SUPREME COURT Ruling On Abortion – May Be Overturned

STATEMENT:   “The Dobbs Arguments Revealed Why The Supreme Court Ruling on Abortion if faulted”.

The point is that government should NOT intervene in abortions at all and scrap the Dobb’s decision.   It is not a Constitutional ‘right’, and the 14th Amendment, which is used to protect abortion, is arbitrarily applied.  

Sotomayor has stated that an ‘unborn baby having any right is a religious view’ (note she said ‘baby’)   And thus the term ‘viability’ is used as a means of determining whether abortion is murder or simply a ‘woman’s health right’.   In terms of a literal definition, viability simply means ‘ability to survive’.   Technically, a newborn cannot survive on its own. A toddler cannot survive on its own.   And even a teen cannot survive on its own, they must all be suckled and cared for to survive and be – viable.   Thus we developed an age of emancipation – 18.

In that definition, anyone under the age of 18 is NOT viable.

The government altered that definition to reference ‘in the womb’, and the Supreme Court upheld the change   But even that viability has changed with increased surgical evolution.    Did the government have the ability to recreate the definition?   Did the Supreme Court have the right to hear the case?   The likely answer is – NO.

When a person develops age related dementia or Alzheimers, are they viable?   A child with Down Syndrome – are they viable?   Their survival is dependent on being cared for and thus the answer to both is – NO.

While Roe vs Wade was a Supreme Court decision on abortion rights in 1973, it was based on Privacy, not murder. The decision also ruled that this right is not absolute, and must be balanced against the government’s interests in protecting women’s health and protecting prenatal life.  But WAIT – only 3% of all abortions are a result of medical needs protecting the mother and unborn child, the remainder are for – convenience.

The Federal Government began funding Planned Parenthood in 1970 under Nixon’s “Family Planning Services”.   The Law specified low income or uninsured families and specifically was enacted as a result of ‘uncontrolled population growth and its effects on economic growth’. The Bill was co-sponsored by Bush Sr. and addressed mass access to contraception and birth control aimed specifically at the impoverished population.

In 1994, the UN became involved with “The Program of Action of the International Conference on Population and Development.” Depopulation thus became a part of the UN’s first Sustainable Development Goals as outlined in 1994.   The crux?   Reproduction can impact environmental sustainability.

It was ALWAYS about – Targeted Depopulation and Eugenics.

Prenatal Life is defined as the ‘interval of life between conception and birth’. That would presuppose that an arbitrary, blanket ruling of abortion for all was NEVER intended and the use of that ruling to defend ALL abortions is without precedent.

It was in 1992 that the Supreme Court once again interjected in the abortion fray with Planned Parenthood vs Casey.   Sandra Day O’Connor, Anthony Kennedy, and David Souter determined the ‘viability’ definition.  O’Connor and Kennedy were nominated by Reagan and had already expressed their support for abortion.   Souter was a Bush appointment. He was known to always side with the liberal wing. The ruling determined that the due process clause of the 14th Amendment protects a woman’s right to choose to have an abortion prior to viability.

In other words, the entire Abortion Rulings were based upon a flawed refurbished definition of viability and continually altered.  WHY?

The Supreme Court Justice who rewrote the US Constitution to interpret Privacy as an abortion right within the 14th Amendment was Harry Blackburn.   He was appointed by Nixon. Despite his status as a ‘republican’, he was considered one of the most liberal justices in history.  His conservative status eroded between 1975 and 1980 when Blackburn began to vote in line with William Brennan. The liberals thoroughly embraced him and his viability definition stood.

He considered a woman’s womb to be her ‘private property’.

Today, that interpretation takes on additional new causes as we are being ‘mandated’ to forego that ‘private property’ right to vaccine mandates.   You can’t allow one and mandate another under the same Constitutional auspice of ‘property rights’, ie, my body.    Beyond that, it opens up the right of the Supreme Court to determine the term ‘viability’ at all.   And how that might play in the other age and developmental disabilities I described above.

Could an adult thus choose to end the life of a parent, sibling, or child based on their nonviability?  

Three quarters of all abortions are performed on women in poverty.  Nearly 1/3 of abortions in the US are on black women.   There are an estimated 73 million abortions performed worldwide – EACH YEAR ~WHO.   The US accounts for 800,000 to 1 million annually despite having open access to contraception – the day-after pill – and sexual ‘choice’.

