The UN has a headlined article referencing climate change and the devastating effects sit has had on Africa. Specifically, they cite Lake Chad which covered approximately 10,000 to 25,000 square km in 1983 and today fluctuates between 1500 and 2000 km. The problem with the UN statement? Lake Chad has been eroding since 5000 BC when it is estimated to have covered roughly 1 million km.
But the UN is still demanding that the member countries fork over $100 billion per year to defend against the travesties of climate change that is causing; droughts, floods, conflict, hunger, famine, poverty, greater migration, political instability, Ebola, stress and lack of resilience. They feel that the African governments are forced to syphon off money to combat these disasters when the money could be used for education, social programs, healthcare, and business development. Citing the cause of the current droughts to be the abnormally strong El Nino cycle, El Nino representing the warm cycle and La Nino the cool. Of course, as with any graph, your starting point can significantly alter ones perception.
1980 seems to have been a particularly peak year according to the various methodology graphs which show a decidedly less El Nino impact since. The previous comparable to the 1980 impact was in 1895 and again in 1910. Not a lot of CO2 emissions then. And hence the debate, at least as promulgated by the UN.
Most, if not all, scientific journals describe El Nino as a ‘natural phenomenon’. In a nutshell, El Nino is caused by weakening trade winds. The trade winds are caused by a combination of convection air currents and the Earth’s rotation. What would cause them to weaken?
The scenario becomes an argument of the chicken and the egg, which comes first? Globalists argue that global warming causes weakened trade winds. But if that were true, prior to industrialization the Oscillation Index would never oscillate – it would be static showing a beginning causal human effect. But it doesn’t. Which leads to the alternate argument, weakened trade winds effectuate warming conditions.
Trade winds are a function of the pressure gradient of the atmosphere over the ocean. And science has yet to determine what causes that pressure gradient change. They can tell you what happens – but not why.
“Atmospheric pressure is caused by the gravitational attraction of the planet on the atmospheric gases above the surface, and is a function of the mass of the planet, the radius of the surface, and the amount and composition of the gases and their vertical distribution in the atmosphere.”
Atmospheric Pressure is governed by Atmospheric Tides. The Tides can be affected by:
- The regularday–night cycle in the Sun’s heating of the atmosphere (insolation)
- Thegravitational field pull of the Moon
- Non-linearinteractions between tides and planetary waves.
- Large-scalelatent heat release due to deep convection in the tropics.
“The reason for this dramatic growth in amplitude from tiny fluctuations near the ground to oscillations that dominate the motion of the mesosphere lies in the fact that the density of the atmosphere decreases with increasing height. As tides or waves propagate upwards, they move into regions of lower and lower density. If the tide or wave is not dissipating, then its kinetic energy density must be conserved. Since the density is decreasing, the amplitude of the tide or wave increases correspondingly so that energy is conserved.”
So we are back to defining The Chicken And The Egg:
Some of the classic causes of these changes include; a change in the Earth’s tilt, alteration in the Moon’s density and/or configuration, changes in the ‘tropics’ deforestation, etc… , and possibly weather manipulation – when nations try to alter El Nino and Al Nino to effect war, rain, snow, optimal weather for special events – The Olympics, etc… they alter the natural phenomenon. And don’t know how to reinstate it. So instead, they blame the causal factor elsewhere – a Distraction.
So, in other words, while Scientists are still fighting over the conundrum of The Chicken And The Egg, they are certain that when it comes to Climate Change it is…. They don’t know.
What exactly does the UN propose to do with $100 billion per year?
Spend it on Africa of course. How? By “empowering women to be effective climate action champions”, “supporting governments with improved information climate warning systems”, and “improving food security”. Straight off the UN website.
To understand the motives, one needs to understand who supports the UN. It is increasingly clear that The People, do not. That would leave ‘governments’. Governments who have abdicated the power of The People, and chosen to bear Law, make decisions, pass legislation, and act quite like a Monarchial system. It is our history.
Lately, we have all tossed about the terms Socialism and Communism, and yet, we have alluded to the ‘reign’ of Obama, and Queen Hillary, and perhaps not given those labels their fair due. Because, in essence, in order to own the globe, one needs a “Supreme Leader”, a King/Queen, to dominate and officiate, and enslave. As this earth has done for thousands of years – until now.
Today, that effect is more complicated. People are more educated. Wealth has been spread more liberally. And everyone in Hollywood, the low lifes of the Monarchial times, today think they are ‘the monarchy’. The Rulers.
In the end, you have to try and conceptualize the amount of money the UN is asking – $100 billion per year. In addition, to their budget. In addition to all the subsidiary budgets. USAID. UNICEF. Etc…
In conclusion, the UN’s worthiness and purpose have significantly deteriorated in the last decade or so, since Obama came to ‘reign’. And perhaps it was really decades earlier, but Obama brought it to the surface, brought light to the corruption that he embraced and lived.
Not to say Obama was not simply a cog in the skew or puppetry would be short-sighted. Although egos would seem to dictate that most everyone we think are aligned, also think they are ‘worthy’ and elite. And therefore believe they will be the few – saved.
Only to learn they are – the least. It is ultimately – in your heart.
Trying to unravel the entire scheme of the Cabal is like trying to define the universe! Not even Hawking could do that! And yet, we are stubborn, and try. The Cabal is an interesting lineage that dates thousands of years into our history which apparently we can only retain for 100 days.???