Month: January 2016

Polls – An Agenda Revealed

Posted on by Helena

We’ve become so indoctrinated into thinking that a poll holds the truth that we fail to see the absurdity.

Depending on what agency is taking the poll, what factors are considered, who is being polled, what the +/- skew is, and what outcome the agency would like to advance – a poll is a pole is a puddle. According to “Real Clear Politics’, polls show that politics is very NOT clear… The site lists a multitude of polling companies including; the Economist, Reuters, Rasmussen, KBUR, Loras College, Monmouth, CNN, Gravis, PPP, Florida Atlantic University, Gonzales Research, ARG – and blah-de-blah-de-blah.

Who are these people?

PPP Polling took the grand prize as a democrat leaning pollster whose historical credits include the ‘approval rating of God’, and ‘would Obama be eligible to go to heaven’… Every polling company has a healthy ego referring to themselves as ‘the best’ and ‘the most accurate of all polls’. But they can’t all be the most accurate when their results are all over the place. Right?

Polls may have the dubious honor of swaying because people have an inherent instinct to go with a winner. So if the poll can tell you who the winner is according to what other people think, the mindset is to – follow like sheep as in – bahhhhh.

Outside of politics, polls are always trying to determine which country in the world is best. This year, Germany came in Numero Uno, according to US News and World Report. The problem? While it supposedly ranked number one, there were some rather poor grades that were considerably lower than even average: “Under the adventure category, the Bundesrepublik was given a 1.2 out of 10 for fun, a 3 for friendliness and a withering 0.1 for sexiness.”

Ouch!

The survey claims it sampled 16,000 people in ‘four global regions’, which seems a rather strange survey – as in exactly who, what percentage male and female, and were the Saudis ranking Iran, and North Koreans ranking Japan, I mean specifics do make a difference…

Then there is ‘Gonzales Research’, a company that apparently no longer exists as their website is kaput and they have no presence on wikipedia… There is ARG, a polling company – er, one man show blogger, that admittedly failed in 2012 elections. There is Monmouth University, a small school in New Jersey whose polls have always been pretty much confined to New Jersey’s populace. Gravis, which won the prestigious award for the most botched polling in 2014…

Polling is marketing. Buying a poll for the politicians is like buying a business card – you can print just about anything and claim just about anything. In a review conducted of public polling for the 2012 election, within the top 28 there were a few absences, including; Florida Atlantic University, Gonzales, ARG, The Economist, KBUR, Loras College and CNN – sigh. Top of the list? Reuters.

The only polling Reuters has out currently is on ‘the direction of the country’ and Obama’s approval rating’. The problem? Nearly all the Presidential election polling is being done by either CNN, NBC and PPP who are all very liberal politically, or by KBUR, Florida Atlantic Univ., and Gravis who well – are pretty worthless.

Just trying to keep the truth straight is a fulltime job these days.

FYI – The Germany ranking was done by Bav Consulting – there foremost marketing is under Brand Development and Business Management… Their motto? “To change the way the world thinks about brands.”

The Palin-Trump Agenda

Posted on by Helena

Palin endorsing Trump has a lot of people scratching their heads asking, “What the hey?” Including me. Which bears reason for looking beneath the surface. The media acknowledges the endorsement, but few can answer – why?

When Palin joined the ranks of McCain in his presidential run, that exposed her to the ideologies of Neoconservatism. Neoconservatism was actually a movement created by Democrats in the 1960’s who held different views of domestic and foreign policies. Many within the early movement were Zionists who advocated for democracy through military force. Leo Strauss was considered the father of neoconservatism teaching that, “perpetual deception of the citizens by those in power is critical because they need to be led, and they need strong rulers to tell them what’s good for them.” McCain and Palin share the views of war mongering and US intervention – neoconservative ideals.

When McCain was running for election his primary adviser was Randy Scheunemann, whose advisory qualifications include George Soros Open Society Institute. It was Scheunemann who advocated for McCain to pull in Sarah Palin as his VP running mate.

And while Palin has attempted to define herself as a Tea-Party Republican, her stance on wars and bombing and military rule continue to define her priorities. As in – call a country evil and wipe them off the face of this earth… Another neoconservative advocated for Palin to join McCain, William Kristol, a political analyst and pundit.

