Sharia Law in US

There are only sixteen states in the US that expressly ban ‘foreign law’ and by presumption, Sharia Law.  They include:   Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, 
Texas, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia and Wyoming.  

The Washington Post, Brennen Institute and Southern Poverty Law Center all argue that Sharia Law is not ‘Law’, it is instead a sort of ‘code of ethics’ a morality thermometer wherein punishment is administered in accordance with the crime…   Ummm, that is law, it is the system of justice and penalty, so obviously these astute lawyers are attempting to play weird word games.

The Washington Post article actually goes so far as to say that ‘the main criticism is the unfair justice perpetrated on women in Sharia Law is unfounded… because women are allowed to have an orgasm’.  Help me here!   The article goes on to discuss how corporal punishment under Sharia is way overstated, and yes, severing of limbs and death for adultery are high on the radar, but they require 4 witness’s to testimony – all men.

So here is just a ‘sampling’ of some of those non-laws that are simply moral codes similar to the ‘Old Testament’:

  • Theft is punishable by amputation of the hands (Quran 5:38).
    • Criticizing or denying any part of the Quran is punishable by death.
    • Criticizing Muhammad or denying that he is a prophet is punishable by death.
    • Criticizing or denying Allah is punishable by death.
    • A Muslim who becomes a non-Muslim is punishable by death
    • A non-Muslim who leads a Muslim away from Islam is punishable by death.
    • A non-Muslim man who marries a Muslim woman is punishable by death.
    • A woman or girl who has been raped cannot testify in court against her rapist(s).
  • A woman or girl who alleges rape without producing 4 male witnesses is guilty of adultery.
    • A woman or girl found guilty of adultery is punishable by death
  • A divorced wife loses custody of all children over 6 years of age or when they exceed it.
    • A woman’s testimony in court, allowed in property cases, carries ½ the weight of a man’s.

Apparently, according to the Washington Post, Brennan Institute, SPLC and a host of other Mainstream NGO’s, these morality codes are not violent at all, and evidence complete equality.   Especially in the eyes of Hillary, Pelosi, Abedin, and the two newly appointed House Representatives.

In 2014, Time Magazine demanded that Islam be taught in our public schools just like Judaism and Christianity is taught… except that they aren’t in fact taught in public schools and are in fact prohibited from being taught within that very misunderstood Constitutional Amendment that advocates a separation of church and state – state being anything public – as in schools.

When one researches history (that is history that has not been rewritten), it is a rather fundamental understanding that the entire purpose of the clause was in direct correlation to the reason Europeans fled Europe – because The Monarchial King was ruled by The Pope.   And in the US our founding fathers sought to sever that Pope rule.

Of course even the Establishment Clause is subject to vague interpretation because it does not prohibit discussion – it decrees prohibition of making a law.  But States have routinely ramped the interpretation to mean unilaterally – with one exception of – Islam is not law, it is a code of ethics and thus – above the law.

And We The People have sat dumbly and accepted this false doctrine.

Time Magazine advocates for teaching Islam in public schools, just to ‘educate’.   Christianity?  Judaism?   Not allowed.  

 

Bannon’s War! Southern Poverty Law Center

Bannon left the White House precisely because he would be free of the liberal media scrutiny and free to do and say what he wanted to do and say while in the White House – but couldn’t. His hands were tied. No more.

He has created an agenda; The Swamp Cleaner.

There was an old movie in which Harvey Keitel played The Cleaner. His job was to come in when a hit had gotten messy and clean up the mess. Frequently that meant additional hits as well as literally wiping clean all evidence. Bannon was a target from the getgo from the Liberals, and the liberal media. The New York Times vehemently hated him and badgered him relentlessly. Because he was a spokesperson for Trump the targeted badgering reflected on Trump negatively.  Exit stage left, Enter stage right.

Now, outside of the confines and constricts of the White House, he is free to do what he wants which entails cleaning the Swamp of both GOP fuddy-duddies and Liberal weeds.

While the New York Times has bashed Breitbart News, aka Bannon, citing The Sourthern Poverty Law Center (which is a front for yet another George Soros web) which refers to Breitbart as “a white ethno-nationalist propaganda mill.” Because apparently, today, if one is white, one is a racist and supremacist.  But wait!

It is interesting to note that the Board of Directors at the Southern Poverty Law Center is comprised of; 1 black man, 2 women, and 10 white supremacists! Aw Shucks! And in teaching “Tolerance” and love, they have devised a “Hate Map” on which they pinpoint what they refer to as Hate Groups around the US whose activities include; criminal acts, marches, rallies, meetings, leafleting, publishing and speeches. Well, that’s hateful.

