The Illusion of the Deep State Matrix: An Elite Parlor Game

Whether writing history or rewriting history, as we watch and listen to the perceptions being parlayed today and yesteryear the very truth of history begins to form a colossal doubt.

Our overly lauded science community residing in the House of WHO and CDC have long labeled every number – an estimate.   Yet, they present these guesstimates as fact.   Every statistic is created as a ‘best guess’ and always has been.   Census takers dating from 300 BC supposedly physically counted populations in the millions – which would have been physically impossible. But our history records it as so.

And the matrix opens to much more broader revelations as historians arbitrarily fill in blanks to ‘create’ a whole story.   Science creates entire dioramas of ancient life and with time, the verbiage is altered by one word – believe.

“Scientists ‘believe’ this is how the earth looked 1 million years ago.”

“Scientists ‘believe’ dinosaurs roamed the earth 450 million years ago.”

And suddenly with the elimination over time of this one word, Science and History evolve into an absolute instead of a philosophy of thought.

Much of our understanding of ancient history is attributed to accounts of storytelling attributable to a single person over a span of time which became the only written account.

Today there is no absolute count of the population of Africa.   There is no ability to determine the number of CoVid ‘cases or deaths’.   Yet the House of WHO will make a magical determination – and the non-critical thinkers will blindly accept.

The media created Bill Gates.   They have claimed he is brilliant, a scientist, a virologist, a philanthropist.   Yet, listening to countless speeches, ads, and videos, the man speaks on an 8th grade level.   Video’s from his testimony during the 1990’s reveals a man unable to comprehend simplistic questions.

The illusion – for critical thinkers – begins to fray.

Zuckerberg was brought before Harvard administrators for violating copyright and privacy security.   Meaning he hacked someone else’s work and claimed it was his construct.   Unlike 3 of the Facebook co-founders, Zuckerberg never graduated from college. When reviewing historical accounts of attribution of Facebook to Zuckerberg, the present written account has been altered to support Zuckerberg as the founder and his friends as joining him later. The original account did not make that representation.

Zuckerberg claims to be a co-founder of Breakthrough Starshot despite having no university degree, and no science background. In reality Starshot was founded by Steven Hawking and physicist Yuri Milner.   Zuckerberg apparently sits on the board.

And history is altered.

In testifying before congress in 2018, Zuckerberg used the magical word ‘believe’ to circumvent a question of breaching privacy.   He also stated that he and he alone created Facebook.

Is Zuckerberg a scientist or engineer?   No.   He did what Gates did, he capitalized on the knowledge of others much more capable and then eliminated them.   But the illusion remains that Zuckerberg has some indefinable Steven Hawking IQ.

Maxine Waters:   Her original biography has been extensively ‘rewritten’.   In 2005, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) declared Waters to be one the 13 most corrupt members of Congress.   Her original bio further states that she ‘attended’ LA State College and then between 1973 and 1990 – her bio was devoid of anything.

Her rewritten bio declares she received a Bachelors degree in Sociology before working as chief deputy for Councilman David Cunningham in 1973.  Subsequently,  she was elected to the California State Assembly in 1976.   Cunningham’s bio makes no mention of Maxine – and one would think that earlier bio’s would hail her election to State Assembly.

The altered version claims Waters represented California’s 48th District from 1976 to 1990, but the District wasn’t created until 1993 and is predominantly white Republican.

And the illusion is staged.  Albeit in this case rather messily.

Waters likely has no college degree, did not work for Councilman Cunningham, and was never an elected official of the California Assembly.

Ocasio Cortez:   Her bio states:  “In high school, she took part in the National Hispanic Institute‘s Lorenzo de Zavala (LDZ) Youth Legislative Session. She later became the LDZ Secretary of State while she attended Boston University. “

According to LDZ’s website – her school has never participated as a partner school and there is no secretary of state dedicated position. Nor is there any mention of her ‘involvement’ on their website.

A small planet/asteroid was awarded Ocasio in 2007 as a “finalist” in the Intel International Science and Engineering Fair. She claims she won second place.   According to the IAU, political leader’s names are considered ‘unsuitable’ unless the person has been dead for over 100 years. It appears that 2007 was the only year ALL finalists of that dedication were awarded.  Odd.

If her forte was science and engineering, why would she get “degrees” in ‘international relations and economics’?   She has tweeted that she started as a science major and subsequently switched – which would obviously mean she would need additional time to complete not just one degree, but two degrees as she claims.  Unless she was Steven Hawking.   In addition to the requirement in International Studies that the student study abroad, which she didn’t, a research paper is also required to be submitted to qualify as honors – none exists.

Ocasio claims she interned for Ted Kennedy while in college.  But Kennedy was rather busy having seizures, brain surgery, relocating to Florida, and dying during that same time.   Obviously the script writers were more than a bit negligent when creating Ocasio’s bio.

And then of course there is the oddity of her 7 years post 2 honorable degrees working as a bartender.

An illusion.

Obama refused to provide his Harvard or Columbia transcripts.   Were they an illusion as well?  Trudeau, Macron, their intellect seems devoid of – intellect.