Kristol, Scheunemann, Palin and McCain were demonstrative advocates for the coup in Ukraine, the Gulf War, Iraq War, Kosovo War, War in Afghanistan and even supported Obama in the Libyan war. McCain openly befriends the befuddled Soros and their entanglement has been recognized for many years. McCain created the Reform Institute in 2001. Funding for the Institute came from Soros and Kerry as well as a number of pro-abortion foundations. The current President of Reform Institute is Juan Hernandez an ‘open borders freeway’ advocate whose roots are in the Liberal Party and Soros.

McCain has been openly against both Trump and Cruz although his dispassion for Cruz is preeminent. Palin has spent her time since resigning as Governor of Alaska co-writing books which have earned her lucrative royalties – just one is estimated to be upwards of $9 million. Given the enormity of sums flying her way, it has been alluded that she would make a play for running for President. But she still doesn’t have the following.

Along comes Trump. Trump who only recently changed his political party from Independent to Republican in 2012, was a Democrat in the eighties and then again from 2001 to 2009. If Palin was indeed a staunch Tea-Partier, I doubt she would be backing the neoRepublican Trump which means her policies and stances are more aligned with neoconservatism as she learned from McCain. There are three possible motives for her backing Trump: 1. she is looking for a White House position and made a deal, or 2. she and Trump both share a Soros backing, or 3. Soros was wringing his hands trying to figure out how to dismantle the Cruz Trump out of reach candidates when his Republican favorite was Rubio. If in fact Palin moved to the Soros camp when she was introduced by McCain, Soros may have called her in to bring Trump down.

How? While Trump may believe that a Republican woman endorsing him defrays his crass remarks about women in the past and thus give him a boost, it could also spell disaster as Palin is considered a bit ‘out there in la-la land’ by a lot of Republican and Democrat voters, never mind the GOP Party.

On the other hand, if Trump and Palin are both in the Soros camp and this is all a magic trick with mirrors and wires, then we are in trouble. If McCain moves to the Trump camp – that would be a clear signal that the Soros agenda is confirmed.

Thank You -obama,ptsd,military

Posted on by Helena

I was thinking about PTSD. I was thinking how it can alter a brains’ very chemistry structure and create – it’s own. I was thinking how PTSD offers the divine and beautiful hope in God. I was thinking – you couldn’t get much closer on this earth than all the military soldiers who have fought for us to the complete and utter sacrifice of themselves.

How complete. Most of us could never imagine!  Amazing!!

Me, I’m an artiste. I think in realms. But there are these pragmatic mindsets that are so completely devotionally giving that their life is a part of the contract. We accept them – as our security – our military. And I believe 99% of them have the most golden of hearts God would never reject them. But, as in all things, it is the few. It is the few that inject into our society a new norm, a new agenda, a new morality. And each time we cave. How can we be so strong… and yet so weak?

The same reason we get up after we fall, brush ourselves off, and vow to try a bit better – next time.

I try to imagine the PTSD after WWII where my father fought as a Colonel of a tank battalion. He never outwardly showed any PTSD aggravation, but I can’t imagine he didn’t harvest it internally. The Glass’s were – are a very proud genealogy. We do not like to show weakness, and would therefore prefer to suffer in isolation. Weird, but it is who we are.

While my father must have experienced great pain during his tenure in WWII, he never really alluded to this weakness in our presence. And I think some of my brother’s therefore had no concept of who he was so much a who he was expected to be for them. A doomed expectation. They could never see him, they could only concentrate on what they were denied. A pivotal spiral that has no win.  But I had One.

Still, somehow, he rose above. He climbed past the grotesque images, and the horrific memories, and he was a great father to me. In fact, I think he was so good, he could have been an incredible inspiration to the masses of young people. Because he embodied the precept ‘I am here’. And he was. Amazing. I imagine my strength in diversity certainly comes from him. My ability to persevere, as my son says, definitely comes from him.

So, to you the men of honor and integrity and value – to you the men who sacrifice and live the memories, to you the men who have been our shield, our sword, our honor, our life, thank you!!! Sometimes we take for granted that which is most precious.  And I don’t want my appreciation to be shallow.

