VOTE!

There are two memes being floated that bear some analysis.  One is the Left’s rise of the Socialism in the US – the other is the notion that Nikki Haley, an ultra right wing, could ever gain acceptance to run as President.  Both are extremes.  Both signal a massive shift.  Both convey the theory that the current parties, Democrat and Republican, are going to die.

Most people in the US are neither, most people describe themselves as falling somewhere in the middle, so how could these extremists rise to take power?

Both parties are perceived to be comprised of old fodder, old school.  People want vibrance – change!  This was the campaign that ushered in Obama – and it worked.  Division was instigated and massive-massive wealth was sheltered to a few.  The ‘youth effect’ is why Trudeau is in office despite being a complete economic ninny.  Macron. Campaigns are calling for the ‘youth vote’.  Why?   Because it has been on the fence and could alter the course of election.  Universities are the source of Socialism, they advocate it, support it, and recreate it so as to give it the appearance of the Garden of Eden.

Feminists are the other liberal skew.  Feminists lean significantly toward more socialist ideals advocating for everything equal-equal, welfare for all, and the redistribution ideal.

So, the Socialist shift is capitalizing on both the youth movement and feminists.

Who would vote for a right wing extremist hawk like Nikki Haley?

Ultra evangelicals won’t because they don’t believe in a woman President.   Moderate conservatives won’t because they aren’t hawks.  The only way Haley would have a chance would be if the only other option was a Socialist.  However, she could garner the hawks, and the remaining Swamp vultures which would skew the Republican vote and diminish a win.

The Democrat Party runs the risk of allowing the Socialist movement to continue gaining traction because it skews and divides liberal votes giving more traction to the alternate Republican or Right Wing.

It is and always has been about – DIVISION.

In 1912, four parties ran for office:  Democrat, Progressive, Republican and Socialist.   Teddy Roosevelt got in a spat with Taft, the Republican, and initiated a third party run as Progressive.  What he accomplished was a schism in the votes whereby Democrat, Woodrow Wilson won with 41.8% of the votes.  Had Teddy kept is pandering in check, the votes he and Taft garnered would have secured the election at 50.6%.  It was sheer pride stupidity.  Or was it?

It changed the course of history giving the Democrats control to usher in the Federal Reserve System under Wilson.  The Fed, the same Banking Cartel that became the shadow government and has ruled ever since. Wilson also found the US Constitution filled with corrupt potential and vowed to change it.  He supported segregation.  He advocated lowering tariffs, but to do so had to implement the new federal income tax.  And the people fell like slaughtered sheep

In other words, because of the implementations of Wilson at the behest of the Banking Cartel, the American people were thus levied an insurmountable income tax, and handed over our monetary system to the private control of the banking system named the Federal Reserve under the rule of unelected individuals.

Single handedly, Teddy was manipulated or in collusion to alter the course of this country forever by ushering in the pawn, Woodrow Wilson.

It was essentially a coup and the American people went down without a fight.

The parallels today are frightening.  We don’t know who to trust, who is lying, who is manipulating.  But if we aren’t careful, the disruptive of an undivided party will be death.

It was a game that altered everything we know today, created a disbalance of wealth, and relegated control of our country to the shadow government that today still controls the money supply.

Who runs the Federal Reserve, the private banking cartel that decides our fate?

Jerome Powell was elected to the Board by Trump.  But a quick look at his background reveals that he worked for The Carlyle Group whose cartel is well plugged in the Netherlands, land of the BIS, the core of money laundering and the mafia.  One of its founders, David Rubenstein is well entrenched in;  Council on Foreign relations, Harvard, Aspen Institute, Brookings Institute, World economic Forum, etc… etc… etc…

He is quoted as saying, “The only game in Washington is the Fed.”

One of the first Chairman of the Federal Reserve was William Harding.  Coincidentally, he was also managing director of the War Finance Corporation.  “The War Finance Corporation was a government corporation in the United States created to give financial support to industries essential for World War I, and to banking institutions that aided such industries.”

In other words, the Chairman of the Federal Reserve that controls all our money was also tasked with giving money to corporations and banks according to his desire… which is essentially how the Rothschilds, Roosevelts, Morgans, Chase, etc… made their wealth.  The war bank.

Bottom Line:  That was the beginning.  The Trump effect upsided their agenda.  But drawing on history, splitting votes as they did in 1912, would effectively realign the power giving it back to the Swamp that rules NOT from the US as many believe, but from The Netherlands, the EU.  Don’t split votes!

Vote as though your life depended on it – because it does!

US Presidential Election – a Four Party Game

Could the GOP writhing fear of Trump really be that instituting his way of thinking might create a domino effect in state elections and jeopardize the clansmen from their traditional parties? As Trump gains and garners popularity will like minded candidates get propped up for Senate elections and Governors? Given an all time low of 11% approval rating, could it be that our esteemed elected officials are screaming in peril that they will most certainly get the boot as the populace realizes they are totally worthless?

Parties have come and gone in the US historically. We had the Federalists and the anti-Federalists who were interestingly called the Democratic-Republicans. We’ve had the Jacksonian-Democrats and the Whigs. We had the ‘anti-slavery’ Republican Party, the Copperheads, the Bourbon Democrats. We’ve had the Green Party, the Constitution Party, the Libertarians, the Socialists and the Communists – all right here in free American politics. So would this new wave shift be bad or simply another cycle in our maniacal political agenda?

