Political Parties: What’s in a Name?

The various ‘Party’s’ with the EU and its monarchial reign including Australia and Canada, are so convoluted as to be completely built on fakery.   The Liberal Party assigned to the newly elected Morrison as PM of Australia, is considered ‘conservative’. But it is called the Liberal Party and supports monarchial rule… The Austrian People’s Party, is historically built on Socialism, but identifies with Merkel’s, CDU Party, because they claim a Christian alignment.   And the various Socialist Parties throughout the EU like to claim they are Christian and thus confuse the Communist lean of secularism.   Like a shroud, they deceive.

And yet Europe seems to think that the US needs to reign in it’s parties given our lines are gray…

The European People’s Party is considered conservative although they advocate liberal, socialist ideals. The Populist Freedom Party is hard right that advocates for German nationalism, liberal internationalism, and has at its core, historical Marxist Nazism.   Convoluted?

On top of that you have ‘pan-Germanists’, national liberals, classical liberals, movement for European alliance, Europe of nations, etc… etc… etc… Until ultimately, there is no party at all.   It is all a conflagration of mirrors designed to create a convoluted carnival image.

Trump is a Republican, but a hundred years ago, Republicans in the US were Democrats, and visa-versa. So when pundits liken a historical Democrat they are actually quoting a Republican… and visa-versa. We had Whigs and Federalists, and Republican Democrats, and pretty soon it became apparent, that the parties and party affiliation meant – nothing.

Routinely we see candidates switch parties, not because of an ideology change, but because of a better chance to ‘win’.   Bernie grappled with whether to run as a Socialist or a Democrat because he need to gauge how he would be perceived – as opposed to being based on what he actually is/was.

So we now have a Liberal Party contender in Australia who is being called a conservative by the MSM, who advocates for monarchial rule, winning the election, and the media is aghast at what he might do. Is he like Trump?

NO!   He is a freakin’ monarchial rule Liberal with a few populist ideas that helped to get him elected.

Will he alter the face of Australia and drain the swamp? This is not on his stated platform, although he does claim he will cap immigration.   In Australia, immigration is merit based, and has been for decades. They do not allow immigrants unless they can prove to be significant contributors to society monetarily and socially.   They have a capped immigration within that quota, and require all those who have managed to breech their shores illegally to be encamped on Papua New Guinea in what formally was – a prison, where they remain for upwards of two years before being – deported.

That is their Liberal rule that has been upheld by each subsequent PM no matter what party affiliation they espouse.

The newest fashion craze in the US is “Independent”.   This means that you have surpassed the modicum of label and now belong to the elitist existential thinker platform.   That’s me.

In essence, Independents think that the Republicans and Democrats are beneath contempt, Swamp reptiles.

Of course, until this election the Green Socialists didn’t garner much beyond 1% or 2%, so they didn’t even warrant a nod.   But the media wasn’t about to let that little factoid deter them from creating a monster of mania support that really doesn’t exist.   But still, it looked good on paper.

The EU is essentially Socialist, Canada and Australia, Monarchial colonies of the UK, are Socialist.   Pakistan and India support Socialist ideals.   China is Communist.   Venezuela is Socialist/Communist.   Cuba,…   This was the Great Ideal!   To create a global Communist State.

And when the word gained negative appeal, they simply rearranged the words, played chess with the words, manipulated the words, but the ideal always remained – to create a global Marxist regime with Germany and the UK at the helm. The US is and was – a colony usurped by the cabal hundreds of years ago. And thus – the monarch – remained in control, at the helm.

SO.  What Party is Trump?

 

UN: Climate Change…

The UN has a headlined article referencing climate change and the devastating effects sit has had on Africa.  Specifically, they cite Lake Chad which covered approximately 10,000 to 25,000 square km in 1983 and today fluctuates between 1500 and 2000 km.  The problem with the UN statement?  Lake Chad has been eroding since 5000 BC when it is estimated to have covered roughly 1 million km.

But the UN is still demanding that the member countries fork over $100 billion per year to defend against the travesties of climate change that is causing;  droughts, floods, conflict, hunger, famine, poverty, greater migration, political instability, Ebola, stress and lack of resilience.  They feel that the African governments are forced to syphon off money to combat these disasters when the money could be used for education, social programs, healthcare, and business development. Citing the cause of the current droughts to be the abnormally strong El Nino cycle, El Nino representing the warm cycle and La Nino the cool.  Of course, as with any graph, your starting point can significantly alter ones perception.