A Charter City in Honduras – the ZEDE Effect

Posted on by Helena

What if groups of Investors Ruled Cities? What if committees oversaw all management instead of politicians? Would it be any different?

– ZEDE –

Honduras is one of the poorest Latin American countries riddled with crime, corruption, gangs and violence. A US backed coup hailed in a new leader in 2009, Juan Hernandez, replacing the elected Zelaya. Hernandez, was the US choice as he would back a critical new concept, ZEDE. When the locals realized what the true concept meant to them, they took the case to the Supreme Court. Four of the five judges ruled against the ZEDE concept in favor of the people. Hernandez fired the four judges and replaced them with 4 new and approved ‘abiding ones’. And so the case for ZEDE was approved. Voila!

ZEDE = Zone for Employment and Economic Development.

Basically, a ZEDE is a privately owned and ruled city. It operates outside of the law of the land and is taxed at a significantly lower rate per a negotiated contract with the government of the country. Each ZEDE will nominate their own internal governing body as outlined by the 21 members of the “Committee for Adoption of Best Practices”. The governor will be called Secretary and the committee has full authority over the actions of the Secretary. The land necessary to create a ZEDE is bought by the group of investors from either the government, or from private parties, depending on ownership. However, if the private party does not want to sell, the land is appropriated by the government and sold anyway – something like ’eminent domain’.

Promoters of ZEDES claim they will reduce poverty and increase security. While opponents claim the cities are built for the uber wealthy elite and organized crime and will serve to take away their sovereignty and increase poverty through class status.

There are currently 14 potential locations for ZEDE’s in Honduras, coincidentally they are all either on the sea, or they are in places where there is known oil. These enclave cities being self governing will have some autonomy with the current government legally, economically, administratively or politically, but for the most part can adopt their own set of laws and regulations. They will have their own courts, police, prisons and security. And while human rights laws against sex trafficking, child abuse, money laundering and drugs are regulated according to Honduran law, they can change that with the approval of Congress.

But laws in Honduras are not as strident nor as punished as ours in the US. Drug trafficking is raging forward, human trafficking for slaves is not illegal, and although sex trafficking is illegal, there has been very little done to actually enforce the laws. ZEDES need only be compliant with similar human rights laws established and enforced by the government.

They are identified as LEAP zones and operate according to their own rule of law. Theoretically, ninety percent of the internal employment is supposed to come from local Hondurans. Technically, there are no restrictions on their self governing laws – however, a free market system is a requirement. All imports are free of taxes, fees, tariffs and any other charges. In addition, a major focus is the creation of a tax haven.

This is not a concept – this has already been signed and ratified in Honduras under the regime change president, Hernandez.

Who is behind the ZEDES?

According to their website, in order for projects to be considered for admission into the ZEDE Regime (their word not mine), the Committee for Adoption of Best Practices (CAMP) will make that decision. The members of this committee include; Grover Norquist, Mark Klugmann, Mark Skousen, Richard Rahn, Michael Reagan, Loren Smith, Lars Christensen, Morton Blackwell, Alex Cranberg, Barbara Kolm, Salem Ben Nassar Al-ismaily, Faith Ryan Whittlesley-Articulo, Ricardo Cardona Lopez, Ricardo Rodolpho Joest, Octavio Rubin Barrientos, Ebal Jair Lupian, Surse Pierpoint, Alejandra Chafuen, Enrique Ghersi and Kakha Bendukidze.

So who are these guys?

Cranberg = energy, Norquist = connections and money, Klugmann = developed LEAP, Skousen = investment analyst, Salem Ben Nassar Al-ismaily = written about mining and metallurgy exploration, from Oman (and there is insinuation of working for the intelligence department of Oman per Bob Carr a former Australian intelligensia), Enrique Ghersi = a lawyer and free market activist, Alejandro Chafuen = President of Atlas Network, an NGO promoting less government and free markets and Barbara Kolm = President of European Center for Economic Growth.

Given their stout support of economic freedom, market freedom, and an ‘altered’ government body, they represent the antithesis of the Socialist and Globalist agenda of Soros. Right? But wait. Grover Norquist actually appeared in a Soros funded ad tauting for more immigrants to come to the US and condemning Islamaphobia… Norquist also allegedly has links to the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas and Hezbollah according to Frank Gaffney and Glenn Beck. He created the Islamic Free Market Institute and is married to a Palestinian woman.

