Crowdstrike: Cyber Security In a Hillary World

President Trump is bringing up an assertion that the previous government of Ukraine in conjunction with a US company, Crowdstrike, had a hand in the Trump Dossier and election meddling in 2016.   Of course the old schoolers are furious that he would even suggest such a bald faced lie given everyone knows the meddling came from Russia – proof positive per Crowdstrike’s in-depth security analysis.   Unfortunately, the Crowdstrike narrative was punched with Swiss cheese holes 2 years ago and while the stream has attempted to bury the story – it still lives!   Damn that Google for not eliminating every piece of evidence!

Any longer, when President Trump makes a comment or statement, no matter how mundane or abrupt, if the media goes berserk it is likely because the comment has backbone.

Crowdstrike was founded in 2011 by: George Kurtz formerly with McAfee, Dmitri Alperovitch also with McAfee whose family had fled the Soviet Union, and Greg Marston whose bio would seem to have been scrubbed.  Interesting…

Shawn Henry, a former Assistant Deputy at the FBI during the Clinton administration, is the current president of Crowdstrike while simultaneously serving and advising NBC, MSNBC and CNBC, while simultaneously serving as faculty at National Association of Corporate Directors. Busy!

Crowdstrike was responsible for the 2016 story that Russia hacked the DNC in order to get dirt on Hillary and favor Trump.  They affirmed this because simultaneously they claimed Russia had immobilized 80% of Ukraine’s missiles and only one country fit the cue – Russia.   This was their analysis.   Their assessment was backed by James Comey.   Since then, the methodology of Crowdstrike’s determination came into question and was found to be highly defective according to The International Institute for Strategic Studies, but even more interestingly, by John McAfee.

McAfee’s point is simply this:   “If you have the wherewithal to pull off a hack of that nature, you’ve got the wherewithal to hide who you are. Otherwise, you shouldn’t be hacking. You know this.

So when someone says, “Oh, the Russians did it,” well, that’s because someone in the incompetent government cybersecurity collective said, “We traced it back, and it sure looks like the Russians because they used a hammertoss, which the Russians always use.

If I’m the Chinese, and I want to make it look like the Russians, I’ll learn how to use hammertoss.”

The point McAfee is making is that simply asserting that a type of code has been used by a hacker in the past and every security expert knows this, it stands to reason that the hack would be hacked.

McAfee further stated, “Hackers have become much more advanced than those trying to protect against them. We’re like puppets on their strings. You know how easy it is to spoof an IP address? Thousands of programs will do it. You can do it multiple times, and it can’t be traced back to you. You can make it point to anyone you want. The fact that it points to anybody at all tells me that’s not the person who did it.”

Other cyber security firms have concurred with McAfee which makes Crowdstrike’s narrative either profoundly incompetent, or it alludes to their bedfellow relationship with Clinton.

Crowdstrike was a nothing company until Google invested $100 million in 2015.   Later additional investments from investment funds including Warberg Pincus helped lift Crowdstrike’s prominence. Warberg’s president is Timothy Geithner who was president of the NY Federal Reserve under Clinton and Secretary of Treasury under Obama. Geithner also serves on the boards of Bank for International Settlements (BIS), Bilderberg Group, and the Center For Global Development.   Geithner’s father and grandfather were principles in the Ford Foundation – a serious manipulator within the mechanisms aligned with Soros Open Society – among others.

When Geithner left his position as Treasury Secretary, he proposed Hillary Clinton as his successor.

Alperovitch is senior fellow at The Atlantic Council.   The initial purpose of the Atlantic Council was to make sure Europe and the US were aligned.   Council members are a who’s who of the liberal Swamp:   Chuck Hagel, James Jones, Susan Rice, Richard Holbrooke, etc… etc… etc… Even the New York Times called out the Atlantic Council for receiving funding from 25 foreign governments. It’s board has consisted of rather interesting fellows from the ranks of Clinton, Bush and Obama.

So why would they be backing a relatively obscure cyber security company, Crowdstrike, when there are literally hundreds of more mature companies to choose from?

Because, they can control the strings.

As McAfee had noted, the intel within the government during the Hillary/Obama reign was operating under the auspices of a bunch of old men with antiquated ideas who had no idea what the cyber world was capable of doing.   McAfee’s recommendation was to offer double salary to the best of the best, overlooking the died purple hair, ring in the nose, gumshoe wearing tye dyed tea shirt manifesto, who regularly smoked weed.   In his esteemed analysis – when you are looking for real cyber security, who the ‘heck’ cares what they look like, if they are the best in the field! Because that is why the US government remains in a pigeonhole of inability to compete – we are so indoctrinated into manners, suits, and Harvard, that we lose what counts – competence.

