Bernie Sanders addressed a handful of Harvard students the other night. One girl asked Bernie how his Socialism differs from every other country’s socialism, particularly, Soviet Russia? His answer was a campaign conflagration that delved into the US wealth statistics, the Supreme Court decision to allow unfettered financing for political candidates, and free education and healthcare for all.
WHAT?
What he attempted to do was align communism in other failed socialist ideologies without addressing the question. Classic deflection.
He then made an interesting claim that he had some success in making public college tuition free – thus reducing student debt. Really? Where? How?
Sanders introduced a Bill, College For All Act, in which the Federal government would provide 67% of the $70 billion per year college costs at public universities. States would ante up the difference – 33%. Current and past student loan rates would be halved from 4.32% to 2.16%. The cost would be funded by imposing a Wall Street Tax – which Sanders refers to as a Robin Hood Tax of .5%. Sanders speculates this tax could raise hundreds of billions per year to fund free education for all and jobs.
Where? How? Why? What jobs would be lost?
What kind of jobs? I imagine it would bolster CPA’s who would work fervently to find loopholes. But the key political mumbojumbo is –‘speculates’. As in, ‘if you like your healthcare and doctor you can keep ‘em… statement’.
Still, Sanders is ‘polled’ to be the leading Democrat to pit against Trump. Including Sander’s own internal polls.
The problems with Sanders are multiple: a) he is rife with dirt that destroyed his previous bid, b) he is old and – he would be approaching 80 quickly, c) Alzheimers will likely be touched upon – if not dementia, and d) he is wealthy, defeating his entire anti-wealth platform.
So is Sander’s a ‘deflection’.
As we become more acclimated to the subversion of the media, we can realize and to an extent accept, that most everything has an agenda. That agenda – is likely a deflection from what is really happening. It is designed to motivate or despair. But the core is – manipulation.
Sanders himself may be unaware of the deception. But the stage is never dark.
TO date, all the Democrat candidates share a universal theme. Boring.
And like a Hollywood extravaganza, the true plot is never revealed until the last moment. It is how books are sold. How movies are monetized. How the stage has become the celluloid hero.
From that perspective, all the idiots, the Jokers, the King’s entertainment, will have exhausted their fame, and the people will be crying for something unique, something new and exciting!
All the deflection pawns will fall, and the real candidate will emerge as a ‘savior’. Like The Hunger Games. While Ocasio-Cortez may have been a trial drug, her allusion failed. So the puppet masters went back to the factory to produce what has been manufactured as the perfect candidate. While this candidate has yet to walk the model runway, rest assured she is being groomed, anointed, and coiffed to perfection – in their minds. She will be presented in the final moments, any conspiracies to her will be eradicated and cleansed, and she will emerge a deity of sorts to unify.
The press will be instructed to promote her as some glorious goddess, and Trump will not be able to attack her given she is – female. Anything he says will be vilified as anti-feminist.
But rest assured, she is a robot. She is a creation. She is a lizard in the realm of the Agenda, picked only for her ability to deflect every aspect of her persona to and for – the Cabal/Swamp.
Even Sanders will bow to her deference and ultimately call on his supporters to back her.
- For today. All the blah in the Democrat Party is a stage. Purposefully set to create a chaos of party so as to cause a unity in one.
And this is why Pelosi is no longer an impeachment protagonist. She has been cued. The others? Delusional misfits with eyes of self glory. Don’t be detracted.
Who is she?
I have thoughts…
And for the record, she is not Michelle or Oprah, she is someone far more versed. And a potential significant challenger.