Elizabeth Warren: Coached by Hillary, Backed by Soros – A Communist Agenda

To understand the behind the scenes trajectory of the Democrat candidates, one need not look to mainstream media given they are simpleton puppets rehashing the exact same propaganda feed, instead look to The Economist.

The Economist is the reiteration of The Swamp, or the Cabal, owned and run by Rothschild interests.

While bolstering all things Hillary and all things Obama once upon a time, today their support is behind Elizabeth Warren as the preferred candidate. From their perspective, she is bold, clear, clean and likable.   The debate moderators were hailed as ‘outstanding’, ‘substantive’ and ‘pointed’.   While Sanders, in their opinion, is still a viable contender, Biden is likely out, and the rest, while perfectly perfect, haven’t the populous support.

Hillary has been coaching Warren, while both Hillary and Obama have snubbed Biden.  But even more transparent is Warren’s daughter, Amelia Warren Tyagi, who is positioned throughout a web of Soros bravado NGO’s, including the progressive non-partisan, unbiased, unpolitical, Demos.

Demos: “focus includes election reform, voter rights and voter registration, civic engagement, financial reform, and sustainable economics”.   Sustainable economics is a posh phrase for socialism.

The Board of Demos is clearly indicative of the Swamp behind Elizabeth Warren and includes: Wally Adeyemo- President of Obama Foundation, David Johnson – serves on board of Human Rights Watch, the Soros organization, Rashad Robinson who has an organization that forces corporations from supporting Trump and white nationalists, Steven Heintz, one of the founding members who is president of the Rockefeller Foundation, etc…etc…etc…

Bottom line, Warren is entrenched in the Cabal – and the Cabal has pushed ahead of schedule it’s agenda to implement Socialist-Communism before Trump can initiate indictments and blow the lid off the entire Protocol.

It bears mentioning that as Warren takes the lead in the Democrat polls, Buttegieg has gone from a ranking of 4 to 16 in this past week. According to The Economist, Buttegieg may be positioning himself for a VP legacy.

While Hillary has intimated that she could beat Trump “Again”, there are a number of factors that would play out to her disadvantage:   1.   The fact that she has been coaching Warren would certainly not go over well with Warren should she suddenly enter the race,   2.   Billy’s history with Epstein would erupt, 3.   The fraud perpetrated by the Clinton Foundation would ramp up exponentially, 4.   The negative press would all but destroy Chelsea’s chances of being a politician,   5.   The Benghazi crisis,  6.   The email crisis,   7.   Hillary’s bizarre health issues back on display…   all the dirt that Obama stuffed into the garbage bag would be rehashed.   Jail would be considered, and Billy doesn’t seem too well.

Still there are those on the right goading her very massive ego knowing that a Hillary run would open Pandora’s Box and leave her vulnerable to all things covered up in the labyrinth of The Swamp.

Warren will have to deal with her own convoluted non-truths, her Soros backing, and her inability to produce a plan other than ‘Bernie’s’.   She has less backbone than either Pelosi or Hillary and has been insulated from attacks.  So far.  I doubt she would be able to survive the onslaught.

But even more so – do Americans really want to become a Communist nation?  Because that is what Warren is offering.

Trump – The Money Grubber…?

Elizabeth Warren, Pocahontas, how much does a person’s net worth have to be to be a ‘money grubber’?

Because in her opinion, Trump is a grubber and Hillary and Bill are not… Worse, apparently Mz. Warren has a net worth of over $14.5 million as of 2010, with no valuation attributed to her current wealth.

Compared to the average Joe, that would make her in the category of ‘money grubber’. In addition, when offered to option to pay a slightly higher wealth tax to the state, she decided NOT to comply. In addition, she apparently has -0- or less of charitable contributions.

So what makes a money grubber?

A person who cares more about accumulating than giving… and that definition would surely apply to Mz. Elizabeth Pocahontas. So while she is not in the realm of Romney or Trump, nor is she in the realm of Hillary, but she far outweighs the public at large and thus it becomes a simple matter of semantics. How much? A million per year apparently does not qualify. Tch. Is it a graph? What is the cap that defines ‘grubber’ vs liar?

How dare she attempt to align herself as a candidate of the women and yet lie, and slander, and make a hypocrisy of the entire agenda. I am outraged! She does NOT speak for me. And I AM woman.

And despite the absolute fact that she lied on her application to Harvard as having Indian heritage that qualified her for certain privileges and tuition breaks, she skates unscathed. How is it that we ALLOW this? How is it that she can skate – and Martha Stewart, of all people, goes to jail? How does that nuance happen?

How is it that such a woman can make such defamatory comments and not be taken to the mat? I am a woman, and I do NOT support liars. And as a woman, if it is the woman candidate who is lying, so much worse is the judgment. Because, they believe they are speaking for me.

And they are NOT!

I’m sorry, but when deriding someone else and calling them names and creating a national sensation, it would behoove tat person to take a look at the content of their accusations and how they might apply to themselves.

Between Warren and Hillary, we are acutely bereft of a candidate that would seem to have any viable value structure or honor, and it is this depravity that makes both democrats and republicans cringe when confronted with females whose behaviors and ethics would seem to be – vacant.

You are not Ghandi!

And while there are numerous countries throughout the world who have honored women as their Presidents and Prime Ministers, America still has not. And perhaps that is because the pickins just ain’t that sweet!

For the record, Sarah Palin, wasn’t a good choice either. While she might be a fun social guest, an intelligent debater, an interesting character, she was not a person who represented – me. Or many other women for that matter. And then of course, there was the Soros affiliation that became the McCain agenda, not a good neighbor. Too bad. A loss.

While I am stupified who could possibly vote for Hillary given her status as crook and traitor, I am humbled by the fact that my ex-husbands entire family are adamant supporters. How can they not know? Because like most, they are victims of a branded media that has created a virtual reality of politics and politicians. If this were a movie, it might be viewed as ‘interesting’ and ‘scientific’, but the fact that it is our reality, makes it horribly scary and infinitely manipulative.

In the end, it is up to each of our individual selves to try and rise above, to see the world for what it is, to create our values based on our heart, to disassociate ourselves from the media, from entertainment, and from the manipulative powers that will send us to eternal Hell. It is after-all that poignant. That imperative.

Just close your eyes and take a breath and – breathe.