His profile is oddly checkered. Given his hardline Republican stances, it is an odd that he supports some very liberal views – not to mention aligning with Soros. But Soros has been known to play ‘both sides of politics’. Paul Ryan, Grover Norquist and Rubio – the trilogy of immigration thought as in, “Sharia Law is compatible with the US Constitution.” ~ Grover Norquist. Could that be his intent in his Honduras ZEDE? Sharia Law? Unfortunately, I suppose we will have to wait and see as in – the ink is dry…

In totality – its that odd shift of who is right, who is wrong, who is the good guy and who the bad – that has now discombobulated our thoughts to the point – we don’t know. And that’s a bit scary.

Germany Arrests One in 750 Cologne Attacks

Posted on by Helena

The German police have arrested “one” suspect in the 750 assaults that occurred in just Cologne over the NYE weekend. One. Justice? Or cover up to the nth degree?

And yet, worldwide, we wonder why so few crimes are actually reported… Well, maybe this is a good indication!

Despite the Socialist perfect life that the Scandinavian and Germanic countries portray, there is a wicked undercurrent that allows certain crimes to be overlooked. When it involves politics, race, immigration, or politicking, or creating a mask, or discounting women – that would seem to be the doctrine of protocol that Europe holds mightily.

I am no longer angry because I am a Christian, I am angry because I am female. They have crossed even the most generic division you could possibly attempt to dissolve – the 51%. While the black population in the US is between 12-13%, the female population is over 51% – so tell me, why would you insult and target the 51%? Supporting Germany and the Scandinavian countries repress the rape and sexual assault cases is five time the black agenda. So why go there?

As with all agendas there are typically two points – stupidity or purposeful. Purposeful is almost more scary for it yields a foreboding, a design to decay and bring down, whereas stupidity – can be corrected.

Me – I go for the purposeful agenda. I just can’t accept that people are that stupid. Giving them the benefit of the doubt, means I give them evil. They do this from a place that – does not have your best interests at heart. They do this to sacrifice the women, the few, to the many, the Muslims.

Why? The why is even more cynical. It is because they find it – fun.

Do these women feel vindicated by the ‘one’ arrest? Of course not, they feel the police are giving preferential treatment to Muslims and immigrants with no legal status, and they are paying for these same people to assault and rape them. They are providing the welfare for the same people who assault them. They give money and housing to the men that then rape them. They are raped while these men have their wives and families brought to Germany under asylum. They are beaten so that these poor immigrants may thrive.

Thank you Germany. Thank you Merkel for your heart, your wisdom, your nationalism – for the German people… oh right – your nationalism is silent. Allah Akbar!

White Christians Killing Blacks

Posted on by Helena

A report has surfaced on RT claiming that ‘white Christians’ have one view of the black killings by police in the US, vs. blacks who see a different targeted pattern. Really? How naïve, chaotic and ridiculous.

So let the real statistics speak:

  1. Blacks make up less than 13% of the US population
  2. According to the last FBI data available, 2014, blacks accounted for 28% of all crimes
  3. Blacks accounted for 52% of all murders
  4. Blacks accounted for 66% of all rapes
  5. Blacks accounted for 56% of robberies and 63% of aggravated assault

While ‘profiling is technically not acceptable, it is reality. When you profile a perp for any given crime, ethnicity plays into that statistic. Profiling is what helps the authorities capture the criminal. For example, any more it is considered ‘not politically correct’ to profile, so when the media release the data on a crime asking for public assistance, they typically are now relegated to a benign description of the automobile if it is known, and the determination of gender. Of course, we can expect that the gender profile will most likely also be expelled as we have ‘gender identification’. So now the police are looking for a – person who may have been in the vicinity of such and such at such and such time. Great!

Everything else is prohibited.

Gee – let me keep my eyes out for a white Honda…

If I were a cop – I’d be looking for the statistic. Because that’s what helps keep the rate at the 52, 66 and 56 percentile instead of the 82, 90 and 100% percentile! NOT arresting people does not make crimes go down. It simply makes the arrest ‘rate’ go down for statistical purposes.