But the Legal Definition of Privacy and Property Rights is also on display: “Everyone has a right to life, liberty, and property as long as they are accommodating the specific state’s private property laws.”

THUS, according to THE LAW, state laws take precedence.  And the Supreme Court should have immediately dismissed the case.

The average cost of an abortion in the US is roughly $500-$1000.   An annual outlay of $300,000,000 to $1 billion in the US alone.   Average cost of an IUD is about $500.   An IUD lasts for 10 years – meaning it would cost a max of 10% of the annual abortion costs.   And for those with insurance it would cost – $ZERO. Completely derailing rape abortions as well.

So what is the REAL reason for supporting abortions vs contraception devices?   MONEY. Simply another means for propping up an ‘industry’ with taxpayer funding going to Big Pharma in the guise of depopulation/eugenics!

Planned Parenthood Abortions for HUMAN HYBRIDS –

IN 2019, Project Veritas did an expose on the selling of aborted baby parts via Planned Parenthood.   While these bioscience and research institutions that buy the parts claim they use the baby parts for disease research, it is quite possible there is a more nefarious application.   Hybrid creation and cloning.

Animal/Human hybrids are created by injecting stem cells into animal embryo’s.   Having success with sheep and pig chimeras, these grand science harbingers of death have moved to monkeys the closest DNA match to humans.   What better stem cell to inject into an animal embryo than the ‘fresh’ stem cells of an aborted baby embryo.   Stem cells from baby heads, arms, legs, liver, lungs, and heart.

And somehow these hybrids will benefit mankind within the guise of ‘disease research’…

Everybody knows…

Hybrid humans is in the second phase of experimental trials. Trials always begin with animals.   The human composition is next, but aborted babies proved cheap given the failure rate.   The next phase will require children and adults.

Remember Governor Cuomo ceremoniously digging mass graves for coffins?   Unclaimed people.   People who had no name.   People who were never identified.   Was there anyone inside those coffins?   Or were their fresh body parts sold for ‘disease research’, aka hybrid human experiments.

Everybody knows…

Exactly how could the creation of a chimera help fight against disease?   Especially given that many diseases are created in a laboratory, not in DNA.   What better way to globally catalog everyone’s DNA than through a voluntary DNA test wherein each person must submit their name, address, phone number and genetic abnormalities?   That would be the CoVid PCR test.

In China the Uyghur’s are disappearing.   During the Syrian War there were accounts of makeshift hospital rooms set up to perform amputations on live subjects.   In the US, Biden has ramped up the importation of children who are now considered orphaned. Test subjects?

Currently, due to regulations in the US, all US funded Human Hybrid chimeric projects are conducted in China with the Salk Institute and NIH.  The Salk Institute develops – vaccines.

Ultimately, the true desire for human hybrid success is genetic manipulation, as in remove a part of their natural given DNA and replace it with perfected DNA.   The same concept behind MRna.   “Only the strong will survive.”  That was Bill Gates warning.   But there is still yet another possible explanation.

Biden has announced the release of the UFO report this June.   Sitings have increased significantly in the past five years.   One could assume these UFO’s are piloted by other beings. Technically they would be identified as – illegal aliens.   Technically, due to their sophisticated means of travel, one can hypothesize they are significantly more advanced and that earth’s atmosphere is not conducive to their requirements.   Therefore a Human/Alien hybrid might solve that technicality.

One such cult exists that celebrates occultism through the rites of Raelianism.   Founded in France in 1970, their logo is the Jewish Star of David with a Nazi Swastika impregnated in the center.   Called a New Age Religion, they hold to their codes as Scientific religion as opposed to theocratic religions which they conclude are mysticism.   They believe that earthlings were created by aliens, and these aliens are unhappy with what has become of their project.   Therein, an Age of Apocalypse is upon us.   They believe that Elohim is an alien and that unless earthlings become tolerant and peaceful, Elohim will destroy Earth.

In light of that, in 1997 Dr. Brigitte Boisselier, a follower of Raeliaism, created a company called Clonaid.   Clonaid claims it has already perfected a means for cloning humans. With its headquarters seemingly in Korea, their subsidiary is BioFusion Tech. According to Biofusion’s LinkedIn page; “BioFusion Technologies, LLC. provides exceptional customized surgical instrumentation, tissue transplant products, orthopedic hardware, human tissue recovery, and consultation services to multiple organizations both domestic and international.”    Its website has been taken down.

