Environment

Biden’s Climate Change EO’s – Green Energy Another WWII Revenue Gouge!

Posted on by Helena

Biden has announced his first 10 Executive Orders once he is sitting in the White House.   They all revolve to some degree around Climate Change policies, although most are vague with wording that really is meaningless:   ensure, double down on, reduce, require and protect.   None actually present a definitive date, time, percentage, and the proverbial – where will the money come from determinations.   As such they seem more to placate the Greenies, than to actually administer a plan of action, although he pledges to appropriate $2 trillion for these costs.

Electric cars have definitely been making the rounds with the new and improved Boris Johnson proclaiming a green transformation for the UK by 2030.   No one really objects to reducing emissions, we just don’t like when mandates that we can’t afford empty our purses and wallets.  But what is Bojo really touting?

For example, a Sunday drive would have to be pre-planned to make sure your vehicle is charged which can take up to 12 hours.   No more, “Honey let’s go up to the mountains, what do you think…”   spur of the moment drives.   Intrastate travel will slow to a crawl as motorists are forced to stop every 200 miles for 8 hours of charging! That 13 hour drive from Denver to Phoenix will now take 36 hours.   And your vacation choice will be altered due to drive time.

But more importantly how can cities sustain the additional load on electrical grids?   California and New York typically have blackouts due to over use.   Imagine adding 15+ million additional vehicles to that grid?  Because California boasts the most vehicles in the nation.

Generally, blackouts are triggered during the summer months due to heightened use of air conditioners. But summer is also the time of heightened travel, summer vacations, road trips, weekend getaways, etc…

The ten largest utility companies in the US service 9 states including California and New York.   ALL are investor owned.   Do you really think those investors won’t hike rates to cover the increased usage for electric cars? Think again.

California has 24 separate utility companies including Pacific Gas and Electric which ranks in the top 10 by Revenue.   And it STILL had rolling blackouts this past summer.   Pacific Gas is also embroiled in lawsuits given the grid explodes every year causing massive wildfires!    In 2017 alone – 9 separate wildfires were attributed to PG&E.   It filed for bankruptcy in 2019 and was bailed out by Newsom in 2020.

Natural gas was the primary source to power PG&E.   It diversified in the 1990’s to the utilization of some hydroelectric usage, but droughts hampered the ability to produce power. And droughts are a mainstay of California.

PG&E’s renewable source for utility plants is estimated to be 32%.   That would include hydroelectric which consumes vast amounts of water – another huge depleted asset in the US.  That means 68% of power is generated thru fossil fuels.   HELLO!

Lets look at another top utility company and its profit margin.

Duke Energy services North Caroline, Tennessee and South Carolina.   Its revenues are upwards of $23billion annually, achieved thru ‘natural gas’ facilities and ‘water reactors’. The CEO, Lynn Good, rakes in annual compensation of more than $14 million per year and simultaneously sits on the Board of Boeing earning her additional income.   IN 2002, Duke was named the 46th largest polluter in the US.   Eighteen of its facilities are ‘coal fired’ and 23 are oil and gas fired.

But electric energy is – CLEAN.

Transitioning to Green energy is NOT viable. At least not given we haven’t developed a source that can generate the needs demanded of coal, oil and gas.   A nuclear plant requires years for approval and another 20 years to build.   Europe is shuttering their nuclear facilities.   The alternatives have yet to be scientifically developed.   Solar is solar specific and not captured.   Wind is a veritable disaster!   And water is more precious than GOLD!

Which is why the Flintstones cartoon makes headlines.

In an Amazon world – all employees would exist within a housing unit city for the purpose of doing Amazon work 13 hours per day and paying rent for the privilege to work in their city state.   Their life would revolve around one thing – work. Their existence would be determined by their work.   And their productivity would be monitored by their accomplishments for Amazon – as determined by Amazon police Karens.  And as mini-me robots, their utilization of energy would be reduced.

Such an existence would require – no cars, no travel, no vacations, no movement outside the complex.   That is the vision of Bezos.   Workers. Bees to the queen.   Nothing more.

The largest investor of Duke Energy that services the Carolina’s is CalPers – which is a subsidiary of California Government Operations Agency under the guidance of Governor Gavin Newsom.    Surprise.

IN February 2020, Gavin Newsom et al proposed a governmental takeover of PG&E.   And the MSM was wholly supportive…

Exelon would seem to top the charts in revenue for a ‘clean source’ with $40 billion annual revenues , $118 billion in assets, and a portfolio that includes Nuclear Power, fossil fuels, natural gas and Hydroelectric… blah-blah.

In other words – NONE of the electric producers in the US are anything but – consumers of nonrenewable plants – nor do they have any incentive to alter that diaspora.   Money is money – and they are making plenty as the incentive to use more via fake electrical greens escalates.  How much more they can make should conversion to electric energy vs gas stations is likely in the Trillions.

In the end – GREEN has absolutely Nothing to do with preserving the Planet or reducing emissions, or saving anything!   It has everything to do with a new source of revenue gouging by creating an overload and thus ramping up electricity costs 120-130% – or more….  Have fun!

It is no different than the WWII war effort wherein industries played their profits by supporting both sides and oil became the new gold.

Hedge your bets – buy electricity company stock – maybe then you can afford your monthly bill. They like to call it a Green Revolution – but in actually it is simply another Elite Gouge – for profit.

Environmental Pollution: A Catastrophe of Decades

Posted on by Helena

Where are all the charities tackling global pollution?   When I was growing up, pollution, the environment, and saving the whales were the calls to action!   Decades later, billions of dollars later, thousands upon thousands of charities later, what has been accomplished?