Calling the stats ‘white Christians’ vs ‘blacks’ – is reprehensible! The stats speak for themselves without further demonizing who says what – just look at the numbers. If 13% of the population is committing 52% of all murders, that is a statistic that deserves recognition. If despite that statistic, the police killed 1.7 times more whites than blacks, then the blacks should feel privileged given they commit more violent crimes! The fact remains that the number of deaths of whites is simply not a topic of discussion, because most whites believe the death was justifiable.

Yet, no matter the circumstances, no matter the demographics of the specific city or city district, the cry is fowl – when it should be – thank you!

Hillary Clinton would attempt to target our heart strings by stating – what if – what if it was whites… But it IS MS. Clinton, we just don’t have protest after every justifiable shooting! So if by percentage, blacks commit more of the violent crimes, and they are actually less likely to be shot by police, what is the reasoning? Because of the media portrayal.

How many white families sued the police?

Some – a few. There are certainly wrongful death suits. And they come from BOTH racial sides. But the disparity is large and remains a subdued statistic. And we as a united people need to understand from where the design for chaos is generated… it is not from the police, it is not from the people, the communities, the heart or the soul – it is created for entertainment by the Globalists who wish to re-invent our world within the One World Order – as masters.

I have never had more fear of my fellow man, than I have today. Ever. So that did not come from me – it came from the mainstream media and their masters. Take heed.

Navy Soldiers in Irans Territorial Waters

Posted on by Helena

The media is filled with angry reports of how the US Navy servicemen were treated by Iran. They continue to blather about how Iran is using this for propaganda and to embarrass Obama. And while the Iranian newspapers did in fact headline the event, it has already been removed to the bin as they discuss more important matters affecting their country, the economy and the world. Yet, our media insists on dragging the story into epic demonizing proportions!

The story changed regarding what actually caused these two boats to venture into Iranian waters. The pictures of the soldiers are rather inane – they look bored, they’re eating oranges and drinking tea – hardly a heavy handed approach to finding ten US soldiers on boats with huge caches of arms – trespassing. Because, in fact the boats were fully operable, they were not drifting, and they had made no attempt to correct their error. And Ash Carter made such a statement to Iran Wednesday – despite the media continuing its vigilante, demonizing approach.

Sounds more like the US was testing its authority. The boats were traveling from Bahrain to Kuwait, an easy jaunt directly north – Iran’s territorial waters are east. And the boats were said to be three miles into Iran’s territory. I imagine the fact that they were traveling where there were no other boats might be a good indicator. At its ‘narrowest’ point, the Persian Gulf is 35 miles wide, at the point where the boats veered off track the Gulf is about double that width – 70 miles. The Iranian territorial waters include those within 12 miles of Iran which is standard according to the Unite Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. That would put the two boats well off their course which would normally have taken a route hovering the west side of the Gulf. That means the US boats had traversed 61 miles east in order to trespass. 

So they would have us believe that a highly trained commando of two US navy Assault boats accidentally got off course by 50 miles in a 70 mile sea span and did nothing to inform – anyone?   Don’t think so. Get real.

The obvious military discrepancy comes to play in the fact that that the US supported the shooting down of the Russian jet that inadvertently crept into Turkish airspace for 8 seconds…and had no sorrow for the pilot that died. According to the White House, the action of Turkey was completely and unequivocally within its jurisdiction given the ‘trespass’. And yet cry fowl-foul when the tables are turned? Not logical at all.

The boats, top of the line assault Riverines, are equipped with four machine gun mounts capable of handling heavy .5 M2HB machine guns as well as medium and miniguns. The boats are also equipped with a Mk49 remote control weapons station equipped with a M2HB heavy machine gun. Developed by Israeli defense contractor Rafael, the Mk49 has a 360 degree arc of fire. These are heavy duty military vehicles.

In fact, Iran did treat the soldiers in a completely normal military fashion given the circumstances. The detention was short – hours – and everyone was released without issue. One soldier looks as though he is laughing…

Why wouldn’t they apologize? They made a mistake? When you make a mistake – you apologize! What the heck is wrong with that? And while some outlets have decried the military Code of Conduct regarding ‘not being taken prisoner without firing a shot’, that applies to a ‘war’. We are not at war with Iran. The US committed an egregious act, Iran acted responsibly, and the story should have ended. In fact we are attempting to make them an ally. Whether you agree with what Obama’s tactics are or not, we are NOT at war with Iran and the military code of conduct does not apply. What does apply is a gentlemanly approach to behavior. Given the boats were loaded with weapons, looks pretty much precautionary to me.