George Seidel of Colorado State University claims that cloning a human embryo would not be too difficult and completely feasible today with ‘directions’ posted in published scientific literature.

The Rael’s are huge proponents of attending and infiltrating into protests and riots on behalf of women’s rights and the bare breast agenda in France. They believe that a world without work or money is our coming utopia. Does AOC – come to mind?

Personally, I keep thinking about an old Twilight Zone episode, “To Serve Man”. The Kanamits, a race of 9-foot-tall (2.7 m) aliens, land on Earth as the planet is beset by international crises. As the Secretary-General announces the landing of aliens on Earth to the worldwide public at a United Nations news conference, one of the aliens arrives and addresses the assembled delegates and journalists via telepathy. He announces that his race’s motive in coming to Earth is to provide humanitarian aid by sharing their advanced technology.   Soon, humans are volunteering for trips to the Kanamits’ home planet, which they describe as a paradise. Kanamits now have embassies in every major city on Earth. With the U.S. Armed Forces having been disbanded and world peace having been achieved,

Later, it is discovered that the book the aliens leave behind detailing their benevolence is actually a ‘Cookbook’ about how to Serve Man!

Ultimately, the research into human hybrids and cloning for disease prevention would seem ridiculous at best and potentially a human cookbook.

And – Everybody Knows!

PELOSI: White Suffragists… Left Abortionists

The Women in White at the SOTUS event would like to claim that they are simply “Suffragettes” fighting for the rights of women against Trump, who they claim represents their demon.  While the Suffragettes wore white ‘on occasion’, it was also a symbol of the KKK, and the pedophile, rapist, faith healer John of God who demanded everyone who entered his temple of healing in Abadiania, Brazil wear only white. 

The Suffragettes of the US and Uk in early 1900’s had one calling demand, the right to vote.  There were two factions, both included only white women, one faction employed radical, chaotic means, and the other faction promoted peaceful protest and written appeals.   The militant suffragettes used physical violence, arson, and damage to support their cause which ultimately led to hurting the Liberal Party’s reputation and losing their cause.   When WWI began, the movement was tabled completely as women focused on the war effort.  It wasn’t until four years after WWI that suffrage was partially granted by the UK to women over 30 and not until 1928 that all women were granted the right to vote.  In the US the right was granted in 1920 under then President Wilson.  Wilson was bedridden as of October 1919 due to a severe stroke which greatly affected his health and mental acuity.  His wife, Edith, became the defacto ‘president’ and the granting of the power to the right to vote was likely her doing.

Since the abolition of the Suffrage Movement, women have appealed for a variety of rights including ‘reproductive rights’.   It is this right that is frequently quoted as the bain of Trump and all conservatives, and the squeal of all Spocialists and Liberals.   The World Health Organization defines reproductive rights as follows:

Reproductive rights rest on the recognition of the basic right of all couples and individuals to decide freely and responsibly the number, spacing and timing of their children and to have the information and means to do so, and the right to attain the highest standard of sexual and reproductive health. They also include the right of all to make decisions concerning reproduction free of discrimination, coercion and violence.”

Nowhere in this definition is ‘abortion’ defined as ‘reproduction’, because it quite simply isn’t a part of the act of reproduction.

When and where did abortion gain traction?

Interestingly, it was introduced in Russia during WWI with the Bolshevik Revolution.   Under Bolshevik rule, Russia became the first country in human history to provide free abortions in state run hospitals as of October 1920.  In the US, Socialist Margaret Sanger has been labeled the mother of abortion as she was the founder of Planned Parenthood.  In fact, it was Mary Calderone, a physician who worked at PP in the 1950’s, who advocated for abortion, sex education for children as young as 5, and sexual promiscuity earning her the award as Humanist Of The Year by The American Humanist Association in 1974.  Her husband, Frank Calderone, was chief administrative officer at the World Health Organization.  The American Humanist Association is a non-profit that advocates secularism and advances the concept of ‘the greater good’ which is a Socialist/Communist meme.  Its past president, David Niose has been a writer and blogger for Psychology Today, Washington Post, BBC, Salon and Huffington Post.

Neither Sanger or Calderone actually conducted abortions at Planned Parenthood.