Buying degrees, restating history, the world within the matrix of the liberal deep state leaves one in doubt of accepting any reality presented. But we know that the lies and deception are quite real as though this profound lack of truth is part of their training.   And little slips suddenly emerge as expansive canyons. The relevance is massively important given the extent to which truth can thus be obliterated.   And all of history, all of science, are suddenly falling off the precipice into the fiery pit of deception and illusion.

For all we know, our Congressional members and elites have little to no education, have rewritten their bio’s, and operate on completely faked, false and deceptive information.

What if Bill Gate’s IQ is actually 100?   And WHY would the shadows want such idiots in charge of wealth and power?

Pedophilia – A Catholic Church’s History

A continuous gnaw has wreaked havoc on my gut of late. It stems from the latest conviction of a Catholic Cardinal for pedophilia. When asked in closing what he would say in his defense, the Cardinal sent chills through the airwaves as he claimed that what he did was ‘vanilla sex’ and shouldn’t be condemned so harshly. The obvious rationale being that he knew of, and/or witnessed, far worse by his peers and thus his ‘vanilla’ wasn’t worth the persecution. The extent of that statement is the core of conspiracy theories because it is represented by a truth or truism that can easily spike perverse imagination of what might be entailed in the non-vanilla world of Priestly tradition.
How can a man of the cloth, a man who is a devout follower of God, logically justify pedophilia?

So I decided to research ancient history within this context:

Like Homosexual, the term Pedophilia was not coined until modern times. The term paedophilia was created in 1886 by Viennese psychiatrist, Richard von Krafft Ebing. The original term used in ancient Greece and Rome was pederasty.   Dating from sometime in the 9th century BC, it is thought that the practice was a cultural norm. It is believed that Saint Augustine, Muhammad, Socrates, Lord Byron, and Ghandi all participated in this form of relationship which was socially acceptable in the time.

While pederasty may have been the origin, it was very different from what has evolved into pedophilia. In ancient periods, all forms of sexuality were acceptable in that they were not considered criminal or deviant. The Old Testament references having multiple wives in order to “proliferate”.  Sexual relations with young boys was common, especially among the elite. The Roman era references the monarchial rule of Kings and Priests who were provided slaves with whom they could freely have relations. In the 3rd century, Mesopotamia, ritualistic homosexuality was an integral part of temple life.
The term homosexual was also created by Richard von Krafft Ebing in 1886. While in Latin ‘homo’ simply means man, as in homo sapiens, in Greek it can mean ‘same’. It should be noted that Ebing believed that sexual relations should be for one purpose only, procreation, and that all other forms of sexual relations were perverse, deviant.

Unfortunately, Ebing felt that ‘any’ relations that could produce a child were perhaps reproachable, but not deviant. Thus rape was not considered perverse.

It is likely that within the confines of the Catholic Church, the change in societal morays were never adopted, and thus it never qualified as deviant in this contingent. But then the Church has operated outside of the law since it’s inception as it still adheres to the belief and philosophy of serfdom.

Some pundits argue that pedophilia in the church is a minor fault within the scheme of statistics. Only a very small percentage of Catholic Priests and Bishops have been convicted. But that logic is rife with hypocrisy. Conviction rate is not a viable statistical assertion. A parallel assertion would be that the vast majority of thieves and murderers are prosecuted and in jail. The absurdity of that is obvious, and it applies to pedophiles, priests, and sexual assailants. The vast majority are never prosecuted.

Others argue that the Church’s Priests and Bishops entered into this pedophilia state of mind due to the clause of celibacy. But celibacy was not always a rule. The first Pope, Paul, was married. Many subsequent Popes were also married and had children. The Council of Elvira convened in 304 AD requiring abstinence even if the clergy was married. In 325, this ban was overturned by Constantine. Celibacy in the Catholic Church has only e less than a thousand years.

“In the early 11th century Pope Benedict VIII responded to the decline in priestly morality by issuing a rule prohibiting the children of priests from inheriting property.” In 1139 AD celibacy was made the rule of law within the Church.

But homosexuality and pederasty were not prohibited. While they both were well entrenched prior to the law of celibacy, the rule then became that the clergy were prohibited from procreating – not sexual relations.

Therefore, homosexuality and pedophilia can NOT be attributed to celibacy because they both existed well before and were considered an elite rite of passage.
Some historians claim that the law of celibacy was created to ‘lift’ the church into a higher status than even the nobles by claiming sex with women was sinful and beneath them.

In the Bible’s New Testament, Paul was writing letters to the Corinthians and Galatians between 53 AD and 55 AD, in which he was responding to a flagrant lack of ethics or morality within the culture. Prostitution was largess, bestiality existed, and orgies were commonplace. People were no longer ‘procreating’.

This was not nouveau, this was the lifestyle that had existed for hundreds of years prior, dating to the 9th century BC. It is also relevant to note that Paul wrote numerous letters to the Corinthians and Galatians, although only a limited few have been preserved and acknowledge by the Church.

While this research in no way supports pedophilia in the church, it does reveal that in their world, it is a code of ancient history that is righteous. It explains the statement “vanilla sex”. And it explains how and why the Church believes laws are a means of control for the elite, while they hold to the epithet that they are, above the law. They meaning – All those who define themselves as – elite.

While I in no way purport to hold myself out as a theologian to any extent, I was curious to try and understand and research how the highest members of the Church could justify their behavior.

IN particular:  What thought process could possibly justify the rape of a child as “vanilla sex”?