1980 seems to have been a particularly peak year according to the various methodology graphs which show a decidedly less El Nino impact since.   The previous comparable to the 1980 impact was in 1895 and again in 1910.  Not a lot of CO2 emissions then.  And hence the debate, at least as promulgated by the UN.

Most, if not all, scientific journals describe El Nino as a ‘natural phenomenon’.  In a nutshell, El Nino is caused by weakening trade winds. The trade winds are caused by a combination of convection air currents and the Earth’s rotation.  What would cause them to weaken?

The scenario becomes an argument of the chicken and the egg, which comes first?   Globalists argue that global warming causes weakened trade winds.  But if that were true, prior to industrialization the Oscillation Index would never oscillate – it would be static showing a beginning causal human effect. But it doesn’t.  Which leads to the alternate argument, weakened trade winds effectuate warming conditions.

Trade winds are a function of the pressure gradient of the atmosphere over the ocean.  And science has yet to determine what causes that pressure gradient change.   They can tell you what happens – but not why.

“Atmospheric pressure is caused by the gravitational attraction of the planet on the atmospheric gases above the surface, and is a function of the mass of the planet, the radius of the surface, and the amount and composition of the gases and their vertical distribution in the atmosphere.”

Atmospheric Pressure is governed by Atmospheric Tides. The Tides can be affected by:

 

“The reason for this dramatic growth in amplitude from tiny fluctuations near the ground to oscillations that dominate the motion of the mesosphere lies in the fact that the density of the atmosphere decreases with increasing height. As tides or waves propagate upwards, they move into regions of lower and lower density. If the tide or wave is not dissipating, then its kinetic energy density must be conserved. Since the density is decreasing, the amplitude of the tide or wave increases correspondingly so that energy is conserved.”

So we are back to defining The Chicken And The Egg:

Some of the classic causes of these changes include; a change in the Earth’s tilt, alteration in the Moon’s density and/or configuration, changes in the ‘tropics’ deforestation, etc… , and possibly weather manipulation – when nations try to alter El Nino and Al Nino to effect war, rain, snow, optimal weather for special events – The Olympics, etc… they alter the natural phenomenon.   And don’t know how to reinstate it.   So instead, they blame the causal factor elsewhere – a Distraction.

So, in other words, while Scientists are still fighting over the conundrum of The Chicken And The Egg, they are certain that when it comes to Climate Change it is….   They don’t know.

What exactly does the UN propose to do with $100 billion per year?

Spend it on Africa of course.  How?  By “empowering women to be effective climate action champions”, “supporting governments with improved information climate warning systems”, and “improving food security”.   Straight off the UN website.

Why Africa?

To understand the motives, one needs to understand who supports the UN.   It is increasingly clear that The People, do not.  That would leave ‘governments’.   Governments who have abdicated the power of The People, and chosen to bear Law, make decisions, pass legislation, and act quite like a Monarchial system.   It is our history.

Subordination.

Lately, we have all tossed about the terms Socialism and Communism, and yet, we have alluded to the ‘reign’ of Obama, and Queen Hillary, and perhaps not given those labels their fair due.   Because, in essence, in order to own the globe, one needs a “Supreme Leader”, a King/Queen, to dominate and officiate, and enslave.  As this earth has done for thousands of years – until now.

Today, that effect is more complicated.   People are more educated.   Wealth has been spread more liberally.   And everyone in Hollywood, the low lifes of the Monarchial times, today think they are ‘the monarchy’.   The Rulers.

In the end, you have to try and conceptualize the amount of money the UN is asking – $100 billion per year.   In addition, to their budget.  In addition to all the subsidiary budgets.  USAID. UNICEF.   Etc…

In conclusion, the UN’s worthiness and purpose have significantly deteriorated in the last decade or so, since Obama came to ‘reign’.  And perhaps it was really decades earlier, but Obama brought it to the surface, brought light to the corruption that he embraced and lived.

Not to say Obama was not simply a cog in the skew or puppetry would be short-sighted. Although egos would seem to dictate that most everyone we think are aligned, also think they are ‘worthy’ and elite.   And therefore believe they will be the few – saved.

Only to learn they are – the least.  It is ultimately – in your heart.

Trying to unravel the entire scheme of the Cabal is like trying to define the universe!  Not even Hawking could do that!   And yet, we are stubborn, and try.   The Cabal is an interesting lineage that dates thousands of years into our history which apparently we can only retain for 100 days.???