I recently saw a meme on Facebook that made a frivolous statement that going green, cleaning the environment, cutting carbon emissions, neutralizing our pollution would all be beneficial gains.   True.   Somewhat.   So what?   Rallies and protests, federal funds, grants, billions from concerned citizens, and what has happened?

According to the UN, land based agricultural run-off, discharge of nutrients and pesticides and untreated sewage including plastics account for approximately 80% of marine pollution, globally. Great!   Who is doing anything to mitigate this?

Apparently – no one – not any country on earth. Not the NGO’s, not Greenpeace or WWF, or any of the hundreds upon hundreds of NGO’s that have reaped billions on sympathy.

According to the UN, there are now close to 500 dead zones covering more than 245,000 km² globally, equivalent to the surface of the United Kingdom. Is that diminishing? Hardly.   China, Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam and the Philippines dump more plastic in our oceans than the rest of the world combined. Has that statistic changed? Yes. It has grown!

While the Greta’s of the world would demonize developed countries for their global warming footprint, what are they doing to alter the pollution that has grown unabated for a hundred years?   Global warming is simply the new – NEW.   It is a fashion statement.   And in a decade it will be replaced with another fashion statement in which charities demand more funding to alleviate another crisis that will never be dealt with because all the money goes to pay salaries and administrative expenses to demean The People.

If an NGO was truly about their cause, wouldn’t there have been a positive impact these last 50 years?   Has whaling decreased?   Are our oceans less polluted?   Does China have non-mask days?   Remember the Animas River in Colorado that was completely devastated due to negligence by the EPA?

Everyone is about the talk – but who is actually ‘acting’?

“Talk the talk, walk the walk”.

Europe and the western greens were aghast when President Trump pulled out of the Paris Climate Accord. “How dastardly!”   But what has the accord actually accomplished?   Have they altered the output of Germany’s pollution? No.   China’s? No. France?   UK?   Japan? What they have done is redirect funds to Africa which has -0- carbon footprint, for the purpose of constructing an infrastructure system that will help the transportation of palm oil – to Europe.   Ahhh!

And then, there is the factual calamity that many if most of those who scream the loudest are among the largess of polluters. Jane Fonda is notorious for her own carbon footprint while screaming, “it’s not my fault – they are guilting me!” So if it isn’t her fault – then whose fault is it?   Bill Gates?   Bloomberg?   Obama?   Buffett? Has Jane Fonda’s protests changed anything? Has she lowered her carbon footprint?   Or, is it the continuum of finger pointing?

The garbage that floats in island patches throughout our oceans has grown exponentially.   Teams of NGO’s have commissioned studies and research and evaluations for decades, spending billions to determine existence….   One such project included The Ocean Voyage Institute which claims it has removed 84,000 pounds of polymer nets and plastic trash.   One patch alone is estimated to contain 80,000 metric TONS – 1.8 trillion pieces.

Yet no one seems to acknowledge this travesty of growth that can be trajected to every single city, country, continent and government dating for at least 5-6 decades.

So.   To address the meme. Would a clean environment, wherein there were no polluter, no arsonists, no travesties, be better for our environment? The answer is a resounding – YES!   But the solution is pathetic.   It starts with you! Each individual! Including Jane Fonda.   It means no more pampers.   It means no more wipes.   It means no more water bottles.   It means no more electricity in ‘elite compounds’, it means shutting down office lights, it means no more superfluous air flights – say once a year…   It means eliminating yachts.   It means no glyphosate. It means organic farming. It means so much more than most are willing to actually – do. Oops.   It means planting trees, not having wood floors, it means no more paper, it means deescalating city growth which is a cement paradise.

You want to talk the talk? Then you need to walk the walk!

It isn’t about a President.   It is about – YOU!

Environmental Charities – Another Ponzi Scheme

Posted on by Helena

Once upon a time, environmental organizations were at the top of their game!   They made the news nearly daily with their accomplishments, advocacy, and rallied millions to their causes. What happened?

The Nature Conservancy is by far one of the wealthiest with over $7.4 billion in assets and $2 billion per year in gross revenues.   But where does the money go?   In 2017, $400 million went to salaries and benefits, while $64 million went to program grants around the world. That would equate to just 3.2% of gross revenue – and 7% of total expenditures.   Unfortunately, a detailed list of every NGO receiving grants is not available – apparently, their donor recipients want to remain anonymous. In a world of NGO’s it bears accountability. The balance of expenses was equally disconcerting:   “Other” ranked highest at $138 million, $87 million for office related expenses, $15 million for interest, $5 million for equipment, etc…

They have previously come under fire for making unsecured loans and buying and selling assets to employees, trustees, and related third parties.   But even that doesn’t tell the story.

The most recent award granted the Nature Conservancy was for it’s restructuring of Sychelles’ ‘sovereign debt’ in 2016. Debt, micro-finance?   What happened to the ‘environment’?

Some of their largest corporate benefactors include: Monsanto, BP, Cargill, Shell, Chevron, Conoco, Altria and Nestle.   Not exactly companies with environmental friendly business models…   But then, they have learned from the giants.   Another supporter is Jack Ma of Alibaba who stated that he would fund his foundation with .3% of the Alibaba net revenue for such causes as education, environment, and philanthropy. In the five years since he established the foundation, he has ‘pledged’ or distributed $300 million.   He is worth $48billion. That would reflect a contribution based on his net worth of .125% per year. To put that in perspective, for a person with a net worth of $500,000, that would represent a contribution of $625.

The Sierra Club is another former actionable environmental group that has succumbed to political agendas.   For them, it is support for the Socialists who vie for the Green New Deal.  

Greenpeace past president, Patrick Moore, has vocally outed Greenpeace for abandoning their true environmentalist actions while bowing to political agendas, fear mongering and propaganda.

