With the global flap in the wind Climate Change Fund errr, flapping, the EU has found a new and improved way to prop up their financing the redistribution of wealth agenda – “Colonialism Reparations”.
Another good reason for the UK BREXIT given they could be one of the biggest EU targets…
The gist of the bill is based on EU Afrophobic attacks. The term, Afrophobic, conjures up unjust prejudicial and racial ideologies in line with Islamaphobia. Except that Afrophobia is related to ‘anyone of African descent’. Each ‘national authority’ would thus be required to provide proper “education, housing, health, criminal justice, political participation and migration”.
The reasoning behind the gem of the bill is that the EU created colonialism and slavery throughout Africa and must be held accountable.
What this bill does not seem to address is the fact that hate crimes can occur against any race or culture including Jews, Whites, Christians, women, etc… Therefore, creating an African agenda is actually quite blatantly – racial and prejudicial.
What is the real purpose?
- It opens the door to possible reparations being made to African states in the form of monetary aid. Given the fall of funding for Climate Change that was being filtered to Africa, and the need for infrastructure to support the current colonialism land grabs, Africa has lost significant $$$$. As the cabal took control of large swathes of land in Africa for pennies per hector, pushing out the local farmers, they required infrastructure in order to market their new machinized farms. The Paris Accord Green Fund flapped, and money dried up. Thus, a new agenda needed to be created to address the cabal’s need to have funding provided by taxpayers instead of from their own wallets.
- It creates an even larger welfare budget within individual EU countries that would become the burden of viable taxpayers further spiraling the EU economy into oblivion.
- It demonizes nationals as being the aggressors and victimizes immigrants further suppressing the criminal activities that are decimating entire cities throughout Europe.
The EU Commission rarely operates on a level that is not embedded in an alternate agenda. And this instance is no different than any other. The media coverage is slim with respect to hate crimes perpetrated by immigrant Afrikaners. Most governments, specifically Germany’s, have adopted rules for quashing anything related to immigrant crimes. The police are forced to release perpetrators, and statistically, they are prohibited from making any arrest which could skew the crime rates.
According to Germany’s Deutsche Welle, there were 800 attacks on Muslims last year. By contrast, the first nine months of 2018 saw 1000 attacks on Jews. There are roughly 117,000 Jews in Germany, while there are roughly one million Afrikaners (statistics are not available because Germany does not believe in profiling – numbers are based on an estimate done in 2013 before the massive immigration).
Similarly, in France it is illegal to conduct a census that queries race or color, therefore a proper statistic that would qualify as either Islamaphobia or Afrophobic is completely and utterly impossible. Making the EU Commission’s bill nonsensical and without a shred of basis.
In addition, given Germany doesn’t profile, the number of attacks on Afrikaners could include black on black which would not be racial at all.
The agenda is obviously far from the purported EU Commission statement. But as we watch Merkel and the growing possibility of her early resignation, it will be interesting to see where she chooses to reside as her country falls…