It wasn’t until 1970 when then Planned Parenthood president, Alan Guttmacher, opened the first legal abortion facility in New York.  The facilities were called abortoriums.   As the president of The Eugenics Society, Guttmacher’s primary concern dealt with a means to correct over-population.  Prior to the legalization of abortion, Planned Parenthood had about 42 centers, however, with legal application the number of facilities jumped to 100 with Ellen Fairchild and Dr. Jeff Penfield having the ‘honor’ of conducting the first legal abortions for Planned Parenthood. Their goal was to perform 100,000 per year in New York City.

The initial funding came from the Rockefellers, The Scaife Mellon Trust, and an anonymous donor.   But it wasn’t long before government funding from Health and Human Services was added to the burgeoning budget in 1971 by Richard Nixon under the premise that government funds would not be allocated to abortion, but instead to family planning and birth control.  Today, Bill Gates Foundation, Ford Foundation, Buffett Foundation and the Turner Foundation make sure abortions are liberally covered.

During the Obama tenure, Planned Parenthood received tremendous grants from the government with the caveat that they help promote Obamacare.   Follow The Money.  And despite finding that Planned Parenthood was indeed selling human body parts, the courts under Obama and the Socialist Liberals determined that it was not illegal because they did not make a profit.  Within their non-profit 501©(3) status, they are prohibited from spending funds on any political campaign.  Not to be deterred, they simply set up a PAC, fund it liberally, and spend upwards of $6-$7 million per year on Democrat candidates.

Ironically, sitting Chair for Planned Parenthood is Joe Solmonese, former president of Human Rights Campaign.   Cecile Richards, formerly Deputy Chief of Staff to Nancy Pelosi is a former president of Planned Parenthood, and current president, Leana Wen, who served as a fellow for World Health Organization and The Department of Defense, and like David Niaose, Wen blogs for Psychology Today and the Huffington Post.

In essence, this is the white Suffragist Movement of the Nancy Pelosi Party today – a party that feels they represent ‘all women’ and wear the KKK white to prove their solidarity and female nationalism, rooted in Bolshevik Ideology – Socialism – Eugenics – De-Population – Secular Stoicism – and Sexual promiscuity.

Trump Dossier – The Circle OUTED!

Christopher Steele, FusionGPS, Jeb Bush, Glenn Simpson, a spy novel in the making, George Soros, and The Council on Foreign Relations! The Dossier sources have been OUTED!

The same FusionGPS was hired by Planned Parenthood to discredit the lurid and incriminating videos that taped their executives making incredibly raunchy statements about fetus’s and selling fetus limbs. The report did nothing to discredit the facts, instead it only attempted to manipulate public opinion.

It is insinuated that Jeb Bush may have been behind the initial request for dirt on Trump, hiring Fusion GPS, who collaborated with Christopher Steele, a former M16 agent who spent some time in Russia in 1990.

In 1996, 9 intelligence agents from Britain were outed by Russian intel creating quite an embarrassment for M16. Their names were not released. However, it would appear that if Mr. Steele was a part of that embarrassment, his last tour of Moscow was 20 years ago… hardly noteworthy for today.

Glenn Simpson is the founder of Fusion GPS, formally a reporter for the Wall Street Journal and an author who has produced One book published in 1995. It may be that he is looking for fodder for a sequel – only this time it will be fictional!

The ‘report’ written by Mr. Christopher Steele was heavily infused with inconsistencies and falsehoods which was why the FBI tabled the entire agenda and gave it little truth or credence.  But Others were not willing to let it go.

Written with an agenda, it was not unlike the Planned Parenthood report, or the Climate reports being generated today. Pick an agenda, hire someone to corroborate the agenda using speculation and release it as factual conclusion. Not Scientific! And not factual.

For example;   Mr. Steele used two different type fonts – and the writing forensic characterization seemed to come from two or more different voices. He consistently covered up some names by referencing a Letter as their name, while outing names that have been under the scrutiny of the Hillary, the Soros, the Bush, the Rubio, and the Obama Agenda.

There was no evidence to support the statements, they were simply ‘presented’. As such they read like an outline to a novel and have been subsequently found to have numerous obvious falsehoods.

McCain, a well known Soros Puppeteer, re-released the report after the initial release gained no press coverage or FBI narrative. US Intel claims they did not out the report to the press. So who did? The obvious candidates would include; Bush, McCain, or Glenn Simpson.