World Wildlife Fund  is now mostly a micro-finance organization that does little to protect the environment.   Micro-lending in countries that have no usury, the interest rates are as high as 32%.   Hardly a charitable cause.

Most of WWF income comes from government grants.  Total revenue per their 2017 990 form tax return was roughly $300 million.   Despite being a non-profit, net profit for 2017 was over $37 million, salary costs were $92 million, office related expenses were roughly $46 million, and grants amounted to about $75 million of which $70 million funded grants outside the US to unnamed NGO’s. One of their primary partnerships is with Coca-Cola.

All these environmental organizations claim to be working toward one desirable goal; sustainable water.

All of the partners of these environmental organizations have one shared need for their business future – water.   All of these partners are guilty of depleting water reserves across the globe:

“Coca-Cola has been accused of dehydrating communities in its pursuit of water resources to feed its own plants, drying up farmers’ wells and destroying local agriculture. The company has also violated workers’ rights in countries such as Colombia, Turkey, Guatemala and Russia. Only through its multi-million dollar marketing campaigns can Coca-Cola sustain the clean image it craves.

The company admits that without water it would have no business at all. Coca-Cola’s operations rely on access to vast supplies of water, as it takes almost three litres of water to make one litre of Coca-Cola. In order to satisfy this need, Coca-Cola is increasingly taking over control of aquifers in communities around the world. These vast subterranean chambers hold water resources collected over many hundreds of years. As such they the represent the heritage of entire communities.

Coca-Cola’s operations have particularly been blamed for exacerbating water shortages in regions that suffer from a lack of water resources and rainfall. Nowhere has this been better documented than in India.”

The environmental organizations of lore have been hijacked and bear no resemblance to what their mission statement details or their ideology dictates. Instead they have become the progenitors of waste, subsidizing the depletion of valuable water resources across the globe, while pocketing huge sums of money that are labeled – nontaxable. As of 2015, there were 1.5 million nonprofits registered in the US, employing roughly 10% of US workers. There are roughly 160 Environmental nonprofits in the US.

We are supposed to be stewards of this planet.   Each individual is tasked with protection and balance.   But these organizations, many of which began with a grand ideology, have succumbed to the greed of businesses that are some of our greatest polluting threats.   Instead of helping, they are decimating.   Their integrity is non-existent.   And they fly under the flag of ‘nontaxable status’, paying exorbitant executive wages, while gifting often less than 3%.

It is a travesty.

World Wildlife Fund: Conservation Ponzi?

Posted on by Helena

Brazil’s president, Bolsonaro, has accused Leonarda Di Caprio of funding an NGO that is complicit in the Amazon fires as arson triggers the cycle need of financial aid.   While the media have widely tabled the allegation as unfounded, the root would seem to revert to the World Wildlife Fund. Mired in extensive allegations of corruption and fraud for over a decade at least, it bears further investigation.

While the World Wildlife Fund may have originally been created for idealistic purposes, it’s role in the environment has slowly evolved into a ‘finance mechanism of swaps and pillages as they sold out to such environmentally unfriendly organizations like – Monsanto.

A cursory list of donors includes; the MacArthur Foundation, Packard foundation, USAID, and Wildlife Conservation Society.   While their names may seem innocuous, their agenda is not. And Bolsonaro’s concerns may be quite valid.

The Packard Foundation is run by his granddaughter and her husband, Franklin Orr, who was Under Secretary For Science and Energy – under Obama.   Their organizations are clearly focused on – over-population, and how to reverse this evolution. Of course, select names on “The List” who are designated to survive would be a who’s who of the wealthy.

After all, there has to be a carrot.   What could make, lure, these people without ethic or morality toward a failed earth?

The notion that they will survive as some super human class.

So what happened to the largest environmental group in the world that caused it to be so mired in controversy?   The Panda.   It hardly represents any action within the organization, it’s focus having shifted from the actual hands-on to the financial reward, or gain that can be levied so easily under the guise of beneficial ownership. Corrupted.   It is like a virus that takes over the host soul and creates new gene cells.   It is nothing compared to what it once was.

I remember well when I was in my post Hippy coming of age era and I was introduced to Greenpeace.   I invited the gentleman into my house and he talked for hours.   And I was hooked.   I had no idea what he was revealing and having a heart I wear on my sleeve, I was completely drawn.

Decades later, WWF has accumulated a veritable laundry list of controversial infractions – all of which lead to one over-riding justification – money.   As such, this once ideological organization has evolved into a Lehman Brother’s subsidiary.   It is nothing more than a clearing house for – money.

And Bolsonaro’s claim begins to gain traction.

Because, you can’t finance a crisis if a crisis doesn’t exist.   So create the crisis so as to perpetuate the finances.   And this would seem to be the crux of Bolsonaro’s claim and the Ponzi scheme manifested by World Wildlife Fund.

Leonardo Di Caprio has no more interest in anything than his own gain however that might be attained.   Too often we forget. Hollywood is composed of actors, playing make believe, faking who they are, and convincing an audience they are real.   Most have little more than an 8th grade education. And yet, they are experts at everything because they played this part once – upon a time. And therefore, presume they are this person, this created persona, with full knowledge of what would be – their education.

It is fantasy.

I think we may soon discover that World Wild Life Fund and its players have indeed manipulated in the witch’s brew of population control, destructive micro-financing, sterilization, and deadly vaccines.

WWF website lists exactly four initiatives

All of which are based on a financial schematic, and have nothing to do with the initial focus of wildlife or even environment, instead it is a for profit, money making scheme that indebts whose who had nothing, with less than nothing, and bulges the pockets of ‘conservation’ organizations.

In Brazil, there are two companies that Bolsonaro mentioned when calling out Di Caprio;   Alter Do Chao and Forest Trends both of which are connected to WWF.