Adding to the fray of frettered journalists, the story – changed – dramatically from a wayward drifting as a result of mechanical failure, to an odd story of a ‘gps malfunction’. Still no one communicated with a higher up or commander… not normal. That alone makes the entire episode look even more suspicious – against the US intentions. But we know that everything is manipulated, including our perceptions, and what news we read, is filtered, and censored – sigh.

Yes, the Iranian media did air the event in the media? So did every single US outlet, as did France, Germany, Canada, Australia, Brazil, Venezuela, Italy, UK, and every freaking paper in the world… because it was – news. Hello? Wake-up!

If Iran had followed the logic of Turkey, with the thumbs up from the US, we’d be in the middle of a World War of epic proportions. But they didn’t. Consider ourselves ‘lucky’!

Soros Unveils the Fall of Europe – Germany First.

Posted on by Helena

More refugees arrive in Bavaria. Bavaria is over capacity and sends them to Merkel. Merkel says she’ll send them to Greece. Greece says no way. More are in sprinter mode at the border waiting for the right moment to spring. And the merry-go-round doesn’t stop because there is no gold ring.

Why did Merkel put her own country in this position?

Initially, the approved media response was that she had a heart. That her heart was for the plight of these impoverished people. We had destroyed Syria, their country, and left it in rubble. We destroyed their means of survival. We bombed their children and created one of the worst refugee crisis ever. So naturally, it was now up to us to ‘assimilate’ and rebuild.

Obama’s disdain for Merkel was evident when she was in the US and there was a ‘mic problem’.  But Soros hatred is deep and unyielding!   He has made that abundantly clear in past interviews. “Merkel is leading Germany in the wrong direction”, “Merkel doesn’t understand basic Keynesian economics”… In 2012, Soros vocally challenged Merkel, saying Germany should leave the Eurozone because their wealth was not shared by the poorer more corrupt nations. Either leave or bail them out – was his rhetoric! Merkel did not listen. In 2013, Soros said again Germany should either allow eurobonds or leave the euro altogether. Merkel refused both. And now its payback time, aka Soros.

How best to destroy Germany than from within.

Soros and his Open Society Institute have been attacking Germany for years, citing discrimination in their schools, reprimanding them for banning headscarves, brandishing Germany’s support of drone strikes against ISIS, and offering legal aid to anyone willing to fight the rule of law in Germany. Soros wants to bring Germany down, because the house of cards will follow easily, once she is dismantled.

Germany represents the EU. They are the core strength, the vision, the apple of the eye. And Soros needed to fragment this power – through his only course of action – division. Merkel was adamant that the EU remain intact – but Soros had a different Agenda. Erdogan opened the doors. Erdogan – another Hedge Bet personality saw a win win situation for himself. Open the doors, relieve Turkey of the responsibility and the financial drain of refugees, make side bets on stolen Iraqi oil, sell it to ISIS for profit, and then blackmail Germany so as to ‘close’ the doors and be rewarded monetarily. Not to mention – twist the dagger that would allow Turkey to join the EU.

Because if Turkey joins the EU – ALL 2.2 million Syrian refugees become the problem of the EU, straining finances, straining rule, straining law.   Merkel would be called to stand down and the EU member states would begin to pull out.  So, what would an unraveling of the EU look like? What would be the consequences?

The concept has been discussed by a number of economists. Thomas Wright stated that the levels of volatility in the international economic order would create a ‘disorderly collapse’. What he could not know at the time was the refugee influx would keep Germany from rising up out of the destruction and instead see it’s implosion as utter chaos consumed and all EU countries followed.

One of the reasons the EU was created was to invoke a unity wherein all countries could operate independently, but within a guide of common rule. This unity would keep countries from falling prey to narcissistic power plays for dominance.  To create divide, one must inject fear. And while Merkel may have played into the Hedge Bet, it is most likely her naiveté that got her there. But in so doing she has effectively begun an unraveling across the EU that will rip apart the last vestige of ‘union’.