And then there is Cruz, who is equally disliked by his own party because he refuses to play their childish games and follow like a sheep within the pack of wolves. But using the Senate as a mirror of what the people want is hardly accurate given no one likes our current Senate. Which actually serves to elevate Cruz in the voter mindset, as Congress is considered a muddling bunch of self serving cronyism. Threatening to create a third party candidate, the GOP would thus terminate the party altogether. Which may be happening as we speak anyway.

While Ann Coulter gave a point-by-point parody comparison of Trump to Hitler that had about as much value as the National Enquirer, she has adamantly defended him as the only way we will gain footing in a world that has succumbed to chaos. While Romney continues to put out telephone blasts denouncing Trump, the people are now seeing him as a victim of abuse… and Romney as a bully. Within that frame maybe it is time for the entire GOP Party to re-create itself as they have in the past.

On the other ticket – slight of hand, if Bernie Sanders is such a devout Socialist, why is he running under the Democratic Party? Why doesn’t he run as a third party Socialist?  And perhaps that is exactly where we are heading.

November 5, 1912 four parties ran for the office of President. They included; a Democrat, a Progressive, a Republican and a Socialist. Sound familiar? Who won? The Democrat, Woodrow Wilson.

Ahhh, but here’s the Democrat platform on which Wilson garnered the nomination: anti-monopolies, anti-tariffs, integrity of states and their sovereign power, restrictions on campaign donations, national defense, a progressive tax rate beginning at 1%, the 19th Amendment giving women the right to vote, free market system, pro-central banking, judicial reform, greater agricultural development, environmental conservation, reform of legal system, and a return to the ‘rule of the people’.

Despite advocating for segregation, he was quite an action oriented President having succeeded on many fronts – including WWI. It is a shame when an entire man’s life is taken out of context of its true legacy and instead a view that was considered uniform for the time is translated as his character. Given the era of lynchings, Wilson may have truly believed that segregation would field the murdering. However unjust society was before the Civil War, and after, it would appear that the circle is complete as it is now blacks who advocate for segregation.

However, I digress.  As we have seen, a four party election could be the evolution of this very divided race we watch unfold before us now: Cruz the Republican, Trump the Progressive, Hillary the Democrat and Bernie the Socialist. How the votes would be cast no poll can accurately define, as polls are random, arbitrary and weighted by the way the polling company’s client determines the end result.

Princeton Slavery to Black Agenda

Princeton folds. Woodrow Wilson, is being beheaded and a bunch of idiotic privileged children are to blame. ARGHHH!

History cannot be eradicated no matter how hard you try. It is persistent. It is stubborn, and no matter what you might dislike about it, you have no power to change the facts.   So a bunch of overly spoiled elite children attending the prestigious school of Princeton which boasts a ‘racial diversity’ of 7%, well above the 4% of black youth entering colleges around the US, want to expel Woodrow Wilson from history, and Princeton is bowing to their demands.

Wilson was born in 1856. The Civil war was fought from 1861 to 1865, 150 years ago!   He was a part of the Confederacy as were 11 states including; Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, Texas, South Carolina, Virginia, Louisiana, Arkansas, Tennessee, and North Carolina.   These states fought for slavery.   Headline: They lost. But if these bored, unimaginative, pompous students have their way, I suppose we should ask these states to succeed from the United States because of their Confederacy stance.

In fact, anyone who has any connection to these states must no longer be allowed to do business because they are obviously racist. Any relative of anyone who was a part of the confederacy should face civil penalties, a trial and a lashing. This law shall be in place for perpetuity. In addition, given that some blacks were slave owners as well, they too shall be subject to this law.

The first slave owner in US history was Anthony Johnson, a black man. Prior to Mr. Johnson’s assertions, indentured servants were forced to work for a period of seven years per a contract and then they gained their freedom, bought land, and ran farms. But when one of Johnson’s indentured servants reached the end of his term and left a free man to work elsewhere, Johnson sued the new employer and won the right to own his servants and indenture them for as long as he wanted. Thus slavery was BORN.

Halleluiah, slavery in the US was created by a black man.

This would mean that all descendants of Mr. Anthony Johnson should hereinafter be jailed and horse whipped… In 1860, 3000 blacks/Negroes living in New Orleans owned slaves which represented nearly 30% of the negroes that lived in the city!

In contrast to their white counterparts, most black slave owners owned upwards of 10 to 80+ slaves, while most whites owned 1 or 2 with a small percentage (1%) known as slave magnates who owned 50+.

Does this mean we must hunt down these black slave owners and erase their names from history?  Apparently a slew of university students would believe this is a proper agenda today.

But slavery was not merely a black conscription, white Irish prisoners were sold into the slave trade by James I, King of England in the early sixteen hundreds. White slaves were sold to Antigua and Montserrat where 70% of the population were Irish slaves. As a result of this slave trade, Irelands population went from 1.5 million to a mere 600,000 in one decade.   They were sold to New England, Jamaica, Barbados, and Virginia. And the practice wasn’t abolished until 1839. They worked the land for their black owners as well as their white owners.

The point of history is to learn the whole truth, not just selected bits and pieces edited and transcribed for a false premise and a false doctrine for perpetrating chaos and divide.

Moral:  The point is that slavery was not a racial agenda, it was an elitist agenda that dates back thousands of years. It crosses all lines of color and is rooted in society, culture and money.   So, my children, ‘before you cry fowl, it might be wise to see if the wolf is a person of color… or something much deeper in our psyche that has its beginnings in – the Middle East.’  History lesson 101.