At this point, Christopher Steele and his family are in hiding having been outed for writing fictional content that could be considered legally defaming, and fearing reprisal.   His claim to fame was that he supplied potential corruption matter for the FBI to go after FIFA officials. But even that is now muddied as we learn that he was hired by The Football Association to get corruption calls on FIFA so that they, The Football Association, could host the 2018 and 2022 competitions instead of Russia and Qatar.  Agenda.

Prior to founding FusionGPS, Simpson worked for The International Assessment and Strategy Center which was founded by Arthur Waldron, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. He also lived and studied in the Soviet Union. The Council on Foreign Relations is a DC think tank with a very muddy and controversial agenda most of which involve regime change and instigation of coups.

The Council on Foreign Relations is said to have sponsored the medical marijuana movement. Soros is said to have gained a significant portion of his wealth in drug dealing. Soros is a registered member of the CFR, per the roster released January 2017

And so, the circle is complete.

Planned Parenthood: Sterilization and Racial Cleansing

Forced sterilization and ethnic cleansing define the business plan created by Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood!

Margaret Sanger, was a proponent of Eugenics, the belief that the weaker vessels must not be allowed to birth and thus muddy the supremacy of the perfect race.  Should they allow their loose morality to cause them to get pregnant, abortion was the only means of righting the wrong.  Sterilization would be the punishment, whether elective or a consequence.  Decades later, contraception  became the focus with Enovid, a pill that had dire side effects including, death.

Reading her ideals, one might falsely assume her pen was ruled by the doctrines and ideology of Adolph Hitler.

“They are…human weeds, reckless breeders, spawning… human beings who never should have been born.”

“Birth control is nothing more or less than…weeding out the unfit.”

“Knowledge of birth control is essentially moral. Its general, though prudent, practice must lead to a higher individuality and ultimately to a cleaner race.”

“Instead of decreasing and aiming to eliminate the stocks that are most detrimental to the future of the race and the world, it tends to render them to a menacing degree dominant … We are paying for, and even submitting to, the dictates of an ever-increasing, unceasingly spawning class of human beings who never should have been born at all.”

She speaks of the negro population, of immigrants, of anyone she deems an inferior race who must not be allowed to breed because such breeding only fills the world with a defective race of sub-humans. As such, she worked tirelessly to destroy life through abortion and sterilization projects. To keep the population cleansed of the abominations.

In other words, the stated purpose of Planned Parenthood was – Ethnic Cleansing.

Married to a radical marxist/socialist jewish man, it was his influence that propelled her to atheism, population control, birth control and eugenics. She was instrumental in the Negro Project in which Sanger utilized black clergy and black doctors to help appeal to the race in order to succeed in mass sterilization.  A feminist and a socialist dabbling in the occult, her birth control clinic was funded by the Rockefeller family.

She believed in the creation of a thoroughbred race, one that was without defect, one of genetic superiority, white, and cleansed of all potential disease and inferior qualities. In the 1950’s Sanger met Dr. Pincus who was working on reproductive and infertility in animals. Sanger encouraged Pincus to create what would become The Pill, a contraceptive against pregnancy. Planned Parenthood didn’t have enough money to fund the Pincus’ project and so Sanger solicited a friend, Katherine McCormick, a wealthy suffragist whose husband’s brother had married into the Rockefeller family.

Human trials were conducted on women from Haiti, Mexico and Puerto Rico where the governments turned a blind eye to any ‘mistakes’, side effects or deaths that might ensue.   Side effects included nausea and vomiting to such extent discontinuance was required (affected population –  25%), edema, weight gain, changes in thyroid and adrenal function, thyroditis, toxicosis, hair loss, dermatitis, jaundice, chloasma, toxemia of pregnancy syndrome, While Enovid was taken off the market in 1988, its long term effects and death rates have been deleted from most of Google.

Her birth control project was considered the most powerful in the world impacting Europe, China, Japan, India, Korea, and Singapore. Her eugenics and sterilization projects were adopted by Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark and – Nazi Germany.

And while today Planned Parenthood provides some medical procedures outside of abortion and sterilization, Sanger abhored the idea stating that the provision of medical and nursing facilities to the slum mothers was insidiously injurious. Utilizing statistics of white vs black birth rates, she was able to garner political support as she claimed the survival and domination of the white race was being significantly threatened.  President Roosevelt supported the idea and government funding became the backdrop.