Could the murder of German tourists in Istanbul be just another warning from Erdogan and Soros?

Soros has had an agenda to assimilate Turkey into the EU for some time without much progress – until now. Turkey holds a bribe – refugees or EU membership – take your pick. Merkel took the refugees and put the EU membership on the table. Perhaps she felt it was the lesser of two evils. But evil it was. With organized sexual assaults – to the murder of German tourists – Merkel has lost:

In 2001, the Soros Open Society Foundation opened a branch in Turkey under the auspices of:

“The foundation pursues many of its activities by offering grants to projects that focus on the foundation’s priority issues such as Turkey’s EU membership, political reform, gender, education, regional disparities, disadvantaged groups, and civil society.”

In 2005, Erdogan and Soros met at the World Economic Forum and discussed the impact that Soros investment could have on Turkey’s growth and desire to become a member of the EU. Soros generally gets what he wants so when he offered to get and keep Erdogan in power, albeit under his thumb, Erdogan was willing and able in exchange for whatever Soros wanted. Soros agenda called for a new Constitution (something Soros and Obama have dangled here in the US). This new and improved Constitution would in effect usher in Sharia law given that rights would not be considered ‘inalienable’, but up for vote. Soros rigs the vote, and voila – it is done.

Sharia Law is the cornerstone of control.

Why is Turkey important?  It could be their Biblical position – north of Israel.  I’m not sure – yet.

Obama’s State of the Union Address: Bridging the Gap

Posted on by Helena

It’s always interesting to read the perceptions of other people writing about the same event. Especially when those people are writing from a different country. Often, Americans are hauntingly laughed at for being ignorant about what is real and what is fabricated, but I would contend that the fabrications have reached their tentacles overseas.

An Irish news reporter commenting on Obama’s legacy and his final state of the union address, revealed an odd view of his accomplishments and failures, as well as an interesting view of what she perceives to be the desires of the American people.

According to her perception, Obama is unilaterally responsible for making community college education affordable in the US. He takes responsibility for turning around the economy, for strict environmental regulations, Obamacare, and same sex marriage. And while Obama focused on a positive approach, it was more like a resume builder for supreme leader of the UN, than a true account of his internship as President.

Education?  The US education system is considered to be in crisis. Obama has made no impact on education whatsoever – and certainly has not made it more affordable. Community colleges have always been more affordable than private or public universities!  Stating that fact, does not mean Obama has created that reality…  College debt in the US has risen to an all time high of $1.2 trillion, with upwards of 67% in default! The interest rate on student debt ranges from 4.29% to 6.84% for 2015-2016. That’s higher than car loans and mortgage rates. And with jobs unavailable for graduates, paying the debt is simply not conceivable.

Unemployment? There are essentially six different measurements of unemployment. One of the measures was created around 1995 and sought to be all inclusive. At it’s starting point, it measured an unemployment rate of about 12 ½%. It declined to roughly 8% in 2008 and shot up to over 18% in 2010 before beginning its descent once again to its present level of about 13%. There is no world standardized method of determining the unemployment rate, so it is a waste to make a comparison.

Environment? The EPA has caused some of the worst disasters it is tasked with deterring. The Colorado Rive Animas disaster, and the Georgia cotton mill disaster were just two that occurred in 2015. Add to the disasters, the current methane expulsion that continues to destroy the air in southern California which is slated to be worse than Chernobyl, and we have a rather different perspective. There was the billions of toxic wastewaters that were injected into California’s aquifers in 2014 and an LA neighborhood that tested positive for toxic levels of hazardous lead poisoning. Just to name a few…  Instead – we focus on ‘climate change’.

Obamacare? Well let’s look at Kaiser, given their transparency. In 2009, they reported that the cost of healthcare had risen 131% in the previous decade at which time a family plan cost an employer $13,375 – with deductibles ranging from -0- to $1000. In 2015, Kaiser stated that the average employer based plan cost $17,545 with out of pocket costs of $4955 to $6251. A total cost inflation of 65.5%. Hardly a success for the small businesses and individuals.

