else Biden would withhold aid…

So it isn’t merely hearsay, Taylor’s testimony is now gossip down the line of gossip.

The Democrats defend the hearsay claiming Taylor was ‘under oath’ and therefore his hearsay isn’t real hearsay, it’s something else…

Media Liberals claim the evidence is damaging and proves Trump committed a sort of bribery scheme of ‘I will release the aid if you reopen the investigation against Hunter Biden.’   But President Trump never actually said that, all the evidence reveals is that some people who heard bits and pieces of a telephone conversation in which they were not privy made conclusions as to how they personally viewed said conversation despite hearing nothing to allude to aid.

The fact that the President of Ukraine, Zelensky, and his staff find the entire frame of the conversation as damning preposterous at best, and comedic at worst, invites no credibility.   Why?

Are the democrats saying that testimony by the Ukrainian president is not worthy of acceptance? Are they claiming the Ukraine president is lying?   Because that would indicate that they feel the Ukraine president is corrupt… And if the Ukraine president is corrupt, then deferring aide to Ukraine would be completely within President Trump’s authority.

Democrats site that ‘all the witnesses are corroborating each other’ – yet all the witnesses give depositions behind closed doors, we have no idea what coercion might be relayed.
So far, most of the testimony is supposition and has taken a simple remark made by Sondland and embellished it with theories and innuendo.   The fact that Trump withheld the aid a full month before the telephone conversation took place, before Zelensky was elected, refutes nearly every statement.   The fact that Zelensky won the election based on his promise to eradicate all corruption is also telling knowing that Biden had quashed the initial investigation into Burisma by threatening to withhold aid back in 2016. In essence it is Biden who should have been impeached as VP under Obama given his public admission that is widely available.

The impeachment hearing is marked with legal issues, corruption, altered words, and the absolute heinous desire to derail President Trump because the 2020 election is a Democrat failure.

Democrats: The War Mongers Demand War

When did the Democrats become the War Mongers?   The short answer might be – they always were.

Woodrow Wilson was President when we entered WWI.   Franklin Roosevelt was President when we entered WWII.   Kennedy and Johnson engaged us in the Vietnam War. Obama sent us into the Syrian conflict.   And it was initially Jimmy Carter that engaged the US in the Middle East. Today we are witness to a Republican President literally ‘fighting’ to keep us out of war while hawks from both parties rally around the bomb cry! Remember the ‘red button’ propaganda being wrestled by the Democrats when Trump was elected?

How is it that the Democrat Party, the party of peace, has been the progenitor of War?

Money.  Follow The Money.  Or more aptly, follow where the money flows.

The bets were on defense stocks when it was thought Hillary was the sure win in the 2016 Presidential race.   Not so much to defend our country as to ravage war.

Syria:   Listening to hawks from both sides of the party planks, the grand call to arms is about how the US provides stability to the region – and any withdrawal will only cause an escalation of ISIS.

The US has been actively engaged in the Middle East for roughly 40 years. During that time we have witnessed: The Gulf War involving Iraq and Kuwait, the ongoing war in Yemen, Syria’s destruction, wars in Lebanon, Libya, Egypt, Turkey, Iran-Iraq war, Jordan, Cyprus, and Afghanistan-Taliban.

How’s that stability working for ya?

This is why President Trump rightly states that the US has no place in the Middle East – period.   The Middle East has been rife with war for thousands of years. Nothing the US does will ever temper that reality. It is a consequence of ideology. Regime changes, coups, have done little except to redistribute assets.

Money: Since 2001, the US has spent nearly $6trillion on wars in the Middle East.   There are 141million taxpayers in the US – that means each taxpayer forked over $42,500 – so far.   The top five companies in the world profiting from war are predominantly US: Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Raytheon, BAE Systems, and Northrup Grumman.

The value of Saudi Arabia’s arms purchases from the US is nearly double Australia which is ranked 2nd in the last ten years.   Value of the top ten importers of US arms over the last ten years is roughly $57 billion.

Where did the money go?   Are we better off?  

The entire Syrian escalation was created during the Obama administration to oust President Assad and bomb the country into oblivion thus allowing the infiltration of ISIS.   It was the US assassination of Iraq’s Hussein that allowed ISIS to infiltrate throughout Iraq – also under Obama’s reign of terror.

Troops throughout the US, Canada, and Australia have attempted to bring to light what these choices have truly cost, lives; death, casualties, unmentionable horrors, the destruction of valuable artifacts, refugees, lost civilizations…

Today, the same Democrats and war monger hawks, including Mattis, demand that the US counter attack Turkey for the affront on the Kurds on the Syrian border.   Assad demands all US troops withdraw.   Erdogan threatens to release 3.5 million refugees into Europe.   Europe is divided.  Our allies are not our allies.   And war has erupted in Lebanon. Again.  This is The Middle East.

The liberal propaganda machine known as the New York Times ran an article, “Trump invokes War’s Human Toll to Defend His Policies”.   “Trump’s Withdrawal From Syria Prompts Rare Criticism From Military Officials”, Washington Post.   And CNN, “The Largest US Troop Withdrawal From Syria Underway”.

