Hate speech

Facebook and Twitter: Hate Speech Police

Posted on by Helena

In some Middle Eastern countries morality police, or vice squads, enforce Sharia law to promote virtue. In the US, Twitter and Facebook have announced that they are the self-appointed speech police determining what is morally acceptable, who should be punished, and even going so far as to direct those whose mindsets are not aligned to their dictum shall be sentenced to a clinic so as to undo the brainwash of conservatism and national pride.

Life After Hate is the organization Facebook refers members to for rehabilitation.   Based in Chicago, it was founded in 2011, funded by the Obama administration, and dedicated to the elimination of white power ideologies. Backed by the controversial Southern Poverty Law Center, the organization is in it’s core – racist. Focusing exclusively on ‘white power’, Life After Hate claims that Neo-Nazism and skinheads are the focus of their ExitUSA program.

But Facebook and Twitter have expanded that definition to include what they term ‘white nationalism’.   Apparently ‘black nationalism’ is not racist because it is ‘cultural’.   Black feminism is also not racist, although it is nationalist.   Chicano Nationalism is also not considered racist because ‘it is an ideology, not a political movement’.   But White Nationalism is now defined by Facebook and Twitter as Neo-Nazism and aligned with skinheads…

Facebook and Twitter have thus exposed themselves as being ‘racist’ – against white culturalism.   Perhaps they should subject their racism to the AI analytics.

National pride is considered a vice that must be eradicated.   Despite the fact that it does not define as a color, it is termed a color movement by the media, the same media that upholds the anti-semitism voice of Ilhan Omar.

And the inane hypocrisy continues.

Twitter has stated that politicians are exempt from this censorship because their speech is worthy of public interest – but citizens must be deleted. Oddly, calls for death and dismembering, rape and assault by Hollywoodites falls under the Twitter code of worthy of public interest.

Given Trump’s penchant for tweeting, I doubt that he will put up with any interference from the Liberal Twitter veil on speech by it’s Executive Chairman, Omid Kordestani. Kordistani is an Iranian well entrenched in the Globalist scheme as he was groomed by the best – Google. Infamous for manipulating the search engine schematic on behalf of Hillary Clinton, Goggle and its ‘allies’ continue to use their supremacy to further the demise of Constitutionally protected free speech.

In the midst of this censorship revelation, the same outlet that self described itself as the racist police identifying organizations it termed ideologically upholding hate, has been caught in its own vise.   The Founder of SPLC has been forced to resign, it’s President and legal Director have resigned, amid allegations of sexual harassment, gender discrimination and racism have been levied.

Funded by the Rockefeller Foundation, Open Society Foundation, Cisco Systems, Grousbeck Foundation etc…, the Southern Poverty Law Center has used its massive connections to create a list of hate groups, primarily conservative, to delude and vilify their viability.   Rooted in Socialism and Communism, the original founders were racist, radicals who embraced Marxism.   Many of the organizations on its list of hate groups were found to be either nonexistent, inactive, or existing in name only.

Despite a history mired in fakery, the SPLC has routinely been quoted as a source by Mainstream Media new sites.

In 2013, the Swampland FBI endorsed the SPLC as a ‘partner’ in battling hate crime.   On it’s website, the FBI listed as a resource, the SPLC. During this same period, the Justice Department was supporting and funding the Facebook antidote: Life After Hate. Their government grant funding was immediately suspended under President Trump.  But the circle continues.

The enormous risk Facebook and Twitter giants face by their self proclamation of speech police, while aligning with a neo-nazi self help organization, is the same possible outcome as that of the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Massive lawsuits are sure to be levied.  Zuckerberg, who is already fighting left calls for his resignation, could find himself embroiled in monumental legal ranglings that call for the complete takedown of the platform.   It is a stupid move, but the Left is more and more desperate to censor any form of conservative voice.

Hate speech is not illegal in the US.   Censorship is.