The economy? While the world experienced a derivatives fallout that killed the economy in 2009, the US GDP growth rate recovery has not been ‘stellar’, instead it continues to mangle out a 2.4 and 2.2 trend. In 2014, the US ranked 121st of 198 countries in GDP growth. African countries dominated with Libya, South Sudan and Gaza Strip at the bottom, -19.8 an all time blow. According to the IMF, the cumulative growth between 1990 and 2006, showed the US behind Taiwan, Singapore, Turkey, Korea, Israel, China, Ireland, India, Hong Kong and Australia.  Stellar?

Perceptions.

Obama may be trying to recreate history to write his own legacy, but the facts don’t support his assertions of grandeur. It is like a virtual reality wherein the Truth is obscured. But ultimately, virtual reality is turned off and the bleak gray of what we must face is crystal clear. If we pretend anything less, we do ourselves a disservice in not focusing on what needs fixing.

Positive thinking has its place, as long as that place is grounded in Truth and Reality.

Obama as UN Secretary General?

Posted on by Helena

So, Obama wants to be King of the World – as in UN Secretary General. General? Interesting given Obama’s only role in a military strategy was listening to the anarchists during his college days while smoking pot and snorting cocaine. Not exactly good resume qualities.

While the UN continues to put on excessive weight, leaning towards obesity, it’s success has fallen on an almost identical parity. It’s staffing has become so bloated that 75% of it’s funding simply pays for their salaries and benefits, which are apparently quite generous! It has been described as inefficient, ineffective, weak, fragmented and a total failure. It employs over 41,000 and easily spends through an annual budget in excess of $45 billion (the number is an estimate since they refuse to provide budget transparency).

And while its budget has been compared routinely as ‘only half’ that of New York City… NYC employs nearly 328,000, as of FYE 2012, – 8 times the staff! An obviously ridiculous comparison.

All of that changed January 1, 2016, while we lay sleeping.

Obama has categorically announced his intention of ruling this organization once Ban Ki Moon’s term is up as of December 31, 2016, coordinating with the day Obama hands the baton to his successor.  Why?  How could Obama’s rule undermine our core? The UN already oversees the World Court which is charged with deciding disputes between countries. But there is something else, something so insidious that has already transpired, while we lay sleeping, that will alter every aspect of our world – forever.

In 2015, a little reported document was signed by the UN and its Member nations; Transforming Our World; the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. It took effect January 1, 2016 with little fanfare because our esteemed media chose not to inform us. You see, while we’re still talking about a One World Order. It is now a far gone conclusion, one our presidents and prime ministers agreed to behind our backs.  We were sold out:

The document purports to represent the Greater Good of all populations and states that they will act on our behalf to create a complete transformation of the world as we know it to one they feel is decidedly more fair, more socialistic, more equitable, ruled by and for our benefit.  As Secretary General, Obama would have the power to appoint ALL other heads of offices within the UN.  The POWER would thus be – over the world.  They refer to this design as the New Agenda where we will all live in conformity with their laws, or else:

Equitable education – as in they decide

Sexual and reproductive health care services – as in they decide

Shared wealth – as in what has not already been committed ie, the Gates/Buffett Giving Pledge which removes wealth from the individual into a Foundation controlled by the individual under the auspices of charity – these funds will not be confiscated

Fundamental changes in the way societies produce and consume goods and services – as in we will be told what to produce, when and for whom

Positive contribution of migrants – as in greater welfare recipients and more terrorists

States that do not comply – will be penalized – as in the mark of the beast

Climate Change mitigation – as in rammed down our throats

Rule of Law will hold any individuals not conforming to these promulgations as a possible criminal or terrorist – as in if you do not accept the mark, you will not be permitted to buy and sell.

The Third International Conference on Financing for Development, held in July 2015, outlined the means for sustaining the cost of The New Agenda – public taxes and ‘mobilizing public resources’. As in, your assets will be confiscated.

It has already begun, while we lay sleeping…signed, sealed and accepted for you, on your behalf.  Are you ready?

William Casey, CIA 1981:  “We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.”

BIBLE:  “And he causes all, the small and the great, and the rich and the poor, and the free men and the slaves, to be given a mark on their right hand or on their forehead, 17and he provides that no one will be able to buy or to sell, except the one who has the mark, either the name of the beast or the number of his name.”