The Royal Society Colonized The US in 1660

WHAT WAS LIFE LIKE AS A SLAVE –

  • Slaves were required to toil 60-70 hours every week.
  • Their children were home school educated
  • Punishment for revolts was cruel and inhumane
  • Their Masters lived a plush lifestyle
  • Freedom was restricted – available to only the select few
  • The quality of food was bare minimum
  • Housing units were small and cramped
  • Enslaved men and women created their own cultural means of living to provide unity
  • Slaves were divided into levels of hierarchy in labor
  • Sometimes the Masters took the children away from the slaves
  • Slaves were not allowed to defend themselves against violence
  • Leaving the Master’s property without permission was prohibited
  • Militias were created to enforce slave laws
  • Sometimes slaves feigned illness to get out of working
  • They were taught specific tasks like cooking, cleaning, carpentry, ranching, branding, etc…
  • They were required to perform all their own personal maintenance
  • As slaves, they had no rights within the confines of their plantation

LIFE was Brutal!

Except what I am describing above is the ‘evolution’ of slavery. Today, a slave is called an employee.

The terminology of slave and slavery have simply been rebranded with the assistance of propaganda, illusion, and heady marketing campaigns.   Workers today are effectively subjected to much the same conditions as slaves of the 1800’s, albeit in an advanced industrialized society.   The quality of life has somewhat adapted and elevated, but the suppression of labour is no different.   And the disparity of wealth is purposeful.

We don’t realize this shift because of the mass hypnosis employed by various ‘intelligensia agencies’ have told us slavery ended.

HISTORY:

In the 1600’s, letters were sent to friends and relatives in England and abroad encouraging them to come to America where ‘labourers’ could earn much more, sometimes 3 times more. Of course, the reasoning was the fact that in order to sustain and grow the wealth among the Aristocrats, the colonies needed more people to create an evolutionary revolution of labor.

Initially, Laborers in the 1600’s were given the same constraints as slaves including lack of property ownership.   Governing colonies were reticent, they didn’t want to share wealth, they wanted to create more for themselves in a repressed society. The concept of allocating property to the commoners became a bitter battle.

It was called “Prosperity Legislation’.

In addition, if a man had a particular trade as a craftsman, the colonies would not allow him to change his trade or become a farmer. Because Farmers were the lifeblood.   They were also the Masters. The Masters who came from England and built a New America.

At the end of the Civil War, the Sharecropping solution was developed.   Former slaves were allowed tracts of land to farm as tenants – for the Master Plantation owner.   Much like the Okies during the Dustbowl of the 1930’s.   Slave Labor – just redefined.

Today a Master is a Boss, a plantation is a corporation or manufacturing facility, and a minimum wage is supposed to afford you the means to buy what was given to slaves for free – poor housing, poor nutritional food – and bills.

Of course there are some advances today vs historical slavery. Today we fill out an application for the privilege of being a peasant laborer.   “Yes, sir.”    A Salary means no overtime for the 60-80 hour work-week.   We have to navigate multiple bus routes, traffic jams and train delays – and if we are late we are docked pay!   Like a slave. “Sorry sir, it won’t happen again”.

People line up at the grocery store to buy Wonder bread, corn flakes, potato chips and sodas – poor quality – but affordable nutrition.   The Plantation Corporate Bosses are dining on caviar, lobster, and Angus beef, because ‘value’ was predetermined centuries ago by the Royal families.

Nothing has changed it has just been rebranded.

It is an interesting chronicle that our Founding Fathers were all Democrat plantation owners of great wealth and British Aristocracy. They established the plenary system of wealth and poverty while carefully rebranding kings as presidents – and slaves as labourers.

The New America was a way to appease the Crown in establishing yet another colony.   A colony created under an illusion of freedom. A colony beholden to the Crown for eternity.   A colony that answers to The Royal Society. A Society coincidentally founded in 1660 and today overlorded by King Charles.

The Royal Society was Founded by Robert Boyle – a Rosicrucian. The pre-cursor to the Free Masons and The Knights Templar. In Western culture – the Rosicrucian movement adopted the philosophy of esotericism. By the nineteenth century, esoteric thought evolved into the mystic occult of wicca and satanism. A secular culture of magic, gnosis, the principle that all religions must merge, formal initiations and enchantment was adopted.

It would seem to closely align with the ideologies of the World Economic Forum, Epstein, Gates, and Soros as they consider themselves ‘enlightened’ and of a ‘higher knowledge’ than the commoners. They have attributed to themselves ‘second sight’ and the ability to foretell the future.

