National Security

Pete Hegseth Fighting Lizards On The Left & Right

Posted on by Helena

The Lizards on the Left are hellbent on demanding Pete Hegseth resign immediately as Secretary of Defense.  Which only makes it notable who they are not trying to dislodge.  What dastardly deeds has Hegseth committed?  1.  He allowed Mein Kampf to remain on the shelves of the Naval Academy library.  2.  He allowed Elon Musk to sit in on a Pentagon briefing.   3.  A supposed unnamed anonymous whistleblower claims Hegseth used Signal Chat in a group with his wife and brother divulging classified information. 

Pete Hegseth’s brother is a security advisor to Pete employed by the Pentagon.  The whistleblower did claim that there was classified information in the ‘chat’ while none was actually revealed, nor confirmed by anyone at the Pentagon or by President Trump.  But the classified hit job was also parlayed against Trump so the likelihood of it amounting to anything but a left Lizard move is not likely.  In fact, they tried the rape conquest first.  That failed.  I suppose when this falls flat, they’ll try and honeypot him.

Hegseth’s wife is a former news producer with Fox.  Once again Biden set the Precedent.  Jill was giving briefings.  She was signing his signature.  She was running the Stage.   Thus Hegseth’s wife is a non-sequitor of Media stupidity.

Always the same boring jabs.  Meaning they have absolutely nothing on him.   Bigger question – who is the Pentagon Leaker Lizard?

Given the media must acknowledge that Pete’s brother is a security advisor working at the Pentagon, their about-turn is ‘nepotism’.  Something the Lizards know all too well;  Hillary & Chelsea, Maxine and daughter, Biden and brother and son, Pelosi and daughter,  …  as I said, boring.

The problem with all the media in hyper-modus is that nothing is backed with any evidence of wrong doing.  In fact, Vanity Fair, a fashion magazine, thought they were qualified to spill the story verbatim.  Typically, Vanity Fair posts Hollywood gossip and gasp stories of infidelity.  Owned by Conde Nasty, their chief content officer is Anna Wintour whose resemblance to E. Jean Carroll is more than a bit creepy.  But then Carroll wrote for Vanity Fair…

It was during Carrolls time at America’s Talking housed in Fort Lee, New Jersey as a call in advisor to women, the Caroll claimed Trump assaulted her in Bergdorf, New York.  Her ratings were low and the entire show was shuttered July 1996 after just 2 years.

The Atlantic author Tom Nichols high-brows his demand that Hegseth must resign as his Patriotic Duty to America!  Written by a man who never served in the military, a diehard neoconservative anti-Trumper whose spewing is well rehearsed.  He continues to demand that Trump punish Russia for interference in the 2016 election despite the entire episode of Democrat Terrorism 101 being labeled the HOAX of the century and propagated by Hillary.

Although once they feel they have slandered Hegseth enough they can move on to Noem or Patel, they are simply testing the waters right now to see how far they can wade in before warrants are slapped down.  Warrants long overdo.  Of which their lacking is becoming a bullhorn cry!   Epstein.  January 6th.  Russiagate.  Ukraine.   $4 trillion missing from the Pentagon…  The Big Stuff.    

At issue is the fact that IF repercussions are not levied quickly enough we will once again become mired in the Lizard loathesomes.   Unable to lift our head from the Haze of fools and jesters who enslaved us under Biden.   It is unclear what is at stake that is causing them to drag their feet.  While focusing on immigration and MS 13 is a priority  – that is ONE agency, ICE. 

Given Hillary is known to have instigated the HOAX, signed off on the HOAX, and helped the Media Glam JAM the HOAX down everyone’s throat, the magnitude of this and the Pelosi January6gate are big enough to go forward with indictments now.  The Evidence is huge and the courts should be Military.  “Military courts can be used to try civilians who are accused of serious offenses, such as terrorism or espionage. These civilians are tried in military courts because their crimes are a threat to national security.”

What is considered a threat to national security?  Any action or circumstance that endangers the well-being, sovereignty, or interests of a nation.  The following would pertain to both Pelosi and Hillary:

  1. Human Security:  These involve threats to the well-being of citizens, including threats to their physical safety, livelihoods, and access to basic needs. 
  2. Internal Threats: These include domestic terrorism, organized crime, and political unrest that can undermine a nation’s stability. 
  3. Geopolitical Instability: This includes conflicts and tensions between nations, which can destabilize regions and pose risks to global security. 
  4. Terrorism: Domestic and international terrorism, including acts of violence and the propagation of extremist ideologies. 

There have been troves of lawyers at Trump’s beck and call months before he was elected that should have been putting together these cases.  Therefore, there is an unknown reason.  Something big enough and bad enough that President Trump is holding his team back.  And all we can do is … WAIT.

COVID National Security & Emergency Status – Illegal?

