Pelosi Ravaging the Coffers Again: Biden’s Migrant Hotels = $46,700 per month Per Family!!!

With Biden’s pronouncement that a hotel contractor will be given $84 million for the purpose of housing ‘up to 1200’ family members for a period of 6 months, has an ominous tone.  

It isn’t just the staggering dollar value which equates to $11,667 per individual, or $46,668 per family EACH month.   It is the interesting stock purchase that Nancy Pelosi has been making over the last 2 years:   REOF XX LLC, is a commercial real estate company that bought 5 Courtyard Marriot hotels in 2019 alone – the same year they filed for status in San Francisco.

Nine months later, they filed for and received a PPP Loan in April 2020 when the pandemic was in its infancy in the amount of $1,406,100.

The President of REOF is Greg Grant Flynn. His background lists associations with 21 companies including; Flynn Properties, Inc., Flynn Restaurant Group, Carneros Bevco, LLC. Reof Managers, LLC., etc…

Carneros lists 3 key people – Flynn, Barry A Malkin, and Eric Siegel.   Malkin is managing partner of GEM Realty Capital – which owns – hotels.   Eric Siegel is VP of GEM Hillside in Texas. GEM also owns a management company for its properties in Texas located in Preston Hollow, Highland Park, University Park, Devonshire and Turtle Creek.

What hotels have received the contracts for the children detained at the border?

While there are a spattering of articles claiming that Endeavors is the recipient of the $84 million – this realization would seem to not exist on their own website… And the ‘hotels’ have not been named.

But where Pelosi goes – it is inevitable that $$$$ and contracts follow.

While Pelosi’s major purchases in the beginning of the “Pandemic” included Amazon and Facebook, and obvious earlier purchase including Netflix, and VISA, the REOF purchases seemed to manifest each quarter, per the financial disclosures. Well before the Pandemic.   But during the immigration influx that would escalate 150% under Biden in just 2 months.

And while Nancy Pelosi is NO Politician – she and her husband do tend to profit significantly from all things – political. And that would seem to be her forte.   Despite her 80+ years, Pelosi’s obsession with ‘more money’ is beyond ‘normal greed’.   The accumulation has no point other than accumulation – given she is in the final throes of death and has no physical ability to actual ‘do’ anything.

And yet – money remains her blackmail.

Her cohorts in the WH scheme to create a hotel bonanza for those who share Pelosi’s obsession would seem more than willing to throw her a carrot – just to shut her up and make her feel important.

Because in the multiple $trillion dollar schematic, what is an $84 million contract really worth?

And so – Pelosi is placated and continues to perform her duties of subservience and defense of nothingism while the evils within attempt to secure ‘sedition’ charges against veterans.

I’m sorry, but at what point do you FBI, Veteran, National Guardsman, and Sheriffs, refuse to intimidate and prosecute who you know to be innocent victims of the Sedition Communist Agenda?

Is YOUR job, is your ego, worth more than the people you are arresting knowing their innocence?   You have family – I get it… but so do they – and the government is destroying their lives.   DO you really think you will be immune?   When will they come after you, me, us?

Until the WH announce which hotels are being granted this massive funding, we won’t know who benefits and who profits. But you can bet that Pelosi is somehow integrated in the wave of recipients through a maze of octopus arms – and REOF XX is central.

While Endeavors is a nonprofit that advocates for migrants and veterans, according to it’s website, it does not OWN hotels or OWN food franchises – like GEM.   And thus, while they might skim the top as a finder’s fee, who is awarded the $$$$$$ of the contract is reaping some very significant PROFITS At $11,600 per person per month…

Migrant Children – Don’t Want To Go Home!

Once again the perspective of the German government media icon, Deutsche Weil, seems somewhat perplexing as they attempt to provide a psychological analysis of migrant children being reunited with parents on the US border.  Apparently, the problem is the fact that many children aren’t too keen about the reunion, and DW would have us believe it is because they have been traumatized as a result of the separation.