In Bolsonaro’s esteemed belief, these NGO’s are actually conspirators of Amazon arson for the purpose of creating a market for the financial initiatives offered by these WWF adjuncts, which include;   MacArthur Foundation, Packard Foundation, and USAID.

It is really no different than the belief that wars are literally created, and propagandized, by the media so as to line the pockets of a few. WWF is labeled the worlds largest conservation organization with consolidated assets over $500million and annual revenue for 2018 shy of $340million.   The executives are paid handsomely with the CEO, Carter Roberts, of the US entity reporting over $1.45 million in compensation. While they are incorporated in Delaware, the vast majority of their grant making is to foreign countries – all donation names have been ‘redacted’.

Like the racket that NGO’s and Foundations have become – their funding is a mass circle of Ponzi schematics whereby each Foundation donates to another so as to support excessive salaries and little actual philanthropy.

Like The Nature Conservancy where Carter Roberts previously was employed, the WWF Board is composed of a number of elite corporations that are quite removed from conservation and more inclined to making money, including the Leonardo Di Caprio Fouundation, Google, Goldman Sachs, Coca Cola, and individuals connected to petrochemical companies, mining companies, natural gas companies, and individuals currently or formally connected to the UN!

While there are likely a few people who actually are dedicated to climate change ideologies, the phrase has recently been hijacked – again.   It is now “Climate Justice” and includes reparations, and LGBT rights, and ‘legal rights’ for eco-systems.

One such organization has gained traction in the last year, Extinction Rebellion.   Their motto is ‘nonviolent civil rebellion’, which is rather an oxymoronic statement given that rebellion means ‘destruction’ and the creation of chaos.   While its members and advocates routinely cite the need for government intervention in our climate, they don’t actually exert any personal change in their own gad about town delusional activities.   Including the Hollywood elite who defend their excessive flying as necessary for their career – and their excessive use of electricity and other carbon footprint mechanisms.

While they may not effect any positive change, they do manage to make quite a bit of money – to support their own higher education in degrees like ‘effective radical campaigning’.

In alignment with Ocasio Cortez, unions, green anything, except vegetables, and socialist communism for all, these millennial’s have found a niche wherein they can radically up their monetary inflow all while spouting billionaires should be eliminated.

Of course, naked protests are always inserted in their agenda revealing narcissism at it highest altitude!

FYI:   At present;   “World Wildlife Fund is the subject of an investigation by The House Natural Resources Committee according to an article titled, “House Panel Investigates Whether U.S. Funds Anti-Poaching Efforts Linked To Rights Abuses.” 

Nature conservancy:   There have been allegations of The Nature Conservancy obtaining land and reselling it at a profit, sometimes to supporters,[47] who have then made use of it in ways which many perceived as being insufficiently environmentally friendly. The Nature Conservancy argues that the profit from such sales allows The Nature Conservancy to increase its preservation of what the Nature Conservancy claims are more important locations

IN addition there have been numerous sexual harassment charges brought against the Nature Conservancy.

Violence and Mental Health: A Cocktail of Chemicals

Posted on by Helena

Mental health is continually cited as a causal factor in gun violence, ‘it isn’t the gun, it is the person’.   But rarely do we take that statement and apply it globally to violence. A person that physically harms another by any means, in my opinion, is mentally ill, with few exceptions.

Recently, a home security video was circulating the internet depicting a woman screaming hysterically and banging on a door crying for help. She was located the next day inside the home of her boyfriend brutally beaten, her boyfriend was arrested and she was immediately taken to the hospital.

The actions of the man should be considered mental illness, just as the actions of a deranged mass gunman.

Another video was released today showing a Swedish woman at an Ocasio townhall calling for everyone to eat babies in order to reduce carbon emissions. While she is obviously mentally ill, she was told to sit down and at the end of the meeting likely went home.

Mental illness has been rising steadily, and while it is prevalent across the globe, it is measured in oblique terms by each country and the numbers do not represent the real problem when measured within the scope of violence.

Psychiatrists within mainstream outlets provide the same dreary analysis:   Mental illness can be caused by environmental factors, biological factors, and hereditary factors.

So why the increase?   What environmental factors should be avoided?

We have become a planet of toxins.   Both heavy metal and man-made chemicals disrupt brain development and hormones.   The cocktail has become so pervasive it is difficult to near impossible to avoid completely but knowledge can help mitigate:

1) Lead from old water pipes leaching into drinking water causes irreversible brain damage, a lowered IQ, brain volume loss, disrupted motor development and function, and the inability to achieve academically.

Although lead pipes were slowly discontinued since the 1950’s, any home, apartment, school, or office built before 1950 is likely to have lead piping.   Flint Michigan was only the tipping point, the US has 6.1 million lead service lines connecting water supplies.   The heaviest concentrations are in the north eastern and north central regions, Texas and Florida. States are doing absolutely – nothing to resolve the problem given that replacement is estimated to cost $1 trillion.

24 million homes across the US still have lead based paint.

2)   Copper is an essential mineral that we obtain through shellfish, grains, nuts, beans and potatoes. But copper pipes leach just like lead pipes.   Copper produces dopamine which is essential in providing us with alertness and reward based motivation. But too much dopamine can lead to ADHD symptoms; hyperactivity, aggressiveness, irritability, impulsivity, and agitation.   In our pharma culture ADHD is treated with stimulants which do not work when levels of copper are too high and instead increase the ADHD symptoms.

In addition, excess copper blocks the production of serotonin, the necessary natural chemical that creates mood balancing in humans. A lack of serotonin causes; emotional, mental, and behavioral problems, depression, anxiety, psychosis and paranoia.