In 2013, at the direction of Obama, the CIA was put in charge of arming anti-Syrian government forces, although intelligence revealed the CIA had begun arming rebels as early as 2012. Later, it was shown that many of the rebel groups facilitated by the CIA were in fact affiliated with ISIS and/or al Qaeda. In 2012, David Patraeus was head of the CIA.   Disgraced, he was replaced by John Brennan, who has been a central figure in the treasonous document, “The Trump Dossier”. Brennan was also accused of financial gain through the use of his security clearance.

These are the provocateurs that engaged us in the Syrian conflict, the Liberal war mongers who allowed the rise of ISIS and Al Nusra throughout the region.   These are the peacemakers who criticize Trump as he withdraws our troops to safe passage. All 1000.

IN 1980 the price per share of Lockheed Martin was about $13, today it is worth nearly $400 per share.   In 1980 the price per share of Raytheon was about $8, today is is worth roughly $200 per share.

US Socialist Party – A Distraction?

Where have all the Democrats gone, long time passing, where have all the Democrats gone, long time ago…

Fourteen Democrats have made the announcement that they will be in the run up for the Presidential bid in 2020.  After splashing through the media, gloating over their financing and mucking up their scripts, they have all but disappeared.  Into the shadows, licking their wounds, they quickly discovered that the truth cannot be faked.  As such, new scripts are being created;  one script will support the Green ideologies, and the other script will attempt to convey a more moderate viewpoint.  Which one they dust off depends on the wind.

Kamala Harris made a fool of herself as she claimed to be puffing joints while in college and listening to rappers that didn’t even exist.

Elizabeth Warren tried to drink a beer but didn’t know how to open the bottle.

Bernie Sanders is busily trying to justify his three elaborate homes under a Socialist agenda.

Biden is hoping all the creepy photos of him fondling little girls can be destroyed.

And Beto the beast is grappling with claims he is a verifiable lunatic.

Meanwhile, not to be left on the sidelines, Marco Polo Rubio is testing the waters by pouting that someone needs to run against Trump – as in mememememe?  Pretty please give me money…

But no one is in the news.  Hollywood is relatively quiet given their penchant for self granulizing.  No one seems to be making the waves necessary to actually point to a possible game changer.  And not one candidate has announced anything remotely innovative that would make them shine.  In fact, it would appear that the script is universal and only the tone of the candidate differentiates one from another.  Whether it is shrieking Warren, or bug eyed Kamala, or bat eye Beto, they are all reading from the exact same platform script and would seem too ignorant to understand that means they are thus running on charm and beauty instead.   A losing agenda.

Of course the media is attempting to address this bizarre anomaly by declaring that the Democrats are no longer a Party, instead they are a “Movement”.    The backdrop of this Movement would appear to be highly controversial as even Socialist Bernie has employed Faiz Shakir to be his campaign advisor.  Faiz Shakir, a Pakistani Muslim, was senior advisor to Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi, groomed at Harvard, and a founding member of ThinkProgress.org, a far left unionized political blog.

Kamala Harris has employed the granddaughter of Cesar Chavez, a far left radical labor union devotee, in addition to her sister.  The alliance is likely to inspire labor unions to add $$$$$ to her campaign, because the democrats continue to believe that a candidate is made by their monetary backing, and not by their personage.

The Movement is energized by common shifts from the staunch Democrat agenda of the world according to Hillary.   Radicalism has captured the Movement with Socialism becoming the core phenomena.  The shift from a centrist party to pure socialism is particularly interesting given the collapse of entire countries within this idealism.  Venezuela is only one example.  Cuba, Poland, Russia, Yugoslavia, and most eastern European countries at one time embraced socialism.  Each time, it collapsed the country and sent it spiraling into poverty.

As such, the obvious assumption is that the only way the Cabal believes it can own the US is through its collapse.   And Socialism is the means.  It is the new script that has come out of the closet and decided to boldly go where no American can survive.  It is the precipitator to mass exodus.  And just as we have witnessed in such countries as Sweden, The Netherlands, and Norway, it ultimately results in lower birth rates of nationals, and emigration of the youth as they search for a better life in countries that embrace hope within free market capitalism.

Where would Americans emigrate if the US slipped into socialism?

Still, despite the congruence of the new Democrat Socialist Movement, none of the candidates for President in 2020 have the charisma or the clarity to create a solitary lead and as they vie for that place of King of the Mountain.  They will invariably need to haul some pretty ugly mudballs at their fellow Movementors in order to be seen as the candidate of choice.  In essence, the Mud alone might collapse the entire Socialist cry and usher in something just as fearsome.

Which brings us to what no one dares to utter for fear that it is the back game of King against Queen chess – Michelle Obama.   Obama has not openly commented on the New Green Deal.  Waiting to see the American response, her chess move is cued but holding tight.

Fortunately, Michelle Obama is not without her gaffs, and potential corrupt schemes, but she has a powerful force behind her – The Cabal.  The same cabal that created the Clinton Dynasty with the lure of money and power is harvesting their brainchild in the form of the next generation. Given their losses within Trump’s rule, they are angry, and within that anger a rage is building.  They have lost a number of key chess men, but the Queen is still viable.