While history has been somewhat rewritten to laud the efforts of this woman in fostering women’s rights, her motives were far less than her depiction and what the media slaves might have us envision. Her goal was the eradication of a great number of undesirables who she felt did not deserve life. She advocated that women should be free to explore sexuality without the ‘consequence’ of pregnancy. Despite some articles which attempt to elevate her motherly instincts, she abandoned her own children, sent them off to boarding schools, gave their care to her aunt and husband and generally had little involvement in their lives. Her true agenda ultimately became the sexual immorality that contraception and abortion advocated and how she might partake of this freedom.

Before WWII, her appeal was quite well observed, however after WWII comparisons to Hitler and the Nazi’s became problematic. As a result, the name of her organization was changed from The American Birth control League, to Planned Parenthood. And while Planned Parenthood makes the claim that most of their income is generated from health services, including mammograms – it has recently been revealed that too is false. Only a spattering of facilities provide ‘some’ health services, and none provide mammograms, those are out-sourced.

The history of Planned Parenthood and it’s morality today have changed little.  It’s purpose and ethic remain. 

Alone, addicted to alcohol and painkillers, Margaret Sanger died a bitter old woman.

Planned Parenthood – FOCUS on Reality

What is this support of Planned Parenthood? Where does it come from?  Somehow, the point has become entirely lost!   This is not about std testing or cancer testing, or any other service performed by Planned Parenthood.  This is a straight focus on ONE issue – harvesting of fetus body parts for sale!  Period!

The disgust is not with ‘women’s rights’, it is with the fatalistic, disgusting notion that selling body parts is okay.  Is it okay to harvest adult body parts without consent? What if we start subjecting our elderly to harvesting of their parts when we simply decide we don’t want to care for them any more? They have over-stayed their welcome on this planet and need to do something worthwhile – give us their body parts for “science”. Doesn’t matter if they want to die, because, well, the government says they have over-stayed. It is – time.  And euthanasia dictates…

Far fetched?

Really? All things lead to further allowances, further pushing of boundaries. All we need to see is the euthanasia that has led Norway into a state of murder. Children don’t want the burden of their parents – that’s okay – euthanize!

It’s not about fantasy – it is about having boundaries. Boundaries are necessary in a relationship and they are necessary in a society. Without boundaries, a marriage dissolves into divorce and a society into chaos. Why is it that we can relate to one – and not the other?

They are forever interlinked. Lose one and you lose them all.

Why is continued funding of murder and body part harvesting even considered?  What could possibly be the rationale? A few women protesting the ‘right of women’ to sell the tissue and arms and legs of their aborted fetuses? Do they want a part of the $$$? Is that their motivation? A new industry: get pregnant, sell the aborted fetus, and get pregnant again – it’s a living…

When we declare it a ‘right’ to kill a fetus, is it any different than a right to kill a dog, a cat, a child, a homeless person, an immigrant? Where is the boundary? It is a hazy gray area that has no justification in morality. But if society ‘says’ it’s okay, then the masses flock in agreement without having even the most remote concept of ‘what they are doing’.

Do not judge them for they know not what they do!

But society does know. The media does know. And they attempt to aggressively block this Truth that could be available through ultrasound, through counsel, through compassionate dialogue. Why? Because it does not further the almighty cause of material dollar – a Ferrari, whatever. Because the Truth might cause a percentage, a group that represents $$$ – to change their mind.

Planned Parenthood has been called out – to the forefront – without panties, and they are running in circles, blaming a few, scraping the barrel to clean up the mess and disassociate themselves from anyone who might bring them down further. But they have a staff of idiots, and their response has been feeble, unprofessional, and purely pathetic.

Who supports this ‘charitable organization’ that receives huge federal funding? George Soros, Bloomberg, Mostyn Law Firm, Goldman Investments, Bonanza Oil, Trace Foundation, etc… some oddities include; Monterey Bay Aquarium, Tiff Advisory Services, Museum of Modern Art, Barbara Lee Foundation, etc…

And to clarify! No one objects to the OTHER services performed by Planned Parenthood. The objection is very specific. The objection is a moral one, and the objection is rationally motivated. No one objects to their cancer screenings, their std screenings, their services that have a positive purpose and outcome. The ISSUE – is the illegality of specific procedures. Period! Do not lose sight of the obvious, the focus, and you will come to understand. No one is attacking Planned Parenthood for the value they do have in ‘other’ aspects of their services. This is specific. It is focused. It is heinous.

