Migrant Birthright?

Trump wants to overturn the automatic, unconditional birthright status that the US has offered to illegal immigrants in the past.  And of course the media is all a frenzied because, well, that’s what the media does any more – they get angry. 

So, a bit of common denominator sense:

Countries that have no such unconditional status include: China, Japan, Europe, Africa (with one exception), Middle East, Russia, Australia, New Zealand, Pakistan, India, Columbia, Malaysia, Chile, Peru, and Greenland.   In other words – most of the world, with the exception of Canada and the US.

Why?

Maybe because they are ‘nationalist’ and believe that citizenship is not an entitlement, but something earned because of your desire to work and support your newly adopted country.  Maybe because they believe that the hard earned benefits that working citizens reap should not be shared with those who hate the country and have no desire to work or support its laws.  Or maybe it’s because the country has no desire to support passels of illegal children who don’t even attempt to gain rightful immigration status.

It is always odd when Human Rights are applied in a fashion that is hypocritical at best, and destructive at worst.  In fact Europe and Australia have some of the most stringent laws in place regarding gaining citizenship.  No one complains.

So Deutsche Weil took it upon itself to chastise Trump’s stance on unconditional birthright status by highlighting ‘all the other countries’ which mimic the US, including:  Honduras, Ecquador, Guatemala, Venezuela, Brazil, Mexico and Canada.  In other words, all of North America and partial countries within South America adhere to similar unconditional status.    Germany’s law states that the birthright of children of illegal aliens is only granted when the unlawful aliens apply for naturalization.

Why is the wolf lecturing the Eagle?  Because it furthers an agenda of polarizing a viewpoint without explaining or analyzing the data and facts.

The 14thAmendment to our Constitution references naturalization and legal immigrants who have a permanent residence in the US and are thus subject to US jurisdiction.  An illegal by definition of being illegal is not subject to our jurisdiction – which is why we ‘deport them’ instead of putting them in jail for their crimes!

As Germany tries to tout the benefits of immigration they site ‘a study’ which indicates that “migrants from within the EU have contributed to Germany’s economic growth”.  A.   the migrants they reference are European, and B.  they claim that all the migrants in this study emigrated when they were young, highly trained, well educated and looking for jobs, and C. their contribution to GDP growth was estimated at .2% per year.

We can imagine if these were well educated, highly skilled laborers, and the entire estimated contribution was .2% – what does an uneducated, unskilled migrant contribute? COST.

The study was relatively small covering a period from 2011 thru 2014.

Skilled craftsmen make up 1/8 of all of Germany’s jobs, and there is currently a tremendous shortage of workers, and a 40% drop in those wanting to train, hence Germany’s Merkel thought to fill the void with immigrants from Eritrea, Somalia, Syria, Afghanistan, and Sudan.   Bring in millions and hope they can learn German and a skilled trade without bombing, looting and raping, was the plan.   Except that training takes 3 – 3 ½ years, and completion of an exam – in German.

So now, if you need a plumber, the wait time is roughly 3 months…

Part of the problem when trying to assess the percentage of immigrants who have found employment, is that statistics provided by Germany include EU migrants who are highly skilled.  So the statistic is relatively worthless.

Making the matter more complicated is the fact that a part of the Syria brokering deal was that all refugees be returned to their country.  Thus the pool is reduced.

So Germany instituted a plan to train those who already had command of the language and threw over $300 million toward helping refugees obtain jobs with a projected 100,000 employed.  Merkel recently nixed the project after less than 25,000 gained employment.

How many refugees are in Germany?

No one really knows because they aren’t calculated until they are processed and the backlog for processing can be years.  In addition, migrants that are illegal aren’t tallied.  A fair guestimate would be about 2.5 million, with Germany hailing the success rate of 25,000 employed – 1%.

And the cost?

By 2020, the annual cost is projected to be over $20 billion, which is most likely rather low.  Maybe if they spent that money encouraging Germans to procreate again they wouldn’t have to give away Germany just as Sweden has given away it’s country, Norway has given away its country…

Birthright means someone who ‘wants’ to be in this country, who would defend this country, who values the freedoms this country provides, and someone who does not leach off benefits.  If someone is born in this country to illegal parents, they can attempt to gain naturalization – if they wanted to.

