Facebook has 2.27 billion users monthly. Today they announced the ‘unprecedented’ deletion of 500 pages and accounts… which represents a dastardly .00002%. All of these accounts were logged from Ukraine, central Europe, eastern Europe and Russia. In 2017 Facebook clocked nearly $40 billion in ad revenue, and these dastardly accounts had the nerve to spend $135,000 over six years, representing less than .0001% of their total revenue for six years. Still this deserves front page news! Why? Because according to the liberal media, these accounts were ‘loosely related to Russia’ even if they weren’t.
In fact, 13 people worked for Russia’s Internet Research Agency… oh wait, no, those people were indicted 3 years ago. But still, that is – ‘The Spin’!
What was their dastardly offense? Why these pages purged? They were apparently, anti-NATO, anti-corruption, and discussed protest movements…, and one page actually was ‘linked’ loosely, somehow to Russian media Sputnik. Unknown how.
Of course the fact that every country in the world now has multiple ‘government’ owned media conglomerates would seem to be a repressed reporting technique.
Germany emphatically demanded Facebook purge any account that Germany felt breeched their definition of hate speech, and went so far as to legalize their ability to fine any social media platform that failed to do so within a stated period of time.
Germany, the ally that – wasn’t.
Germany was an ally as long as a Progressive, Socialist, Democrat was in power in the US. Then Germany wasn’t. An ally refers to a nation which is united with another due to treaty and/or common cause and purpose. Therefore, if the US chooses a President who is not of the Socialist ilk, then the US is no longer an ally. Hence the German liberal/socialist media is lashing out at anyone in the US who represents an alliance with our current President, Donald Trump. Oddly, despite strict laws against ‘hate speech’, these defaming German outlets are apparently free to wage defamation and hate – against anyone and anything – conservative.
Der Spiegel has issued a scathing article in which the US Ambassador to Germany, Richard Grenell, is labeled a pro-Trump, alt-right, right wing colonial officer. How does Germany define hate speech?
Whosoever, in a manner capable of disturbing the public peace:
- incites hatred against a national, racial, religious group or a group defined by their ethnic origins, against segments of the population or individuals because of their belonging to one of the aforementioned groups or segments of the population or calls for violent or arbitrary measures against them; or
- assaults the human dignity of others by insulting, maliciously maligning an aforementioned group, segments of the population or individuals because of their belonging to one of the aforementioned groups or segments of the population, or defaming segments of the population,
shall be liable to imprisonment from three months to five years.[
Based on Germany’s definition, it would appear that Der Spiegel is more than obviously guilty of crossing this law and should be subject to penalty. But of course they won’t be because the law is only upheld when it serves the purpose of the Socialist Democrat Party.
What did Grenell say that was so offensive and thus deserving of a thrashing by German media? In referring to Merkel’s refugee policy he said, “There was no plan in place.” “…anyone calling for secure borders in Germany today faces an “overreaction.”” And, “…anyone who speaks openly about the issue runs the risk of being portrayed as being part of the “radical far-right” by the German media.”
Which of course was exactly what then occurred as Der Spiegel went on a rampage to defame Grenell, thus hypocritically upholding Grenell’s claim…
Der Spiegel was embroiled in its own massive fraud in 2018 when it came to light that their darling reporter, former CNN journalist Claas Relotius, had fabricated many/nearly all of his stories including infamous anti-Trump and anti-American spews and won awards for them. Despite the publication claiming it has the most extensive fact checking system of all media, the Der Spiegel fact checkers apparently failed miserably for 2 years while Clads was employed with them, and roughly 4 years while at CNN.
Who owns Der Spiegel?
It is a cross of owners including; Gruner + Jar which is owned by Bertelsmann, and employees. Bertelsmann was sympathetic to, and supplier for the Nazi’s during WWII. During that period their revenues soared while they employed jewish slave labor who were forced to work for the paper in Lithuania. Reinhard Mohn, who ran the company after the War was himself a Nazi under Rommel. In 1993, he donated 69% of his shares in Bertelsmann to the Bertelsmann Foundation. Their ‘projects include; globalization, immigration, and redistribution of wealth. More importantly, they emphasize digital globalization and censoring of – fake news – unless of course that news is generated through their partners including; Vox, RTL, Der Spiegel, Brigitte, STERN, Gala, and Harvard Business Manager.
Der Spiegel has also been embroiled in its own history of subversion charged with engaging with the Nazi’s, Third Reich reporting, distorting history, and covering up for Nazi’s and SS Officers. Interesting that they would refer to the US Ambassador Grenell as a “neo-Nazi”… But then this is the liberal agenda: accuse your opponent of the evil that is within you.
Der Spiegel represents the German Government, Merkel, and all things NWO. But they are the strings for Bertelsmann wherein the power lies. And in its current and previous history, Bertelsmann was directly interlaced within the Nazi Regime. Not simply through a slur of some Hollywood Socialist, but through absolute participation, membership, and governance.
And THEY fear Trump and all the Deplorables more than anything.