Merkel Building Detention Centers – or Reception Centers?

Angela Merkel is under fire as her popularity wanes between 35 and 50% on a good day.  Why?  Because of her embracing of illegal immigrants.  So she is now in Lebanon desperately trying to see if Germany can get rid of, pawn off, their immigrants by shipping them ‘elsewhere’.   But it wasn’t quite phrased in this way.  The Media phrasing is interestingly culled to read a different scenario.   She states that she wants to find a way to host immigrants closer to their native home, say in – Lebanon for instance – and out of Germany – for instance.   She is proposing building Reception Centers on behalf of Lebanon to house the immigrants within their country confines.  

After condemning Assad and helping to create the absolute devastation of the entire country of Syria, Merkel now wants to provide these Syrian refugees with a path home, via Lebanon’s Reception Centers.

Untangled, what does this really means:

  1. a) Merkel is fighting for her life to secure her constituency in Germany which has been severely harmed by her open borders policy at the behest of George Soros.
  2. b) No one wants her refugees, so she is trying to ‘convince’ Lebanon’s PM Hariri, to take them while Germany continues to pay for them.
  3. c) In exchange Lebanon would allow Germany to gain contracts for infra-structure projects in Lebanon. Germany would likely under-bid the projects in order for them to appear as the legitimate winner and so the German taxpayers will pick up the slack.
  4. d) For media purposes, instead of calling the refugee facilities, Detention Centers, they have come up with the novel idea of referring to them as “Reception Centers”. Thus while they will be the same as the centers in the US, they will be labeled with Mary Poppins sweetness and nice.

The number of Syrians in Germany varies by media/polls and census from 200,000 to 640,000.  Quite a broad discrepancy for a transparent government? 

According to a report issued by GDMAC, the EU determined that refugees had a ‘positive impact on the economy’, with an average contribution of .3% despite increased spending for infrastructure and housing.  If this were in fact true, then obviously Germany would not be looking to expel migrants – they would continue to embrace more and more.  Right?  And according to the OECD, the additional expenditures for migrants will positively impact per capita income in Germany.  Whose?  The Rothschild’s?

Sweden is the second largest port for refugees.  And yet, despite all the glowing support for more and more, the UN stated that as a result of Sweden’s acceptance of refugees and immigrants, Sweden will become a third world country by 2020.

So who do we believe? Obviously if the OECD and GDMAC agencies are correct then the refugees have a positive influence and more would be better – right?   But if in fact that influence was positive, then why would Merkel and the German government be so radically fearful and demand to expel these adjuncts to their economy?

Spin.

As Glen Beck attempted to enunciate, in the US, as the Hollywooders form the basis of the screaming fits of defamation, what has any of them actually done?  Has Rob Reiner offered to bring 2000 children to his home?  Has Chelsea Handler offered to help them find their parents and fly them back home?   Has The View paid for their Reception Center costs?   Has De Niro provided a diaper?  Have any of the Hollywood instigators done anything at all other than scream?   No. Not a one.  They lend their name because Liberals are like rock and roll groupies fawning after, drooling after ‘a name’ without regard to the character substance and the Hollywood’s are ‘being paid’.  Big Bucks.

The fake politician is easy to spot – they will criticize and demonize the current politician – and then offer to give free education, free healthcare, free food, free air, free clothes…  while never telling you – how.  Because NOTHING is free.  They may claim they are Democrats, Socialists, Independents, or even Republicans, but in the end, their single agenda is to promise everything while never providing the means or a solution to any crisis.

Merkel is using a framed white washing of words to create exactly what the MSM and Hollywood are screaming about in the US while blaming Trump.   She is posturing to create Detention Centers in Lebanon at taxpayer expense while buying/blackmailing Saudi Arabia’s Hariri, to give Germany contracts to undercut building infrastructure projects – also at German taxpayer expense – so that she can gain traction in beleaguered polls and pretend she is not really selling her country.  And while the actual number of Syrian refugee’s in Germany has a range of +/- 300%, I wonder how many will find themselves detained in these ‘prisons’? Caged.  I mean, hotels.

Jordan continues to cage refugees since originally being detained in 1947.   Millions.  But no one scuttles even an ‘outcry’.   As Glenn Beck asked the defeated CNN, Brian Stelter, if it is about the numbers, then what is the number?  And Stelter dignified the question with the response, well as the numbers rise, so does the indignation… if it is ten we don’t care, but 2000, now we care.  Okay.  Then why isn’t he talking about Jordan?

Because, he was lying.

Of course, Saudi Arabia will have to get some cut in the deal… as they own Lebanon’s Hariri.  I’m sure more weapons at cheaper prices might be in the making as we speak.

In the end, Merkel is playing into the part of the fool, just as she played into the part when Soros bullied her into accepting millions of refugees four years ago and she fawned and bowed to his will as though he was god.  

Ultimately, Germany will come tumbling down, and Soros will be laughing hysterically at how easily Merkel was pawned.  It has nothing to do with the people, not the people of Germany, Sweden, Iran, Iraq, Turkey, Yemen, Lebanon, or any other country.  It is all about an agenda game played by Swamps that rule everywhere.

