democrat

IOWA Caucus: Propaganda Machines Full Speed!

Posted on by Helena

The CEO of Shadow Inc., the startup based out of Denver, CO, employing the Democrat Iowa app that reportedly failed, is Gerard Niermira. Niermira worked on the Hillary campaign in 2016.   He developed the app for the Iowa caucus.   The app apparently failed to count – anyone.   After the hubbaloo Buttigieg claimed he won.  I wonder how he knew…

Niermira’s first interlude into the political arena was in 2005 when he interned for Congressman Eliot Engel.   In 2015, Engel was part of a delegation that traveled to Saudi Arabia to pay their respects to King Salman.   The delegation included: McCain, Mark Warner, Pelosi and Kerry.

His website lists specific people and organizations which have helped launch his business including Clinton, Obama, Apple, Afl-CIO, DNC, Google, and Kiva.   Between 2008 and 2015, Niermira worked for Kiva. We are all well aware of all these affiliates with the exception of one – Kiva:

Kiva is a nonprofit created in 2005 that has a US subsidiary called Kiva City which was launched by Bill Clinton within the Clinton Global Initiative, to make micro-loans.   The interest rates vary from 0% to over 60.5% in countries that don’t have usury laws. Funding for Kiva has come from Google, Omidyar, and the Skoll Foundation.   In addition, The Economist (Rothschild rag) and Oprah both gave it high marks.

The Skoll Foundation is a private foundation with an endowment of over $1.1 billion.   Jeffrey Skoll is a Canadian who was briefly President of Ebay and later founded a movei/media company Participant Media.   Today Skoll is worth nearly $5 billion and operates numerous NGO’s. They do a significant amount of work in conjunction with Al Gore, Jimmy Carter, Kofi Annan, and Sir Richard Branson.

Prior to launching Shadow, Niermira worked at ACRONYM, a political nonprofit that claims to ‘build power and digital infrastructure for the progressive movement’.   ACRONYM’s founder, Tara McGowen, was the digital producer for Obama’s re election campaign in 2012 which was primarily funded by Bill Maher, Ellen Malcolm (Emily’s List), Geoff Garin (political strategist for Obama and Hillary), Paul Begala (Bill Clinton policy advisor), Mary Beth Cahill ( Worked on Kerry’s campaign), and Irwin Jacobs (on the Board of Salk Institute).   Founded in 2015, ACRONYM bought Shadow Inc. in 2019.   According to their analytics, the biggest spenders on Facebook and Google are:   Bloomberg, Steyer, and Bernie, with Schiff placing 5th on Facebook ads. They refer to Schiff as an “MVP”.

In 2016, McGowen ran the largest digital ad campaign for the Democrat Party, Priorities USA Action supporting Hillary’s failed 2016 election campaign.

Basically, Dark Money Propaganda machines, these various tech companies are funded with millions to prop up ad campaigns for Democrats – specifically Biden, Buttigieg, Warren and – Schiff, while creating massive negative campaigns regarding President Trump. However, their LinkedIn page lists an anonymous person as “Senior Organizing Director to Warren For President. No other candidates have a personal director at this organization.  According to their website, they were instrumental in gaining seats for 60 different Progressive candidates in 2018.

ACRONYM’s Senior Director of Campaigns, Tatenda Musapatike, was previously Client Solutions Manager for Facebook, in addition she has worked for The New Media Group, NGP VAN, and the Beekeeper Group which all seem to have ties to Emily’s List.

In addition to the regulars; Hillary, McCaskill, Klobuchar, Feinstein, Kamala, Boxer, etc…, Emily’s List endorsed and funded Ilhan Omar.

The sheer vastness of organizations working behind the scenes in media propaganda, analytics, and tech development is obscene.   Many also work to promote the Liberals in Canadian elections as well.   The billions of dollars involved reflect a maze of Dark Money pay-for-play that we can not even begin to comprehend or conceive.

While Hillary owns to a particular animosity toward Bernie Sanders, her most recent public comment was that nobody likes him.   He is therefore NOT the Democrat Party’s collective candidate. However, the fact that Sanders continues to climb in polls, has been alarming for a party that typically chooses the end candidate well before the nomination.

Iowa has just released its first blather of announcing the leading candidate: Buttiegieg.