3)   Phosphorous is the second most abundant chemical in the body. It is essential for our bone health. It is found in protein rich foods and a deficiency is rare.   But, our bodies are finely tuned and balance is the scale that defines. Too much phosphorus interferes with our absorption of other minerals, such as calcium and magnesium.   Phosphates in processed foods and soda are the largest contributors to an over abundance of phosphorus.   Phosphates have been shown to trigger ADHD symptoms.

4)   Many plastic products contain hormone disrupting chemicals, such as BPA and phthalates which enter the body and disrupt brain function and our nervous system.   Phthalates are classified as a human carcinogen and are associated with childhood behavior problems and executive functioning problems (ADHD).   These products have been found to leach from medical devices and pronounced levels were determined to be higher in children who were in intensive care facilities. Levels were shown to be sustained four years later.

BPA levels are monitored in urine. Children with higher levels of BPA are said to be 5 times more likely to be diagnosed with ADHD.   There is a significant positive association between pregnant women with high levels of BPA and boys showing behavior problems, depression, somatic behaviors, and defiant oppositional behavior. It is believed that the BPA in pregnancy altered thyroid function which is critical to brain development.

5)   Insecticides have been shown to destroy an enzyme that controls attention, learning and short term memory. There are 40 different types of insecticides used throughout the US – including on school grounds.

In 2016, Hillary Clinton vowed that when she was elected president she would overhaul the US mental health system to increase providers and provide more medication.   In other words, her solution had nothing to do with the ‘cause’ and everything to do with hyping Big Pharma.  It wasn’t about curing – it was about profiting.

Knowledge is power.   Each of these causal factors are detailed in their singular effect, the cocktail effect can be devastating!   While we can likely not prevent the absorption of all these chemicals, we can limit the deficiencies and abundances through careful choices. Some are preventable.   Healthy detoxification can include simple choices including drinking green, dandelion and black tea, eliminating processed foods, using toxic friendly household cleaners, no plastic, no Teflon, filtered water, no soda, etc…

Greta Thunberg: A Ponzi SchemeWith Bill Gates and Soros at the Helm

Posted on by Helena

Ever wonder how much a chartered sailboat with 10 crew crossing the Atlantic might cost? Not to mention the cost of airfare to send the crew home and the cost of airfare and time to return the sailboat to it’s port in Europe?   Likely upwards of $150,000 or more. But hey, Greta Thunberg saved one carbon footprint while creating 30 more…

So where did this humble child get the money? How much is her entire campaign costing?   Who is behind angry, angry Greta?

The list is not new, what is new is that in this instance they are ALL together: Bill and Melinda Gates, Open Society, Apple, Starbucks, Coca-cola, Google, Facebook, Buffett, Bono, Business Roundtable, Bloomberg, Caterpillar Foundation, former PM David Cameron, former Secretary of Treasury Lawrence Summers, Bobby Shriver, Twitter, HBO, Verizon, YouTube, Rolling Stone, Merck etc… etc… etc…

Two companies rule: ONE.org, and RED.org. They are interconnected with RED being purchased by ONE.

RED claims they have saved 32 million lives since their founding in 2002, in particular thru Malaria, AIDS and TB – education.

But according to graphs provided by WHO; TB and Malaria cases are lower, but not since 2002, for TB the downward trend began in 1992, for malaria it began in 2000 – and for both the rates have remained relatively stable since then.   AIDS has continued to rise.

The organization ONE claims to be about ending poverty and disease by 2030. The magic year that all politicians proclaim.

RED is all about selling a product through intermediaries while claiming the dollars are fighting disease. GAP, Vanity Fair, The Independent, etc… sell RED products and retain their profit margin. For example a straight donation of $100 to the RED cause might result in about $18 spent for charity.   Corporations make money, shareholders make money all while deducting their charitable gift.   All the while utilizing hundreds of thousands of youth volunteers.

It’s a Hustle of enormous proportions.  And it is all about molding and manipulating the most pliable, uneducated, and naive minds – YOUTH.

And little Greta is a pawn of ONE – albeit a highly paid pawn.

In essence, ONE is a lobbyist group ‘campaigning in the US, Canada, Europe, pounding for media representation, to fight poverty, income inequality and disease.   Nowhere in their form 990 or on their website do they make any claim regarding climate change despite being heavily invested.

According to their Form 990 for 2016, the latest available, their revenue tanked to a mere $16 million from the previous year of over $50million. Their expenses were roughly $36 million of which $6 million was spent on grants and the remainder or 83% was spent on salaries, new construction and design, and overhead. Of the $6 million in grants, $3.5 million of the total grants were made to an ‘affiliate’ of ONE. The remaining amount of the $6.1 million grants was made to their own ‘action lobbying group’, ONE Action in the amount of $2.1 million.   Their fundraising activity lists expenses of nearly $200,000 with $-0- gross receipts, including fees to the LA Entertainment Industry.

In other words, ONE makes no charitable gifts per se to nonaffiliated entities, spends roughly $36 million on expenses including compensation and consulting fees, and supports the cost of manufacturing RED products to be sold at profit by their member companies, such as GAP, Starbucks, etc…, while generating charitable deductions for their partners and paying no taxes.

That’s quite a Ponzi scheme.   All under the guise of helping to eradicate AIDS, Malaria and TB.

The charitable money raised by RED is supposed to be given to the Global Fund, a nonprofit founded with seed money from Bill and Melinda Gates!   Since it’s inception in 2002, the US (the funds largest contributor by far) has given the Global Fund roughly $15 billion out of a total of $46 billion – 32%.   Most of the US contribution came with the approval of Bush and Obama.  Of the total global contribution for 2018 – $6.1 billion, RED contributed $32 million or .5%. The RED contribution is not from the company itself – instead, the corporations who sell RED products contribute 50% of their “Net Profits” from the sale of the products, according to ONE’s website.

