Merkel Building Detention Centers – or Reception Centers?

Angela Merkel is under fire as her popularity wanes between 35 and 50% on a good day.  Why?  Because of her embracing of illegal immigrants.  So she is now in Lebanon desperately trying to see if Germany can get rid of, pawn off, their immigrants by shipping them ‘elsewhere’.   But it wasn’t quite phrased in this way.  The Media phrasing is interestingly culled to read a different scenario.   She states that she wants to find a way to host immigrants closer to their native home, say in – Lebanon for instance – and out of Germany – for instance.   She is proposing building Reception Centers on behalf of Lebanon to house the immigrants within their country confines.  

After condemning Assad and helping to create the absolute devastation of the entire country of Syria, Merkel now wants to provide these Syrian refugees with a path home, via Lebanon’s Reception Centers.

Untangled, what does this really means:

  1. a) Merkel is fighting for her life to secure her constituency in Germany which has been severely harmed by her open borders policy at the behest of George Soros.
  2. b) No one wants her refugees, so she is trying to ‘convince’ Lebanon’s PM Hariri, to take them while Germany continues to pay for them.
  3. c) In exchange Lebanon would allow Germany to gain contracts for infra-structure projects in Lebanon. Germany would likely under-bid the projects in order for them to appear as the legitimate winner and so the German taxpayers will pick up the slack.
  4. d) For media purposes, instead of calling the refugee facilities, Detention Centers, they have come up with the novel idea of referring to them as “Reception Centers”. Thus while they will be the same as the centers in the US, they will be labeled with Mary Poppins sweetness and nice.

The number of Syrians in Germany varies by media/polls and census from 200,000 to 640,000.  Quite a broad discrepancy for a transparent government? 

According to a report issued by GDMAC, the EU determined that refugees had a ‘positive impact on the economy’, with an average contribution of .3% despite increased spending for infrastructure and housing.  If this were in fact true, then obviously Germany would not be looking to expel migrants – they would continue to embrace more and more.  Right?  And according to the OECD, the additional expenditures for migrants will positively impact per capita income in Germany.  Whose?  The Rothschild’s?

Sweden is the second largest port for refugees.  And yet, despite all the glowing support for more and more, the UN stated that as a result of Sweden’s acceptance of refugees and immigrants, Sweden will become a third world country by 2020.

So who do we believe? Obviously if the OECD and GDMAC agencies are correct then the refugees have a positive influence and more would be better – right?   But if in fact that influence was positive, then why would Merkel and the German government be so radically fearful and demand to expel these adjuncts to their economy?

Spin.

As Glen Beck attempted to enunciate, in the US, as the Hollywooders form the basis of the screaming fits of defamation, what has any of them actually done?  Has Rob Reiner offered to bring 2000 children to his home?  Has Chelsea Handler offered to help them find their parents and fly them back home?   Has The View paid for their Reception Center costs?   Has De Niro provided a diaper?  Have any of the Hollywood instigators done anything at all other than scream?   No. Not a one.  They lend their name because Liberals are like rock and roll groupies fawning after, drooling after ‘a name’ without regard to the character substance and the Hollywood’s are ‘being paid’.  Big Bucks.

The fake politician is easy to spot – they will criticize and demonize the current politician – and then offer to give free education, free healthcare, free food, free air, free clothes…  while never telling you – how.  Because NOTHING is free.  They may claim they are Democrats, Socialists, Independents, or even Republicans, but in the end, their single agenda is to promise everything while never providing the means or a solution to any crisis.

Merkel is using a framed white washing of words to create exactly what the MSM and Hollywood are screaming about in the US while blaming Trump.   She is posturing to create Detention Centers in Lebanon at taxpayer expense while buying/blackmailing Saudi Arabia’s Hariri, to give Germany contracts to undercut building infrastructure projects – also at German taxpayer expense – so that she can gain traction in beleaguered polls and pretend she is not really selling her country.  And while the actual number of Syrian refugee’s in Germany has a range of +/- 300%, I wonder how many will find themselves detained in these ‘prisons’? Caged.  I mean, hotels.

Jordan continues to cage refugees since originally being detained in 1947.   Millions.  But no one scuttles even an ‘outcry’.   As Glenn Beck asked the defeated CNN, Brian Stelter, if it is about the numbers, then what is the number?  And Stelter dignified the question with the response, well as the numbers rise, so does the indignation… if it is ten we don’t care, but 2000, now we care.  Okay.  Then why isn’t he talking about Jordan?