Address the issue rather the 50 other arguments that have no bearing whatsoever on the allegations.

Planned Parenthood – An Abortion Expose

Planned Parenthood has come under fire again, this time for its practice of selling aborted baby parts to biotec companies for cost or profit – either one is equally despicable. The defenders claim that the cost $30 – $100 per part is simply a recovery of expenses and therefore of no consequence. With an average of 1 million abortions per year in the US alone, Planned Parenthood admits to about 1/3. A $30 cost per ‘part’; liver, heart, lung, head, legs and arms (8 parts per fetus) would benefit Planned Parenthood to the tune of $80 million at an intake of $30 each. At $100 per part the rake would amount to $280 million per year potentially.

Total revenue from all sources for Planned Parenthood was about $1.2 billion in 2013, of which, $500 million came from the government. Expenses totaled $1.15 billion. While the federal government is prohibited from granting money for abortion, the clinic steadfastly claims that is only a small portion of it’s service, but if we extrapolate mathematically, the potential income from body part sales could be nearly one half it’s entire budget!  Not the disproportionate amount they claim.

So far, the defense on behalf of Planned Parenthood have four claims. One; the body parts qualify as ’tissue’ and therefore are not regulated by law. Secondly; they claim that the tissue donation provides lifesaving scientific research. Thirdly; they claim the video and report comes from a discredited pro-life organization. Fourth; they claim that they get the consent of each and every woman before extracting the ’tissue’ through ‘partial abortion’ methods.

ONE:   What is ’tissue’? There are four types; muscle, epethilial, nervous and connective. To extract these ’tissues’, entire organs and limbs are severed from the body. While organs and limbs are ‘made up’ of tissue, they are not defined as tissue for the purpose of medical use. To define more explicitly; embryonic cells are cells that have been fertilized in in-vitro fertilization clinics and then donated for research. Cells from a woman’s body are specifically excluded. Although even this method is considered contemptuous by Christians.

More plainly, extracting tissue involves extracting ‘cells’, not entire body parts. As in, a tissue sample to determine cancer does not include severing a leg to analyze and biopsy.

SECOND: This is not really a claim at all, but a justification and is of no consequence because it is against the law.

THIRD:  The organizations that are attempting to discredit the Center For Medical Progress (Who made the video/sting) include Media Matters, funded by George Soros, Daily Kos, funded by George Soros, Think Progress, funded by George Soros, and New York Times journalists who are radically liberal. They attempt to denounce the investigation as unfair because it was a ‘sting’. and denounce the maker of the video because he is an advocate for pro-life and has been for many years. But that hardly discredits him or the video any more than we would discredit a police sting because they are biased for law. The logic is bizarre.  Everyone has a belief o some sort, a belief does not make them not credible.

But the contention goes on to implicate and discredit The Center For Medical Progress founder by associating him with previous sting operations including the ACORN debacle from 2008. Of course, given that the founder of the center for Medical Progress would have been about 18 at the time is noteworthy. Again the ACORN controversial history was justified and cleansed by – Media Matter’s George Soros.  The discredit isn’t based on truth but an innuendo of something completely unrelated.  The entire transcript and video WERE released without edit.

FOUR: The fourth claim by Planned Parenthood states that every woman who donates ’tissue’ gives prior consent. But no such consent form is on the Planned Parenthood site – at least not yet!

I visited the site for Planned Parenthood and tried to find the consent form that specifically addresses the ’tissue donation’. When I tried to open the pages for Texas and Louisiana laws, I received an error 503 service unavailable message…It did come back online, but the consent form made no mention of tissue donations whatsoever.

Planned Parenthood is rife with past controversies; teaching sex education in California, post-birth abortions, their opposition to over-the-counter birth control, their 2013 Susan B Komen controversy and stem cell research, and not to mention the controversial law which prohibits the government from funding abortions and Planned Parenthood’s justification by stating they perform other procedures as well.  A former employee estimated that PP profited about $350 per abortion. They have ‘acknowledged they perform about 335,000 per year – at $350 profit = $117.5 million ‘bottom line’.

Please note: Profit is not Revenue – it is pure bottom line AFTER expenses. The actual Revenue/Cost for an abortion ranges from $1000 to $1500 which would then generate about $400 million in actual abortion revenue, or roughly 57% of total revenue before government grants.