Sanders: A Democrat Deflection

Posted on by Helena

Bernie Sanders addressed a handful of Harvard students the other night. One girl asked Bernie how his Socialism differs from every other country’s socialism, particularly, Soviet Russia?   His answer was a campaign conflagration that delved into the US wealth statistics, the Supreme Court decision to allow unfettered financing for political candidates, and free education and healthcare for all.  

WHAT?

What he attempted to do was align communism in other failed socialist ideologies without addressing the question. Classic deflection.

He then made an interesting claim that he had some success in making public college tuition free – thus reducing student debt. Really? Where? How?

Sanders introduced a Bill, College For All Act, in which the Federal government would provide 67% of the $70 billion per year college costs at public universities.   States would ante up the difference – 33%. Current and past student loan rates would be halved from 4.32% to 2.16%. The cost would be funded by imposing a Wall Street Tax – which Sanders refers to as a Robin Hood Tax of .5%.  Sanders speculates this tax could raise hundreds of billions per year to fund free education for all and jobs.

Where?  How?  Why? What jobs would be lost?

What kind of jobs?   I imagine it would bolster CPA’s who would work fervently to find loopholes. But the key political mumbojumbo is –‘speculates’.   As in, ‘if you like your healthcare and doctor you can keep ‘em… statement’.

Still, Sanders is ‘polled’ to be the leading Democrat to pit against Trump. Including Sander’s own internal polls.

The problems with Sanders are multiple: a) he is rife with dirt that destroyed his previous bid, b) he is old and – he would be approaching 80 quickly, c)   Alzheimers will likely be touched upon – if not dementia, and d)   he is wealthy, defeating his entire anti-wealth platform.

So is Sander’s a ‘deflection’.

As we become more acclimated to the subversion of the media, we can realize and to an extent accept, that most everything has an agenda. That agenda – is likely a deflection from what is really happening.   It is designed to motivate or despair. But the core is – manipulation.

Sanders himself may be unaware of the deception.   But the stage is never dark.

TO date, all the Democrat candidates share a universal theme.   Boring.

And like a Hollywood extravaganza, the true plot is never revealed until the last moment.   It is how books are sold. How movies are monetized. How the stage has become the celluloid hero.

From that perspective, all the idiots, the Jokers, the King’s entertainment, will have exhausted their fame, and the people will be crying for something unique, something new and exciting!

All the deflection pawns will fall, and the real candidate will emerge as a ‘savior’.   Like The Hunger Games.   While Ocasio-Cortez may have been a trial drug, her allusion failed.   So the puppet masters went back to the factory to produce what has been manufactured as the perfect candidate.   While this candidate has yet to walk the model runway, rest assured she is being groomed, anointed, and coiffed to perfection – in their minds. She will be presented in the final moments, any conspiracies to her will be eradicated and cleansed, and she will emerge a deity of sorts to unify.

The press will be instructed to promote her as some glorious goddess, and Trump will not be able to attack her given she is – female. Anything he says will be vilified as anti-feminist.

But rest assured, she is a robot. She is a creation.   She is a lizard in the realm of the Agenda, picked only for her ability to deflect every aspect of her persona to and for – the Cabal/Swamp.

Even Sanders will bow to her deference and ultimately call on his supporters to back her.

  1. For today. All the blah in the Democrat Party is a stage. Purposefully set to create a chaos of party so as to cause a unity in one.

And this is why Pelosi is no longer an impeachment protagonist. She has been cued. The others? Delusional misfits with eyes of self glory. Don’t be detracted.

Who is she?

I have thoughts…

And for the record, she is not Michelle or Oprah, she is someone far more versed. And a potential significant challenger.

Hillary vs. Hillary

Posted on by Helena

The media keeps hyping how Hillary is ahead in ‘the polls’. But they don’t mention what poll nor do they say how they phrased the question. For example, if they were to ask, “Of all the Democrats running for president, who would you vote for?” Ummm, she’s the only one running, so I guess that would definitely put her in the lead…

So, what are you supposed to do if you are a democrat or liberal and you can’t stand Hillary?

Where are her Democratic contenders? Has she made a ‘Pac’ with the Devil to keep all other democratic candidates away, denouncing competition? She could compare notes with Kim Jong-un who garnered 100% of the votes, of course he was the only one running, and if you didn’t vote chances are you were shot.