FYI:   despite the fact that Life After Hate bills itself as a 501(c)(3) which must post it’s 990 forms online – it has failed to do so and is thus in violation of its IRS tax status.

EU Approves Censorship – Article 13

Posted on by Helena

The EU Parliament passed Article 13/17 censoring and regulating internet freedom of speech in a vote approved by 348 MEPs, with 274 voting against, and 36 abstaining. 

The law proposes to filter all content on its way to the web to ensure no rights are being violated.  That means that content is delayed, content is filtered by artificial intelligence, and AI determines what is appropriate.  It goes without saying that AI is the least intelligent – intelligence.  It does not understand humor, or sarcasm, made up words, or parody.

It is designed to push out any platform that hasn’t the resources to meet the criteria leaving the giants; Facebook, Google, and YouTube to rule and decide what information the EU public will be allowed to know.  While the giants feign anger, as in how dare they, they already have in place algorythms to filter out unwanted conservative news, bloggers and sites. It will likely not have much of an effect on them.  In contrast, small sites that don’t have the resources to censor will be the object of the law. Recently, these alternative sites have gained traction for doing just that – allowing freedom of speech.

The EU Socialist Marxists have found a backdoor means of putting them out of business while cracking down even further on anything deemed unacceptable.

Sites can still show ‘snippets’ of news but will have to pay above a certain word count.   Speech that is deemed ‘problematic’ by the internet police and AI will be taken down and if not done in a ‘timely’ matter criminal charges and hefty fines will be levied.

Non-profits are exempt.

The EU parties that supported this censorship include:  Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats, Social Democratic Party, Christian Democratic Union, Labour Party and European Peoples Party Group.   The European People’s Party is led by Donald Tusk and Jean-Claude Juncker.  In other words it is a manifesto instituted by Socialist/Marxist regimes and opposed by Nationalist and populist parties.   The brainchild of Germany.

In the UK a Catholic journalist is being investigated by the police for mis-identifying a transgender person.  She used the wrong pronoun, and that ‘hate speech’ is now a criminal offense and considered to be racist.

The EU has already rather strict laws in place with regard to what they classify as ‘hate speech’, including specifying something generalized such as – Marxists are bad.   Instead we are told to imply rather than state, such as – many are of the opinion that ideologies that applied their roots in the Soviet Union era after the ‘fall’ of the Tsar and until the fall of the Soviet Union, were based on a different meme of thinking…

SNORE.

Mocking is also not allowed. Satire is considered in bad taste and anyone engaging will be found guilty, their site taken down, and possible fines imposed.  Criticizing hate speech is also considered ‘hate speech’.

Ultimately, the fines and determinations will become so costly, so rampant, that the giants will simply block everything except pretty pictures of food, puppies and landscapes.

Saying “Boo” – might be construed as prejudicial to ghosts, or believed to be inciting violence by goblins. Hate Speech.

These are the rules imposed on all blogs and media (with the exception of non-profits) within the boundaries of our great allies in the EU – the Socialist/Marxists.  The allies that never were.  The allies in Germany that instigated WWI and WWII.   The allies that we were deluded into believing were our friends, but in essence were building the new world according to the promulgations of the failed Order of Hitler.  

That alliance was the very first propaganda employed by the EU – a wolf shepherding the sheep to the cliff.

Germany: The Ally That Was – And Isn’t…

Posted on by Helena

Facebook has 2.27 billion users monthly.  Today they announced the ‘unprecedented’ deletion of 500 pages and accounts… which represents a dastardly .00002%.   All of these accounts were logged from Ukraine, central Europe, eastern Europe and Russia.   In 2017 Facebook clocked nearly $40 billion in ad revenue, and these dastardly accounts had the nerve to spend $135,000 over six years, representing less than .0001% of their total revenue for six years.  Still this deserves front page news!  Why?  Because according to the liberal media, these accounts were ‘loosely related to Russia’ even if they weren’t.