According to a recent Royal Society Report, their priorities in the short term will include data, climate change, net zero and energy, genome editing (altering DNA with Cripsr technology), and biodiversity. Overall, the Royal Society’s aim is to assure that global governments recognize that Science is The Master.   In 2018, Elon Musk became a Fellow.

American Nationalism -if you can keep it…

Last night I had the privilege of hearing Eric Metaxas speak at a forum and was extremely impressed!  An amazing man.  He spoke about America from the perspective of it’s beginnings, the first country ever in the world to adopt a self government as opposed to a Monarchy or Communist/Socialist rule of restricted freedom. He spoke about how the Founding Fathers were sketchy and fearful that despite all their efforts to make it work, it might not. And while it did for two centuries, in the last fifty years it has been attacked. And we stand at a precipice today whereby two paths are shown – and the quote “if you can keep it”, attributed to Benjamin Franklin when he exited the Constitutional Convention, applies to us today.

Can we keep the country that America was created to be – a republic separate and distinct, rooted in Freedom and the ability of the people to self rule in a venue of virtue and faith? Can we keep it? Because if we can’t that means we spiral into Monarchy or Communist rule and become the puppets of the elite.

Freedom, Virtue, and Faith. Inexplicably intertwined, not one can live without the other. Take away one leg of the triangle and the other legs fall, they can not stand without the support of the triune.

And within this triune there lives fellowship and heroes. Not comic book heroes, but real life men and women who we can look to with respect and awe and say, ‘I am so grateful’! We need heroes. We crave them. But in the last fifty years we have allowed fake characters to become our heroes and disregarded and even disparaged the real heroes. George Washington’s name removed. Woodrow Wilson’s name removed. As though removing a name will alter the truth and eliminate history…

As virtue and faith fall – so will freedom.

In that picture our media has faithfully pulled us down, portrayed us as demons, demoralized our will, and created an atmosphere that would give such people as Kaepernick who feels compelled to call out his country as unworthy of him! Instead of ‘doing something positive’, instead of ‘working for his beliefs’, he would instead denounce the entire nation – and all its people as “Deplorables’. This same man was given a loving family, a middle class lifestyle and a $12 million sign-on bonus in addition to $61 million guaranteed. Where else in the world would anyone be so privileged? And still, he is entitled. He is miffed. And that arrogance owns him.

Nationalism is the people believing in their country and making it strong from its bowels, from within. Canadians are proud to be Canadians! The French are quite proud of their Frenchiness. The Russians are proud of their ability to persevere and a strong equally nationalist president. Nationalism is the Brazilian people not wanting to auction off their country to the highest bidder.

Eroding nationalism erodes virtue, and the triangle falls.

In the last fifty years we have watched the systematic destruction of our country. As Dennis Miller stated recently, it’s as though a coup in America already happened and the people are too bleary eyed to notice. Wake up!

Freedom is being shred from our country as we espouse ‘freedom’. New York now recognizes 33 different genders… that’s not freedom. Blacks demand more money… that’s not freedom. Social Welfare is Socialism – that’s not freedom. Freedom means taking care of yourself. It means being self reliant and self responsible. It means having a means of employment, a place to live, and food on the table. The Constitution was about taking care of our people, our country, our freedom, our virtues and our faith. Rewriting the backbone that defines us is a type of pandering. The concept of majority rules, of an elementary school team actually winning, of education that is open and embracing of all thought would seem to have been quashed.

America was created for a reason. It was created on a faith. It held virtue as it’s greatest strength and freedom as its foundation. At the time, it was the ONLY country in the world to give these tenets to The People. And the world began to see the value in this way of life. Countries changed. It wasn’t that America was rooted in exceptionalism, it was that the ideas, the concepts, the structure was seen as good and valuable and worthy. Because it was ‘for the people’, as opposed to ‘for the government’.

And now people are attempting to destroy that ‘for the people’. The cost? Freedom. Virtue. Faith.

I listened to Geraldo describe the ideal President. His litany offered the ‘perfect human being’, without flaw, without mark, an inalienable being that could never be marred. It was ridiculous. Such a person does not exist. Perhaps he would like to put God on the ballot. And so we are left with flawed beings, and the virtue of their flaws must then be analyzed, diagnosed and evaluated.

Hillary Clinton and Trump are both flawed. But there is a difference between a flaw and acts of tyranny that would elevate us to the rule of a Monarchist or Communist regime.

Is that what we want? Choose.