Reading the New York Times Headlines one feels like they have just been airlifted to an alternate universe: “When Trump Froze Aid, These Soldiers Felt The Chill…” – …the country was struggling in bare bones fight against Russian separatists.
Obviously history has been completely annihilated.
Ukraine’s coup came under the direction of the Obama administration so as to insert a US asset who would benefit US interests. While the focus has been on Biden and Kerry, it would seem much deeper as a veil is pulled back revealing the global Marxist agenda of Pelosi, Soros, USAID, and the National Endowment For Democracy. Suddenly, it all becomes clear.
No one seems to ask the most obvious question: Why would the US even involve itself in providing aide to Ukraine at all?
The intent was to recreate Ukraine so that it could enter into the European Union. In that vein, aide was supposed to build up their economy so that it met the criteria of the EU.
While Europe claims they have contributed far more to Ukraine, their monetary aide comes primarily in the form of ‘loans’, much of which are passed through via NATO. The US is the largest contributor to NATO – so essentially, the claim falls on its face.
But again, if the purpose of the aide is to rebuild Ukraine so that it can become a member of the European Union, why is the US even indirectly responsible? Shouldn’t the EU be completely responsible?
The aide that the US supplies is labeled military in nature and the amount being contested by the Democrats as being blackmail money was $250 million. The aide was held up initially in August, well before any purported telephone conversation between President Trump and President Zelensky.
In 2017 shortly after Trump took office, he questioned the veracity of sending any aide to Ukraine given the purpose was support the war in Donbass. But that wasn’t the first time military aide was questioned! In April 2016 Washington’s UN envoy Samantha Power said that a military solution to the crisis in eastern Ukraine would spell disaster for all. “A lot more people would suffer,” she warned.
Despite that warning, during Obama’s final moments in office, he unilaterally decided to ramp up spending from $125 million to over $500 million. The money has done nothing to quell the violence, and instead has simply extended it. No attempt whatsoever has been initiated to resolve the conflict through communicative means. So why pour more money on old failed money?
In 2014 when Obama promised $1billion in loan guarantees to Ukraine, The Huffington Post asked a pointed question, “where does the money go?” and found a very opaque circle of NGO’s. One such privately held organization is Chemonics.
Based out of DC, Chemonics receives the majority of its grant money from USAID to support various programs throughout the world, including – Haiti. In 2012, they were awarded $196 million in no-bid, uncontested contracts and came under considerable criticism for misspending, overspending, noncompliance, and abject failure. Money given to Chemonics supported the White Helmets in Syria, an organization that was found to be in collusion with ISIS. As a For Profit enterprise, Chemonics net income for fiscal year 2019 was $1.5 billion. What aide did Ukraine get?
Another flow-through organization receiving money for Ukraine is the National Endowment For Democracy whose president and CEO, Carl Gershman, hails from the UN and the Social Democrats USA. The Social Democrats USA was formally the Socialist Party of America. It is considered a left wing Socialist organization in affiliation with the AFL-CIO and was found to have used USAID money to support the communist regime of Poland in the 1980’s. In addition, “NED has also supported, provided training, and consulted with groups which approve of democracy, but criticize the United States, in countries such as Indonesia and Ukraine.”
NED has been cited as funding the Hong Kong rioters in order to create chaos.
Each year NED provides a Democracy Award to recognize creative work. Past speakers at awards ceremonies have included: John McCain, Nancy Pelosi, and Paul Ryan.
According to the Huffington Post: “The program’s efforts are described on the USAID website as providing “training for political party activists and locally elected officials to improve communication with civic groups and citizens, and the development of NGO-led advocacy campaigns on electoral and political process issues.”
The Board of Directors of NED is crammed full of notables in Washington including; Senator Tim Kaine, Congresswoman Karen Bass – who was selected by Pelosi to serve on the Steering and Policy Committee, Victoria Nuland, and Ambassador William Burns and Michelle Dunn of the Carnegie Endowment which promotes globalization.
In 2000, the Carnegie Endowment created the Migration Policy Institute which is funded by: Open Society, Ford Foundation, MacArthur Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation, Urban Institute, UN, governments of Sweden, Spain, UK, Netherlands, Norway, etc…
James Zigler who serves as a Trustee to Migration Policy Institute is also a board member for National Foundation for American Policy:
“The National Foundation for American Policy, according to it’s website, “is a non-profit, non-partisan organization dedicated to public policy research on trade, immigration, education, and other issues of national importance. The organization seeks to expand the debate over the proper role of government on key issues of the day and to engage actively in the media and with the public to ensure its ideas are considered and implemented wherever possible.”
In 2005, Ron Paul stated that NED has “very little to do with democracy. It is an organization that uses US tax money to actually subvert democracy, by showering funding on favored political parties or movements overseas. It underwrites color-coded ‘people’s revolutions’ overseas that look more like pages out of Lenin‘s writings on stealing power than genuine indigenous democratic movements.”
So. Who profits from military spending in Ukraine? Soros, Pelosi, Ryan, NED and the globalization effort of the Socialist Marxists.
In other words, the Ukraine debacle with Pelosi leading the pack behind closed doors whereby testimony can not be verified, is embroiled in a collage of organizations whose function is to instigate coups and color revolutions so as to destabilize the balance of power utilizing media propaganda as a tool to promulgate fake and false news while promoting mass immigration within the veil of globalization.
And the US government/aka taxpayers are paying for these organizations through shadow pools of NGO’s whose agenda is to realize radical Marxist socialism and world dominance therein.
The war that erupted in the region of Donbass – Ukraine, was a direct result of the coup in 2014 – a Color Revolution….