In fact, 13 people worked for Russia’s Internet Research Agency… oh wait, no, those people were indicted 3 years ago.  But still, that is – ‘The Spin’!

What was their dastardly offense?  Why these pages purged?  They were apparently, anti-NATO, anti-corruption, and discussed protest movements…, and one page actually was ‘linked’ loosely, somehow to Russian media Sputnik.  Unknown how.

Of course the fact that every country in the world now has multiple ‘government’ owned media conglomerates would seem to be a repressed reporting technique.

Germany emphatically demanded Facebook purge any account that Germany felt breeched their definition of hate speech, and went so far as to legalize their ability to fine any social media platform that failed to do so within a stated period of time.

Germany, the ally that – wasn’t.

Germany was an ally as long as a Progressive, Socialist, Democrat was in power in the US.   Then Germany wasn’t.  An ally refers to a nation which is united with another due to treaty and/or common cause and purpose.   Therefore, if the US chooses a President who is not of the Socialist ilk, then the US is no longer an ally.   Hence the German liberal/socialist media is lashing out at anyone in the US who represents an alliance with our current President, Donald Trump.  Oddly, despite strict laws against ‘hate speech’, these defaming German outlets are apparently free to wage defamation and hate – against anyone and anything – conservative.

Der Spiegel has issued a scathing article in which the US Ambassador to Germany, Richard Grenell, is labeled a pro-Trump, alt-right, right wing colonial officer.   How does Germany define hate speech?

Whosoever, in a manner capable of disturbing the public peace:

  1. incites hatred against a national, racial, religious group or a group defined by their ethnic origins, against segments of the population or individuals because of their belonging to one of the aforementioned groups or segments of the population or calls for violent or arbitrary measures against them; or
  2. assaults the human dignity of others by insulting, maliciously maligning an aforementioned group, segments of the population or individuals because of their belonging to one of the aforementioned groups or segments of the population, or defaming segments of the population,

shall be liable to imprisonment from three months to five years.[

Based on Germany’s definition, it would appear that Der Spiegel is more than obviously guilty of crossing this law and should be subject to penalty.   But of course they won’t be because the law is only upheld when it serves the purpose of the Socialist Democrat Party.

What did Grenell say that was so offensive and thus deserving of a thrashing by German media?  In referring to Merkel’s refugee policy he said, “There was no plan in place.”    “…anyone calling for secure borders in Germany today faces an “overreaction.””  And, “…anyone who speaks openly about the issue runs the risk of being portrayed as being part of the “radical far-right” by the German media.”

Which of course was exactly what then occurred as Der Spiegel went on a rampage to defame Grenell, thus hypocritically upholding Grenell’s claim…

Der Spiegel was embroiled in its own massive fraud in 2018 when it came to light that their darling reporter, former CNN journalist Claas Relotius, had fabricated many/nearly all of his stories including infamous anti-Trump and anti-American spews and won awards for them. Despite the publication claiming it has the most extensive fact checking system of all media, the Der Spiegel fact checkers apparently failed miserably for 2 years while Clads was employed with them, and roughly 4 years while at CNN.

Who owns Der Spiegel?

It is a cross of owners including; Gruner + Jar which is owned by Bertelsmann, and employees. Bertelsmann was sympathetic to, and supplier for the Nazi’s during WWII.  During that period their revenues soared while they employed jewish slave labor who were forced to work for the paper in Lithuania.   Reinhard Mohn, who ran the company after the War was himself a Nazi under Rommel.    In 1993, he donated 69% of his shares in Bertelsmann to the Bertelsmann Foundation.  Their ‘projects include; globalization, immigration, and redistribution of wealth.   More importantly, they emphasize digital globalization and censoring of – fake news – unless of course that news is generated through their partners including;  Vox, RTL, Der Spiegel, Brigitte, STERN, Gala, and Harvard Business Manager.