Busily traipsing across the US with her new book in tow, Michelle Obama is likely to make a last minute announcement of her decision to run whereby the distractors will all immediately dissolve to allow her free reign.  I imagine she would be presented as a solution to the radical left socialists. She would likely run on the same platform that created her husband – Hollywood charm.

Former President Obama continues to make the media rounds promoting his self success, his accomplishments, and his ability to shelve his ego – OUCH!   Should Michelle Obama actually run, it would necessitate inventorying those purported successes employed by husband Barack and that could be the wrecking ball.  An Obama run could also invigorate investigations surrounding Hillarygate FISA, and collusion within the Mueller blackmail.

It is a precarious stage, and what we read, what we see, is often a distraction from the reality that is a game of chess.

Hillary’s Health – Tim Kaine’s Gain!

Confusing parties… The UK ‘Conservative Party’ is more closely aligned with the US Liberal Democrat party. A recent row arose in the UK about providing more arms to the Saudi’s in their ‘coalition’ against Yemen. Of course, we all know it is an ethnic cleansing genocidal war, not a coalition. But apparently, Boris Johnson who is a representative of the UK ‘Conservative Party’ is arguing that despite Amnesty International and the UN declaring war crimes committed by the Saudi’s in Yemen, there is no evidence to support that allegation and therefore he encourages ramping up arms sales to them. Much like the Clintonite/Obama/McCain agenda.

Political parties used to have clear definitive lines of values and beliefs. But more recently those lines have shifted to be inclusive of more ambitious definitions including liberal Republican, progressive democrat, socialist democrat, conservative union, labour, liberal labour, and even liberal democrat – which seems an oxymoron – or just a moron…

That being said, the muddiness of the US Republican and Democrat parties has reached breaking point. The lines have been pushed to the point of spicing up a steak – add a little salt, pinch of pepper, turmeric, basil, cloves, garlic, Rosemary, lemon, etc… and voila!

While a VP has historically little impact on the election results, Tim Kaine, Hillary’s VP pick has some interesting stances and allegations. For example:

*Kaine adamantly opposed the War on Iraq. Hillary was a strident backer.

*Kaine opposed reduction of military and veteran benefits. Clinton advocated for ‘redeployment and caps on troops’, and a reduction in military spending.

*Kaine criticized the No child Left Behind Act. Hillary supported it.

*Kaine supported coal. Clinton opposed it.

*In order to balance the Virginia budget, Kaine put through budget cuts that required higher tuition for public universities. Hillary wants free public university education.

What Kaine did accomplish was winning previous Republican strongholds in his run for Governor. How? Same way Hillary is luring and baiting, by speaking their tongue, their language, like a lobbyist compromising on one issue in order to push through a dozen others. This crossover would be the fate of Republicans today as their loyalty would seem to have wavered and waned, their value system grayed, and their reputation shallowed.

While most of the Republican’s jumping ship are retired, their reasoning is more hypocritical – and sometimes strangely devious with the Bush’s leading the pack. They continually defend the ‘good ole boys network’, and anyone outside the club is not welcome.

So why Kaine? Why would Soros/Hillary pick Kaine? He walks the walk, talks the talk and appears squeaky clean. Perhaps his Google history has been scrubbed. And while events did occur during his tenures as mayor, lieutenant governor and governor, whether those events can truly be attributed to him – is rather vague. During his term as mayor the homicide rate fell 55%… because ‘Kaine supported Project Exile’… he didn’t draft it, he didn’t oversee it, he didn’t have anything to do with it and yet, he is credited with that ‘success’.

What has he actually accomplished? “As Governor, Kaine successfully protected 400,000 acres of conservation land’. In reality, the conservation was done by The Virginia Outdoors Foundation, which worked to protect the land two years before Kaine was even elected Governor… During the Great Recession, Kaine’s tenure was marked by the fact that Virginia’s unemployment did not drop as much as the national average. There is no reason given, just that he happened to sit at his desk during this time frame. In fact, outside of an executive order banning smoking in public places, it would appear that Kaine’s entire tenure has been that he ‘supported’ something someone else actually did.

And yet – Soros picked him for Hillary’s VP.

Why? It may be that Hillary was played as the puppet, the democrat with the most notoriety able to wreak the most havoc on a Republican election. And maybe, she is the mask to usher in Tim Kaine. While she courts the Republicans with her feminism and hawkish ideals, her health could very well be a more significant factor on the stage of Act II. Given that nothing is decided without known and unknown motives, Kaine’s placement as Hillary’s VP is certainly not accidental or misguided. If Hillary were to win the election before her health completely failed her, Kaine could invoke her as unfit to lead and succeed as President.

His policies are not progressive – they are liberal and in line with Obama, a stance that would not win an election today. To be sure, his appointment should be scrutinized given it was most definitely a Soros decision and Clinton’s health would not appear to be a conspiracy but a definitive fact.