A Charter City in Honduras – the ZEDE Effect

What if groups of Investors Ruled Cities? What if committees oversaw all management instead of politicians? Would it be any different?

– ZEDE –

Honduras is one of the poorest Latin American countries riddled with crime, corruption, gangs and violence. A US backed coup hailed in a new leader in 2009, Juan Hernandez, replacing the elected Zelaya. Hernandez, was the US choice as he would back a critical new concept, ZEDE. When the locals realized what the true concept meant to them, they took the case to the Supreme Court. Four of the five judges ruled against the ZEDE concept in favor of the people. Hernandez fired the four judges and replaced them with 4 new and approved ‘abiding ones’. And so the case for ZEDE was approved. Voila!

ZEDE = Zone for Employment and Economic Development.

Basically, a ZEDE is a privately owned and ruled city. It operates outside of the law of the land and is taxed at a significantly lower rate per a negotiated contract with the government of the country. Each ZEDE will nominate their own internal governing body as outlined by the 21 members of the “Committee for Adoption of Best Practices”. The governor will be called Secretary and the committee has full authority over the actions of the Secretary. The land necessary to create a ZEDE is bought by the group of investors from either the government, or from private parties, depending on ownership. However, if the private party does not want to sell, the land is appropriated by the government and sold anyway – something like ’eminent domain’.

Promoters of ZEDES claim they will reduce poverty and increase security. While opponents claim the cities are built for the uber wealthy elite and organized crime and will serve to take away their sovereignty and increase poverty through class status.

There are currently 14 potential locations for ZEDE’s in Honduras, coincidentally they are all either on the sea, or they are in places where there is known oil. These enclave cities being self governing will have some autonomy with the current government legally, economically, administratively or politically, but for the most part can adopt their own set of laws and regulations. They will have their own courts, police, prisons and security. And while human rights laws against sex trafficking, child abuse, money laundering and drugs are regulated according to Honduran law, they can change that with the approval of Congress.

But laws in Honduras are not as strident nor as punished as ours in the US. Drug trafficking is raging forward, human trafficking for slaves is not illegal, and although sex trafficking is illegal, there has been very little done to actually enforce the laws. ZEDES need only be compliant with similar human rights laws established and enforced by the government.

They are identified as LEAP zones and operate according to their own rule of law. Theoretically, ninety percent of the internal employment is supposed to come from local Hondurans. Technically, there are no restrictions on their self governing laws – however, a free market system is a requirement. All imports are free of taxes, fees, tariffs and any other charges. In addition, a major focus is the creation of a tax haven.

This is not a concept – this has already been signed and ratified in Honduras under the regime change president, Hernandez.

Who is behind the ZEDES?

According to their website, in order for projects to be considered for admission into the ZEDE Regime (their word not mine), the Committee for Adoption of Best Practices (CAMP) will make that decision. The members of this committee include; Grover Norquist, Mark Klugmann, Mark Skousen, Richard Rahn, Michael Reagan, Loren Smith, Lars Christensen, Morton Blackwell, Alex Cranberg, Barbara Kolm, Salem Ben Nassar Al-ismaily, Faith Ryan Whittlesley-Articulo, Ricardo Cardona Lopez, Ricardo Rodolpho Joest, Octavio Rubin Barrientos, Ebal Jair Lupian, Surse Pierpoint, Alejandra Chafuen, Enrique Ghersi and Kakha Bendukidze.

So who are these guys?

Cranberg = energy, Norquist = connections and money, Klugmann = developed LEAP, Skousen = investment analyst, Salem Ben Nassar Al-ismaily = written about mining and metallurgy exploration, from Oman (and there is insinuation of working for the intelligence department of Oman per Bob Carr a former Australian intelligensia), Enrique Ghersi = a lawyer and free market activist, Alejandro Chafuen = President of Atlas Network, an NGO promoting less government and free markets and Barbara Kolm = President of European Center for Economic Growth.

Given their stout support of economic freedom, market freedom, and an ‘altered’ government body, they represent the antithesis of the Socialist and Globalist agenda of Soros. Right? But wait. Grover Norquist actually appeared in a Soros funded ad tauting for more immigrants to come to the US and condemning Islamaphobia… Norquist also allegedly has links to the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas and Hezbollah according to Frank Gaffney and Glenn Beck. He created the Islamic Free Market Institute and is married to a Palestinian woman.

His profile is oddly checkered. Given his hardline Republican stances, it is an odd that he supports some very liberal views – not to mention aligning with Soros. But Soros has been known to play ‘both sides of politics’. Paul Ryan, Grover Norquist and Rubio – the trilogy of immigration thought as in, “Sharia Law is compatible with the US Constitution.” ~ Grover Norquist. Could that be his intent in his Honduras ZEDE? Sharia Law? Unfortunately, I suppose we will have to wait and see as in – the ink is dry…

In totality – its that odd shift of who is right, who is wrong, who is the good guy and who the bad – that has now discombobulated our thoughts to the point – we don’t know. And that’s a bit scary.