But like everything else, the caravan is supposed to take our attention away from the voter fraud that is hailed by the democrats who liberally give illegals identities so they can vote illegally and usher in more Democrats who have no intention of giving them status or jobs unless they need someone to take care of their children… but even then, they prefer nanny’s from Sweden…

If there was a door to door solicitation for money to pay for all the illegals in the US, for managing the caravans, for replacing facilities that they burn down and destroy, how much would the Democrats raise?  What if instead of raking in donations for Hillary – or her Party of Progressives – the entire funds were given back to the US government to pay for the illegal immigrants that the Liberals defend?

In essence it would reduce our taxes – a tax rebate in the making!  Clinton alone raised $1.2 billion…

Illegal Immigrant Crisis – Global Chaos

Dutch authorities have admitted massive fraud in the refugee benefit program wherein Turkish citizens with homes in Turkey are using fake ID’s to claim benefits in The Netherlands and Germany.  According to Dutch authorities upwards of 17million Euros have vanished and perhaps as many as 12,000 Turks and migrants are capitalizing on the fraudulent scam.  

In fact, the Turkish town of Rashdiye is home to 700 Turks, all of whom claim and are supported by German welfare.   This is their ‘wage’, it provides for all their needs including a home, food, and even televisions.  According to one such resident, his children work and own multiple hotels, but this is free money.  German authorities are aware, but choose to ignore the situation because it would be bad press coverage and stoke more animosity toward the migrants.

Last year, when an employee of Germany’s state reception authority discovered that a large number of migrants were collecting multiple benefits using different names, sometimes as many as six, and reported the fraud, she was fired.   Her boss told her to bury the files in the basement where they wouldn’t be found, leave it alone, and most importantly, keep quiet.  She refused.

Still, nothing changed, no one is denied benefits.  It might appear racist or discriminatory, or their fragile demeanor might be offended…

The Dutch authorities state that the fraud is most likely widespread throughout the EU with Turks, Syrians, Afghani’s, and Lebanese playing the game.  And they have an unlikely assist to help them in these schemes – medical doctors.   In both Germany and France, medical doctors sometimes provide fake medical certificates for immigrants who have no ID in order to prevent deportation.   They then use these fake documents to obtain welfare benefits including ‘retroactive benefits’.

The cost of illegal immigration is difficult to tally, because it involves services not typically transparent such as;  deportation costs, travel costs, medical costs, fraud costs, housing and welfare costs, childcare costs, border costs, security costs, and societal costs.

According to the Heritage Foundation, as of 2013, the cost to the US was roughly $55 billion per year for ‘illegal immigrants’.   According to FAIR, Federation For American Immigration Reform, the annual ‘NET’ cost is now $116 billion per year on a federal, state and local level.

The confusing issue that seems to somehow allude the MSM, is attempting to classify illegal vs legal immigration.   No one is opposed to immigration, it is the illegal portion that is at issue.  If Governor Jerry Brown wants to personally go to Honduras and grant California documents to a bunch of Hondurans and personally fly them back to San Francisco, then more power to him.  If George Clooney wants to house illegals at his home in Lake Cuomo Italy and have Amal get them legal citizenship while providing an annual stipend to keep them off welfare, more power to him.

But this constant defense of illegal activity is simply nonsense.

Germany has estimated a cost of $86 billion over four years to support their immigrants and plan to pay for it out of their surplus budget…   Unfortunately, they are also attempting to spend their surplus on the creation of a new military given the US demand for them to be in compliance with the 2% requirement, and they are spending their surplus on debt repayment so that they can be in compliance with the EU Commission requirement of no more than 60%.   Some economists argue that Germany’s surplus comes at a detriment for other EU countries whose markets are squeezed because of Germany’s low import strategy which, despite Merkel’s rhetoric, is a nationalist strategy.   Germany is actually on par with China, hypocritically claiming a global alliance effort, while supporting a nationalist economic Germany.   Greece and Italy suffer in particular.   But Germany’s imports are falling, its trade economy is faltering, and its ability to pay for all these welfare immigration costs is less likely.