Posted on by Helena

Legally, for the HHS to declare a State of Emergency they must determine there is a National Security Threat.   In order for that threat to be confirmed, there are multiple rules in place that assist in making the declaration.   Those rules would dictate that in order for a disease to be considered a viable cause for implementing the Emergency Order, it should be identified as a terrorist attack, a biological warfare attack that justifies it as a Security issue both at home and for American citizens abroad.

In addition, in order for the FDA to authorize unlicensed, unapproved treatment for a disease, there can NOT be any other available treatments.

Public Health Emergency Law:   A pre-requisite to determining the use of biological agents to treat a disease via the EUA – There can be no adequate, approved, and available alternative to the product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating the disease or condition.

In addition:   Within the emergency authorization, fact sheets providing the potential risks shall be provided to each patient who then has the ‘option’ to accept or refuse the product with no consequences! In addition, the FDA is mandated to provide patients with alternatives whether approved for use or not. State and local officials must comply with the conditions attached to the tests and treatments, ie refusing to comply shall have zero consequences.

NO tests or treatments shall be mandated given the entire purpose is to uphold economic and individual freedom and ALL measures will be deemed ‘GUIDANCE’ and shall not infringe on freedom.

Lockdowns and closures were – illegal.   We were not fighting an attack.   We were fighting a disease.  Diseases are NOT terrorists.

Humor!   In the wake of all the rules promoted by various states in converting our freedoms to illegal wakes, 2 democrat senators have determined 2 measures should be made law: 1. Third party delivery apps would have a cap on fees, and 2.   Restaurants would be allowed to sell ‘cocktails to go’ for two years.   Priorities!

These statements, rules and guidance I am quoting are stipulated within The Homeland Security Act, Public Health Emergency Medical Countermeasures, Public Health Service Act and the FDA.

The authority for treatment is specified as coming from government ‘stockpiles’ or from previously issued but unapproved treatments that meet risk evaluation vs benefit analysis, or from treatments approved for other diseases but not yet approved for this disease.   These treatments must continue to undergo rigorous trials and updates made available on a continual basis to the FDA in the form of reports.   These reports which must be made public via the FDA must include adverse reactions – as in keeping the public informed.  To the best of my knowledge none of these requirements have been met.

March 27, 2020, the Following Federal Declaration was issued by Azar, Secretary for HHS:

“…there is a public health emergency that has a significant potential to affect national security or the health and security of United States citizens living abroad and that involves a novel (new) coronavirus (nCoV) first detected in Wuhan City, Hubei Province, China in 2019 (2019-nCoV). The virus is now named SARS-CoV-2, which causes the illness COVID-19. On the basis of this determination, he (Azar, Sec of Health) also declared that circumstances exist justifying the authorization of emergency use of drugs and biological products during the COVID-19 pandemic, pursuant to section 564 of the FD&C Act, subject to the terms of any authorization issued under that section.”

 According to the FD&C Act 564, the FDA must determine that: “If the secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) determines that there is a public health emergency under the Public Health Service Act (PHS Act) §31910 that affects, or has significant potential to affect, national security and involves specified CBRN agents (chemical warfare) and diseases… an EUA can be allowed.

In other words, all these authorizations were dependent on the one thing the White House and Fauci continually denied!   A Terrorist Attack using chemical agents. As such, they acted outside their authority.

The Heritage Organization issued an essay in 2015 targeting misconceptions on the use of and definition of National Security. Identifying what it is NOT, Heritage issued this statement:   “While a pandemic disease could endanger the safety and security of thousands of Americans, unless it is committed as an act of biological terrorism, it should be considered a matter of health and domestic safety, not national security.”

Once again, the distinction is whether an event occurs as a direct result of an attack, or act of biological terrorism, or whether it is a ‘social security’.   Further undermining the entire federal, state and local misuse of power.   National Security is not climate change, it is not gender identity, it is not human rights.   And it is not disease. National Security involves a threat of war wherein the military is involved.  That has always been it’s purpose and interpretation.

As such, 1000 lawyers and 10,000 doctors have convened to file a lawsuit claiming the CoVid laws and lockdowns violated the Nürnberg Code against the CDC, WHO and Davos Group for crimes against humanity. Stating:

  1. The PCR test was never designed to detect pathogens and is 100% inaccurate at 35 cycles. All PCR tests monitored by the CDC are set at 37 to 45 cycles.
  2. Under Article 32 of the 1949 Geneva Convention, “mutilation and medical or scientific experiments not required for the medical treatment of a protected person” are prohibited.

However, the Nuremberg Code is based on the ‘Consequences of War’ – so the entire lawsuit may be tossed unless the National Security issue is triggered.  A very interesting conundrum!   Because governments declared a disease was a National Security Threat, they have in fact triggered the very concept of War – which would then trigger the Nuremberg Code.   If it is deemed to NOT fall into the category of war, then every aspect of lockdowns was ILLEGAL>