Instead, in the past, the US government has been more concerned with creating backup companies whose data can conform to a predetermined end point to support an agenda – rather than an analysis of competent, intelligent, fact finding security.

President Trump’s statement with regard to Crowdstrike, is likely the tip of their iceberg about to melt as all things always point back to – Hillary.

Hillary’s Russia Vendetta – Hack Job?

In 2014, Soros gave an interview in which he said imposing sanctions on Russia was futile and a better alternative was to give Ukraine money, LOTS of money.

In 2015, Soros gave another interview in which he said that sanctioning Russia was a ‘necessary evil’.

In 2016, the White House proxies, Hillary and Soros, gave the order for Obama to sanction Russia to an extreme, based on evidence that is described as ‘belief’… and rooted in vengeance.

In 2015, Soros tells Merkel that the EU needs to take in a million refugees every year!

In 2016, Soros says that Merkel’s policies of opening borders to refugees is the downfall of Europe.

In this topsy turvy flip-flop of psychosis, Soros has held firmly to one thing – he Hates Putin with vehemence. Given Soros is deeply complicit in the orchestration of chaos around the world, we should listen to his dictums with the mind and heart that understands – whatever he says – believe the opposite.

It is the same confusion reaped by the Obama administration in their ‘news feed’ in which we were led to believe that sometimes he was policies seemed legitimate, and sometimes he lied. It is a psychological Game. In reality – we know in our hearts, when a liar lies, there is no dissemination…

It is well known that Soros hates Russia, hates Putin, and that this hatred is born of the fact that he has not been able to overtake and control – Russia.  Other countries have been targets; Brazil, Venezuela, Hong Kong, Ukraine, UK, US, France, Germany, etc…   A Power struggle of Games. But in order for him to usher in the Order from which Chaos controls, he needs to create chaos in all the major power blocks. To date, he has failed, and the Hillary/Obama regime collapsed leaving the US vulnerable to freedom.

Personally, I feel that sanctions are an immature vendetta that really have no value whatsoever. Do we really believe that ‘sanctions’ will suddenly halt all cyber-security issues including those that are covertly imposed by Germany, France, Ukraine, US, UK, Canada, Russia, Brazil, Venezuela, China, Japan, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Bahrain, etc… etc… AGAINST everybody?

This is so naïve as to be ridiculous. They are playing on the idea that American’s are united in idiocy.

Relying on immature data trails that actually make our own security look pathetic, a vendetta is authored. While no one in our esteemed cyber security can even trace Gucifer II, a lone wolf hacker who has even provided a general geography of where he is located, how in the world can we assess the sophistication of China and Russia?

While a number of cyber security companies have joined in the FBI ‘belief’, only one claims to have expertise in actually audit tracking the source, CrowdStrike. All the other companies mentioned simply provide ‘security’ meaning their platform is to prevent a breach and to mediate one if you have been attacked. Tracking the source is a completely different strategy and action.

Dmitri Alperovitch, a co-founder of Crowdstrike, is the only one to actually state he has evidence that the DNC hack originated in Russian intelligence. Interestingly, he was formerly the VP at McAfee.  In a recent interview with Larry King, John McAfee staters that the sophistication of hacking has evolved to the point that trails are impossible to follow and that anyone skillful enough to hack the DNC would be skillful enough to hide their tracks.

“If I was the Chinese and I wanted to make it look like the Russians did it, I would use Russian language within the code, I would use Russian techniques of breaking into the organization,” McAfee said, adding that, in the end, “there simply is no way to assign a source for any attack.”

So why would Crowdstrike blame Russia?

It should be noted that Crowdstrike ihad three funders:  1)   Warburg Pincus.  Tim Geithner, is president of  Warburg Pincus, former Secretary of Treasury under Obama, and formerly worked in the Clinton administration…  Uh-oh.   Warburg Pincus was a contributor to the DNC and Clinton campaign.   2)   Accel Partners is also a Crowdstrike funder.   According to the Clinton Foundation website,  Accel is a venture capitalist partner in the Endeavor Investor Network created by the Foundation. Uh-oh.   3)   And the last funder of Crowdstrike is Google Capital, now CapitalG, managed under David Drummond of Google who was instrumental in ‘realigning’ Google search engines to favor Hillary’s campaign.  Big uh-oh!

So what we actually have is the authority of one company, Crowdstrike, which derived all of its funding from venture capitalists linked to Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation. Funny, they didn’t hide their tracks very well for a high powered security breach company.

And the BEAT GOES ON!!