What would Greta’s role in all this comprise? Sympathy funding.   ONE’s revenue is covering less than half their expenses. They need new partners and have launched outside their stated IRS and Corporate realm of activity to capitalize on the climate change cult bonanza.

This is who Greta works for.  Everything about her is a ‘creation’, from her appearance, to her script, to her agenda, to her media representation, to her funding.   She is less than a puppet, she is a toy.

Holding her hand is Luisa Newbauer who is the Youth Ambassador for ONE and a member of the Green Party in Germany. It is believed she was first introduced to the clan by Al Gore.  Subsequent to Greta’s rise, her mother received a book deal – it would appear – in exchange for her child.

This is not about climate change, it is not about AIDS, it is not about curing anything, it is about creating wealth pockets, using foundation and NGO tax havens to scheme and skim $$$$$, and promoting an agenda that is no longer simply socialism, it truly has as its end game – Communism.

And we need to stop ALL FUNDING from taxpayer pockets.

Global Climate Strikes: The New Cult

Posted on by Helena

The Climate Debate seems to consist largely of Chicken Little arguments made by non-scientists, and sometimes by – children, aka Greta.   Case in point. An article in The Guardian, written by an unnamed source, makes some rather heated statements as fact that are completely fictitious and unscientific.  

But then it is the journalistic trend to create fabricated information:

The Guardian Chicken Little opening statement: “The level of CO2 has been rising since the industrial revolution and is now at its highest for about 4 million years.”

If Co2 levels have been steadily rising for 4 million years, it sort of eradicates the belief that the rise is man-made. But even more interesting is the relationship of Co2 to temperature because we have been in a cooling trend for about 10,000 years while the CO2 levels have been steadily rising. That’s not how it is supposed to work.

We also know that over the last 4 million years the earth has experienced various ice ages – meaning the correlation between CO2 and temperature is not a parallel science. Historical levels of CO2 are calculated by measuring Ice cores.   While ice cores hold information, the information is predicated on a particular latitude and is not representative of the entire earth. In fact, scientists have found that climate change in the northern hemisphere is quite different from the southern hemisphere.   So averages are a misnomer.

El Nino and La Nina have only been charted for the last 60 years. The climate has only been charted since the mid 1800’s.   Hurricane activity has been charted since 1851 – That’s a mere 168 years in the span of millions!

All other historical data has been theorized. Which is why scientists cannot agree – they each have their ‘theory’. We cannot possibly ‘know with certainty’ what happened 4 million years ago any more than we can 10,000 years ago.   But it makes for good Chicken Little journalism to – pretend.

For example, here is another ‘theory’:   “…recent research has shown that the solar wind, driven by solar eruptions (flares and coronal mass ejections) and plasma flux emanating from coronal holes, has a stronger impact on climate phenomena either directly or by modulating galactic cosmic rays.” 

According to another scientist, Javier, the earth’s obliquity and solar insulation angles are the main drivers of climate which is why changes have been manifested for millions of years without human interaction. In fact, according to Javier, the earth has been experiencing a cooling trend since 8000 BCE, and these trends typically manifest over a 41,000 year cycle.

If anything, that would mean that if human mismanagement is causing warming, then we are actually postponing the next ice age!

Guardian statement #2: “As a result of global warming and rising sea levels, 1 in 5 people in the world will eventually see their cities submerged.”

Over the last 200 years, sea levels have risen about 16 centimeters (roughly 6 inches). But historical time frames can be misleading.   If you view decades, centuries, or even a thousand years, the reference does not equate.   For example, many scientists argue that the change in climate over the past 100 years is ‘more rapid’ than historical data and therefore is man-made. They support this argument with a graph indicating various changes over the last century.   The statement; “global climate change is happening faster now than in any other point of modern civilization”.

  1. When did modern civilization begin?

Apparently, there isn’t a clear definition or time capsule that can be attributed to modern civilization.   Some reference 3200 BC, others reference the 19th century. But its definition is important because it is used to create a scientific statement that is relevant to climate change. Yet it is fraught with vagueness.

Recent, modern history is packed with droughts, mini-ice ages, and societies that fled their conditions; the Mayans, Easter Islanders, Sumerians, Vikings, etc.. What did they do? They fled. They went to higher ground. They moved. Today, we stubbornly remain in areas that are no longer suitable and whine. It all comes down to trying to fit a square peg in a circular hole.

According to recent ice core data corroborated as of 2012;  “During all episodes of major global ice loss, sea level rise has reached rates of at least 1.2 metres per century (equivalent to 12 mm per year). This is 4 times the current rate of sea level rise.”

Since 1870 polar warming has caused a steady rise in sea levels as ice melts and the warmer seas expand.

The rise and fall of sea levels has been scientifically deemed to be a direct response to the earth’s orbit. The warming trend is believed to have come to an end 10,000 years ago or 8000BC. While graphics provide slightly different +/- in terms of 1000-2000 years, even if we look at a graphic provided by NASA and NOAA the last ice age ended 16,000 years ago and the increase in global temperature rose from 42 to 58 within 2000 years before leveling somewhat and rising to 61 3000 years ago and sits now at 60.   Well before the Industrial Revolution!

http://www.internetlooks.com/globaltemperaturedegflast25000yr.jpg

In the end maybe Greta would be better served getting an education, gaining real knowledge, researching supportive data, and serving where pollution is greatest – China.

Google, Hollywood, and High School Dropouts Descend on Italy to Solve Climate Change…

Posted on by Helena

The UK’s Independent media is highlighting a story on Honduras. The point of the story is a lament because all the able bodied men have left the country while women, young children, and old men are all that are left to manage the towns and eek a living.   They discuss how the migration has increased dramatically over the last two years and the impact this has left as entire townships are deserted unable to survive.