They have identified 663 antigovernment hate groups in the US who they define as opposed to The New World Order. Christians are considered a ‘hate group’, are thus not tolerated and must be extinguished…   In total they list over 900 Hate Groups. If it wasn’t crazy, it might be a funny spoof movie with Leslie Neilson.

Their teaching tools, which they distribute to schools ‘for free’, perpetuate a communist view. No surprise. Everyone must be the same. No one can be different. No societal class, no wealth, no poverty, no color, no religion, just absolute homogeny. Ommmm.  I think it’s called Communism.

A 501©(3) charity with a budget approaching $80 million, they somehow manage to operate at a net loss. According to their 2014 990, their 10 officers rake in about $2.3 million, another $17+ million is paid for employees, benefits and payroll taxes, occupancy/rent is $1.4 million (nice digs), and the publications that they give away for ‘free’ cost them over $14 million. They bought their building and equipment for about $35 million. They are sitting on roughly $6 million in cash and cash equivalents, and over $330 million in investment securities!!

That’s a LOT of Moula!

I guess hate maps make a lot of money. But they also make money by ‘seizing the assets’ of ‘hate groups’ they cripple? Really?

So how is it that a non-profit can have so much cash and investment income? Doesn’t that make them a profit? Because right now, it’s all – TAX FREE.

The company also passively notes that they have ownership interest in several ‘foreign corporations’ which they are not required to list, and they are indirect owners in several passive foreign investment companies… While the names have not been disclosed, their locations bear witness; Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands and Bermuda – all tax havens. Golly.

In addition, their principle campaign organization, Grassroots Campaign, which generated a net fundraising loss for them of over $1.2 million, is apparently affiliated with the Democrat National Committee and Moveon.Org. Other prominent clients include; Planned Parenthood, Doctors Without Borders, Amnesty International, and ACORN. That didn’t go well…

The organization is routinely quoted by the media to prove a point, to certify that a company or person is a hater, or to defame those who do not support the agenda of a New World Order.

All the while they quote the meme, “Don’t fight hate, with hate.” Which of course, is exactly what they are doing…

HATE CRIME: Propaganda

HATE CRIMES in the US are created and promoted to cause internal societal chaos.   Trump hasn’t even assumed Presidency and the media and Southern Poverty Law Center (a Soros organization) are spewing accusations claiming Trump is responsible…   WHAT?

Why would Soros peddle the blame on Trump? Because his puppet Hillary didn’t make the cut and he’s in major hate mode for losing.  Wait – doesn’t that make him a perpetrator of Hate Crimes – that should be prosecuted?

Hate Crimes are a difficult category to assess due to a wide range of what constitutes such a crime. In addition, the FBI actually uses ‘other sources’ to make a tally and that source may include The Southern Poverty Law Center which has a massive bias and questionable statistical proof.

According to the FBI: “Though the reports from these agencies are insufficient to allow a valid national or regional measure of the volume and types of crimes motivated by hate, they offer perspectives on the general nature of hate crime occurrence.”

 In other words, the statistics are ‘faith based’ using data outside of the FBI.

A breakdown offers the following insight:

1)   About 30% of ‘hate crimes’ are intimidation, or basically bullying.   It is estimated that only 36% of Bullying is even reported, skewing the statistic. In addition, 92% of bullying is because of a person’s appearance

2)   Vandalism or destruction to property accounted for 30% of the offenses, but riots are not included, ie: Ferguson, Baltimore, Milwaukee, Charlotte, Anaheim, and Oakland. In fact thee have been 7 riots during the Obama administration, the same number that occurred between 1980 and 2009 -29 years.

3)   While the media states that 11,000 to 14,900 agencies were asked to participate in the data release of hate crimes, only a fractional percentage actually reported any crime at all – roughly 1600, which indicates that hate crimes are most definitely clustered and attributable to specific cities.

4)   Sexual and gender bias far outweigh in terms of percentages. While only 3% of the US population identifies as Gay, roughly 30% of hate crimes were targeted at them.

Statistics provide some degree of insight, however, how one reads, interprets and analyzes them is of equal or greater importance.

For example, yesterday it was revealed that a ‘hate crime’ occurred in which 4 black men tortured a disabled white man for hours while yelling Trump slurs. Will this be classified as a hate crime involving race? Disability? Or Politics?

According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, they counted 867 hate crimes between November 8 and November 18th… and while those numbers declined shortly thereafter, one could interpret that the multiple indicates about 80 hate crimes per day over a 365 calendar year would amount to 29,200 or about 4-5x what the FBI reports. And given we know that most hate crimes after the election were political – against Trump supporters – against whites, it is puzzling that the SPLC doesn’t see it that way. In fact, other reports indicate that there were over 2000 hate crimes perpetrated against Trump Supporters since the election! There have also been a slew of “FAKE Hate Crimes” being reported predominantly by college kids, Muslims and Blacks.