Germany is also battling their policy of uniting unaccompanied immigrant minors with their extended families.  The same policies that the US battles.    It also follows that many immigrants claiming to be minors are actually considerably older, and thus not entitled to the unification.  In 2015, 95,000 unaccompanied minors applied for asylum, in 2016 it was 63,200, and in 2017 31,000 – 90% of which are males.    How many family members were they entitled to bring to Germany?

Without documentation, these Afghani’s and Eritreans that overwhelm the system claim they are under the age of 18 and therefore entitled by German law.  Backing off, Merkel has ordered her government to deny the reunification and is ordering Medical testing  to determine their true age.

With the radical islamafication movement within the EU, France is now facing the ultimate truism as they predict that many mayoral candidates in the 2022 cycle will be Salafi Muslims as entire districts and towns are majority Islam.

Arguments still abound regarding the net surplus these immigrants bring…  Arguing that tax revenues are increased as a result, the NET deficit in France was still $22 billion in 2009 and the argument is terribly poor because it does not consider the true ‘COSTS’!

Illegal immigrants in a district north of Paris now account for 20% of the population.   But it is illegal in France to identify a person by their status – so true numbers are virtually impossible to tabulate.   This same District has a 50% unemployment rate and the locals there blame France…for their predicament.

Macron’s solution?

Process them faster so they are no longer illegal.  As for the unemployment – education and language remain the deterrents.

It is interesting to read articles from four or five years ago wherein the immigration issue was a nonissue and the governments and respective media outlets were encouraging more and more, faster and faster, only to read articles today wherein the same governments, the same media outlets, decry the folly and are quick to label blame.

It is reminiscent of the Clinton and Obama reproach today of Trump’s anti policies only to find articles and videos in which they said the same thing against the illegal flux 3 – 5 – and even 10 years ago.  Odd those videos don’t seem to make it to the unbiased MSM?

It is why we need to claim history vehemently –  because it remains evidence.

Private Detention Facilities: Corruption within…

There are three main private contractors who own the immigrant detention centers;  GEO Group whose parent company is G4S, Corrections Corp of America which has been renamed Corecivic and Management and Training Corporation founded by Robert Marquardt.   Corecivic and GEO Group are actually public companies traded on the stock exchange.  And while all three are ‘independent’ per se, they receive the majority of their funding from the government.  So in essence they aren’t really private at all!  We as taxpayers fund them, including the Democrats and Socialists.  They are allotted money based on how many beds they fill.  Therefore, their incentive is to have prisoners and a steady flow of illegal immigrants.  Without them, they die.

Corecivic’s revenue topped $1.7 billion annually and GEO $2.26 billion – .  

Remember Thurgood Marshall, the American lawyer who served on the Supreme Court and was an active civil rights activist?  His son, Thurgood Marshall Jr., sits on the Board of Corecivic’s, after previously serving as cabinet minister to Bill Clinton, and advisor to Al Gore.   He is also on the Board of the Ford Foundation which is heavily involved in The Open Society causes.

Thurgood is also partner at the global law firm, Morgan, Lewis and Bockius with offices acrss the globe including Russia, clients that include Google, Apple, Microsoft, JP Morgan Chase and Amazon, – and Trump.   One of their attorneys, Jim Hamilton, was instrumental in vetting running mates for Hillary Clinton, Obama, John Kerry and Al Gore.  Jim Hamilton was appointed as a Director of the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board – under Bill Clinton, 1995 – 1997.

An interesting ménage… Could this configuration be responsible for leaks as conflicting parties and agendas would seem to cross over?

CoreCivic — which profits from criminalized drug and immigration activity — has lobbied for policies that would fill its beds, rendering Marshall Jr.’s company leadership and recent donations to the CoreCivic PAC neutralizing forces against his father’s historic efforts.  There have been numerous allegations of abuse, mismanagement and corruption surrounding the facilities.

Still, Thurgood Jr., has utilized his connections to lobby for more strident laws aimed at filling the beds of the correctional and detention institutions.  Specifically harsher drug laws and harsher immigration laws. Follow the Money.