Of course, these statements would verify all things Trump.

The vast majority of migrants storming the US border are men, not the poor women and children that the media would like us to believe.   Villages without men will ultimately die.   The reasoning given for the mass exodus? Climate Change. Of course.

The added spice? It’s all Trump’s fault. Of course.

But Honduras’ ails have been on-going for decades and can be attributed to an arena of causal factors:

Honduras has been a tourist destination for decades despite the rise in crime and internal poverty.   With some of the world’s best beaches, fabulous snorkeling, rain forests, a barrier reef, Mayan ruins, and flora, it has been a tourist haven for Canadians, Mexicans, Americans, and Europeans.  However, as the gang warfare escalated, eliminating those elements became a challenge.

Although Honduras has abundant natural resources including; minerals, coffee, tropical fruit, sugar cane and textiles, those industries were not properly managed by the government resulting in land degradation, soil erosion, deforestation, loss of rain forests, and mining that has resulted in heavy metal pollution in freshwater and rivers.

Giving the government more money, handing out free meals, and aiding and abetting the constant flow of immigration of the working age male population to the US will NOT solve their vast problems. Nor will blaming Climate Change, ICE, or Trump eradicate the devastation.

Nor will talking about it endlessly.

And yet, Google is hosting a Climate Event in Sicily wherein hundreds of private jets, exquisite yachts and helicopters transport the pretty people, many of whom are endowed with the intellectual education of their GED, to solve the global Climate Change agenda. While Google reports the camp is to be a “meeting of the minds” between technology giants, powerful business owners, and others who are known to be global thought leaders, one conspicuous absence would be, Jeffrey Epstein.  He was typically the party favor man providing the entertainment…

In essence, the ‘camp’ would seem to be nothing more than a frivolous Hollywood tete a tete to see who can look the prettiest.

The who’s-who list of billionaires attending the posh event at an opulent hotel include; Obama, Prince Harry, Katy Perry, Zuckerberg, Bradley Cooper, Tom Cruise, etc…etc…etc.. ad nauseum.  Oddly, the list would seem vacuous with regard to actual scientific brainiacs.

Literally, none of these attendees have any scientific knowledge, bioscience knowledge, or any education whatsoever in a field remotely connected with Climate Shifts. But they do share a common Liberal hatred of all things Trump and the Trump Effect in the US, UK, Italy, Hungary, Czech Republic, and Austria.

Of course, the sheer magnitude of all these highly notable GED billionaires requires massive security likely equipped with Glocks, SIG Sauers, P90 Submachine guns, Remingtons, etc… to protect their prettiness while spewing kilo’s of carbon footprints.

I’m sure we will also be privy to their assorted designer cloches, Milan shoes, and champagne, caviar and lobster tastebuds. The cost?   Likely could support every Honduran citizen for the next five years.

Some ‘scientists’ estimate that 100,000 kilograms of CO2 will be vaped into the air and atmosphere as a result of this singular meeting.

I imagine Honduras will be on the list of topics given that a reinstatement of its pristine vacationland could be fast tracked as the pouring of male gang members equipped with debit cards, cell phones, new clothing, and cash, hijack US borders, leaving the women and children to work the resorts.

It is estimated that over a million Hondurans live in the US. Unfortunately, it is an estimate because most of them are without Visa’s living in the US illegally.   While no one denies the poverty and crime in Honduras, the solutions should never include leaving your wife and children to save yourself.  Imagine if these same million strong able bodied men sought to instead reconstruct their country?

What a novel idea.

Syria is an interesting example of such nationalism as they rebuild with fierce conviction and amazing craftsmanship from nothing but rubble.  And while many hundreds of thousands of Syrians have requested to return to their country from Germany, Merkel has denied that levy, because, well, that would devastate her agenda  of destroying Germany before she resigns and moves to – Honduras…

Pesticide Peril – not for the faint of heart

Posted on by Helena

Germany’s flagship company, Bayer, is facing 18,400 lawsuits, predominantly from California whereby their subsidiary, Monsanto, has been cited for its toxic, cancer causing pesticide, glyphosate.   Bayer bought Monsanto for $63 billion one year ago and today Bayer’s total market value is less than what it paid for just Monsanto with it’s stock plummeting 50%. While Bayer claims that there is absolutely nothing wrong with the chemical, they are fast-tracking an alternative.

There are 26 countries that ban or restrict the use of Monsanto products including: Germany, China, India, France, Hungary, Austria, Australia, Switzerland, Italy, Poland, Luxembourg and Mexico.   The four largest pesticide companies in the world are: Syngenta, owned by China – the world leader of agro-chemicals, Bayer, headquartered in Germany, DOW, headquartered in Michigan, and BASF, also headquartered in Germany  (they purchased Monsanto’s seed division).

In the US alone 851 million pounds of pesticides are used annually.   90% of private wells sourced by groundwater contain pesticides. The contamination results in 14 million fish deaths, 67 million bird deaths and 20,000 new cancer patients each year.

The most prolific user of pesticides is China at 4 trillion pounds per year. Obviously their ban of Monsanto is purely a business decision and not an environmental one.

The top consumers in order of pounds: China, US, Argentina, Thailand, Brazil, Italy, France, Canada, Japan, and India.   The impact on the smaller countries is significantly more hazardous given the concentration levels.

Glyphosate is not the only banned chemical that is showing up in our food chain, paraquat and chlorpyrifos which are banned in the EU are a common supplement to Brazils exports including wheat, soy, cotton, dairy products, coffee, tea, eggs and beef. YUM!  But chlorpyrifo’s are the brainchild of DOW and used for insect control on citrus fruits, wheat, corn, cotton, soybeans and sugar beets in the US.   They are NOT banned in the US despite serious potential side effects including:  vomiting, stomach cramps, muscle twitching, tremors, weakness, loss of coordination, unconsciousness, loss of bladder control, convulsions, difficulty breathing, paralysis and of course – death.