Because, he was lying.

Of course, Saudi Arabia will have to get some cut in the deal… as they own Lebanon’s Hariri.  I’m sure more weapons at cheaper prices might be in the making as we speak.

In the end, Merkel is playing into the part of the fool, just as she played into the part when Soros bullied her into accepting millions of refugees four years ago and she fawned and bowed to his will as though he was god.  

Ultimately, Germany will come tumbling down, and Soros will be laughing hysterically at how easily Merkel was pawned.  It has nothing to do with the people, not the people of Germany, Sweden, Iran, Iraq, Turkey, Yemen, Lebanon, or any other country.  It is all about an agenda game played by Swamps that rule everywhere.

Government Incentivizing Prisons and Detention Centers

Remember last year, that long, long time ago that most of us have forgotten, when thousands of children attempting to immigrate into the US from Central America were put in detention centers? Remember?

Well guess what? They are all still there. And the facilities are crammed.

So, who is paying for this? We are.

You see, a privately held company holds most of the prison contracts with the Federal government and eleven states. GEO Group builds and manages prisons across the US. And they hold the keys to the ‘detention centers’ in Texas and Pennsylvania currently holding all these children and their moms.

With revenues well over $2billion, the CEO of the Group, George Zoley, was paid over $4million in compensation last year. He is considered the highest paid government contractor and they are continually awarded new contracts despite numerous lawsuits and citations for wretched conditions and death.

The charges filed include deplorable medical conditions, substandard care, nine deaths, under-staffing, and at a youth center housing 13-22 year olds there were brutal beatings, sexual attacks by prison guards, gang fights, rapes, denial of education and medical care, and overall negligence. There was one federal indictment in that case – the warden, William Grady Sims, resigned and served seven months in prison.

Despite numerous civil lawsuits and federal charges, they are still a major government contractor. Mandatory sentencing has produced a system of incentivized incarceration.  In addition, detainees at detention centers and prisoners are required to – work.  It’s called slave labor and it’s authorized by the government.

As incarceration has risen 500% over the past 30 years, the rise directly coincides with the founding of GEO, originally Wackenhut Corporation, in 1984. Incarceration has become a monetary incentive. But the states and the fed are in collusion with this in that their contract with these private prison companies include a clause that requires the state to maintain a 80-100% occupancy on the prison’s behalf! And GEO boasts a 95% occupancy rate. But it is worse. If the state doesn’t have enough prisoners to fill the private prisons, they still receive a guaranteed percentage of occupancy even for – empty cells. For example: if the prison is only filled to a 60% capacity, the prison will still receive the minimum guaranteed payment per person up to the 80%to 100% per the contractual agreement.

GEO is large and expanding. They have a number of subsidiaries including:

  1. GEO Care Inc – which, “provides correctional mental healthcare services and operating state psychiatric hospitals treating forensic and civil populations, including the current management of six adult residential treatment centers. GEO Care has established itself as the premier provider of mental health and residential treatment services.” But this subsidiary is also not without it’s history of problems: “unauthorized restraint and seclusion of patients, incomplete medical records, failure to show patient consent for medications and failure to report serious injuries to the state.” In 2012, three patients died, 2 from overdosing on medications and one from a scalding bathtub.
  2. GEO Transportation, Inc
  3. GEO UK
  4. GEO Australia

Incentivizing occupancy means that crimes not deserving of prison will nonetheless mandate an order from a judge. This undermines basic law. In Colorado state prisons were shut down due to low occupancy as crime fell. But the private prisons remain full.  Arizona boasts an over capacity of prisoners relative to prisons.

They have such a win-win that they have created their own production and no one can bring them down. It is estimated that ICE spends over $2billion per year – on detention centers alone.

So what happened to all those moms and children in the private detention centers run by GEO? Mothers are protesting, hunger strikes are ramping up, solitary confinement is not uncommon, and children are sick. Las Hieleras in Texas is a temporary holding where allegations of freezing temperatures are utilized to break the spirit of the detainee.

While immigration is certainly a problem that has seen no remediation, ethics are in question as these people become simply a piece of merchandise on which private enterprise profits.