Der Spiegel has also been embroiled in its own history of subversion charged with engaging with the Nazi’s, Third Reich reporting, distorting history, and covering up for Nazi’s and SS Officers.  Interesting that they would refer to the US Ambassador Grenell as a “neo-Nazi”…  But then this is the liberal agenda: accuse your opponent of the evil that is within you.

Der Spiegel represents the German Government, Merkel, and all things NWO.   But they are the strings for Bertelsmann wherein the power lies.   And in its current and previous history, Bertelsmann was directly interlaced within the Nazi Regime.  Not simply through a slur of some Hollywood Socialist, but through absolute participation, membership, and governance.

And THEY fear Trump and all the Deplorables more than anything.

Germany – Integration of Muslims and Jews

Posted on by Helena

Germany allowed 1 million Muslims to immigrate into their country as the escalation of war has devastated African and Middle Eastern states.   Those numbers added to the internal population of about 3.7 million. By contrast, Germany is home to roughly 120,000 Jews.   And anti-Semitism has, not surprisingly escalated. In 2016, Germany ‘recorded’ 1468 anti-Semitic attacks. In one university poll, 62% of the Jews reported that they face antagonistic anti-Semitic attacks – daily. But the media prefers to target the AfD for rhetoric, despite the fact that they have a paltry membership of just 29,000.  

Merkel’s response is to require school youth to make a trip to the Nazi camps a mandatory curriculum. But most Muslim refugees aren’t integrated into the school system, so how will this solve anything?

Worse, she is proposing building a synagogue in the middle of Berlin’s most prevalent Muslim neighborhood!   Help me here!

Hate Speech.

In the midst of these measures, there are increasing issues with Islamaphobia in Germany that Merkel sees as a direct correlation with the rise of – AfD, all 29,000 members comprising; .6% of the Muslim population in Germany, or .03% of the total population of Germany.

If Muslims wanted to integrate they wouldn’t live in Muslim districts.  

When immigrants come to ‘any’ country, their first line of defense is to group together where they find a commonality, a language, a shared culture.   Cities across the world have created Polish districts, Chinatowns, Irish districts, Muslim districts, German districts, black neighborhoods, etc… It is normal.   Integration is not.   Christians like to befriend other Christians.   Democrats routinely drop Republican friends when they discover their affiliation.   Couples alienate divorcees.

I can attest to some of the above personally.

Syrian orphan children cannot be adopted outside of Muslim families. Integration is not permitted.

There are by far more examples of why it doesn’t work than when it has worked.

Germany now stands at the forefront of hate speech laws.  

The origin of hate speech laws is unfortunately, forgotten. Having its core in Communism, the laws were designed to curb freedom of speech so as to protect the government from any dissent.   But Germany seems to have conveniently forgotten this history lesson and imposed these laws to the extent that US citizens are barred from entry into the country due to their blog content.

But Germany isn’t content with simply barring entry to individuals, they have barred social media content that they deem in “their opinion” is not appropriate.   As such, they have instituted Communist Laws and Agendas similar to “Sharia Law”.

And Germany is not alone.

The UK has a history of barring activists from entering their borders (Pamela Geller, Martin Sellner, and Lauren Southern), although they embrace refugees who commit egregious and violent crimes.   And still, both Germany and the UK refuse to criminalize these refugees telling their polizi to abstain for fear of mediaslamation… errr, defamation…

Hate speech does exist, its called bullying in our education system. All three of my sons were bullied in the public school system. Most school shooters were bullied in their public school system.   But if you take away the gun from the bullied, will he feel better, will he/she feel less bullied? Will they cross the line in another way?

Islam belongs in Islam.   Jewish people hang with Jewish people.   Atheists hang with atheists.   It is just the way it is – for the most part.   There are exceptions, but they are few.   Forcing people upon people is NOT the solution.   It is government control bordering on Communism.   And personally, I ain’t a fan…

Beyonce -Super Bowl’s Malcolm X

Posted on by Helena

Imagine if the Super Bowl half time performance was a bunch of white people dressed up like the KKK advocating the annihilation of the black race?  Imagine the Outrage!  The Fallout!  The protests and riots that would ensue!