In addition, these crimes, and all the crimes between 2009 and 2016 that the SPLC likes to flag – all occurred under Obama’s watch.   Eric Holder’s watch. Loretta Lynch’s watch. Biden’s watch.   And Hillary’s watch. Rosie O’Donnell slandering Trump’s underage son was libel – a hate crime that went without consequence or statistic. Robert De Niro, Charlie Sheen, and a host of Hollywooders wanting Trump dead – is hate crime! They should be prosecuted for intimidation and threatening a person’s life.

Recently the media was in a tizzy over a letter sent to a mosque that was pretty vile. It was signed, Americans For A Better Way. But there is no such organization. The problem is the media only reports hate crimes when they fit a particular agenda that the media wants to promote – and are silent when the statistic or event is not a part of their agenda.

WHY does the media choose this agenda?

Again – because it is all about creating division, creating anarchy, creating a false reality that will implode our society.

A reporter or journalist who reports a ‘fake hate crime’ should be labeled a hate crime criminal themselves… and prosecuted.

Ben Carson, CAIR and David Horowitz – An Untangled Web

Ben Carson has suggested that, in his opinion, a Muslim who’s faith is Islam should not be qualified to be President of the US. The media ridicules him for his statement.

Trump is chastised roundly for not ‘defending Obama’ when a question is posed and the man refers to Obama as a Muslim.

CAIR, calls on Ben Carson to – quit.

Hillary takes jab at GOP’s.

Clinton says Trump fueling paranoia with his Muslim views.

And it’s only just begun.

CAIR claims it is the spokesperson of all US Muslims. But the percentage of Muslims in the US is less than 1%, around .8% of the total population. Not terribly noteworthy in terms of total force and hardly a force that can demand Carson to quit. Muslims have historically voted for Democrats, 72% voted for Obama while their voter turnout has been approximately 2/3 of their population – 1,700,000.

Add to the flames that CAIR has a relatively savory reputation for belonging to and or assisting terrorists, they certainly are not a great spokesperson for the religion. CAIR has been linked to Hamas. Created by The Muslim Brotherhood, an organization decreed a terrorist organization by Egypt, Saudi Arabia and by the United Arab Emirates, they are not exactly squeaky clean.

So why do we listen to them? Why are they given media attention at all with regard to Ben Carson?

CAIR boasts a membership of …5,000. Again, hardly noteworthy. But the media would have their panties in a wad because Ben Carson made what they term as an Islamophobic statement. Really? I’d say he made a judgment call on a topic that indicts terrorists and prohibits them from governing the US. Personally, I’m not a fan of Shari’a.

So why all the fuss?

Well, it would appear that the ‘fuss’ is relegated to the media, and does not seem to be the voice of the people.   But then the government and the media ceased being the voice of the people years ago. Instead, they became the voice that wants to defraud the people. Hillary thought using the point would elevate her status, as did Sanders when they decried foul!

Who does CAIR like? Hillary, Rubio and Christie. Who does CAIR dislike? Basically anyone even remotely associated with David Horowitz Freedom Center. According to The Southern Poverty Law Center, a group funded by George Soros, David Horowitz is “the godfather of the anti-Muslim movement”.   This indirectly connects Soros and CAIR as having the same ideals and principles.

David Horowitz has a fascinating background. His parents embraced communism and Stalin, and raised him in a world fed heavy doses of propaganda and censorship. It wasn’t until 1956 that his parents read Nikita Kruschevs Secret Speech and felt deeply betrayed, subsequently renouncing their stance.   David was a devout Marxist advocating his far left political views in the UK and later in the US. A proponent of The Black Panther Party, but moved away from this when confronted with the murder of Betty Van Patter, a good friend whose body was found floating in the San Francisco Bay. The Black Panthers were suspect. Sometime in 1985, David formerly voiced his shift in loyalties in his support to then Republican, Ronald Reagan.

A prolific writer, in advocating for a conservative view, Horowitz claimed our universities were being redefined to a political correctness that had one leaning and one leaning only – left. He exposed 101 professors that he feels are dangerous in their ideals and socialist views in a book entitled, The 101 Most Dangerous Academics in America. And despite a special investigation led by The House of Representatives in 2006 which found that students were not unfairly targeted if their views did not conform to leftist thinking, with the rise of social media, we have seen that is not true time and again.

Two of my sons were witness/victim of these politically correct agenda’s while on campus. Within the college community, it is well known, and routine.

Having turned his sights on Islam, Horowitz wrote of the ‘unholy alliance’, and became a target of CAIR. The book was a bestseller and sold millions of copies. He has been on numerous speaking engagements within various universities and each time shows the explicit anti-Jewish view of the Muslim students, their embrace of Hamas, and their inability to debate with any merit.

Perhaps, he would like to endorse Ben Carson.