GEO Group owns facilities in Broward County Florida (where the mass school shooting occurred), Aurora Colorado (where the Aurora movie theatre shooting by Holmes occurred), Innumerable facilities in our outspoken Liberal California, Pennsylvania, Australia, and Texas predominantly.  They have been the subject of multiple lawsuits including wrongful death, bribery, corruption, deplorable conditions, failure to provide medical care, slavery, and mismanagement.

GEO Group’s predessor company name was Wackenhut Corrections which provided border patrol and security services.  Omar Mateen, the Orlando nightclub mass shooter was a security guard at G4S, the parent company of Wackenhut.

Management and Training is the only true ‘private’ contractor and the smallest of the three.  They are a family owned and operated business affiliated with Jobs Corp.

Bottom line, these facilities have operated on an agenda of more = better, more illegal immigrants = more money – for decades.   That would include Clinton, Bush and Obama.   In following the Money, Thurgood Marshall and his law firm have questionable relationships.   California, despite it’s Liberal bent seems to be a hothouse for the detention centers.

But the journalism has failed to provide a true picture of this phenomena or delved into its more dark web implications as the foster care, detention care institutions tend to be – a major source for the child sex trafficking.  It bears further investigation if they are truly concerned…

Democrat Hypocrites Storm Children’s Detention Center

In 1996, President Bill Clinton, and Attorney general, Janet Reno, signed into LAW the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act.  This act states that immigrants unlawfully present in the United States for 180 days but less than 365 days must remain outside the United States for three years unless they obtain a pardon. If they are in the United States for 365 days or more, they must stay outside the United States for ten years unless they obtain a waiver. If they return to the United States without the pardon, they may not apply for a waiver for a period of ten years.

 It explicitly gave the Attorney General broad authority to construct barriers along the US-Mexico border and authorized the construction of a secondary layer of border fencing to buttress the already completed 14 mile primary fence. 

Deportees may be held in jail for up to two years before being brought to an immigration board.

This means that for the past 22 years illegal immigrants were held in jail, and their children were held in detention centers at the behest of Billy and Reno, Bush, Eric Holder, Obama and Michelle.

And the Media, never gave a hoot.

Today the Democrat Senators; Hakeem Jeffries, Frank Pallone, Jerrold Nadler, Carolyn Maloney, and Adriano Espaillat demanded entry into a detention center claiming Trump was keeping children hostage and his administration is evil…

 

  1. Hakeem Jeffries:   has been called the mini-me Obama.He apparently got ‘chills’ standing next to the Confederate Flag, is anti-stop and frisk, is looking for additional federal aid to prop up the lacking security and risks associated with his district which has the highest number of public housing residents, and has pursued trademark certification for law schools.   Not a wink about ANYTHING regarding immigration – ever.  Not for the 22 years it has been in effect.
  2. Frank Pallone:   He has been in politics since 1988.  His debut came when US congressman, James Howard, died in office in 1988.  Pallone stepped in.  He opposed the Gabriella Miller Research Act which would have diverted funds from election campaign funding to research pediatric cancer.  It would appear, that’s about it folks.
  3. Jerrold Nadler:    His debut came when Ted Weiss died a day before the election primaries, and Nadler stepped into his shoes.   He opposed impeachment of Clinton, introduced the Respect for Marriage Act, and voted to lift sanctions on Iran.   Other than that – he has been mute with regard to immigrants and their children.
  4. Carolyn Maloney:   Apparently, she has ‘secured’ (which means ‘signed’) a number of bills put forth to her including one that would ‘reorganize US intelligence operations.  She was also instrumental in the Credit Card Act of 2009, which came into effect after Pelosi made millions in insider trades based on this bill’s delay and eventual passage, specifically in her VISA trades.
  5. Adriano Espaillat:   In the New York Assembly, Espaillat was an ‘advocate for immigrants, consumers, tenants, business owners, and veterans…  not sure there is anyone left to not advocate?   After a wave of increased assaults and murders in his district he strengthen penalties for violent crimes.  He has instituted some rent controls to sustain lower rent markets, and ‘authored’ the Notary Public Advertising Act which never made it into law.

 

Three of these irate Democrats were in the US House of Representatives during the passage of the 1996 Illegal Immigrant Bill signed into law by their duly devout President Billy, and as Democrats, most likely supported Clinton and Reno’s decision to sign the Bill into Law.