Biden certainly doesn’t conjure up any sense of reality, he’s too easy to laugh at instead of with. But the problem is, no one really wants to spend the money knowing in advance they can’t contend against Hillary’s Soros funded Pacs and bank accounts. Perhaps the agenda is to keep the pool clean. To not dilute the oil with vinegar. And they may be right. One of the problems with Republicans is that too often they divert votes from a party win by having too many candidates spreading a thin layer amongst each. And when the dust settles on one, all the losers have to pretend they like the winner after throwing mud every which way.

As it stands now, there are three Republicans running against one Democrat with a potential run of three additional Democrats and NINE Republicans. I’m already weary in anticipation of the television ads, the rhetoric, the in-fighting, the glossy headlines, the fake smiles, the jabs and jaunts and overload of media deciphering content that is basically – meaningless. UGH!

Who is the biggest winner? The media of course, because they sell all the advertising spots! The money rolls. It certainly would save money to have just one candidate running… Just kidding!

With so much ugliness surrounding her recently, Hillary would seem doomed from the getgo, so what keeps her afloat? Media manipulation, lots of coaching, some plastic surgery, and probably a life coach to help soften that hardline, don’t give a damn attitude.

Re-creating Hillary. Who will she be now?

Apparently, she is targeting the young voters, although I think that’s a mistake. I would think she was far too much like the nasty grandma who pinches your cheek and makes young people cringe. Anyway, as such, her primary issues include: LGBT rights, marijuana, immigration, climate change and education.

A. **Education: 1) increase Pell grants to $10,000 after a person completes a year of ‘national service’. 2) Allow students to refinance loans at lower rates.

What is ‘national service’? Serving in the military. How can students refinance? Not sure yet.

B. **Climate Change: 1) carbon tax (carbon = coal, petroleum and natural gas), and 2) research.

Problem. Non carbon footprints include; wind, sun, hydroelectric and nuclear. Today 70% of electricity is produced using fossil fuels, 50% from coal and 20% from natural gas. Therefore the carbon tax would transfer to electricity as well.

Problem 2: Nuclear waste. We have yet to find of valid and safe method of disposal. We currently have over 88 nuclear facilities in operation with 5 more coming on in the next few years. Young people are hugely concerned about nuclear, especially given the most recent implosion in Japan and the fallout. Selling young people nuclear, is an uphill battle.

And research? I think we’re a bit over uncontrolled research projects that waste immeasurable dollars. Yuck.

C. **Pot: she wants more – research…

D. **LGBT: Advocate.

E. **Immigration: She wants to wave a wand and make everyone here – legal. Problem? What happens to all the people that are in the trials of getting through legally? What happens to those people today, tomorrow and the next day? Do you just open the gates to anyone and everyone unilaterally?

The Ghouls that are out of the closet and following her include:

  1. having upwards of eight to ten different email addresses that she used while Secretary of State illegally.

  2. Benghazi – a mess that caused numerous deaths – conceivably at her hands.

  3. Using an aide while in the White House as Secretary of State who was on two payrolls (illegally) and who has potential ties to the Muslim Brotherhood

  4. operating a foundation that has all sorts of shadowy chemtrails involving Middle East agenda’s the Ukraine agenda and little to no evidence of true charity

  5. advanced age and potential undisclosed health problems

  6. lies unfolding more often that challenge her credibility

Who likes Hillary? Hollywood certainly, she represents the proverbial ‘Queen’. She plays the ‘poor me’ candidate with historical reference to Bill’s dalliances. She has a powerhouse of money backing her. She represents something new – a woman president. Although it isn’t new really like she’s making history. Females who are world leaders include; Brazil, Bangladesh, Argentina, Germany, Liberia, Denmark, Lithuania, Kosovo, Jamaica, – there are 22!

It would be prudent to review why Hillary lost to Obama. The most glaring reason that might encompass a number of faults would be that she was simply too arrogant. She assumed the win would belong to her. And that arrogance follows her much like the dustbowl that follows the character in the Peanuts comic strip, Pigpen.

“Once, after bathing and dressing in clean clothes, “Pig-Pen” stepped outside his house, and instantaneously became dirty and disheveled, whereupon he declared to Charlie Brown, “You know what I am? I’m a dust magnet.”