Merkel: Failed Values Amidst a Purveyor of Fake News

After Merkel openly ushered in millions of immigrants between 2015 and 2017 at the behest of Soros, she is visibly backtracking.  Austria is urging border protections, Italy is shipping immigrants to Spain, and Merkel is mumbling that she needs to talk to Brussels before she is allowed to say anything, because, well, she doesn’t know what Soros wants anymore…

After the EU decried “FOUL” because Trump suggested that the US should no longer be responsible for Europe’s military, the EU Commission under Juncker’s instructions announced a European Defense Fund that would not protect anyone outside the EU.   Of course, the decision to create EDF was due to border threats. Apparently EDF financing will be progressive and use taxpayers as the basis for what would be a new tax…(I wonder if they know this yet)?. Juncker is demanding member states ante up 5.5 billion Euro per year after 2020, and 2.56 billion per year beginning err, last year, although no one has actually contributed anything – yet.

Germany’s foreign minister, Maas, has issued his counter measure to Trump’s America First by stating, Europe First!  Mentioning ‘values and interests’ as his platform is a bit mystifying given Germany is forced to admit that they will fail to meet the goals of the Paris Climate Accord by 2020. Oops.

Maas, who is head of Germanys Social Democratic Party, must also answer for his party’s decision to offer ‘feminist porn’ for free on public broadcasting stations throughout Germany as a means of equalizing divisive sexist pornography which is apparently a favorite pastime beginning at the age of 13.  This value comes on the heels of massive child sex trafficking allegations.

Merkel is arguing the Trudeau platform regarding trade with the US by complaining that although the US does have deficits in the trade of goods, it does not in the trade of services. Foremost, this does not even address ‘tariffs’, but secondly it fails to address the fact that trade in services generates tax revenue for the country that is receiving the service as well as jobs.

According to a document released by the European Parliament in 2015, trade in services is a very gray area given valuations are estimates, can vary widely by country in methodology of valuation, and are not a verifiable number.  In addition, ‘intellectual property’ is definitively a varying value that can be worth billions until it’s patent expires which in the pharma industry is roughly 7-10 years.   The vast majority of trade falls within what is called ‘category iii, or (c)’ referenced as:  “…a service provider of one party through a commercial presence in the territory of any other party”.  This means that a commercial establishment of the US would have created a facility in another country, such as a bank or a pharmaceutical company.  Such company would likely employ staff within the host country and generate taxable revenue.

The TISA agreement (Trade in Services Agreement) which is the basis of all Service Trade is ensnared in ‘secrecy’ which makes the rules and negotiations completely confidential and lacking in transparency.  Thus identifying the services and how they are valued is of little merit.

And lastly, Germany’s values have been purged again.  It has come to haunt Merkel that she has failed to address the ramifications of a German cult that was organized in Chile wherein children were kidnapped, enslaved, tortured, and sexually abused since – 1961.  Despite the Chilean government requesting Germany to resolve the ongoing problem and establish a fund for the survivors – Merkel has apparently failed to do anything at all although her government has promised, pinky swear, to develop a plan of action as of June 30th.

For Merkel to continually create an arrogant aura of superior values, superior knowledge, and a superior attitude with regard to all the above Germany First structures, in reality she embodies a truly abysmal failed Leadership built on fake censored media which is monitored and edited by Soros – DW.com.

G7 Summit Ruled by EU Commission

The G7 Summit is taking place in Quebec under the tutelage of Trudeau.   The purpose of the Summit is to talk about global topics chosen this year by Trudeau to include:  ocean pollution, trade tariffs, and climate change.  The Summit was originally created in 1973 by George Schulz.  It was to be attended by the finance ministers of four countries;  West Germany, UK, US and France.  It has historically evolved to include Canada, Italy, Japan, and Russia, although Russia was expelled in 2014.  

The President’s of these countries basically get together, have some food, meander around the property, and talk.  The only spouse to accompany her husband was Macron’s.  After two days, they go home and nothing changes.  From the perspective of a businessman, it is a huge waste of time.  From the perspective of the various politicians attending it gives them airtime. For Macron, it gives him hug time.

For example, in February 2009, the group of finance ministers met in Rome and pledged to take all necessary steps to stem the financial crisis.  That was the sum total of the meeting.  Seems to me a phone call could have accomplished that at a considerable fraction of the cost.

But it has become a media hype and everyone wears their Sunday best.  Furthering division, the summit conspicuously omits other global countries; Ireland, India, Scotland, The Netherlands, China, Russia, Spain, Portugal, Brazil, etc.., etc…  Instead it is more of a good ol’ boy platform wherein tradition is the only rationale.

The end result of this meeting seems to be that Trump and the EU will talk about trade in two weeks. Macron thinks the US should be expelled from future summits.  And as representative for ALL EU countries, Merkel stated that they all agree Russia should remain expelled.  I wonder if the ‘other countries’ were notified of their agreement before or after her statement?

Apparently, the new PM of Italy, Giuseppe Conte, stated that he felt Russia should be reinvited. However, the EU Council President, Donald Tusk, speaking on behalf of Conte said that Italy would toe the line and be a follower, not a leader.  I wonder if Conte is royally miffed!

Why would the EU Commissioner and EU Council President be at the G7?  They are not countries. 

In 1977, the UK PM, James Callahan, made the unilateral decision to henceforth include the EU Council and EU Commission as a part of the summit.  Supposedly, Juncker and Tusk are there as a united front to represent the remaining EU countries that are not invited.  Why?   Why not let sovereign nations speak for themselves?   Because in reality they are not sovereign, their voice is censored.

If the G7 Summit is really about the EU, and given Canada is a parcel of the Queen of England, why would the US or Russia have any desire to participate?  Both Tusk and Juncker are representatives of ‘open society’ and globalization.   They have collectively taken over the Summit which was originated in the US.

After losing a re-election bid in Poland, Tusk became the EU Council President.   He has since been openly accusatory that the current President of Poland and his conservative party are puppets of Putin.  In addition, he claims that the EU values are quite polar opposite from the values of Poland under conservatism and nationalism. In 2017, Juncker initiated an investigation into the President and his Party claiming ‘judicial independence concerns’.  

The bottom line is the fact that according to the EU any country that is not governed by a Socialist Party towing the line of the EU ‘values’, is operating under a fascist government and sanctions will be levied including being stripped of voting rights.

Hungary is also facing potential sanctions by the EU for their stance on conservatism.   Hungary has come under attack for expelling Soros and refusing to bow to the EU demands for African immigrant quotas.

Slovakia is facing condemnation for similar stances.

BREXIT is meaningless as long as Theresa May continues to be a pawn of MI6 and the Merkel.  What is more relevant is the growing number of countries that are standing up to the Royal Arm of the EU Commission and Council who tend to act much like the Wizard of Oz – behind a red curtain.

Which country in the EU will be next?