Farmers have lobbied for the continued use claiming they stand to lose up to 70% of their crop if insects are not controlled – and there is no alternative product. But, while they claim there is no alternative, that would be a false argument given that organic farming utilizes just that – alternatives.   It is not that their are no alternatives, it is that the alternatives make them non-competitive in the mass market.

Sometimes alternatives may be a predator insect, as in butterflies eat aphids, but as we are well aware, the cost of alternative farming exceeds the mass market and the competition for the general public.

Notable elite such as Bill Gates et all, Buffet, Zuckerberg, those with the means, negate anything mass produced and eat only organic.   While they advocate the use of chemical laden foods for feeding the world, they are wholly repugnant at the thought of consuming such for themselves or their families.

Starbucks coffee is imported from Brazil and Columbia. The term Arabica on the package refers to a type of plant, not a place.  So when you are choking down that latte, or espresso, or French Roast, know that you are drinking a hefty dose of yummy pesticides aka Latin America.  Brazil is known to have the highest per capita consumption of pesticides.

According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer, glyphosate causes cancer, most notably Hodgkins. Nerve damage is the other leading medical ailment associated with the chemical.

A California couple’s settlement award for glyphosate poisoning which was initially $2 billion was recently reduced to $87 million.   Still, given 18,400 separate lawsuits at an award rate of $80 million, that would amount to nearly $1.5 trillion.   At present, Bayer’s annual net is roughly $400 million, so that would wipe out all profits for about 4 years.

Agro companies, pharma companies, they have an agenda.   And it isn’t – health.  Let the buyer beware.  But let the buyer also be informed.

CLIMATE Change: The Crystal Ball Theory

Posted on by Helena

As Climate Changes, the media is all a frenzy with more dire predictions, more exhaustive data, and little scientific truth.

I am always thrilled to discover that climate science is reportedly a 50-50 chance crystal ball venue.   If climatologists can’t accurately predict the weather within fifteen minutes of its event, how can we really accept that they know exactly what happened six hundred billion years ago and 1000 years into the future?

The answer is in the word ‘science’ which until recent history was defined as a philosophy, a ‘prediction’.

When the data was disproven over and over again, global warming morphed into ‘Climate Change’. And no one missed a beat. Except for the fact that climate does change, and likely has since the existence of earth, so making the shift opened a truism, but not necessarily one that supported doomsday.

So what’s the real beef?   Why the paranoia alarms?

It’s complicated.

Like most wars, climate change created a mass chaotic frenzy that resulted in a select group of elite benefactors making beaucoup dollero on the heels of fear.   When a war is over, history typically reveals the ridiculous reasoning for instigating the war in the first place.   WWI some stupid ArchDuke guy was assassinated – and thus 100 million + people had to pay with their lives.   But within that catastrophic event billions were made.   When there isn’t a good war, invent a catastrophe: hence Global Warming aka Climate Change.

After WWII, there was the Korean War, Vietnam War, and then when that was tabled, we were catapulted into the Chicken Little Science of the coming ‘Ice-Age’! It made for massive paranoia, and mucho dollero before fizzling and being shelved in the library of science stupidity and oops factor. Never mind.

In a world replete in fake wars, fake catastrophes, fake news, fake media, and fake religion, one would think that we would become immune and realize the one absolute question:   who is making money off the fakery?

In 1977 Time Magazine published a cover piece titled, “How To Survive The Coming Ice-Age.” It offered 51 things one can do to make a difference. And while the media is desperately attempting to justify the trend, the article, the chaotic fear that was instigated, they refuse to take responsibility for – lying. Instead, they are today busily trying to defend these doomsday scenarios as simply a media creation.

Huh?   The media fabricated a story without Scientific justification? How dastardly!

There was the nuclear war scare in the 1960’s wherein children were instructed to hide under their desks so as to circumvent the effects of the imminent nuclear bomb… And we all diligently went thru the drills believing that hiding under a desk would save us from death.

Each generation creates a ‘boogey-man’.

But the impact, the force, the deliberation and contempt exuded by our media for The People continues to be the real ‘boogey man’.   And likely, history will attempt to justify the current obsession with “Climate Change”.

Yes. Climate Changes.   In fact, graphs created by these same scientific onions graph climate for billions of years based on – gasp – tree rings, and then spew it as a truism. Really, that’s all you’ve been able to utilize for your pseudo science theory?

Why do they create a boogey-man at all?

Simplistically it reverts to basic psychology; united we stand, divided we fall. If they can create a united demon, they can control the meme.   Of course, this can be done by both good guys and bad guys and therein lies the fix.   Who to believe?

The media altered the landscape when it became the most corrupt of outlets that we could possibly imagine. The propaganda and psychological ploy was honed.   And a vast portion of society willingly jumped aboard the bandwagon.

Hollywood became enamored with this political power given they had already usurped the moral and ethical power over their subjects. And besides, there was money to be made on the sidelines as one jettisoned about creating a massive global ‘footprint’.

But it does get a bit more complicated.

Most of the world’s greatest country’s have implemented their own version of climate manipulation for decades. Fundamentally altering the natural course of nature, we have inadvertently created a monster – a Frankenstein. In order to deflect that oops factor, Global Warming frenzy was the best means of the Porky Pig routine, “bede, bede, bede”.   Shift the blame, make money on the shift, and by the time society figures it out, I’ll be dead.   Whew!

Even as I write this, the weather forecast for my town has changed five times – for today.   SO much for science. I suggest they need to dust their crystal balls and ask the birds.