Despite the illegal immigration act being in place for 22 years, not one of these diehard Democrats ever had any issue with the system that jailed the adults and put the children in detention.  Not one has ever raised a pinky finger to support or defend children of illegals, or children – at all!

They are Craigslist actors performing a staged Play, Act 12, Scene 1456, that is so incredibly rife with illiteracy they have forgotten the very Bill they voted into Law.

It is pathetic at best, criminal at worst.   Their souls, their hearts, their pockets, are lined with blackened fish.

SHAME!

The Great Wall of Europe and Mexico

Migrants fleeing to Europe. How many have died attempting to make the crossing? Despite nearly daily reports of scores of deaths, the count remains at a level reported many months ago at 2,000. Odd…

It would appear that there is no ‘official record’ or count of the number who have died. Nor would it seem there is an official count of the number that have survived. A loose number of about a quarter million is the going figure of those fleeing Syria, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iran. They travel to Turkey and cross the Mediterranean to Greece. They are then transported to Italy and dispersed throughout Europe.

What happened?

There are 1.6 million Afghan refugees in Pakistan. But now Pakistan doesn’t want them. They say, time is up and they want them to go home. But Afghanistan is a mess. So, instead they are fleeing to Europe. The refugees in Iran are also mostly Afghan standing at over a million. Iran doesn’t want them – go home has become the endearing cry. But they can’t go home. There is no home. So they flee to the only place willing to take them – Europe.

Some are peaceable – but others are not. They are war torn and weary. They are hungry and angry. They have lost everything. And then some are ISIS, Al Qaeda, and therein lies an even greater complication.

Just as Afghanistan can no longer be home, neither will Syria, these places are dust, given to the criminals/terrorists to reign over and rule. A modern day Ghengis Khan.

Fleeing to Europe they are greeted with less than hospitable locals. You see, the locals are already consumed in their own financial collapse and bitterness and have little patience for the onslaught of foreigners much less possible terrorists to integrate. They see money that could be spent on their failing economy instead spent on migrants. So where in Europe do they end up? Norway, Switzerland, UK, Germany, Sweden, France and Italy have taken in the largest segment. But the proportion of other EU countries taking in refugees is relatively small.

What happens to these immigrants when they arrive to their ‘host country’?

Germany expects to see 450,000+ immigrants this year alone. They are initially housed in tents, or at sports facilities until they can be properly documented. This process can take from 3 months to a year During which time they can not work and must subsist on government entitlements. How much does that cost? Billions?  We don’t know exactly because no one has done a tally for the continent.  The UK estimates put the bill at 4 billion euro’s per year just for them.

The US is embroiled in its own immigrant crisis, most are coming from drug ravaged countries, but many are also ISIS. They build sophisticated tunnels, they come in the dark, and we continue to do little to nothing except turn a blind eye and exclaim loudly about the – ‘crisis’. How much does the illegal immigration cost the US? Estimates put the cost at $100 billion per year!

That could certainly build a lot of wall… The border between the US and Mexico is just shy of 2000 miles long. So far the government has spent $1.7 billion to build 653 miles of wall/fencing.

A) we all take for granted it would have been half that amount had the contract not been with the government.

B) if immigrants cost us $100 billion annually and the wall costs conservatively $5 billion, we are still $95 billion in the black the first year alone! It’s a one time cost!

But Washington doesn’t think in mindsets of businessmen, they think in mindsets of bureaucracy. They look at the committees that would have to ‘plan the fence’, the architecture and design committee, the permit committee, the commission committee, and the final planning committee. If they are anything like the EPA, a probable evaluation and report might be issued in 2020 with construction bids still outstanding. Of course, by then the committee’s would have billed taxpayers $100 billion and the contractors would puff up their costs to $25 billion with a five year construction contingency that would fall apart because they never collaborated with the architectural committee and thus find that the drawings required materials to be shipped from China, but in the meantime we would have slapped China with Tariffs and Taxes thereby causing the prices to inflate 150% which would put the project out of budget and require it to go back to the ‘planning committee’ for re-evaluation.

Just a thought…