The tribute to Malcolm X by Beyonce is really no different given his absolute hatred of white people and his ideology that all white people must die. When the pendulum swings to such absurd maxims, the attitude is really not much different than ISIS. Ethnic cleansing – only the ethnicity is a race and the race is anyone with beige skin.

We accept this?

It is racist, it is inciting hate, it is inciting prejudice and terrorism, so why isn’t it prosecuted? Shouldn’t Beyonce have been arrested for her performance?

“In law, hate speech is any speech, gesture or conduct, writing, or display which is forbidden because it may incite violence or prejudicial action against or by a protected individual or group, or because it disparages or intimidates a protected individual or group.”

The lyrics were so provocative that they included a ‘warning’ for indecency… This is a prime time viewing period in which children of all ages will be in attendance. So why do the NFL organizers allows such drivel? Do they really think Beyonce’s racist rant will create a greater audience? Because personally, I knew of households who vowed to turn off their television during halftime just to protect their children from her extremist, hate speech.

By law, she should have been arrested. But the absolute hypocrisy is only heightened by the fact that she needed armed security guards, aka police, to escort her to the stage to rant about her hate for police, authority and everyone that isn’t black – as in Malcolm X. In true Hitler fashion, she advocates for black supremacy, death and anarchy. That is racist – and it is against the law.

Exactly who orchestrates these ‘family friendly shows’ that require warnings? Jordan Levin, CEO of Generate Content, LLC and President of Defy Media, LLC, is also the content organizer for the NFL since 2015 and was responsible for the half time debacle.   But that doesn’t explain the gross acceptance and media accolade of Beyonce’s hatred.

While there are more white people killed by police very year, the statistics are not equal. Given the disparity in percentages, blacks are more likely to be killed… yes, but they are also more likely to be the killer, the aggressor or perpetrator of violent crimes – disproportionately. Taking out the equation of drug arrests and focusing on violent crimes, blacks account for over 80%.  Despite that ‘profile’, the media is censored from releasing race data any longer because it is considered ‘racist’. If the victim is black, then it is not racist and the media is afrenzy with tributes to the black victim at the hands of a white perpetrator.

Why is the media so anti-white racist?

For one thing, it is a fashion statement – it is the generator of chaos – and it is based in a core of division and conquer. But Beyonce brings a fresh new hatred of white people to fresh new heights. Given she has an ethnic makeup that includes, white, Cherokee Indian, Creole, and French, it is odd that she would harness such a powerful animosity toward her own. She dies her hair white blond… but abhors whites who might sport an afro, citing that afros’ belong to blacks. But then Obama is half white and hates whites as well – and that’s not racist.  A double standard or simple hypocrisy?

She seems to hate with such aggressive venom and then decries foul when she feels blacks are the victim of hate. The immature hypocrisy she exudes is so flamboyantly childish it would be ridiculous if she were not given such notoriety as a half time event at the Super Bowl. While claiming to be Christian, I find it odd given Christianity does not embrace such racial hatred and even her devout friend Obama decries tolerance and embrace. It would appear she is one confused little girl whose education, or lack thereof, was refocused on narcissistic pursuits including the National Church of Bey, an organized church that ‘worships Beyonce’ and is a registered nonprofit entity… UGH!

We are afraid to say what is Truth in an effort at being ‘politically correct’, and not wanting to offend, and that attitude has gone to such extremes that it needs a major over-hawl of core ethics. Remember Gloria Steinem?  The woman is still outlandish in her commentary.  While the concept of equality is certainly important, taking the pendulum to the far extreme only serves to create a ‘new inequality’, and division through chaos.  No different. When an attitude is no longer about balance but encroaches on Fascism, it no longer deserves protection.

NFL shame on you for caving – I think she should have been arrested for racism and inciteful hate speech.