Really?

Children don’t want to hug their mothers and fathers, they don’t smile or run and jump into their arms with happiness and glee. Instead they are sullen, distant, and scowling…  Odd.  Or maybe not so odd.

According to Dr. Elizabeth Barnert of UCLA, she warns that children will be angry, feel abandoned, and have life long health problems as a direct result of the US migrant separation policy.  So why isn’t this the case when veterans are deployed overseas and can be away from their children for a year or even more?  Why is it that time and again the veterans are greeted by their children with huge hugs and tears and kisses?   What could possibly be different?

Could it be because their fathers were beating them?  Could it be because they were abused?   Could it be because the sexual abuse they have endured in their homes has left a lifetime of scars?   Could it be because their life in the shelters was actually much more wholesome than the life they will return to?

Years ago when I lived in California, I came to know an immigrant family from Mexico.   Each year they legally submitted an application and paid the fee to have one of their children come to the US.   One child per year.   I remember Anna telling me how hard it was because all the children were being sexually abused by their uncle.  And yet, there was nothing they could do.   It was tortuous.

Could it be that these sad immigrant children reunited with their parents are not showing joy because this is the life we are returning them to at the behest of our outraged Hollywooders and politicians?

DW also cites Dr. Shonkoff who specializes in researching child development from a scientific viewpoint at Harvard.   Oddly, he too is making an analysis without actually interviewing any of the migrant children.   In fact, the basis of his theory could be more impactful in analyzing the development of children who are raised by nannies, day cares and public schools systems instead of by their parents.   The feelings of abandonment and neglect that institutionalizing children creates.  Or perhaps his research could apply to the roughly 150,000 orphans in the US…  But instead, somehow the millions are neglected in order to make a a statement about a few hundred.  Why?

So why would these two esteemed doctors make subjective statements regarding the psychological and health implications about a few immigrant children without conducting any interviews, specific research, or analysis of the life they are returning to? Why would they condemn the possible value that the shelter offered, as a ‘shelter’ from harm?

The cued media response is ‘irreparable harm, brain damage, obesity, and even – cancer!!  WOW!   What about the hundreds of thousands of children that are sent to the US unaccompanied – by their parents?  Hush!

The misplaced outrage is obtusely – misplaced.

Hundreds of migrant children will be traumatized, adversely affected, and Trump is the ultimate target of blame…  But what about the 2.7 million children who have a parent in prison?   Are they victims of brain damage and cancer?  How about the ‘ever increasing’ number of children in foster care now numbering roughly 450,000!   Where is the media outrage?  Where is Hollywood?

In 2008, a NY judge broke with tradition and granted asylum to three Honduran children who were being sexually abused by their relatives in Honduras.  Did any of these esteemed doctors who gave their name to the media as a reference against Trump’s policy research what these children were being sent back to?   Or maybe that reality didn’t fit the anti agenda…

Could it be that these ‘dogooders’ are oblivious to the abuse?   I doubt it.

In 2009, a report was issued that highlighted the fact that child sex abuse is at epidemic levels in Honduras and that statistics place it as one of the highest in the world!  Still it is below El Salvador…  Oh that’s right, many of the migrant children we are sending back home come from El Salvador too.

In 2006, UNICEF issued a scathing report in which it claimed that 40 million children younger than 15 were victims of violence, abuse and neglect in Latin America and the Caribbean alone!   And most of the violence takes place in the HOME.

HUSH.

Maybe that’s why these children aren’t looking too happy when they are reunited with their fathers, uncles and family…  This is what they are returning to as a result of the media, the outraged Liberals, and the Hollywood elite who throw pennies on the problem all the while derailing Trump.   Where are the politicians now who sought to see their name in print, the face plastered on papers as a guardian for youth?   Because it would appear by all accounts that what has been accomplished is to return these children to a living hell.

Are they protecting the children – or are they putting them to – a living death?  Were the Shelters the only safety they have ever known…